Why Keir Starmer risks making the same mistake as David Cameron when it comes to Europe
The justice secretary joined calls for an overhaul of the convention, warning that 'public confidence in the rule of law is fraying' and 'there is a growing perception human rights laws are a tool for criminals to avoid responsibility'.
It comes after similar comments were made by Tory Party leader Kemi Badenoch, who this month warned human rights laws had gone from being a 'shield' to a 'sword used to attack democracies'.
Falling in line with those calling for the ECHR to be overhauled, but stopping short of calling for the UK to pull out, Ms Mahmood told European ambassadors: 'The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved.
'Now, it must do so again.'
So will Sir Keir be able to quell the grumblings of the Conservatives and Reform UK – or does he risk falling into the same trap as David Cameron, failing to deliver and emboldening his Eurosceptic critics?
The debate over Britain's role in the ECHR has been given a renewed burst of life by the rise of Nigel Farage, Ms Badenoch all-but pledging the Tories would pull the UK out, but most importantly, the head of the Council of Europe saying there should be 'no taboo' on rewriting its rules.
Critics of the convention argue that, without a fundamental overhaul, it will be impossible for the UK to deport foreign criminals en masse and remove those who arrive in Britain illegally, such as via the English Channel in small boats.
Many go further, saying that reform of the agreement would be impossible given its 46 signatories, and that the UK must pull out altogether.
Sir Keir and Ms Mahmood are pursuing the softer option, attempting to take a leadership role in the drive to update the binding legal text.
The move could prove a masterstroke for Labour, run by a man derided by so many as a liberal left-wing lawyer who does not understand the concerns of those impacted by soaring migration and the small boats crisis.
In taking the issue by the horns, Sir Keir can defy his doubters on the right and take on his left-wing critics, painting himself as somebody prepared to do what is right for the country without fear or favour.
But the road to reform is fraught with risk, and could even see Sir Keir suffer the same fate as his predecessor Lord Cameron – who paved the path for Brexit before quitting in shame at the result.
The then prime minister sought to quell frustration about the UK's membership of the EU by promising reforms of his own. He was battling rebels in his own Conservative Party and a challenge from UKIP on the right, and emerged from marathon talks in Brussels in 2016 having secured 'special status' for the UK in the bloc.
But despite his efforts, the tweaks were not enough – with Britain voting to leave the EU just four months later.
In the same way, by promising reform of the ECHR Sir Keir risks two things.
The first is giving ground to right-wing critics of the convention, both raising its salience with the general public and legitimising their concerns.
The second is overpromising and underdelivering, with just four years to force changes the public will experience before heading back to the polls for a general election.
If the prime minister promises a programme of reforms that will help him stop the small boats crisis in the Channel and remove more foreign offenders, he will need to deliver.
If polling day rolls around and the boats are still arriving, taxpayers are still spending huge sums to house those seeking asylum and voters do not feel the difference,
With a slew of recent headlines about deportations being blocked on sometimes ridiculous-sounding grounds, it is clear something needs to be done.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Three people charged with supporting Palestine Action
Two women and a man have been charged with showing support for proscribed terror group Palestine Action following a protest in central Shippam, 71, of West Sussex, Judit Murray, 71, of Surrey, and Fiona Maclean, 53, of Hackney are due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on 16 September, the Metropolitan Police three were arrested at a protest in Westminster on 5 Palestine Action is a criminal offence, with membership or expressing support for the group punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The charges come before a planned protest in support of the group on Saturday afternoon in London's Parliament Square, with organisers expecting more than 500 people to Dominic Murphy, head of the Met's Counter Terrorism Command, said of Thursday's arrests: "We are also planning to send case files to the Crown Prosecution Service for the other 26 people arrested on the same day."I would strongly advise anyone planning to come to London this weekend to show support for Palestine Action to think about the potential criminal consequences of their actions."The group has won permission to challenge its controversial High Court ruled on 30 July that proscription of the group, which has carried out break-ins at defence firms linked to Israel as part of direct action protests, should be reviewed.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Homelessness minister ‘hiked rent at London townhouse by £700 weeks after ending tenancy'
The government's homelessness minister reportedly raised the rent at her east London townhouse by £700 weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Rushanara Ali has been accused of raising the rent on the property, which has four bedrooms, from £3,300 to £4,000 after the previous tenants vacated the property. According to the i paper, the previous occupants were handed just four months' notice last November, informing them that their lease would not be renewed. And weeks after they had left, the house was reportedly once again up for rent – but for £700 more each month. It is understood that Ms Ali – who is the Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney – told the occupants their tenancy would not be renewed as the house was being put up for sale and were offered a rolling contract while the house was on the market, but chose to leave. The property was then re-listed as a rental when a buyer could not be found, it is understood. Ms Ali has previously criticised 'private renters being exploited and discriminated against' when defending the government's Renters Reform Bill, which will eliminate "no-fault" evictions, where landlords can end tenancies without a specific reason using Section 21 notice. She said the legislation would 'empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases'. The bill will also stop landlords who have terminated a tenancy to sell the property from re-listing it with higher rent until six months or more after the occupants vacated the premises. Shadow housing secretary James Cleverly suggested she should resign, saying the allegations 'would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. The Renters' Rights Bill has received its third reading in the House of Lords having already been through the Commons. A spokesperson for Ms Ali told The Independent: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.'
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK hasn't seen poverty like this for 60 years, says Gordon Brown in call to scrap two-child benefit cap
Britain has not seen poverty this bad for more than half a century, Gordon Brown has warned, urging Sir Keir Starmer to scrap the two-child benefit cap at the next budget. The former prime minister and Labour chancellor – who said 'we are dealing with a divided Britain' and a 'social crisis' - backed reforms to gambling taxes in order to generate the £3.2bn needed to scrap the cap. Mr Brown said the gambling industry is 'under taxed', throwing his weight behind a report from The Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) which said that around half a million children could be lifted out of poverty through the reforms. The two child benefit cap, which was imposed by Tory former chancellor George Osborne, prevents parents from claiming benefits for any third or subsequent child born after April 2017. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, the former Labour prime minister issued a stark warning about the state of Britain after 14 years of austerity under the Conservatives, urging the current government to take action. 'Look, we're dealing with a divided Britain. We're dealing with a social crisis. We're dealing with poor children that are living what you might say are separate lives… we're talking about children that are far from the mainstream, and something's got to be done', he said. 'This problem is getting worse. It's going to worsen over the next few years, because there's a built-in escalator in the poverty figures, because of the two-child rule.' He added: 'I live in the constituency in which I grew up. I still live here. I see every day this situation getting worse, and I did not think I would see the kind of poverty I saw when I was growing up, when we had slum housing, when we had traveling people coming to my school. 'This is a return to the kind of poverty of 60 years ago, and I think we've got to act now, and that's why it's urgent that we take action in this budget to deal with the under taxed gambling industry, to pay for half a million children to come up.' Speaking to ITV, he added: 'You cannot have a situation where under a Labour government, child poverty numbers just go up and up, and up.' Sir Keir Starmer is thought to personally be in favour of scrapping the cap, but after a number of expensive U-turns and a new report from top economists warning that the chancellor is facing a £51bn black hole in the public finances, there are growing questions over how the prime minister would be able to fund such a move. But Mr Brown urged the government not to 'leave unaddressed something that is a cancer in our society, which is children growing up and going to school ill clad and hungry.' MPs from across Labour have repeatedly urged the prime minister to scrap or ease the limit amid growing concern over the direction of the party. Critics of the policy say removing it would be the most effective way of reducing child poverty amid warnings that as many as 100 children are pulled into poverty every day by the limit. However, it is thought that a decision on the cap won't be taken until the government publishes its child poverty strategy, which has now been delayed until the autumn. Mr Brown said he understands that Rachel Reeves has 'inherited a very difficult fiscal situation, but warned: "At the budget the government has one straightforward choice: gambling will not build our country for the next generation, but children free from poverty will." His comments came after an IPPR report urged the government to look at measures which could raise £3.2 billion from changes to how gambling is taxed, suggesting an increase on taxes on online casinos from 21 per cent to 50 per cent and raising those on slots and gaming machines from 20 per cent to 50 per cent. The organisation also proposed raising general betting duty on non-racing bets from 15 per cent to 25 per cent which it said would bring other sports in line with the rates paid by horseracing. The IPPR said raising gambling taxes like this would be unlikely to reduce overall government revenue. But a spokesperson for the Betting and Gaming Council rejected the 'economically reckless, factually misleading' proposals which 'risk driving huge numbers to the growing, unsafe, unregulated gambling black market, which doesn't protect consumers and contributes zero tax'. They added: 'Further tax rises, fresh off the back of government reforms which cost the sector over a billion in lost revenue, would do more harm than good – for punters, jobs, growth and public finances.'
