Kash Patel under scrutiny for allegedly using FBI jet for sports events, personal travel
[Source]
FBI Director Kash Patel, who was sworn into the role on Feb. 21, is facing scrutiny for allegedly using government aircraft to attend sporting events and visit his girlfriend.
Flights in question
Patel used Department of Justice aircraft for multiple high-profile appearances, including flying on Air Force One to Miami for a UFC event with President Donald Trump on April 12, according to The New York Times. He also attended two NHL games earlier this month: one in Washington on April 4 and another in Long Island on April 6. It's unclear whether Patel used government aircraft to watch these events, but a Boeing 757 owned by the DOJ landed at JFK Airport shortly before the April 6 game and departed soon after it ended.
The Times also reported three round-trip flights on a DOJ-owned Gulfstream to Nashville, where Patel's girlfriend, country singer Alexis Wilkins, resides. While at least one Nashville trip included an official FBI business meeting with Tennessee senators and local law enforcement, the purpose of the others remains unclear.
Trending on NextShark:
Criticism
FBI directors are required under executive branch policy to use government aircraft for all travel to maintain access to secure communications. When traveling for personal reasons, however, they must reimburse the government the equivalent price of a commercial ticket — significantly less than the actual cost of operating such high-end jets.
The FBI has not commented on Patel's travel arrangements. U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, called for an investigation into Patel's 'apparent misuse' of taxpayer money in a statement to CBS News. Christopher O'Leary, a former FBI senior counterterrorism official, also criticized Patel's use of the planes, calling it 'a bad leadership example.'
Trending on NextShark:
Controversial tenure
Patel's approach marks a stark contrast to his predecessors, who typically worked with minimal publicity. Beyond his travel habits, Patel has made controversial personnel changes, including suspending analyst Brian Auten, whom he previously named as a 'deep state' actor in his book 'Government Gangsters.' In late February, Patel was quietly removed as acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, with Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll appointed as his replacement.
Despite these controversies, Patel recently celebrated the FBI's recent arrest of Harpreet Singh, an alleged Babbar Khalsa International operative who entered the U.S. illegally and is linked to multiple terror attacks in Punjab, India. 'Justice will be done,' Patel wrote on X.
Trending on NextShark:
The FBI has reportedly requested information about purchasing another jet for 'required-use executive travel,' even as Republican senators who once criticized similar travel by previous directors remain silent about Patel's usage.
This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices.
Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community.
Trending on NextShark:
Subscribe here now!
Download the NextShark App:
Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Nebraska Republican says he won't follow GOP ‘off the cliff'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In an interview in his office last week, Bacon, at 61 serving his fifth term in Congress, would not say whether he voted for Trump last year. He also likened members of his party to people following someone off a cliff, compared himself to Winston Churchill speaking out against Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and criticized billionaire tech tycoon Elon Musk, who has bankrolled many of his Republican colleagues. Advertisement 'I sort of blame him for that disaster,' he said of Musk, referring to Musk exhorting Republicans late last year to tank a spending deal that was intended to avert a government shutdown. Advertisement On one level, Bacon is making a fairly obvious statement: Musk did play a crucial role in killing the spending bill. But it is the kind of obvious statement that most Republicans on Capitol Hill are not willing to make these days, for fear of jeopardizing their political futures as Musk threatens retribution against anyone who fails to vote the way he believes they should. In the coming weeks, Bacon, who represents a center-leaning district in the otherwise deeply red state of Nebraska that both former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris won by more than 4 percentage points, plans to announce whether or not he will seek a sixth term in Congress. His retirement would be welcome news for Democrats, who have long viewed Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District as one of their best opportunities to pick up a seat. They have consistently been denied because of Bacon's strong independent brand and unique electoral strength. Last month, a Democrat unseated a three-term Republican in the Omaha mayor's race. The morning after that race was called, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the minority leader, told the House Democratic Caucus that they were officially on 'Don Bacon retirement watch,' and the room erupted in cheers, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Bacon would not discuss his plans, but his recent record of criticizing Trump and Musk suggests that he does not have a reelection campaign in mind. Still, in the interview, he said he had not given up on politics or on the Republican Party. 'I'd like to fight for the soul of our party,' Bacon said, sitting in his office as Trump and Musk's high-stakes alliance dissolved in real time on social media. 'I don't want to be the guy who follows the flute player off the cliff. I think that's what's going on right now.' Advertisement He also has no interest in taking the path of former Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois or Liz Cheney of Wyoming and making a clean break with a GOP that no longer reflects many of his values. 'You can't be anti-everything,' he said. 'I like what the president has done on the border, so I have no problem with that.' He also likes being a negotiator. 'I don't like voting 'no,'' he said. 'I like fixing things.' At the moment, he is pressing Republican leaders to reject a proposal from the Trump administration to claw back $400 million for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the global health program started by President George W. Bush that is credited with saving more than 25 million lives worldwide. The proposal is part of a $9 billion package of spending cuts the White House sent to Capitol Hill last week, which House GOP leaders plan to bring to a vote this week. 'I told them I'm a no,' Bacon said of the bill. 'I just want to make sure we're funding the medicine. We want to prevent AIDS; it's a noble program; it's George Bush's legacy. I put the marker out there. We'll see.' Bacon, a mild-mannered Midwesterner with a permanent half-smile on his face, is too much of a traditional conservative to have ever voted for Harris. But he would not say whether he voted for Trump. This is not a normal pose for a Republican in 2025. But Bacon has grown more confident over the years, as he has consistently fended off both right-wing challengers and Democrats to hold onto his seat, that he can remain fairly independent and suffer no political consequences. Advertisement House leaders have begged him to keep more of his opinions to himself, telling him to, as Bacon puts it, 'quit kicking President Trump in the nuts.' In response, Bacon said he has assured them: 'I'll do it only when I think it's needed.' That is becoming more and more often. In the interview, Bacon said he was disappointed in Hegseth, because 'I expect leaders to take responsibility.' He got his back up about Vice President JD Vance's claims that Denmark has 'not been a good ally' to the United States. 'The Danes have lost more people per capita in Afghanistan than any other country,' he said. 'And to call them not a good ally? They were all in with us, and it wasn't fair.' He said he opposed Trump's decision to take away deportation protections for thousands of Afghans in the United States. 'These guys fought by our side; we have a compact with those guys,' he said. 'To me, it's not a morally right decision.' And he warned that if Russia overruns Ukraine, it will define Trump's entire legacy. 'President Trump will always be known as the president who had Ukraine fall,' he said. He is also unwilling to let some of the less important stuff slide, breaking with some of his Republican colleagues who, he said, have tried to persuade him to pick his battles. On renaming the Gulf of Mexico, he said: 'I thought it was dumb. That's what people told me -- they said, 'It's so dumb; just vote for it.' That argument didn't work on me.' Advertisement In an alternative universe where there was more appetite for a Republican willing to break with Trump, Bacon has the kind of temperament and resume that could prompt dreams of running for president. Raised on a farm in Illinois, Bacon served for nearly three decades in the U.S. Air Force, earning the rank of brigadier general and specializing in electronic warfare and intelligence. The self-described Reaganite Republican has served in the House for eight years, consistently winning a district that centers on Omaha, the 'blue dot' in an otherwise red state. Bacon said he does think about running for president, drawing a comparison between his own fairly independent position in a tribal party and Churchill's during the 1930s, when the British government was pursuing a policy of appeasement toward Nazi Germany. 'You never know; things change,' he said. 'Right now, probably not. But Winston Churchill, who is one of my heroes, he was very unpopular 1932 through '40 because he was anti-Nazi. But in 1940, they go, 'Who was the only guy that knew what was going on?' ' Bacon said his dream job would be to serve in a Republican administration in a Cabinet-level role. 'If I had a perfect lane, someday I'd love to work in an administration, as director of intelligence, or secretary of defense or Air Force.' That's exceedingly unlikely in the current administration. But if his independent streak costs him such opportunities, Bacon said he would be just fine with that. 'I'd rather go down in history as being on the right side of this stuff,' he said. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon Musk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, said during an appearance on NBC News on Sunday that he would not accept campaign donations from billionaire Elon Musk, but added that he would "welcome" the Tesla CEO getting involved in politics "in a more substantive way." Newsweek has reached out to Booker for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Musk led the cost-cutting task force known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until the end of May. He served as a close adviser and key ally to President Donald Trump, and helped bankroll his 2024 campaign with more than $250 million in donations. On Tuesday, he turned against the administration, speaking out against the One Big Beautiful Bill spending proposal, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Musk's public rebuke marked a notable and apparent departure from the Trump administration's legislative agenda. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What to Know NBC News' Meet the Press host Kristen Welker asked Booker, an opponent of Trump's spending bill, if he would accept money from Musk for a potential reelection campaign. He is up for reelection next year. Booker replied: "I will partner with anyone like I did in the last Congress," arguing that the bill is "an American issue. And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign, I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Welker asked again if Booker would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know" about the bill. Following Musk posts on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, calling the bill a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled" piece of legislation that is a "disgusting abomination," Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, told Politico that the party should try to welcome Musk. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," the congressman said. On Saturday, Trump told NBC News that Musk will face "very serious consequences" if he starts to fund Democrats. He did not specify what actions he could take against Musk. When asked if he has any desire to repair the relationship between the pair, Trump simply said "No," adding that he "would assume" their relationship is over after the very public dispute. Musk posted a series of messages criticizing the bill, Trump and the Republican Party and some of its leaders. At one point, he posted a poll asking followers whether they support the creation of a new political party, dubbed "The America Party." Of the more than 5.6 million users who responded, 80 percent said yes. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington,... Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. More AP Photo/Evan Vuccifor Student Borrower Protection Center What People Are Saying Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, wrote on Wednesday on X: "The Big Beautiful Bill is a debt bomb ticking. It's also the biggest missed opportunity conservatives have ever had to put our country back on a track of fiscal sanity. If we defeat this bill, a better one can be offered that won't bankrupt our country." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "I have to agree with [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social on Thursday: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, wrote in a X post on June 3: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.' We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." What Happens Next Trump gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.
The Intercept
2 hours ago
- The Intercept
Trump's Dangerous Decision to Suppress Anti-ICE Protests With Troops
To suppress protests against his deportation agenda, President Donald Trump took an extraordinary action on Saturday by calling up 2,000 National Guard troops to tamp down demonstrations in California. In doing so, he exercised rarely used federal powers, bypassed the authority of the state's governor, Gavin Newsom, and set the stage for violent confrontation. Newsom, a Democrat, said the soldiers were unneeded and would only 'escalate tensions.' Trump's order came after protests broke out on Friday and continued through Saturday as federal agents searched Los Angeles' garment district and other neighborhoods for undocumented immigrant workers. More protests are planned for Sunday afternoon. Any demonstration impeding immigration law enforcement would be considered a 'form of rebellion,' according to Trump. 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump posted to his Truth Social account, using his childish moniker for Newsom. The Trump administration's move to further insert the military into domestic political and law enforcement activities carries immense risk. Militarizing an already tense situation increases the likelihood of civilian harm, threatens to chill civil liberties and could irreparably damage civil-military relations. The White House did not respond to questions about the potential for escalating tensions, worries about violence, or whether Trump would take personal responsibility for any resulting casualties. The National Guard has, at times, been tapped to stifle dissent. In 2020, Trump requested that the governors of multiple states deploy their National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. to suppress protests after Minneapolis police killed George Floyd. Many governors agreed and thousands of troops from 11 states were deployed to Washington, D.C. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush sent National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell riots after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That deployment was requested by California's then-governor, Pete Wilson. The Guard was federalized during the New York postal strike in 1970, following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, and during the 1967 Detroit uprising. Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson used the National Guard to help enforce civil rights during the 1950s and 1960s. But it is the 1970 deployment of the National Guard to crack down on anti-war protests in Kent, Ohio that best illustrates the danger of involving the military in civilian law enforcement. 'At times, their response has degenerated into uncontrolled violence.' That April, President Richard M. Nixon expanded the Vietnam War by invading neighboring Cambodia, supercharging the anti-war movement. In Kent, protests in response led to vandalism and prompted Republican Governor James Rhodes to deploy the Ohio National Guard. On May 4, Guardsmen opened fire on antiwar protesters at Kent State University, firing 67 rounds over a period of just 13 seconds, killing four students – Allison Krause, Jeffrey Miller, Sandra Scheuer, and William Knox Schroeder – and wounding nine others. The unrest that followed was unprecedented in American history. A national student strike involving more than one million students at 450 colleges and universities followed. Close to 90 percent of campuses saw protests in the month after the Kent State killings, with four million participating. This included at Jackson State College (now University) in Mississippi, where city and state police opened fire on student protesters and passersby on May 15, wounding 12 and killing law student Phillip Lafayette Gibbs and 17-year-old high school student James Earl Green. Nixon's own Commission on Campus Unrest, established in the wake of the killings at Kent State and Jackson State, found that student discontent was fueled by the Vietnam War and exacerbated by officials. 'Actions and inactions of government at all levels have contributed to campus unrest. The words of some political leaders have helped to inflame it. Law enforcement officers have too often reacted ineptly or overreacted,' according to the report. 'At times, their response has degenerated into uncontrolled violence.' Trump's activation of the California National Guard is the first time a president has done so without a request from a state's governor since 1965 when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators. During his first term in office, Trump suggested shooting protestors to quell dissent, according to his former secretary of defense, Mark Esper. 'The president was enraged,' Esper recalled, amid the strife following George Floyd's murder in 2020. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak and 'us' meant him.' Esper said that Trump looked to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley and said, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?'' Esper characterized it as 'a suggestion and a formal question.' During the last presidential campaign, Trump promised he would crack down on protests with troops. 'You're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in — the next time, I'm not waiting,' he said. On Saturday, as Trump ordered at least 2,000 National Guardsmen to Los Angeles County, after protests flared in downtown Los Angeles, in Paramount, a small city south of LA, and other neighborhoods. Some activists blocked traffic and confronted federal agents. Others slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Many carried signs, shouted in protest and kept their distance from federal officers. Law enforcement responded by hurling tear gas canisters and flashbang grenades, and firing rubber bullets at demonstrators. 'They threw rocks at the officers,' said Bill Essayli, the interim U.S. attorney for the Central District of California. 'We had Molotov cocktails thrown. We had all kinds of assaults on agents. The state has an obligation to maintain order and maintain public safety, and they're unable to do that right now in Los Angeles. So the federal government will send in resources to regain order.' California's attorney general, Rob Bonta, said local law enforcement did not require federal assistance. 'There is no emergency and the President's order calling in the National Guard is unnecessary and counterproductive,' he posted on At least 20 people were arrested on Saturday, mostly in Paramount, in addition to the more than 100 people arrested at the protests on Friday, according to Essayli. As a third day of protests loomed, Trump issued a social media rant that took aim at Newsom, 'Radical Left protests,' and mask-wearing demonstrators. He thanked the 'National Guard for a job well done!' It was unclear what job the troops, who had not yet been seen on the streets, had done when Trump posted the comments on Sunday at 2:41 AM. The White House did not respond to a request for clarification. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Saturday night that Trump was deploying the National Guard in response to 'violent mobs.' The 2,000 troops would 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' she said. Newsom rebuked the president's order. 'That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' he said, adding that 'this is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.'
