Russia claims counter-offensive into Ukraine's Sumy region
Russia also claimed the recapture of four new villages in its Kursk border region as its troops pushed on against Ukrainian soldiers who had seized territory there.
Kyiv wants to use the territory it holds in Kursk as a potential bargaining chip in any peace negotiations.
US and Ukrainian negotiators are set to meet for talks in Saudi Arabia next week, with US President Donald Trump's administration keen to secure a ceasefire and a "framework" for a peace agreement.
The United States has cut off Ukraine's access to intelligence sharing and satellite data in a bid to force it to negotiate.
The Russian defence ministry said in a briefing that its forces, in a counter-offensive, had "liberated" the small village of Novenke in Sumy near the border with Kursk.
Russia briefly occupied parts of Sumy at the start of its all-out invasion in 2022 but has not conquered any territory there since.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said in mid-February that his forces had entered this part of northeastern Ukraine, a claim branded a "lie" by Kyiv, although it has acknowledged isolated attacks.
Novenke is located about a kilometre (less than one mile) from Kursk and Russian military bloggers said its capture brought troops closer to blocking a major Ukrainian supply route.
Kyiv has not yet commented on Russia's claim to have captured Novenke.
- Incursion's 'final phase' -
Ukraine's state Centre for Countering Disinformation on Saturday denied reports of a "massive breakthrough" by Russia, saying its own forces were destroying small groups trying to cross the border.
Russia on Sunday announced the recapture of the villages of Lebedevka, Malaya Loknya, Cherkasskoye Porechnoye and Kositsa in Kursk, bringing its troops closer to taking back the Ukraine-held town of Sudzha, about 10 kilometres (six miles) away.
Ukraine launched its incursion into Kursk last August, seizing territory as a buffer zone.
But since then, Russia has taken back more than two-thirds of the territory.
A Russian army commander, Apti Alaudinov, wrote on Telegram on Saturday that "all units have launched a large-scale offensive across all areas on the Kursk section of the front".
A Russian military blogger, Yevgeny Poddubny, on Sunday wrote that the Kursk incursion "is in its final phase".
Prominent Ukrainian journalist Yuriy Butusov wrote on Sunday that holding onto the Kursk territory was no longer tactically justified.
- Gas pipe -
Ukraine's General Staff on Saturday confirmed reports that Russian special forces had used an underground gas pipe to reach the outskirts of the main town controlled by Ukraine in the region, Sudzha.
Kyiv said its aerial reconnaissance had spotted the troops, who were "being detected, blocked and destroyed".
Russian military bloggers wrote that troops crawled some 15 kilometres (nine miles) through a pipe with a diameter of 1.4 metres.
They hailed the attack as a feat, said the troops had achieved their objective, and that fighting was ongoing in Sudzha.
Russia supplied gas to Europe via Ukraine until January of this year and Sudzha was a hub for transferring and measuring gas.
Russia also claimed the capture of another village in east Ukraine.
Its troops are advancing in the Donetsk region and are close to crossing a symbolic border into the central Dnipropetrovsk region, which so far has been free of fighting.
The defence ministry said troops had taken the village of Kostyantynopil, around 13 kilometres from the regional frontier and 50 kilometres west of the large Russian-held city of Donetsk.
Russia's advances come as the prospect of peace talks appears increasingly likely, with Ukrainian and US negotiators meeting next week in Saudi Arabia.
US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said his team wanted "to get down a framework for a peace agreement and an initial ceasefire as well" at the talks set for Tuesday.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukraine is "fully committed to constructive dialogue", while wanting its interests to be "taken into account in the right way".
bur/sbk/rlp
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator: Congress Must Hold NATO to Its 5 Percent Defense Spending Commitment
The main benefit of alliances, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), is deterrence. Our enemies are less likely to harm one of us if they know they'll have to face all of us. At the end of the day, though, an alliance is just a promise—built on mutual trust—stating that we won't leave each other to fight threats alone. An alliance will only deter threats if our adversaries sincerely believe that we will all stick together no matter what. If an alliance has loopholes, it's not really an alliance at all. That's why some of the fine print in NATO's latest defense spending commitment is so concerning. On the surface, it appeared as though every member of NATO agreed to increase its defense spending to 5 percent of its GDP by 2035—and I'm confident that many of our allies intend to do just that. A NATO flag is pictured. A NATO flag is pictured. MATEUSZ SLODKOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images But some of our friends in NATO have already begun to weasel their way out of this commitment. Spain, for example, has flat-out refused to spend 5 percent on defense. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez told NATO officials that Spain would only spend 2.1 percent on defense, adding, "It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices." To clarify: Sánchez expects the American people to make sacrifices to contribute to our shared defense, but he doesn't want anyone in Spain to miss a single siesta for the cause. Does that sound like someone who would ride with you into battle? Still, NATO exempted Spain and made the 5 percent defense spending requirement optional for each country, turning its commitment into a wish list. The Spanish carveout isn't the only crack in NATO's commitment. Under the new agreement, only 3.5 percent of each country's spending needs to contribute to core defense needs, such as military, ammunition, and other standard warfighting needs. The remaining 1.5 percent of spending can be applied to almost anything the country can claim is beneficial to its defense. Italy, for example, is already planning to include a €13.5 billion bridge to Sicily as part of its 1.5 percent defense spending. The Italian government has long viewed the bridge, which would be the world's largest suspension bridge, as a possible economic driver. Under NATO's flimsy language, though, the bridge may count as defense infrastructure. This wouldn't be the first time our NATO friends skirted their defense responsibilities. In 2006, NATO agreed to have each member spend 2 percent of its GDP on defense. Only three members of the alliance had hit the spending goal by 2014, the same year that Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. Putin's aggression prompted NATO to reaffirm its 2 percent defense spending goal in 2014. By 2022, only seven members of NATO had reached 2 percent, and, once again, Putin invaded Ukraine in a war that continues today. That should have been the final wake-up call our NATO friends needed to meet their 2 percent spending pledge. Still, NATO's latest numbers show that eight members, including Canada, Italy, and Spain, have not met the 2 percent spending goal. Yet we are supposed to believe they'll hit 5 percent defense spending by 2035. Friends tell friends the truth. When they don't, friendships fall apart—and our adversaries take note. Today, I am introducing a resolution to commend our NATO allies who agreed to increase their defense spending to 5 percent and to strongly urge every member of NATO to follow through with this commitment sincerely. If we want to deter our adversaries, we need real investments in our defense, not bridges that have little, if anything, to do with national security. NATO is one of the greatest defensive alliances in all of human history, but these loopholes make us weaker. The world needs to know we have each other's backs, and that starts by putting your money where your mouth is. Senator John Kennedy is a Republican senator from Louisiana. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Passed the One Big Beautiful Bill to Secure Our Borders—Here's What We Must Do Next
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act was the product of many months of hard work by Congress and the unwavering leadership of President Donald Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson. The legislation stands as a landmark achievement, and it represents a sea change for border security and immigration enforcement. That change is long overdue, particularly as we work to undo the devastation of the Biden-Harris border crisis. President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speak to members of the media at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speak to members of the media at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025, in Washington, the turnaround are historic investments in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Among other achievements, Republicans approved more than $46 billion to finish construction of the strategic border barrier system, $45 billion to expand ICE's ability to detain illegal aliens, and approximately $35 billion to recruit, hire, and retain thousands more CBP and ICE officers, agents, and support personnel. But the work to ensure long-lasting border security and interior enforcement is far from over. While Republicans maintain majorities in Washington, we must advance the ball even further. There are three key areas in which we still have a long way to go—but the path is clear. First, we must act quickly to codify President Trump's executive orders. As we learned when President Joe Biden took office and ended essentially every effective border security and enforcement policy of the first Trump administration, executive actions can be undone—sometimes with devastating consequences. If we want the policy wins of the second Trump administration to be guaranteed for future generations, we must turn those executive orders into law. The reconciliation process allowed us to secure many key victories, but the rules of that process also prevented us from enacting policy changes without a clear fiscal impact. That means there are numerous reforms still on the table demanding our attention and action. For starters, to prevent future abuse of our immigration laws and protect our families and communities from the scourge of the fentanyl crisis, we must advance and expand upon the policies put forward in H.R.2, the Secure the Border Act, a historic border security and immigration reform bill that passed the House last Congress but was ignored by the Democrat-led Senate. Some of those reforms include explicitly prohibiting mass parole and nationality-based parole programs, closing asylum and catch-and-release loopholes, expanding expedited removal, cracking down on visa overstays, and expanding grounds for inadmissibility. The American people support such strong measures. They resoundingly endorsed these policies in the 2024 election after President Trump ran on a platform of mass deportations. Poll after poll shows continued support for that platform, despite increasingly outrageous Democrat rhetoric. Second, Republicans need to ramp up our investigative and accountability efforts, starting with looking deeply into the Biden-era officials who crafted, implemented, and defended the unlawful open-borders policies that caused untold harm to our nation. The burgeoning "auto-pen" scandal of the Biden administration—which casts into doubt whether President Biden was of sound mind and personally responsible for many of the policy decisions of his administration, even from its earliest days—sparks some troubling questions. Chief among these is how many of the radical policy decisions on border security and immigration enforcement were driven not by the president, but by others in the White House who saw the opportunity to systemically undermine longstanding U.S. immigration law in pursuit of open-borders, anti-enforcement policies? We have already identified a number of individuals involved in the Biden transition team and the administration that played a role in this crisis, and we must aggressively expand our investigation into them and pursue accountability where we can. Third and finally, we need to hold accountable the nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that helped facilitate the Biden-Harris administration's border crisis. The House Committee on Homeland Security has devoted substantial time and effort into uncovering how these NGOs served as a conduit for illegal immigration under the previous administration, often to their own substantial financial benefit. A few weeks ago, we sent a letter to more than 200 NGOs suspected of providing services and benefits to illegal aliens, seeking information about how these groups have used federal taxpayer dollars. We need to expand these probes, and as chairman of the Committee's Border Security and Enforcement Subcommittee, I fully intend to do so. No organization should be allowed to subvert or undermine U.S. laws, and they most certainly should not be doing so with taxpayer money. Unfortunately, that is exactly what happened under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and we need to not only prevent further abuse via legislative solutions but also demonstrate that those who do will answer for their actions. This is a bold agenda for the House Republican conference and the House Committee on Homeland Security. But the American people have spoken unequivocally. Just like President Trump, they want the border secured, illegal aliens removed, and their communities made safe. They also want accountability for the harm caused to our country and a firm commitment to advancing President Trump's proven border security agenda. We must show that we are up to the task. Congressman Michael Guest is the chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement and is currently serving his fourth term as the U.S. representative for Mississippi's 3rd Congressional District. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map, List of Cities Hosting 'Rage Against the Regime' Protests on August 2
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Rage Against the Regime" demonstrations against President Donald Trump and his administration's policies are scheduled to take place across the U.S. on August 2. Newsweek has contacted the 50501 Movement, who is behind the protests, for comment via email. Why It Matters There have been several nationwide days of protests against the Trump administration since he returned to office in January, many of them organized by the 50501 Movement (50 protests, 50 states, one movement). Last month, millions took to the streets for "No Kings" protests on June 14, targeting a military parade in Washington marking the Army's 250th anniversary that coincided with Trump's 79th birthday. Protests in honor of the late civil rights icon and congressman John Lewis also took place on July 17, while "Free America" events were held across the country over the Fourth of July weekend. 'Rage Against the Regime' Protest Locations on August 2 "Rage Against the Regime" is the latest nationwide day of action organized by the 50501 Movement. In a press release, organizers called for "a mass mobilization to channel our collective rage against the Trump administration for its weaponization of ICE against our communities, construction of concentration camps, covering up the Epstein files, attacks on transgender rights, and its dismantling of Medicaid, SNAP, USAID, the Department of Education, NOAA, and the National Weather Service into collective action." More than 300 demonstrations are set to take place on August 2, according to the Rage Against the Regime website. A map shows where "Rage Against the Regime" protests are planned to take place on August 2. A map shows where "Rage Against the Regime" protests are planned to take place on August 2. Rage Against the Regime website Here's a look at one event happening in every state where protests have been planned. To see all the events taking place, you can visit the website. What People Are Saying Hunter Dunn, 50501 National press coordinator, said in a statement: "The Trump administration's heralding of American neo-fascism has given us plenty to rage about. When our so-called representative government builds concentration camps and funds genocide, it becomes clear that, as Tom Morello said: 'Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.'" What's Next The protests will take place in states across the U.S. on August 2. According to a messaging guide for organizers, it is a day to "come together to transform anger into action, harnessing the energy of collective resistance."
