People With Asthma And Allergies Share The Air Purifiers That 'Actually Make A Difference'
I was surprised to find out that indoor air quality is often worse than the quality of air outside, per the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). But it makes sense: Indoor spaces can be replete with pent-up dust, accumulated dander, stagnant pollen and dirt — among other creepy-crawly allergens.
For folks who deal with allergies or asthma, this conundrum takes on a different level of urgency, taking a toll on health and well-being — especially because, as the EPA also reports, Americans are indoors about 90% of the time.
The Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA) recommends using an air purifier with a HEPA filter to help remove allergens from the air. People with allergies and asthma concur, sharing with HuffPost via email, phone and Facebook the purifiers that really make a difference in their symptoms. Every option features HEPA filtration, and investing in one may even save you money over time: multiple Amazon reviewers write that with the help of their purifiers, their inhalers are now lasting longer, helping cut costs from their budgets.
Read on for their recommendations.
HuffPost and its publishing partners may receive a commission from some purchases made via links on this page. Every item is independently curated by the HuffPost Shopping team. Prices and availability are subject to change.
Amazon
"I have the BlueAir 411 purifier, which I was inspired to get from bloggers Young House Love," wrote Lena M. over email. "Within a couple of days, I noticed I wasn't waking up with the usually stuffy nose or waking up overnight from snoring, etc. In an interesting twist, I got my purifier within weeks of the start of California wildfire season. It was a lifesaver ... Any time I sleep away from it, I notice a difference in my breathing and quality of sleep."
I own this same purifier and love it, both for its unobtrusive, minimalist style and for the huge difference it makes for the air quality in my 15-by-15-foot room. As soon as it's on, I can feel the difference in the air — it feels crisper and fresher.
I no longer sneeze and itch from dust, pollen, pet dander and who knows what. It's also blissfully quiet, so it's not a bother to keep on in the background at night and throughout the day.
It utilizes a dual-filtration HEPA system along with a machine-washable fabric pre-filter, cleaning up to 526 square feet.Promising Amazon review: "I have two air purifiers for my home. One for my sons room who has severely bad allergies especially with two large dogs and mold/mildew allergens and asthma. One for my living room and dining area and I always receive compliments of how my home doesn't have a 'House' or 'Lived in' smell and they immediately notice a difference in the air quality. Within 3 days of using the product I have had to utilize my inhaler less, the pet dandruff and dust has reduced significantly, and my son's respiratory health was impacted in a positive way which is progress and a miracle. I'm very pleased with this product and cannot recommend them to family and friends enough." — Jacob Thrasher
$139.99 at Amazon
Amazon
Levoit is known for its top-of-the-line HEPA purifiers, which use triple filtration to rid air of microscopic airborne allergens and particles like pollutants, smoke, pet dander and dust.
This Core300-P model is a favorite among users for its effectiveness and lack of noise. "It's made such a huge difference in the air quality of my living space," Lex G., a friend who owns it, said. "It's specifically built for people who have pets and helps to limit dander and hair in the air which both contribute to my allergies. I can tell the difference when I have it turned off."
You can grab it in two colors or in a WiFi-enabled version so you can control it from your phone or via voice assistant; it can clean spaces up to 1,095 square feet.
Promising review: "I have a cat who strayed into my life, and whom I totally love, despite being terribly allergic to him. My allergy and resultant asthma were really awful this past winter, and I bought this air filter out of desperation. When I received it in the mail, I couldn't believe how nice a product it was. This is not some cheaply made item, but reminds me of how many products were years ago: simply made well. And the best thing is, my asthma is so much better now after this purchase. I can barely believe it! I have since bought a smaller version (also nice) for my little study, and will probably buy another large one at some point. Want to add that I love the sound of the air filter too. The first two are fairly quiet, with the third louder but (to me) lulling rather than disturbing. I cannot vouch this will work for everyone who has allergy problems, but I would say it's worth a try!" — m-chan
$79.98 at Amazon
$99.99 at Target
$99.99 at Walmart
Amazon
Lex also relies on this allergen-reducing Honeywell HPA200 purifier for keeping air clean in the rest of their home (it's made for large rooms up to 310 feet, though it can clean up to 1,500 square feet hourly).
"It recycles all the air," Lex explained, noting it helps their breathing. "I would repurchase it in a heartbeat."
Promising review: "I purchased this model because I am an asthma and allergy sufferer and I was looking for something very effective at a good price range. I hooked this thing up in my bedroom (left the door open) and went downstairs for about 30 minutes. When I went back upstairs I could notice a difference in the air. The next day I left it on the allergen setting and when I got home from work and my bedroom smelled like it had never been inhabited. My allergies are lighter in my bedroom than in any other room in the house as my roommate has a dog I am allergic to. In bed my eyes used to burn and I would reach for my inhaler quite frequently. Now my eyes are fine and I barely need my inhaler. Well worth the money as inhalers are over $100 at the pharmacy and the air purifier is $140. It's actually saving me money as my inhaler is now lasting much longer." — STEVE-007
$198 at Amazon (regularly $219.99)
$199 at Walmart (regularly $239.99)
Amazon
You can control this 3M Filtrete purifier from your phone or by voice using Alexa or Google Assistant.
It's a huge help for Ahmed A., who has asthma and a significant cat allergy despite being a cat lover with two beloved kitties. "It makes the air easier to breathe, [with] less contaminants in the air," he wrote. "It's the quietest, most effective air filter I've ever had. It actually does make a noticeable difference after a few minutes." Plus, he added, "[It's] worked really well for years now."
It's best-suited for rooms up to 150 square feet.
Promising review: "I purchased this for my new home since we are doing some remodeling and noticed that my home felt stuffy. This is my first air purifier that I've owned and I can definitely say that it made a huge difference! my home feels so much easier to breathe in." — Mohammad S.
$98.97 at Amazon
$97.57 at Walmart
Amazon
Reviewers call this tried-and-true Winix purifier the "best investment" for helping with airborne pet dander and allergies; one even said they "can literally feel the sinus inflammation going away" thanks to its work.
It's a sure bet for improving indoor air: "My house feels less stuffy," Elizabeth C. wrote of the model on Facebook.
It's designed for spaces up to 360 square feet.
Promising review: "BIRD OWNER HERE. I love that you can turn off the ionization setting so that this product is safe for birds! No harmful ozone buildup!"I am VERY asthmatic and was suffering greatly due to dust, allergies, and bird dander. Within hours of running this machine, I could tell that it was WORKING. I used to sneeze and wheeze and I was not sleeping well at all. I used to wake up several times a night needing to use my inhaler or do a breathing treatment, but ever since I got this air purifier, I SLEEP THROUGH THE NIGHT. I haven't even had to use my inhaler at all! This thing has radically changed my life. I no longer wake up with a headache and stuffy. I don't sneeze anymore. My allergies have almost disappeared. I don't wheeze, and I wake up feeling rested for the first time in months and months. I could seriously cry from happiness. My bird even seems happier and full of energy!"I noticed today that even when I cook, the purifier can tell and the auto mode picks up on the air quality and kicks on."If you have kids, pets, asthma, lungs, a pulmonary system, or you just enjoy breathing, this thing is for you. I can't say enough about how awesome this purifier is." — Meagan B.
$132.99 at Amazon
$132.99 at Walmart
$159.99 at Target
Amazon
This worth-the-splurge Dyson purifier and fan combo circulates filtered air while emitting a cool breeze. It oscillates up to 350 degrees and you can control it by remote — so you can adjust cleaning power and where you want the fan to hit without ever getting up.
"I live close to the airport and can tell a big difference in the indoor air quality when using them," Pam M. said. "I can breathe and sleep better and have one in each bedroom of my house."
Promising review: "I have several of these tall 'cool' fans for breeze, sound, and air purifying. (I also have several of the hot/cool shorter fans, also 5 stars for me!). These are dependable and start working to clear the air quickly. This particular one I set up in a basement gym to clear the air and within hours the air quality was so clean and fresh. I pretty much keep them on 24/7. Filters do not seem to need changing very frequently. I even take the shorter hot/cool fans/ heaters on car trips for lake houses and hotel rooms. Love these!" — Freebird888
$299 at Amazon
$299.99 at Target
$299.99 at Walmart
Amazon
"If I didn't have my two air purifiers, I do not know what I would do," Sherrie A. wrote, saying she deals with allergies from smoke and pollen, and regularly visits a pulmonologist and an allergist for support. "The filters are changed regularly and if that stuff was in my lungs!?!? Yes, they make a huge difference[.]"
She relies on the Coway Airmega purifier, pictured (also available in white), as well as a unspecified GE Profile model. The Coway can clean air in spaces up to 361 square feet.
Promising review: "I looked at various review sites and the purifier was at or near the top of every list and the price point to value was highly rated. I kinda though air purifiers were a gimmick, but I put it on my night stand and for the first time in ages, I had no congestion, no post-nasal drip, and no headache upon waking. It's been the same every night. I keep it on setting #2 and have two big stinky furry dogs and I think it helps a lot with their dander and fur and smells, especially on damp days. As others have notes, the sound is quiet on #1 and #2, but there's a huge jump in the at #3. If you like white noise, youll love it. For me #3 is a bit loud, but I crank it up during the day or when I feel my allergies bothering me. It's kind of weird looking, as if I have a mini front load washing machine on my nightstand, but I would buy it again and probably will get a model designed for larger rooms to place in my basement den. So, my takeaway is that this thing works really well, and In breathing better. The air quality sensor is a bright blue but you can turn that light off and in. I love it! Thanks for making it a little bit easier to get up each morning without the usual effects of kicked up dust, pet hair and dander causing me poor sleep and long tired days. I love it!" — Evelyn Amelia
$164.98 at Amazon
$159+ at Walmart
$159+ at Coway
Reviewers Say This One Emergency Fire Item Put Their 'Mind At Ease'
Cat Lovers Call This A 'Godsend' For Anyone Who Hates Dealing With Kitty Litter
10 'Worth Every Penny' Shower Products To Keep You From Falling In The Shower
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
How thousands of unreviewed ingredients got into our food — and what FDA can do about it
At least 1,000 ingredients in food products on our grocery store shelves have never been checked for safety by the Food and Drug Administration. Dozens have raised serious safety concerns among experts. How did the FDA allow this? The answer can be found in the agency's lax interpretation of a little-known legal designation that lets companies decide for themselves if ingredients in their products are safe. Fortunately, there are steps the agency can take right now to stem the flow of potentially unsafe ingredients into our food supply. Environmental Defense Fund outlined these steps in a letter we recently sent to the agency, but first let's take a closer look at how we got here. 'Generally Recognized as Safe' is a designation Congress created in 1958 to allow commonly used food ingredients to bypass the FDA's pre-market safety review process. It was meant for food substances — such as oils, vinegar, baking soda and common spices — that were widely considered safe due to their long history of everyday use. Since 1958, this status has been coopted to cover a universe of foods that extends far beyond its original intent. According to FDA regulations, a chemical can receive the designation if experts widely agree that scientific evidence shows its use to be safe. But because 'Generally Recognized as Safe' wasn't meant for newer ingredients, Congress allowed ingredients so designated to skip the FDA's premarket approval process — despite requiring similar evidence for other additives. Under the agency's current interpretation, companies can designate the use of a substance as safe and take products with that substance to market without informing the FDA or the public of its decision. While companies may voluntarily submit a notice to FDA offering safety evidence, they are not required to — and often don't. Our organization estimated that manufacturers have notified FDA of fewer than half of the ingredients they market as safe under the 'Generally Recognized' standard. Companies that do bother to submit a notice to the FDA are free to withdraw it at any point and take their product to market, provided they can cite evidence of its safe use. But this 'evidence' is often far from independent. Companies can, and often do, enlist their own employees or handpicked consultants to conduct their safety assessments. The result is a process riddled with conflicts of interest that lets unsafe foods into Americans' homes. We analyzed 'Generally Recognized as Safe' notices received by the FDA, obtained via a Freedom of Information request, and found that of the 1,163 submitted by companies between 1997 and April 2024, 192 were later withdrawn, with safety concerns cited in at least a dozen cases. We also identified 31 ingredients that companies have advertised to be recognized as safe, such as in press releases, trade publications and on their own websites (see the Appendix of our letter). However, we were unable to find the scientific evidence required under this standard to demonstrate these ingredients are commonly regarded as safe among experts. This raises red flags that FDA should be taking seriously. Although a comprehensive fix to the 'Generally Recognized' standard will require legislation from Congress, there are significant steps the FDA can take right away to ensure a more rigorous determination process that better protects Americans' health. Starting today, the FDA can use existing authority to remove safe designations from ingredients it deems unsafe and take them off the market. It can also notify manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers that the substance is no longer recognized as safe. In addition, the FDA can enforce the requirement that companies base safety designations on publicly available data. Although this won't curtail companies' ability to self-declare substances as safe, it will require those who do to be transparent in citing their evidence. Third, the FDA can enforce the requirement that safety assessments consider vital health information such as a substance's dietary sources, potential cancer risks and the cumulative health effects of similar substances. Finally, the FDA can make companies revise and resubmit their data for review when they submit 'Generally Recognized as Safe' notices that fail to comply with the criteria. The 'Generally Recognized as Safe' designation is far from a perfect system, but it can work better if it is interpreted and enforced more comprehensively. If the FDA is serious about protecting public health, it should start by fully exercising the tools already at its disposal. Maria Doa is senior director at the Chemicals Policy at Environmental Defense Fund. Maricel Maffini is an independent consultant focused on human and environmental health and chemical safety.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eating more of these plant-based foods could lower your risk of heart disease and diabetes
Eating more nuts, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains may help to reduce your risk of contracting deadly heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Researchers said this week that people who consumed more phytosterols — a natural compound found in plant foods — significantly delayed both of the conditions. Furthermore, eating more of them was linked to reduced inflammation, markers of better insulin regulation, and differences in the gut microbiome that may contribute to healthy metabolism. The study was not designed to confirm why this is the case, but the researchers said their findings strengthen the evidence. More than 7000,000 Americans die from heart disease and some 101,000 die from diabetes. 'Our findings support the dietary recommendation of adhering to healthy plant-based dietary patterns that are rich in vegetables, fruits, nuts and whole grains,' Dr. Fenglei Wang, a research associate at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said in a statement. 'These findings can help people make informed dietary choices.' Wang presented the observational findings on Tuesday at the flagship annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition. Some phytosterol-rich foods include corn, almonds, broccoli, bananas, and wheat bread. Previous research had found that eating foods with phytosterols can help to improve peoples' health by lowering bad cholesterol, and may reduce the risk of cancer. However, most clinical trials have used high doses of the phytosterols that were beyond what someone might get through just their own diet. The new research is the first to show the benefits as part of a normal diet. To reach these conclusions, Wang and his colleagues looked at data from more than 200,000 American adults that were a part of three studies. All of the participants were nurses or other health professionals and nearly 80 percent were women. Over the course of 36 years, more than 20,000 of them developed type 2 diabetes and nearly 16,000 developed heart disease. The participants' answers to food-frequency questionnaires allowed the researchers to estimate their individual intake of phytosterols, as well as three individual phytosterols known as β-sitosterol, campesterol and stigmasterol. Those who ate the most consumed the most phytosterol had about four to five servings of vegetables, two to three servings of fruits, two servings of whole grains, and half a serving of nuts each day. This made them 9 percent less likely to develop heart disease and 8 percent less likely to develop type 2 diabetes compares to those in the bottom fifth percentage for phytosterol intake, the research showed. Looking at the individual phytosterols, similar associations were observed for β-sitosterol. But, the same was not true for campesterol or stigmasterol. In addition, the researchers analyzed blood samples, looking at the products of metabolism — also known as metabolites — from more than 11,000 people and other metabolic biomarkers in blood samples from over 40,000 participants. They found that phytosterol and β-sitosterol levels were tied to favorable metabolites and metabolic markers relevant to heart disease and diabetes. That signaled a possible reason for the association. 'Our clinical biomarker and metabolomic results suggest the involvement of insulin activity, inflammation and the metabolism of metabolites associated with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease,' said Wang. 'This suggests that phytosterol might reduce risk by alleviating insulin resistance and inflammation.' In a group of just 465 participants, they examined the gut microbiome, or the trillions of microscopic organisms inside the intestines. They found several microbial species and related enzymes linked to higher intake of phytosterols that may affect the production of metabolites associated with a lower risk of diseases. 'We found that the gut microbiome might play a role in the beneficial associations. Some species, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, carry enzymes that could help degrade phytosterol, potentially influencing host metabolism,' Wang said.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 4, 2025
The rundown: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vow to "Make America Healthy Again" could fall short when it comes to chronic disease, experts have warned. Here's how. Why it matters: Nearly 130 million Americans are estimated to have at least one form of chronic disease, which could be heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity or hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The proposed cuts to Medicaid funding and work requirements for eligibility to the benefits, which are set to come as part of the broader GOP budget bill, could leave many with chronic disease without access to vital care. As many as three in four adults enrolled in Medicaid report having one or more chronic conditions, and many are unable to work the hours needed to meet the new eligibility requirements, according to nonprofit health policy research and news organization, KFF. So, while some may be medically exempt, others will lose their health coverage, meaning their conditions could worsen without access to care. Read more in-depth coverage: Health Experts Call Out RFK Jr. Policy Changes: 'New Inconsistency Every Day' TL/DR: Experts told Newsweek that, while the Trump administration's ambition to "defeat" the "epidemic" is clear, whether its policies will help or hinder chronic-disease patients remains to be seen. What happens now? Ross Brownson, director of the Prevention Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, told Newsweek that Medicaid cuts would "likely have a detrimental effect on chronic disease risk among the most vulnerable populations," adding Medicaid-enrolled adults have significantly higher rates of chronic disease than individuals privately insured. Deeper reading Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In
