Novak Djokovic, Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz are playing, but has US Open reduced mixed doubles to an exhibition?
It represents a big punt from US Open executives, who hope to exploit the commercial potential of the event by filling it with big names and having it before the singles main draw of the last Major of the calendar year, which kicks off next week. Traditionally, mixed doubles – an event only played at the Majors – would take place alongside the singles, making it a deterrent for stars hoping to go deep in their individual events.
Big names have turned up for the revamped tournament. Men's world No.1 Jannik Sinner will team up with women's doubles World No.2 Katerina Siniakova, while Carlos Alcaraz will be seen alongside Briton's Emma Raducanu, opening their campaign against top seeds Paula Badosa and Jack Draper. Novak Djokovic will team up with compatriot Olga Danilovic.
Altogether 16 pairs will vie for the title – and the million-dollar prize money – with seven teams being seeded and the others receiving wild cards. The seeds were drawn on the basis of the combined singles rankings of the two players.
The draw is smaller – only four wins required to emerge with the title – and the matches will take place in a reduced best-of-three-sets format. Only four games will be required to win a set; there will be no deuce, instead a single point at 40-40 will win the game; and at one-set a piece, matches will be decided by a 10-point match tie-break as opposed to a full third set.
The new event drew interest from the sport's big names but was roundly criticised by the top doubles players for reducing a Major trophy event to a virtual exhibition. After the new tournament was announced in February, last year's mixed doubles champions, the Italian pair of Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori, said in a joint statement: 'Making decisions just following the logic of profit is profoundly wrong in some situations… The US Open mixed doubles tournament will be completely turned upside down, cancelled and replaced with a pseudo-exhibition focused only on entertainment and show.'
'We see it as a profound injustice that disrespects an entire category of players. We don't know at the moment if we'll have the chance to defend our title but we hope this remains an isolated case,' they added.
Arguments of this being a 'disservice' to the doubles category have been countered simply: the US Open executives believe that the rate at which audiences and viewership are sliding for doubles tennis itself is doing the biggest disservice to the game, and without something new and exciting that sees buy-in from the big stars, it is likely to fade away entirely.
While that buy-in has been achieved, the latest headache for the US Open will be whether those whose names feature on the posters, for whom high-value tickets have been bought in New York, will all feature in the competition. They found a small window to hold the standalone event prior to the main draws but the packed tennis schedule makes it difficult for all the top players to play.
Sinner and Alcaraz, both set to feature in the late session on Tuesday, will cross swords in a highly-anticipated final at the ATP Masters 1000 event in Cincinnati, just 24 hours prior to their match starts in New York. Iga Swiatek, who is the third seed alongside Norway's Casper Ruud, will be playing the final of the Cincinnati event less than 16 hours before she is expected to play the opening match at the US Open.
Her opponent in Monday's final, Jasmine Paolini, has already withdrawn from the mixed doubles event. So too has Emma Navarro – Sinner's original partner – and Jessica Pegula, who was supposed to play alongside Draper.
Still, all three players are scheduled to arrive in time in New York, and the US Open remains bullish on the new initiative providing an additional revenue stream. Its success may signal commercial genius on their side, but would raise greater existential questions about the future of doubles specialists, those of whom the executives rejected while scripting this format.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘It makes you humble, and it increases your compassion for people': Tennis great Chris Evert on her fight with cancer
With 18 Grand Slam under her belt, Chris Evert remains one of the all-time greats in women's tennis and tied for fifth-best in women's tennis history along with long-time competitor Martina Navratilova. It was in 2022 that Evert was first diagnosed with Ovarian cancer, which recurred in 2023. The 70-year-old fought the disease and overcame it and she says that the experience has made her more humble and increased her compassion for people. 'When I was going through chemo, people would always come up to me and say, 'You're so brave. I don't know how you do it.' And I'd look at them and say, 'What's the alternative? What else can you do?' I told them, 'You would do the same thing.' It didn't matter that I'm a well-known athlete who is fit and healthy; I'm one of the millions of people around the world who have cancer, and receive chemo. 'When you're sitting in that room getting chemotherapy pumped into your veins, you can't help but look around and see all the other people doing the same thing. It makes you humble. And it increases your compassion for people,' Evert wrote in her column for The Free Press. While Evert had retired in 1989 after winning 18 Grand Slam titles, the tennis star had stayed in touch with the game afterwards. Within years of hanging up her boots, Evert started the Evert Tennis Academy with her brother John in Boca Raton and later Evert would start commentating in international tournaments including grand slams at the age of 55 in 2010. It was the diagnosis and death of her younger sister due to cancer in 2020, which led to Evert undergoing a cancer diagnosis and with the results coming positive in 2021, Evert would undergo chemotherapy and multiple surgeries. The cancer would return in 2023 followed by further rounds of treatment before Evert was declared cancer free in 2024. The 70-year-old also talked about how she would also get support from fellow competitor and 18-time major championship winner Martina Navratilova, who too was fighting with cancer. During her career, Evert had faced Navratilova in 80 matches and had a 37-43 win-loss record against her. The two faced each other 14 times in major finals with Evert winning four of those finals and Navratilova winning ten of those. 'In the hospital and the doctor's office, I've met other people with cancer, of course. Some of them are accepting of it, and others seem sad. For my part, I feel fortunate—fortunate that mine was caught early and that I had such great support from my kids, my brother and sister, and my ex-husband Andy. And also Martina (Navratilova), who had cancer at the same time I did. We were able to talk to each other about how the chemo affected each of us, but we could also talk about the mental and emotional aspects of having cancer,' Evert further wrote. Post her treatment in 2023, Evert returned to commentating duties during last year's French Open and has been donning the commentator role since then. Evert also talked about how she now has to get a CAT scan every three months and how she looks towards life now. 'The chances of a recurrence were supposed to be pretty small, yet my cancer came back about a year after I thought I was done with it. I was frustrated beyond belief. Fortunately, it's in remission, but in some ways I still have shackles on because after you've had cancer twice, the odds of getting it again go up. I have to get a CAT scan every three months for the rest of my life, as well as blood work and a physical examination. So my perception of my life is: every three months. I just try to live my fullest life within those three months. I don't look ahead to one or two years down the road,' Evert wrote.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Jannik Sinner vs Carlos Alcaraz Cincinnati Open 2025 final LIVE Updates: Brace for another epic showdown before US Open
Jannik Sinner vs Carlos Alcaraz, Cincinnati Open 2025 final LIVE Updates: This is starting to feel a little predictable. For the fourth time in the past three months, Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz will face off with a championship on the line. Their latest chapter began in Rome, continued at Roland Garros and Wimbledon, and now finds its stage at another Masters 1000 final in More The top two in the ATP Rankings — No. 1 Sinner and No. 2 Alcaraz — have been in commanding form in Ohio. The Italian, last year's champion, has yet to drop a set en route to his eighth Masters 1000 final. He is riding a 26-match winning streak on hard courts, a run that includes titles at the 2023 Shanghai Masters, the ATP World Tour Finals, and the 2024 Australian Open. His last defeat in a hard-court final came in Beijing last October, when Alcaraz stormed back from a set down to prevail in three and deny the reigning US Open winner. Alcaraz, meanwhile, has had a more testing road to the Cincinnati final, dropping two sets along the way. Yet he has still advanced to his seventh consecutive tour-level final and his second in Cincinnati, following his runner-up finish to Novak Djokovic in their classic 2023 showdown. The rivalry between the two adds an extra layer of intrigue. Alcaraz leads their head-to-head 8–5, including five straight victories earlier this year in Rome and at the French Open. But after letting three championship points slip in Paris, Sinner struck back at Wimbledon, where he ended Alcaraz's streak with a four-set triumph to capture his maiden title at SW19. Beyond Sunday's trophy, there is much more at stake. The result could decide who carries the No. 1 ranking into the US Open later this month. Alcaraz, chasing his first Cincinnati crown, will reclaim top spot if he wins. Sinner currently holds a 2,250-point lead, but last year's US Open results distort the picture. Sinner lifted the trophy while Alcaraz crashed out in the second round, giving the Italian a hefty 1,950-point edge from New York alone. If Alcaraz wins on Sunday, he will trim the gap to 1,900 points. Once last year's US Open points drop, he would actually overtake Sinner by 50. But should Sinner defend his Cincinnati title, the swing would be 700 points in his favour, giving him a 650-point cushion. Either way, the stage is set for another high-stakes showdown — and a perfect dress rehearsal for Flushing Meadows.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
In US Open mixed revamp, a threat to doubles future?
Mumbai: Carlos Alcaraz reacts after beating Alexander Zverev in the Cincinnati Open semi-finals. The Spanish star will partner Britain's Emma Raducanu in the revamped US Open mixed doubles this week. (AFP Photo) The year's last Grand Slam begins this week with an unconventional first. Mixed doubles as a format in tennis is more than a century old, which the US Open has shaken up through a revamped standalone event starting Tuesday. It largely features top singles stars, with a handful of doubles specialists thrown in to make up the 16-team, two-day, shorter format spectacle. The traditional mixed doubles, a third wheel to the two doubles events at Slams, has been given the boot. From the time this radical move was announced in February, the debate has been about sidelining an entire event and set of players. Reigning US Open mixed doubles champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori, who have since been handed a wildcard in the singles-driven field, termed it 'profound injustice'. Locker room chatter around this appears heading into the innovative unknown. 'Most of the chat has been about uncertainty – if this can happen at one Slam, where does it stop?' Rohan Bopanna, India's 2024 Australian Open men's doubles champion who has played doubles with and against top singles players over a two-decade long pro career, told HT from the US. 'Among doubles specialists, there's concern that this sets a dangerous tone, like doubles can be treated as secondary whenever convenient. Even some singles players I've spoken to feel it sends the wrong message.' The message that the US Open organisers want to send with the revamp is to attract 'the sport's biggest stars' to doubles, as they put it in their statement. And to engage larger and newer audiences with a format that isn't put on show courts and often grapples to fill up seats. Over the last couple of months, social media has been abuzz about Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu teaming up for this, as one of the eight wildcards. Videos of 'who'll be the boss' on court offer a fun intrigue to these fresh pairs with millions of individual followers. 'I understand the intent behind wanting to feature the 'biggest stars' to draw more fans,' Bopanna, the doubles world No.1 last year, said. 'But I don't think you grow a sport by sidelining a format that has history and value. The biggest stars are great for short-term buzz, but building the sport for the future requires depth across all formats.' Jessica Pegula, the singles world No.4, said this will be a 'fun' event to play in, but hoped for better communication from the organisers before pressing on with this drastic change. Lack of dialogue was 'frustrating' for Bopanna too. 'We've voiced concerns in different ways, but the structure of the sport still doesn't allow doubles players to have the same platform as the singles stars,' the 45-year-old Indian said. Bopanna's first Slam title came in mixed doubles at the 2017 French Open. Some of India's most decorated tennis chapters involving the likes of Leander Paes, Sania Mirza and Mahesh Bhupathi have had memorable mixed touches. India's first grand slam came via Bhupathi's French Open mixed win in 1997 partnering Japan's Rika Hiraki. 'For many players, especially from countries where tennis isn't dominated by singles, mixed doubles has been a pathway to visibility and success,' Bopanna said. With this shake up, that pathway stares at a potentially dangerous precedent. Not just in mixed but generally in doubles, a format steeped in tradition that has displayed historic partnerships and classic spectacles – from The Woodies (Todd Woodbridge and Mark Woodforde) to the Bryan brothers (Bob and Mike Bryan) to the Williams sisters (Venus and Serena Williams), to name a few. 'That's the biggest worry,' said Bopanna. 'Once you take away something like mixed doubles at a Slam, it creates a precedent that doubles is optional, not essential. That's dangerous, because it undermines decades of history. Doubles has given the sport some of its greatest champions. It deserves not just respect but investment in its future.' In the present, though, it could do with some reinforcements given its current interest value. Bopanna reckons doubles can be made more appealing by building rivalries, showcasing personalities, putting it on show courts and increasing fan engagement with mic'd-up player interactions and shorter formats. 'Without,' he added, 'losing the essence of the game.'
