Arrest made as protesters gather outside Epping hotel ‘housing asylum seekers'
A person was arrested for breaching an order in place that prevents anyone from wearing a face covering, Essex Police said.
Some of the protesters could be seen wearing English and Union flags draped over their backs as they stood behind fencing erected outside the hotel.
A large billboard set up behind the fencing also showed English flags with the words Protect Our Kids.
A total of 16 arrests were made following a protest outside the same hotel last week.
The force previously said a small number of people used that demonstration as cover to commit violent disorder and criminal damage.
The Bell Hotel in Epping (Robert White/PA)
Chief Superintendent Simon Anslow said on Thursday: 'I want to thank those who are attending today and protesting peacefully.
'We have used powers at our disposal to ensure people can protest peacefully, lawfully, and safely.
'And our officers are in place to ensure you can do so.
'We won't tolerate anyone thinking they can come and cause trouble or breach the orders we've put in place to keep people safe. My message is clear – we will deal with you.'
People had earlier walked through the town's high street and gathered outside Epping Forest District Council, before being walked back to the hotel by large numbers of Essex Police officers.
The force said a group outside the hotel wanted to move towards the town centre and officers 'escorted them there to ensure they could express their democratic right safely'.
Earlier that evening, police announced they will be using extra powers, under Sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, to 'put restrictions on people who plan to assemble or to take part in any kind of procession'.
Protesters near the Bell Hotel on Sunday (Yui Mok/PA)
Sites to lawfully protest at are directly opposite the Bell Hotel 'and will have their own designated entry and exit routes', Assistant Chief Constable Stuart Hooper said previously.
There will also be areas near the Civic Centre, he said, adding: 'If you move from the Bell Hotel to the Civic Centre, you will not be able to return.'
A Section 60AA order, under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, is also in place on face coverings.
'If you wear one, we'll order you to take it off. If you don't take it off, you'll be arrested', Mr Hooper said.
He said all protest activity should cease by 10pm, adding: 'To be clear, you will not be able to get in the way of people getting on with their daily lives in Epping. This is a priority.'
Last Thursday's protest began peacefully but escalated into what officers described as 'scattered incidents of violence' targeting police and property.
Eight officers were injured and a number of police vehicles were damaged as missiles were thrown.
Six people have been charged in relation to the action.
The latest developments come as police are braced for further protests, and the Government and law enforcement have vowed to act swiftly if unrest spreads.
The Epping protest was sparked by the charging of asylum-seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, with sexual assault after he allegedly attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl.
He denied the charge at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court and will stand trial in August.
The protest has drawn national attention and sparked a political row, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage calling for Essex Police Chief Constable Ben-Julian Harrington to resign over claims that officers transported left-wing protesters to the scene, claims the chief constable has denied.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
House of Commons denies Lindsay Hoyle 'personally' blocked secret Israeli emails
Lindsay Hoyle personally blocked emails between him Israeli Embassy, Labour Friends of Israel and members or officials of the Knesset from being made public according to response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request submitted by Declassified. But the Speaker's office has now insisted that characterisation is 'completely incorrect'. The original response to the FOI request confirmed that while the information sought did exist, it was being withheld 'because the Speaker of the House of Commons [Hoyle], on advice from House officials, including Speaker's Counsel and Clerk of the Journals, has formed the reasonable opinion that disclosure of the information would be likely to prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs'. READ MORE: Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians A spokesperson for the House of Commons said: 'It is completely incorrect to say that the Speaker 'personally intervenes' in FOI cases. 'The Speaker's approval is required for the application of any exemption under Section 36. Such an exemption is agreed to following advice from senior officials, including legal advice.' Hoyle went to Israel in November 2023, after Israel had been accused of committing war crimes including killing two Medecins Sans Frontieres workers, on a 'solidarity visit'. He visited a kibbutz targeted by Hamas in the October 7 attacks as well as the Tzrifin military base. 'You can still smell in the air death.'@CommonsSpeaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle MP, describes the horrific scene at kibbutz Kfar Aza. — Tzipi Hotovely (@TzipiHotovely) November 29, 2023 Speaking in a video recorded at the kibbutz, he said: 'As I look around, you can see what happened, you can feel what happened. This should never happen.' Hoyle last year faced the prospect of losing his job after nearly 100 MPs signed a motion of no confidence against him for ignoring parliamentary procedure to let Labour – his former party – avoid a potentially embarrassing backbench rebellion on a vote calling for a ceasefire. READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict on John Swinney's indyref2 plan and SNP chances in 2026 Labour's Chris Bryant, then a shadow minister, admitted he had disrupted the debate on the SNP's ceasefire motion to buy Keir Starmer time to convince the Speaker to allow Labour to table an amendment, which is unconventional. Hoyle has also found himself in hot water over the expenses he has racked up during his time as speaker. A Daily Mail investigation earlier this year found he had charged the taxpayer nearly £5500 for private planes during a tour of the Caribbean.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
I have more questions than answers about Jeremy Corbyn's new party
He and I are both admirers of Tony Benn and I share many of his political opinions. At the same time, I respectfully disagree with him on some important issues. And I point out that the 27-year-old Scottish Socialist Party has already announced – and reiterated again at our National Council in Glasgow last weekend – that it is our intention to stand in all eight regions at next year's Holyrood election. One of the most substantial differences we had with Corbyn for a long time was the nature and role of the Labour Party, which I left 40 years ago. For me Labour are not now, nor have ever been, a legitimate or trustworthy vehicle for socialist change. The independent socialist Scotland and modern democratic republic I want to see, for example, is not an ambition Labour share. The reverse in fact is true. It seems Corbyn, having split with Labour, agrees with me on the former issue at least. Keir Starmer's ambivalence toward the ongoing slaughter in Gaza is merely the last straw for many of his erstwhile voters. Others were just as disgusted by his attack on the benefits for people with disabilities and families with more than two children. Then there is the betrayal of the Waspi women and the repugnant decision to divert international aid spending towards armaments. Many questions remain about the Corbyn/Sultana project, however, largely because its advocates have been slow to provide answers. Is it their intention, for example, to create another version of the Labour Party? In other words, an electoral machine that may criticise but ultimately sustains capitalism? Where is the primacy of class in the new party's politics? How will it prevent the broad, and therefore shallow, coalition of disparate opinions collapsing under the pressure of ideological divisions and competing tactical priorities? If I were to guess at the social composition of the 600,000 people who have reportedly signed up for this project, I'd say many were likely to be students, others would be from the pro-Palestinian diaspora. And most would be from Greater London and the biggest English cities. READ MORE: 'One that belongs to you': Jeremy Corbyn reveals temporary name of new party My late father, a lifelong socialist and trade union member, never took to Corbyn as Labour leader. He felt he was just not 'hard enough' to withstand what the Labour right would throw at him. I confess I could see what he meant. Corbyn is a decent man, and it is an outrage that the charge of antisemitism was levelled against him for criticising the actions of the ultra-reactionary Israeli government. And yet he often seems like 'an altar boy at a knife fight', prone, according to Owen Jones's book This Land to disappearing to his allotment for days at a time to avoid confrontation. Just as Starmer has come a cropper for being merely the anti-Tory conduit in last year's election, Corbyn can surely see that offering an opposition to Starmer is not enough for people to sustainably coalesce behind. Another feature of the Corbyn announcement I found interesting was examining who is not joining – John McDonnell, Diane Abbott (below), Ian Lavery and other members of the 'Bennite' group of Labour MPs, nor are the trade unions. Nor are many socialists in the schemes of Scotland. The project, it seems to me, is therefore hamstrung by the contradictions within it. It's another London-centric project whose approach to the national question is at best ambivalent – they say they will not take a position on Scottish independence. I fear this new party is therefore less likely to succeed in Scotland than many believe. If it fails to build roots in working-class communities here, it will not sustain and in due course may perversely act as an accelerant for further advance by forces such as Reform UK. The rise in support for Reform can also be traced to Starmer's door. It has been seven years in the making and while the first five were spent largely trying to usurp the Tory Party, it really took off under the weight of Starmer's failures. They won the Runcorn by-election in May – Labour's fifth-safest seat – and are on course to win the Welsh Assembly election. They have 500 councillors, many in England's poorest counties and their narrative that 'Britain is broken and needs Reform' resonates with millions. Successful strategies demand thorough preparation, immense funding and resolute application. Nigel Farage, I regret to say, seems better prepared and more streetwise than Corbyn. The question I have been examining in this column over recent months is not so much 'is support for Reform increasing in Scotland?' but rather 'why is it on such a sharp incline?' What is driving its support? It's a question that demands an honest and comprehensive answer from an independence movement losing support to arch-Unionists. READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict on John Swinney's indyref2 plan and SNP chances in 2026 Starmer's failures are undoubtedly the main driver. He promised to redistribute wealth in favour of working people and to fully fund public services such as the NHS, social care and education. He palpably has not. But it is also true that John Swinney must take his share of the blame for Reform's surge here. As First Minister, he has presided over NHS Scotland's worst crisis and betrayed a promise to deliver a national care service. His cut-and-paste independence strategy is no more credible. Claiming only an SNP majority at [[Holyrood]] next year can deliver indyref2 is undermined by a poor record in government over the past 19 years. That referendum also remains in the gift of Westminster and Swinney has never offered a serious route to achieving it. Incapable of thwarting the rise of Reform, he is unable to extricate himself from the view voters have of him as part of the political establishment implicated in the failure to address the grotesque inequalities, privatisations and exploitation people endure here. The Scottish Socialist Party will offer people an alternative to the parties of the 'extreme centre' and Reform UK at next year's election. And in doing so we will highlight our unwavering support for an independent socialist Scotland and a modern democratic republic – and the fact our MSPs would live on the average worker's wage, as I did between 2003-07. We'd replace the hated and unfair Council Tax with an income-based alternative where the poorest are exempt, and point proudly to an unparalleled record, over a quarter of a century, of support for workers and communities in struggle.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Married teacher sexually abused schoolgirl from 13 in 18 months of horror
English teacher Stefanie Kellenberger, 40, admitted to 21 counts of abuse of a minor after she sexually abused the girl at her home in over 18 months A married English teacher has pleaded guilty to abusing a 13-year-old schoolgirl at her home. Stefanie Kellenberger, 40, admitted to 21 counts of abuse of a minor after she sexually abused the girl at her home in Ohio over 18 months. According to police, she pleaded guilty to all four counts of third-degree felony sexual battery and 17 counts of third-degree felony unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. Authorities said she began grooming the schoolgirl when she was just 13-years-old, and kept in contact with the girl the following year, when she turned 14. The abuse continued until "the age of consent", which is 16, according to Bryan Dove, assistant prosecutor for Richland County. It comes after a 16-year-old boy was allegedly forced to live in an outside shed for months by his parents. The horrific abuse all occurred at Kellenberger's home in Shelby from February 2020 through October 2021. "You had been a teacher. She had been a student,' Richland County Common Pleas Judge Brent Robinson told the former English teacher. "But at the time these occurred, you were not her teacher and she was not your student." Kellenberger was placed on paid administrative leave from Shelby City Schools in February 2024. It comes after the Mansfield Police Department confirmed "allegations were made" against the teacher. She was officially charged in September 2024, and resigned from the school the following month. Kellenberger's victim wanted the former teacher to spend three years in jail, but the judge said that sentence was too short. Instead, the abuser was presented with two options by prosecutors, either 12 years in prison or 15 years with the possibility of judicial release after 10 years. She opted for the latter option. "The victim is relieved to not have to testify. That's why we entered into this agreement with the defendant," Dove, prosecuting, told the judge. Kellenberger will be subject to five years post-release control and must register with the county sheriff as a Tier 3 sex offender every 90 days for the rest of her life. She must also remain under electronic monitoring until her sentencing October 6, and has been banned from teaching. It comes after a married special education teacher has pleaded guilty to sending nudes to a 16-year-old student on Snapchat and pressuring him to have sex. Rikki Laughlin, 26, sent multiple nude pictures and a video of her using a sex toy to the student on the social media app. The student reportedly told authorities that "things progressed fast" after the Snapchat messages and that he and Laughlin had kissed. The teenager "made excuses" because "he did not feel comfortable" when the teacher tried to take things further, police heard.
