
How Landlords Are Trying To Stand Out In Crowded Rental Market
Renters in many parts of the country are in a prime position, as the number of rental listings they have to choose from reaches record levels.
Renting a property is taking significantly longer than in recent years and average asking prices are dropping.
Opes Partners economist Ed McKnight used data from Trade Me to determine that properties in South Taranaki are taking 35 days to rent, 23 percent longer than this time last year.
In Stratford, the 33 days it is taking to find a tenant is up 50 percent year-on-year.
Westland's 29 days is 30 percent up and Auckland's 22 days is 10 percent up. Wellington is up 5 percent and Christchurch up 31 percent.
When it came to the property type, McKnight said there was not a lot of differentiation, People were primarily searching for two and three-bedroom properties, and larger places tended to take longer to rent.
Last week, Realestate.co.nz said the rental supply on its site in April was the largest for that month in almost a decade.
Spokesperson Vanessa Williams said investors were holding on to properties, rather than selling them. Some that had been put into the Airbnb market had been brought back into long-term rentals, and some young people were living with their parents for longer or going overseas.
Propertyscouts NZ director Ryan Weir said the change in the market had happened between May and October last year, but he said property investors and landlords could use tactics in their advertising to help let properties more quickly.
'I recommend people have professional photos to make the spaces look bigger and brighter. If you are taking photos on your smartphone, there are websites out there that will sort of touch them up and enhance them to get them towards the quality of the professional photo.'
He said people should also think about the order of the photos they used.
'Have your living spaces or kitchen or outdoor area first, and then your least glamorous ones, like a laundry or a toilet or a bathroom at the back.'
A video walkthrough would also help, he said, as would being careful about the price advertised.
'I don't want to sound like a car salesperson here, but there's a little bit of psychology and strategy that takes place, so a property at $790 a week may get more clicks than the $800 a week.'
He said listings that had been live for a while could be removed and relisted to keep them among the first results on Trade Me.
Allowing pets would also help a property stand out. About two-thirds of households have pets, but only 13 percent of rentals are listed as pet friendly.
A rule change is coming that will allow landlords to charge pet bonds, so Weir said owners would have little to lose, if they acted early and allowed pets. He said people should also ask prospective tenants for feedback.
'If you are a property manager and if someone gives you some constructive criticism, you can say, 'Hey, if we can arrange that for this property, will you apply?', rather than not having that conversation. Now you're working collaboratively with them.'
His experience suggested that a ratio of between 25-35 views every time someone added a property to their Trade Me watchlist was the sweet spot.
'If that ratio goes, say, over 35, it means it might be too expensive or it's not very appealing.'
If the ratio was closer to 20 views for every one person adding it to their watchlist, it could mean the price was too low.
He said things like unaddressed maintenance, or a property that looked damp and cold would put people off. Landlords and property managers should also try to make it easy for people to view rental properties by advertising open homes.
'If you manage to get someone into your ad, and interacting with it and liking the property, it's really important to sort of remove friction… have a number of viewing times and dates set up, so they can elect to take one of those.
'Have the viewing slots ready, so interested tenants can basically act immediately, and when you're at the viewing as well and you're showing these people through, have all your bits and pieces ready to go, like your application links and things like that, so that they can take the next step.'
He recommended landlords keep an eye on the rest of the market and compare their listing to other similar properties.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Kiwiblog
21 hours ago
- Kiwiblog
Will Stuff staff get their 10%?
Stuff owner Sinead Boucher has sold 50% of Stuff Digital to Trade Me, which in turn is 100% owned by Apax Partners, a British private equity firm with around US$77 billion in assets. Good on Boucher. I have no issue with foreign investment in media companies. The discipline they may bring to Stuff Digital could be very good for them. In 2021, Stuff reported: Stuff owner and chief executive Sinead Boucher is gifting a 10 per cent share of the media firm to the company's close to 900 staff. The stake in the company will be transferred to a trust controlled by employee representatives, rather than the shares being directly owned by staff members. The arrangement means staff would receive through the trust a share of any dividends Stuff pays out, and 10 per cent of the sale proceeds if Stuff was later sold or listed, she said. This never happened, as it was later modified to happening if any shares were sold or exited. Presumably this has happened, so we will see 10% of Stuff Digital transferred to a staff trust? Radio NZ report: After Boucher bought Stuff for $1 in 2020, she told staff that a 10 percent stake of the company would be put into a staff trust in the event that the business was sold or listed. A spokesperson said that, while there was still some time until the deal was to be completed, it was Boucher's expectation that a payment would be made into the staff trust. A payment? Would it be a payment equal to one fifth of what Trade Me paid? Shouldn't it be non-voting shares of 10% of Stuff Digital, rather than a payment? After all, that is what was promised?


NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Media Insider podcast: Stuff's Trade Me deal - will staff share in chief executive Sinead Boucher's lucrative payday?; New NZME chair Steven Joyce opens up in first major interview
Steven Joyce sits down for his first major interview since becoming the chair of NZ Herald and Newstalk ZB owner NZME, and we ask Stuff owner Sinead Boucher whether her staff will also share in the rewards of this week's Trade Me deal, as previously promised. Stuff boss Sinead Boucher


The Spinoff
3 days ago
- The Spinoff
Why is Trade Me buying into Stuff? Explaining the stakes of an era-defining media deal
Two decades ago, when news organisations were global business titans able to buy fast-growing tech businesses, Stuff acquired Trade Me. This week's transaction flips the script. Yesterday was a landmark day in the history of New Zealand's news media, with each of our largest news publishers undergoing major shakeups in ownership, governance or both. Stuff Digital, the most popular free-to-access news site in the country, has a new co-owner, with auction marketplace Trade Me taking a 50% stake in the business. The timing of the announcement served to cast a lengthy shadow over a set piece that occurred a few hours later, at the headquarters of NZME, owners of the largest print newspaper and paywalled news audience in the NZ Herald. The company's annual shareholder meeting saw its chair resign, having adroitly dealt with an attempted coup and graciously fallen on her sword. She has been replaced by a former senior minister in the National Party, Steven Joyce, after a lengthy campaign from Jim Grenon, a wealthy Canadian now resident in New Zealand. The latter is now a major shareholder, who decried the business's performance, but also what he perceived as the quality and balance of its journalism. Stuff and Trade Me – star-crossed lovers and a tale of tech and news It's the deal between Stuff and Trade Me that has rightly attracted the most attention. Stuff has a tortured ownership history, resulting from the steady accumulation of dozens of newspaper titles, and the early and prescient launch of a unified national news brand under the name Stuff more than 20 years ago. At the time, it was owned by Fairfax Media, later Nine, out of Australia. It has intimate history with Trade Me, having itself bought the auctions platform in 2006 for a reported $750m. It was an adroit move from the news publisher, as news was still a vast and extremely profitable business at the time, but the challenge the internet would present to its business model was already becoming clear. In particular, classified advertisements, the small individual ads at the end of the paper known as 'rivers of gold' in the business due to the profits they delivered, were under brutal attack from the likes of Trade Me, which had successfully replicated what Ebay had accomplished in the US and Australia. By purchasing the business it had reaggregated what the internet had disaggregated. Unfortunately Fairfax was struggling with a debt load of its own, ultimately carving Trade Me off in a separate listing, and eventually exiting the business entirely in 2012. While it earned a healthy profit on those shares, the subsequent fates of both businesses tell an instructive story about the future of technology-driven businesses and digital news media – of classifieds, and the news they once subsidised, essentially. The values continued to diverge at pace. Trade Me was taken over and delisted by Apax, a private equity firm, in 2019 for around $2.5bn, while Nine panic-sold all its New Zealand assets to then NZ CEO Sinead Boucher for a nominal $1 in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. Now, five years on from that fateful transaction, Boucher has completed one of the most intriguing and provocative deals in recent media history. Stuff last year split into two distinct businesses in a clear preparation for a transaction of this nature, despite their denials. One is called Mastheads, encompassing its paywalled sites and print newspapers (like The Post and The Press), the other called Stuff Digital, comprising its free-to-access digital sites (mostly Stuff). By selling 50% of Stuff Digital to Trade Me, long-rumoured and first reported by the NZ Herald's Shayne Currie in March, it completes an astonishing 20-year turnaround, from news organisations as global business titans able to buy fast-growing technology businesses, to a moment when those same news organisations are so challenged in terms of their financial value that they can be bought by those same tech businesses simply to test a theory. Why would the classifieds buy a news organisation? In many ways this runs counter to business logic. The whole idea of breaking the classifieds away from the newspaper was that the skills and capital needed to create a tech marketplace business were very different from those needed to run a print newspaper, and the expense of journalism was unnecessary and onerous when internet audiences could access what they needed to buy and sell without the expense of buying an issue of a newspaper. However, we are now operating in a different era. Trade Me is now a private company, so not required to release public data or financials. However, it has faced increasing competition in recent years, with NZME's property portal OneRoof gaining ground on Trade Me Property, while Facebook Marketplace, with its free listings, has chewed into its secondhand goods and vehicles markets. (It's instructive that Nine is currently assessing a giant bid for its property portal, Domain, while Bowen Pan, the New Zealander behind Facebook Marketplace, just yesterday joined the NZME board). Yesterday's press release contained only fairly glib statements from Boucher and Anders Skoe, Trade Me's chief executive, with the only concrete announcement being a rebrand of Stuff's fairly anaemic property section, Homed, to Trade Me Property. The potential synergies, however, are obvious and tantalising. Trade Me has what is likely the best and most powerful database of New Zealanders and their spending habits outside of Google's parent company Alphabet and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram. It is also a very mature business now, with a limit to plausible growth aspirations under its own steam. If it were able to thread what it knows of its users through Stuff, Trade Me should be able to markedly increase the value of Stuff to all advertisers – including, but not limited to, its own sellers – while also diverting some of Stuff's vast audience (which represents over half of all New Zealanders in any given month) toward the myriad verticals on its platform. Will it work? It's a very challenging idea, and one that runs counter to some firmly laid assumptions of the internet. It's telling that both Nine, with its separate ASX listing for Domain, and NZME, which is testing doing the same for OneRoof, are moving in the opposite direction. And yet it is also a thesis worth testing, especially given that Trade Me likely paid very little for its share of Stuff Digital (terms have not been disclosed), particularly compared to the relative historic value of each business. That gets at the almost existential question underlying the transaction. Stuff is a journalism business, one that still employs many of the industry's best and brightest. Will its new part owners have the stomach to publish bold, challenging public interest journalism? Or will the incentives ultimately gravitationally pull it towards publishing quirky real estate stories, rave reviews of new EVs and explainers about the environmental benefits of buying used furniture? The answer to these questions will become clearer in the months and years to come. But it also promises to test a different paradox: news still commands vast attention online, yet perennially struggles to monetise that attention. This deal is testing the thesis that you can turn the vast audiences news generates into something far more valuable through a more intimate commercial relationship than display advertising. It's a provocative idea, one with many opportunities to fail, from culture to costs. But if they're right, it could open up a whole new operating model for news. One with a curious resemblance to the old one.