logo
Last-gasp EU demand for 10 years of fishing rights: Ambush over trawlers hits negotiations on 'reset' deal with Brussels

Last-gasp EU demand for 10 years of fishing rights: Ambush over trawlers hits negotiations on 'reset' deal with Brussels

Daily Mail​18-05-2025

Brussels increased its demands over fishing rights last night, delaying the expected agreement of a deal with Britain.
Led by France, the European Union had called for a roll-over of the current five-year deal that grants its trawlermen access to UK coastal waters.
But at the last minute the negotiators said the arrangement should last far longer in return for lifting existing post-Brexit checks on lorry loads of food and animal products being exported from Britain to the continent.
One source told the Mail that the EU had suddenly asked for permanent access to British fish as a quid pro quo for Sir Keir Starmer being granted a so-called Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) agreement that would see red tape for exporters lifted indefinitely.
Another insider said Brussels had put an offer of 'a decade of fish' on the table – access to UK waters for ten years – in return for scrapping the lorry checks.
A diplomat told the Telegraph that the EU wanted 'double-digit' years of fishing rights, sending the negotiations continuing late into last night and dashing hopes that the deal could be agreed early.
The Tories set out a series of 'red lines' last night that they will apply to any deal Labour makes on fishing as part of its EU reset. They said the Government 'must make it clear that giving up any rights to UK waters and natural resources would represent a betrayal to British fishermen, a surrender of our sovereignty and a long-term risk to our food security'.
They also said British fishermen should have exclusive access to a zone 12 nautical miles from the coast, adding: 'We must not sign a multi-year agreement which only benefits France.
'We should adopt the international norm and claim the regulatory autonomy of annual negotiations or only agree a multi-year deal that favours our fishing communities across the UK.'
Former Brexit negotiator Lord Frost told the Mail: 'Conceding permanent EU access to our fishing grounds would be a disastrous sign of weakness.
'It would essentially take us back to membership of the much-hated Common Fisheries Policy. The Government should hang tough in the interests of British fishermen, though I have little expectation that they will.'
Tory environment spokesman Victoria Atkins said: 'Labour must not sacrifice our coastal communities in their 'closing-down sale' of British Brexit freedoms with the EU.
'We will not accept any deal that throws our fishing industries overboard with cut quotas or selling off permanent rights to the EU. The Government should be going into these negotiations proud of our country, its history and its future. Instead, they seem set on apologising, grovelling and selling off the UK's fishing treasures.'
Critics also warned that millions of young migrants could come to Britain unless ministers secured strict limits as part of negotiations with Brussels. The EU wants the Government to set up a youth-mobility scheme letting young adults from across the continent – most likely those aged 18 to 35 – live, work and study in the UK for up to three years.
Eurocrats have allegedly refused to include the word 'cap' in the text of the agreement due to be unveiled today in what has been dubbed Sir Keir Starmer's 'surrender summit' in London.
And the UK has failed to confirm any limit on the numbers arriving, although ministers insisted yesterday that any arrangement would be 'controlled'.
Critics pointed out that wages are lower in many parts of the EU and joblessness is higher, making the scheme an attractive prospect to many of the estimated 80million Europeans who would be eligible to take it up.
The youth unemployment rate stands at 26 per cent in Spain, for instance, compared with 14 per cent in the UK. Such a deal risks pushing up net migration again, angering voters and posing a political risk to Sir Keir a week after he vowed to cut the number of those settling in the UK.
Shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart told Sky News: 'There are obviously very considerable disadvantages to the UK if this deal is done in the wrong way. When people hear about a youth-mobility scheme, they think about an 18-year-old coming over working at a bar. But we may well be looking at a scheme which allows 30-year-olds to come over and gain access to the NHS on day one, to claim benefits on day one to bring their extended families.'
The UK's deal negotiator, Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds, denied the scheme would betray Brexit. He said: 'It isn't freedom of movement. We have 13 existing youth-mobility schemes. We've got a scheme with Uruguay – nobody suggests we've got freedom of movement with Uruguay.'
However that deal is limited to 500 people each year.
Challenged to explain comments by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who indicated she opposed an EU youth mobility scheme, he replied: 'It's absolutely the policy of the Government is that we are going to reduce net migration.
Lib Dem Europe spokesman James MacCleary said: 'We've been hounding the Government for months to sort out a capped youth mobility scheme, but they've been dragging their heels.'
What's at stake - the six key sticking points:
1. Free movement for young Europeans
The EU wants a youth-mobility scheme to give those aged 18 to 35 or so from across the bloc the right to live, work and study in Britain for three years.
For months the UK denied this was a possibility. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is known to have opposed it because of the impact it would have on politically toxic immigration figures.
But ministers belatedly admitted it was indeed on the table. They have insisted it does not constitute a return to 'free movement' and pointed out that the UK already has similar arrangements with other countries.
But critics say these are far smaller and argue that without a strict cap – which the EU is reportedly reluctant to include – hundreds of thousands of young adults would want to move to Britain from parts of Europe where wages are lower and unemployment is higher.
2. Cheaper fees for foreign students
As a result of Brexit, undergraduates from EU countries studying at English universities are now charged uncapped international rates rather than the £9,250 tuition fees paid by domestic students. Senior figures in Brussels are said to have called for EU students to pay the lower fees once more.
However, this would be a blow to university vice-chancellors, who have already seen crucial income from foreign students slashed because of last year's visa restrictions.
3. Following EU rules... and judges
One of Labour's main demands in the talks has been to cut red tape for firms exporting food and animal products to the continent. Known as a Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement, it should end most of the border checks that have held lorries up for as long as 16 hours on their way to the continent. Ministers hope this may lead to lower prices for shoppers. But it will also mean Britain must once more sign up to EU rules and update them as they change – so-called dynamic alignment – which ended with Brexit. Any disputes would again have to be resolved by the European Court of Justice.
4. French boats catching our fish
Britain's fishermen had hoped Brexit would mean they could reclaim UK waters, but under the original deal struck by the Conservatives, EU boats were granted continued access.
This is due to end in 2026 and the EU has been arguing it should become permanent, with France even suggesting a 'hard link' between fishing rights and the UK's access to defence contracts. The Tories say ministers must not agree to a lengthy deal that only benefits France.
5. British troops on Brussels missions
Military co-operation was not a feature of the Brexit deal, but Labour wants a defence and security pact in its reset with Brussels. Ministers are keen for UK arms firms to gain access to the £126million Security Action for Europe fund, set up by Brussels to help EU nations spend more on weapons. A diplomatic source told The Mail on Sunday Britain could have to pay 'hundreds of millions' for access.
Some fear the Defence and Security Partnership could mean British servicemen taking part in EU civilian and military operations.
6. Passport queues at EU airports
Since Brexit, UK holidaymakers and business travellers have faced long waits at airport passport barriers because they could no longer queue with EU citizens. For frequent fliers it has been one of the most visible consequences of Brexit.
Ministers want Brussels to let UK citizens use 'e-gates' reserved for EU passport holders, which would mean quicker transit times and a tangible sign of improved relations with the EU.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years
Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years

The Herald Scotland

time21 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years

Of course, by now you already know the result, so you'll know which of the following scenarios and their consequences are the most accurate. But let me start with what the national polls tell us ought to have happened, by-election peculiarities – which I'll come to – notwithstanding. The SNP should have won with around 33% of the vote, down significantly on the 46.2% it won in 2021, with Labour in a narrow second on around 28% of the vote. Reform should have come third with just under 20% of the vote, while the Conservatives should have collapsed to under 10% of the vote. The rest of the vote, around 10%, will have been split among the Greens, Liberal Democrats, and myriad minor parties and independents. But by-elections rarely work out this way, even when the national polls are accurate. Firstly, voters are more likely to have voted in protest than they are at national elections, which may well help Reform in this case. As Jamie, a service engineer from Hamilton, told a focus group run by More in Common, it's 'time to give someone else a chance,' even if he thinks Nigel Farage is an 'a***hole'. Read more by Mark McGeoghegan Secondly, turnout will likely have collapsed. In the Hamilton and Rutherglen West by-election in October 2023, turnout fell by 43% compared to the 2019 General Election. A similar decline here would see around 15,600 voters who would otherwise turn out in a national election stay at home instead. Given that voters turning out to vote Reform as a protest against both the SNP and Labour governments are likely to be more motivated than SNP and Labour voters, this may also advantage Reform. In fact, assuming predictions based on national polling would otherwise have been accurate, Reform's vote will only have to have been marginally more resilient for it to finish ahead of Labour and narrowly behind the SNP. Factor in that first peculiarity of by-election campaigns, and such a scenario is hardly far-fetched. On the eve of the by-election, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused the First Minister, John Swinney, and journalists of manufacturing Reform's competitiveness in the seat. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a Reform underperformance yesterday will have been more surprising than it coming second. It has demonstrated its strength in a succession of local by-elections, the latest of which saw it beat Labour to come second behind the SNP. Whether or not Reform came second yesterday, its performance will shape the narrative in Scottish politics going into next year's elections in conjunction with its UK-wide polling lead (it has led in 25 consecutive polls going back to the beginning of May) and strong results in recent local elections and Parliamentary by-elections in England. Ultimately, regardless of yesterday's result, the spectre of Nigel Farage looms over Scottish politics. There are three broad scenarios. Firstly, that Reform performed to its Scotland-wide polling, confirming that it is on course to win between 15 and 20 seats in next year's Scottish Parliament election. Secondly, that it did overperform, perhaps coming second, leading to the next 11 months to being dominated by the SNP seeking to present next year's elections as a choice between the SNP and Nigel Farage, and a bitter fight between Reform and Labour for status as the main challengers to the SNP. Thirdly, that it underperformed, in which case the SNP will be quick to emphasise divergence between Scottish and English politics. In any case, the SNP will use the prospect of a Reform government at Westminster to try to increase the salience of the constitutional question, attempting to return independence to the heart of the Scottish political agenda ahead of next year's elections and the following UK general election. It knows that that is its best bet for winning back pro-independence voters who have swung to Labour in recent years. Replacing Humza Yousaf with John Swinney may have stabilised the SNP's support, but the party not really recovered in any meaningful way. The longer Reform leads in UK-wide polls, the more likely that narrative will be to gain purchase among the independence-supporting electorate. Strong Reform showings in Scotland will reinforce the sense that they could win power in 2029; weak performances will emphasise the ways in which Scottish and English politics may be diverging. Both provide hooks for the SNP. The spectre of Nigel Farage looms large over Scottish politics (Image: PA) The bigger question is whether this leads to a change in the constitutional deadlock. Some recent polling suggests that support for independence may have edged up. Norstat recently recorded its first Yes leads in three years, finding Yes ahead by seven points in the wake of Reform's strong showing in the English local elections. Survation still has No ahead by two or three points, down from leads of seven or eight points a year ago. The data is not conclusive, and we should be cautious of hypotheticals around whether developments will change voters' minds – we had enough such polls around Brexit and Boris Johnson becoming Prime Minister that never bore out. But the prominence of Reform UK and Nigel Farage in UK politics is a gift to the SNP and the independence movement, regardless of how they performed yesterday or how they perform north of the Border in the coming year. If Anas Sarwar is frustrated with his opponents' and the media's "obsession" with Reform UK, he should get used to that feeling – they'll be at the heart of Scottish political debate for years to come. Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @

Sainsbury's is testing a huge change to shelf labels – and shoppers will be divided
Sainsbury's is testing a huge change to shelf labels – and shoppers will be divided

The Sun

time23 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Sainsbury's is testing a huge change to shelf labels – and shoppers will be divided

SAINSBURY'S is the latest supermarket to test a major change to shelf labels in stores - but it will leave shoppers divided. One of the UK's biggest supermarkets is trialling electronic shelf labels in a small number of branches. 1 The retailer installed the tech at three of its larger shops late last year and has been trying it out across different sections including alcohol, health and general merchandise. Sainsbury's has partnered with Harrison Retail to build the shelf fixings featuring the labels. A branch in Witney, Oxfordshire, is understood to be one of the three locations where the tech is being trialled. A spokesperson for Sainsbury's said: "We are trialling electronic shelf-edge labels in a small number of our stores." Sainsbury's shoppers are bound to be left divided over the new electronic tags though. Fears have been raised digital labels could lead to "surge pricing", which sees prices hiked when products are more in demand. The labels can make it harder for shoppers to spot cut-price items too, as they're not as visible as the paper yellow, orange or red stickers. Sainsbury's joins a host of other supermarkets trialling electronic shelf labels in stores. Co-op is replacing paper product tags with electronic labels throughout its whole estate over the coming months. The retailer said last month it had already made the change in 340 branches but would roll out the tags more widely. SAVE AT SAINSBURY'S It said 1,500 stores will have the labels by the end of this year and rolled out across all its nearly 2,400 shops by the end of 2026. Lidl also said it would roll out the digital labels across all its stores before the end of 2024. This came after a successful trial at 35 branches. Asda is testing the digital labels at a Manchester shop. WHAT ARE ELECTRONIC PRICE LABELS Electronic pricing labels are not easy to spot and look almost identical to the traditional paper labels which have existed in stores for centuries. They feature everything a shopper would expect to see on a label such as cost, weight and unit price. The only difference is that the information is displayed on screens instead of a paper label. Usually, they are connected to a wireless network that allows for prices to be updated in real-time - instead of it being done manually by a store clerk. Supermarkets say the technology will help cut down on waste and help with efficiency in stores. OTHER SAINSBURY'S NEWS Sainsbury's exclusively revealed to The Sun last month it had closed all remaining patisserie, hot food and pizza counters. It is not clear when the pizza counters shut while is understood the patisserie and hot food counters closed in April. The closures come as part of a wide-ranging update of Sainsbury's' store estate which also saw 61 in-store cafes shut on April 11. The cafe spaces are being replaced with restaurants run by franchises such as Starbucks and Gourmet Burger Kitchen. The supermarket said its hybrid cafe and food halls were becoming popular among shoppers. Sainsbury's first announced the store overhaul in January, as it revealed 3,000 head office staff would also lose their jobs in a senior team shake-up. At the time, chief executive Simon Roberts said the changes would "ensure we continue to drive forward our momentum". .

Starmer hails Labour victory after surprise win in Hamilton byelection for Scottish parliament
Starmer hails Labour victory after surprise win in Hamilton byelection for Scottish parliament

The Guardian

time30 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Starmer hails Labour victory after surprise win in Hamilton byelection for Scottish parliament

Update: Date: 2025-06-06T07:40:06.000Z Title: Keir Starmer Content: Good morning. Assuming he was not still up at 1.36am, woke to good news this morning – Labour winning the byelection in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse for the Scottish parliament. It has gained the seat with a 7.4% swing from the SNP. This is a surprise. A week ago the SNP were press releasing a Norstat poll for the Times suggesting they were ahead by 33%, with Labour on 19% and Reform on 18%. And the bookies had the SNP in the lead too. Yesterday one firm had the SNP as firm favourites, followed by Reform, with odds of 11/1 available to anyone prepared to bet on Labour. Perhaps someone has made some good money. For the rest of us, this is a welcome reminder that opinion polls, and bookies' odds, are not always a good guide to results, particularly in byelections. Starmer was criticisised for not campaigning in Hamilton. But he did announce a big U-turn on the winter fuel payments while the campaign was taking place, and that may have helped get his candidate, Davy Russell, over the line. This morning Starmer posted this message on social media. Congratulations to @DavyRussell4HLS and the team on a fantastic victory. People in Scotland have once again voted for change. Next year there is a chance to turbo charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. I look forward to working with you. A win is a win, and this is good news for Labour. But, as the leading psephologist John Curtice has been telling the BBC this morning, the Reform UK vote is significant too. They came from nowhere to a strong third place, with 26% of the vote. The Conservatives, on 6%, only just avoided losing their deposit. Here is our overnight story by Libby Brooks, Rachel Keenan and Severin Carrell I will be posting more reaction to the result, and analysis, shortly. Here is the agenda for the day. 11am: Kemi Badenoch gives a speech where she will say she is 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw from European convention on human rights. 11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store