'It's what's best for a very select few': Some Texans are skeptical about vouchers as they near the finish line
A mom worried about families like hers, whose kids go to public school. A private school's president refrained from celebrating when lawmakers finally voted in favor of the measure. One former public school teacher who stayed awake as long as she could watching the vote was disappointed with the result.
'Ultimately, this voucher program is not what is best for the 5 million excess Texas public school students,' said Amber Davidson, a Midland resident and mom of two public school students. 'It's what's best for a very select few.'
The Texas House, under immense political pressure from Gov. Greg Abbott, voted 86-61 to approve a bill that will spend $1 billion to create education savings accounts, a form of vouchers families can use to pay for their children's private schooling. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the Texas Senate's leader, has proposed adopting the House bill, which would eliminate the need to reconcile the differences between each chamber's voucher proposals and bring the program closer to becoming law.
The House's longstanding resistance to vouchers, led for years by Texas Democrats and a coalition of Republicans from rural and industrial communities, cracked on Thursday. Many opponents were booted from office during the 2024 primary season as part of a multimillion-dollar campaign driven by Abbott and largely funded by wealthy donors.
[School choice, vouchers and the future of Texas education]
Residents across the state said they worry the proposal will take away money that could have gone to deficit-plagued public school districts needing help to keep up with their rising operational expenses.
Angela Cardenas, an instructional coach at the Frenship Independent School District, west of Lubbock, and a former public school teacher, would have preferred that the Legislature had either used the $1 billion for the voucher program to bolster public education, or let Texans decide directly at the ballot box whether they wanted vouchers, a proposition lawmakers struck down Wednesday night.
She said she fears the voucher program will lead to fewer students attending public schools, which would result in less funding for them. More than 90,000 children could participate in the first two years of the House's voucher program. Texas has more than 5.5 million public school students.
She also worried that families who want to participate in the voucher program wouldn't be guaranteed a seat at a private school. While the House's voucher program would be open to most Texas schoolchildren, the bill does not require private schools to change their admission practices to accept program participants.
Davidson, the Midland resident, doesn't believe the voucher program will greatly help her community, either. She hopes the push for vouchers won't stop lawmakers from supporting public education, especially in her town. Midland ISD, where Davidson's children attend junior high and high school, passed a $41 million budget deficit last year.
'I think ultimately we're giving money to people who already can afford to send their kids to our private school, who have made that decision and choice,' she said.
Gregory Anderson, the president of a private school in Midland, hesitated to tout the bill's passage as a victory for his school, despite Abbott and pro-voucher lawmakers saying it would benefit institutions like his.
Midland Christian School, the 1,300-pupil faith-based school under Anderson's leadership, is at capacity. There is a waitlist to attend, and the requirements are rigorous. Applicants must demonstrate they align with the school's religious tenets and fulfill its academic requirements.
Anderson said he would support any bill that helps education institutions in Texas, whether it is public, private, charter or nonprofit. But he did not believe his school would immediately benefit from the bill.
'It may eventually put us into a position where it could help families who want to be part of our school, but it probably would be a while before that actually plays out,' he said.
In Lufkin, St. Patrick Catholic Classical School is one of three religion-based private schools serving Angelina County. Nearly half of its students come from low-income families, which can make tuition a burden, said Candice Halls, the school's finance and operations executive. The money families would get from participating in the House's voucher program would cover 100% of tuition at St. Patrick, she added.
'I have seen their burden of wanting a faith-based education for their student, yet they struggle to pay the tuition,' Halls said. 'This will provide a lot of relief to them.'
As to how the creation of a voucher program would benefit the school moving forward, that has yet to be determined. Halls, who has been working to market the school more to the surrounding area, said switching schools is a difficult choice for families. Plus, she said, there is still a lot of uncertainty around vouchers, how they would work and their potential benefits. She thinks the impacts will vary by region.
As someone who worked in public schools before starting at St. Patrick, she said she understands some Texans' fears.
School officials in the Permian Basin, Texas' top oil-producing region, said they were ready for the fighting over vouchers to stop, and the work to begin. Chris Stanley, board president of the Ector County School District, said he wants to see the vouchers he's heard so much about for years put to the test.
'I hope they put guardrails [on Senate Bill 2],' Stanley said. 'I fear the comments that are out there, that this is only a tax credit for the rich. Well, legislators, since you're the ones making these decisions, prove to me it's not, prove to me that you are going to help some of the weakest students who are in the greatest need with this program.'
All but two Republican representatives voted for the measure. The two Republican nay-votes were from East Texas: Reps. Dade Phelan of Beaumont and Gary VanDeaver of New Boston.
VanDeaver said he has long believed vouchers would be detrimental to Texas. And his constituents agreed, he said.
'The majority — as was evident in my last primary — of my constituents support my opposition on this matter,' VanDeaver said.
Vouchers' impact on public schools' finances won't be as noticeable in the beginning, as it won't actively taking money from them. State funding for the program will come from a pot of money that's different from the one that finances public schools. However, public schools will lose funding for every student who leaves to enroll in the voucher program. VanDeaver also wondered what decisions the state would make about public schools and the voucher program's funds if the economy stumbles in the future.
Phelan, in a statement, said his vote was based on several factors, including the impact this legislation could have on the state budget and public education funding as a whole.
'Ultimately, my vote was about listening to the people of House District 21,' he wrote. 'Time and again, my constituents have expressed their strong support for our public schools and concerns about diverting state resources away from them. I heard you — and I voted [for] my district.'
North of Lufkin in Nacogdoches, former Rep. Travis Clardy was ousted from his seat in 2024 after publicly opposing vouchers. Rep. Joanne Shoffner, who was a vocal supporter of school choice, took over the seat this year and voted for vouchers. She said most of her constituents support the creation of education savings accounts.
'Parents want the freedom to choose what is best for their kids,' she said.
In the hours after the vote, many rural lawmakers who said they opposed the bill explained why they helped pass it, noting that their vote afforded them a chance to negotiate changes.
Rep. Drew Darby, R-San Angelo, said he voted begrudgingly to pass the bill. In a social media post on Thursday, he said some changes he recommended and were adopted, including annual public audits and requiring schools to be operational for two years before becoming eligible for the vouchers, improved the proposal.
'Allowing this bill to move forward unchanged would be a disservice to the very people I represent,' Darby said.
Rep. Brooks Landgraf, R-Odessa, who also voted in favor of the bill, said the version the House deliberated had sufficient protections in place to shield public schools that experience enrollment changes. In a statement sent Thursday, he underscored that the House on Wednesday also passed a separate bill that would direct $7.7 billion to public schools. The bill will increase teacher pay and the money schools get for each of their students.
'For my district, this means more funding, more resources, and more stability for our schools,' he said.
Rep. Trent Ashby, of Lufkin, was another vocal opponent of vouchers in 2023 who voted for the measure. A press release from Ashby echoed Landgraf's sentiment.
'Instead of sitting idly by and allowing flawed legislation to pass through the legislative process, I felt compelled to do everything in my power to improve the bill,' Ashby said in his statement.
Kristi Gay, the Lufkin ISD board chair, believes Ashby's decision to support vouchers allowed him to press for other agenda items that would benefit public schools — namely, more money for public schools.
Gay's career was not in education, but banking, and said more funding would support the more than 7,000 children who attend Lufkin schools. She said she wanted to look further into what benefits public schools had won from the political negotiations.
'That's the only thing that we have some measure of control over: whatever is allocated to us,' Gay said. 'Then our work begins to see how we can best use that to improve our district.'
Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Get tickets before May 1 and save big! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
7 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Will County Board member Jacqueline Traynere charged with computer tampering
Will County Board member Jacqueline Traynere faces three counts of computer tampering, according to a complaint filed this week in Will County Circuit Court. Traynere, a Bolingbrook Democrat, allegedly accessed the email account of board member Judy Ogalla, a Monee Republican, in March 2024 without Ogalla's authorization, according to the charges. The misdemeanor charges filed by special prosecutor William Elward state Traynere forwarded emails from Ogalla's account to herself and others. Ogalla, who was the Will County Board chairman at the time, said that Traynere knowingly accessed her email and knew it was unethical. Ogalla questioned whether Traynere had opened her email more than once. She said she doesn't know what all Traynere saw. 'Was she in my email other times and I just didn't know?' Ogalla said. 'She shouldn't have done it.' An email exchanged between board member Steve Balich, a Homer Glen Republican, and Ogalla regarding the controversial 143rd Street road widening project had been forwarded to the county executive, who replied to the email, Balich said during a July 2024 news conference with other County Board Republicans. Reached Wednesday, Traynere said she was unaware of the charges. Traynere said she had been testing out a rumor that all County Board members were given the same password when they were issued new devices. At the time the incident occurred, Traynere said she contacted Ogalla to explain what happened and believed it amounted to nothing. She said it was a simple mistake to see if it were true that all board members had the same password and she was exposing a problem with the system. A summons was issued for Traynere to appear in court Sept. 9. Traynere said Wednesday she believes the charges are political. Traynere has been on the Will County Board since 2008 and is the past Democratic Leader. She chairs the Public Works and Transportation Committee. Her term expires in 2026. Already, Sheldon Watts and Tyler Giacalone have announced they are running for the two seats that are up for election next year to represent District 11. Earlier this year, Traynere was issued a traffic citation stemming from an accident with a minor on a bicycle. That case was dismissed May 15, according to her lawyer and Will County Court documents.


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Klobuchar weighs in on deepfake video of her talking about Sydney Sweeney
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) addressed the deepfake video that went viral last month of the senator's likeness offering a 'vulgar and absurd critique' of actress Sydney Sweeney's 'great jeans' ad campaign. In a New York Times op-ed, the moderate Democrat called on Congress to pass legislation to protect Americans from the harms of deepfakes, saying the issue requires urgent action amid the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. 'I learned that lesson in a visceral way over the last month when a fake video of me — opining on, of all things, the actress Sydney Sweeney's jeans — went viral,' she wrote in the op-ed. Klobuchar said after she co-led a hearing on data privacy last month, she noticed 'a clip of me from that hearing circulating widely on X, to the tune of more than a million views,' which the senator then clicked on to watch. 'That's when I heard my voice — but certainly not me — spewing a vulgar and absurd critique of an ad campaign for jeans featuring Sydney Sweeney,' she said, referring to the controversial American Eagle advertisement that touted the actress's 'great jeans.' Klobuchar explained the AI deepfake featured her using derogatory phrases and 'lamenting that Democrats were 'too fat to wear jeans or too ugly to go outside.'' 'Though I could immediately tell that someone used footage from the hearing to make a deepfake, there was no getting around the fact that it looked and sounded very real,' she said. Klobuchar said when the clip spread to other platforms, TikTok took it down, and Meta labeled the video as artificial intelligence. But she said the social platform X 'refused to take it down or label it.' 'X's response was that I should try to get a 'Community Note' to say it was a fake, something the company would not help add,' she added. The Hill has reached out to X for comment. Klobuchar noted that her experience 'does not in any way represent the gravest threat posed by deepfakes' and pointed to other recent examples, including when someone used AI to pretend to be Secretary of State Marco Rubio and contacted various high-level government officials. President Trump in May signed into law a bill that Klobuchar pushed for, cracking down on so-called deepfake revenge porn — or sexually explicit AI images and videos that are posted without the victim's consent. Klobuchar is calling now for Congress to pass her bipartisan 'No Fakes Act,' which 'would give people the right to demand that social media companies remove deepfakes of their voice and likeness, while making exceptions for speech protected by the First Amendment,' she said. 'In the United States, and within the bounds of our Constitution, we must put in place common-sense safeguards for artificial intelligence. They must at least include labeling requirements for content that is substantially generated by A.I.,' she wrote in the op-ed. She warned that the country is 'at just the tip of the iceberg,' noting, 'The internet has an endless appetite for flashy, controversial content that stokes anger. The people who create these videos aren't going to stop at Sydney Sweeney's jeans.' 'We can love the technology and we can use the technology, but we can't cede all the power over our own images and our privacy,' she wrote. 'It is time for members of Congress to stand up for their constituents, stop currying favor with the tech companies and set the record straight. In a democracy, we do that by enacting laws. And it is long past time to pass one.'


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Obama endorses Newsom's redistricting plan in California
Former President Barack Obama endorsed California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) redistricting plan in California on Wednesday, calling it a smart and measured approach. 'Over the long term, we shouldn't have political gerrymandering in America, just a fair fight between Republicans and Democrats based on who's got better ideas,' Obama wrote in a post on X. 'But since Texas is taking direction from a partisan White House and gerrymandering in the middle of a decade to try and maintain the House despite their unpopular policies, I have tremendous respect for how Governor Newsom has approached this,' he continued. 'He's put forward a smart, measured approach in California, designed to address a very particular problem at a very particular moment in time.' Obama's public statement comes after he praised Newsom's plan in front of a crowd at a Martha's Vineyard, Mass. fundraiser on Tuesday. 'We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect,' the former president said. Newsom, who is considered a potential 2028 presidential contender, hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas earlier this month when he called on California lawmakers to come up with ways to skirt the state's redistricting regulations and produce maps more favorable to Democrats to even the playing field. The California governor announced plans earlier this month to hold a special election in November for voters to approve a ballot measure that would permit Democrats to pass a new House map ahead of the 2026 midterms in the predominantly blue state. On Tuesday, California Republicans sued the state in an attempt to block the legislature from considering legislation that would allow Newsom to go ahead with a special election.