Japan, US to hold joint patrol after sexual assault cases involving US servicemen
The United States has around 54,000 military personnel in Japan, mostly in Okinawa in the south, and their behavior has long angered locals.
The one-off joint operation through busy areas until the early hours of the next day was proposed by the US side.
'The joint patrol will be held on the night of April 18, and it is perhaps the first such joint event since 1973,' an official in Okinawa prefecture told AFP.
Okinawa governor Denny Tamaki may participate, the official added.
The patrol reflects 'our continued commitment to partnership, accountability, and mutual respect', said Roger Turner, commanding general of III Marine Expeditionary Force and Okinawa Area Coordinator.
'By working side-by-side with our Japanese counterparts, we are reinforcing shared standards and contributing to the safety and trust that are essential to the strength of the US-Japan alliance,' he said in a statement.
Rules about how to treat crimes committed by US military personnel are stipulated in the Japan-US Status of Forces Agreement.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said when he took office in October that he wanted to review them.
The 1995 gang rape of a 12-year-old girl by three US soldiers in Okinawa prompted a major backlash, with calls for a rethink of the 1960 pact allowing the United States to station soldiers in Japan.
In March last year, prosecutors in Okinawa charged a 25-year-old US soldier for alleged assaulting a girl under 16 years old, according to local media and the top government spokesman.
And days after that case emerged in June, another came to light that a 21-year-old US Marine Corps member had been charged with rape.
The joint patrol also comes as Tokyo and Washington continue efforts to strengthen their alliance partly in response to China's military build-up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump offers assurances that US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Tuesday offered his assurances that US troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia after seeming to leave open the possibility the day before. Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining NATO and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible.' The Republican president, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Zelensky. Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Putin was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked Tuesday on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends' what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Trump said, 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later on Tuesday emphasized that 'US boots will not be on the ground' as part of any potential peacekeeping mission. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the NATO military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Trump said. Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. Trump on Monday said that he was arranging for direct talks between Putin and Zelensky. But the Kremlin has not yet said whether Putin, who has resisted previous calls by Trump and others for direct negotiations on ending the war, is committed to a face-to-face meeting with the Ukrainian leader. Asked whether Putin has promised Trump that he'll meet directly with the Ukrainian leader, Leavitt responded affirmatively. 'He has,' Leavitt said of Putin. Trump early on Monday during talks with Zelensky and European leaders said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Zelensky, Putin and himself. But after speaking to Putin later in the day, Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Zelensky and Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. 'It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday,' Leavitt explained. Trump said he believed Putin's course of action would become clear in the coming weeks. 'I think Putin is tired of it,' Trump said. 'I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks. That I can tell you.'
Leaders
8 hours ago
- Leaders
Iran Says Calm with Israel is ‘Temporary,' Conflict Could Resume Anytime
Iran's First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref warned on Monday that war with Israel could break out at any moment, underscoring that the current calm following June's 12-day conflict was merely a temporary pause, according to AFP. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation; right now, we are not even in a ceasefire (agreement); we are in a cessation of hostilities,' Aref said. On June 13, Israel launched a wave of airstrikes on Iran under the name of Operation Rising Lion. The military campaign targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists. As a response, Iran launched a retaliatory wave of missiles against Israel and targeted Tel Aviv. The US became directly involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran on June 22 after launching airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. On June 24, the US announced a halt in fighting with no formal ceasefire agreement. 'We are not in a ceasefire now, we are in a war phase, it could break down at any time, there is no protocol, no regulations, no agreement between us and the Israelis, between us and the Americans,' Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, told Iranian media. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have maintained that Tehran does not seek war but emphasized that it remains fully prepared for any renewed confrontation. Related Topics: Iran to Maintain IAEA Negotiations after Curbing Access China Rejects European Sanctions over Iran's Nuclear Program IAEA Official to Visit Iran to Restore Ties but No Inspections Planned Short link : Post Views: 37
Leaders
8 hours ago
- Leaders
Israel Weighs Hamas Response to Gaza Ceasefire Proposal
Israel is currently reviewing Hamas' response to a Gaza ceasefire proposal, signaling a potential breakthrough in efforts to de-escalate the conflict that could lead to a 60-day truce and the release of half the Israeli hostages held in the embattled enclave. International mediators have intensified their efforts to restart indirect talks, especially after Israel announced plans for a new offensive in Gaza City. Egypt and Qatar are actively pushing for a US-backed ceasefire plan, aiming to bring an end to the prolonged hostilities. The proposal outlines a significant prisoner exchange: 200 Palestinian convicts, including women and minors, jailed in Israel would be released, with Hamas releasing 10 living and 18 deceased Israeli hostages from Gaza. Hamas has also requested the release of hundreds of Gaza detainees, according to Egyptian security sources, in a comprehensive exchange that aims to address humanitarian concerns on both sides. The agreement also includes a partial withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, where they currently control 75% of the territory to facilitate the entry of more humanitarian aid into the enclave. The 2.2 million residents of Gaza face increasing famine, making humanitarian access a critical component of any ceasefire. Qatar's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson, Majed Al Ansari, emphasized that the 60-day truce could establish a clear pathway to a comprehensive agreement, ultimately ending the war. Hopes and Skepticism on the Ground Israel had previously agreed to the general framework of this proposal, which US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff advanced. However, earlier negotiations stalled over specific details, with the last round ending in deadlock in late July. Displaced individuals in a Khan Younis shelter expressed mixed feelings about the current prospects, with many residents, cooking meals and fetching water, earnestly hope Israel approves the proposal. Despite ceasefire discussions, the conflict continues as Israeli gunfire, tank shelling, and airstrikes killed at least 20 Palestinians on Tuesday, according to Gaza health officials. Israeli forces have taken control of Zeitoun, an eastern neighborhood on Gaza City's outskirts, and continue to pound the nearby Sabra area. Medics reported two women and a man killed in Sabra. Local health authorities stated dozens of people were trapped in their homes due to shelling. The Israeli military is currently checking these reports. Nasra Ali, a 54-year-old mother of five from Sabra, described the nights as one of the worst, with explosions heard throughout the city. She considered leaving if a ceasefire materialized but might stay if nothing happens. Political Pressure and Future Prospects In Israel, the threatened offensive prompted large protests, with thousands urging a deal to end fighting and free hostages. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to discuss the ceasefire proposal soon. A Palestinian source close to the talks anticipates a response within two days. Netanyahu faces domestic pressure from far-right partners, Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, who demand continued war until Hamas's defeat and Gaza's annexation. Hamas official Izzat El-Reshiq stated the agreed truce is an interim accord, paving the way for negotiations to end the war. Unlike previous rounds, Hamas accepted the proposal without further demands. However, significant gaps remain, particularly Israel's demand for Hamas to disarm and its leaders to leave Gaza, conditions Hamas publicly rejects. The war began with Hamas's attack, killing 1,200 and taking 251 hostages. Israel's offensive has since killed over 62,000 Palestinians, causing a humanitarian crisis and displacing most of Gaza's population. Short link :
