logo
Daylight saving time in Wisconsin would end under bipartisan bill in state Legislature

Daylight saving time in Wisconsin would end under bipartisan bill in state Legislature

Yahoo30-03-2025

Among the legislation introduced in the state Capitol in March addresses a topic that sees yearly debate every fall and spring — doing away with daylight savings.
The bill would end daylight saving time in Wisconsin and establish a consistent standard time throughout the year. Federal law allows states that sit entirely in one time zone, like Wisconsin, to forego daylight saving if it's a statewide policy.
So far, 14 lawmakers from both parties have signed up in support of the bill. While introduced by Republicans, supporters include one of the Legislature's most liberal members, Sen. Chris Larson, D-Milwaukee.
The bill authors — Rep. Nate Gustafson, R-Fox Crossing, and Sen. Rachael Cabral-Guevara, R-Appleton — cited research that daylight saving affects mental health and productivity, increases workplace injuries and traffic accidents, and is especially difficult for kids in school.
State lawmakers have debated doing away with daylight saving time before, but it's never changed. In 1999, 2001 and 2003, lawmakers wrote resolutions encouraging Congress to make daylight saving time permanent. Some received public hearings but never passed.
President Donald Trump has also pushed to end daylight savings. If the bill gets signed into law — a long and difficult process in the Legislature — Wisconsin would join Hawaii and Arizona in no longer observing daylight savings. Several states have seen similar efforts to end the practice.
Here's a roundup of other interesting bills lawmakers circulated in March, seeking support from their colleagues. None have received a public hearing or committee votes so far, some of the first steps toward becoming law.
This bill would create tax credits to encourage video game production in Wisconsin. Employers are interested in leaving California, lawmakers say, and Wisconsin has an opportunity to attract them and create high-paying jobs. Wisconsin is already home to a handful of video game studios, including Raven Software in Middleton.
Similar tax credits have been pitched for filmmakers in Wisconsin, including in Evers' budget proposal. But those bipartisan bills didn't go far in previous sessions, and there was no public hearing for them in 2024. The video game tax credits could see the same outcome.
Supporters: Rep. Clint Moses, R-Menomonie; Sen. Patrick Testin, R-Stevens Point
More: Milwaukee has seen a boost in tourism from 'Top Chef' fans
Wisconsin courtrooms face a backlog of cases, including divorces and legal separations. After resolving all steps to dissolve a marriage, parties must appear in court for a final hearing — a "formality that can be stressful and time-consuming," the authors argue.
The bill allows a signed affidavit instead, if the parties are represented by attorneys or working with an attorney mediator. Some counties used affidavits temporarily during the pandemic with "positive feedback," lawmakers say.
The bill doesn't change the legal process for divorce, including the 120-day waiting period and six-month remarriage timeline.
Supporters: Rep. Ron Tusler, R-Harrison; Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto
More: Milwaukee County has a backlog of court cases. A shortage of court reporters isn't helping.
Democrats reintroduced a resolution to declare an Economic Justice Bill of Rights, which includes a job that pays a living wage, adequately funded public education, affordable child care, unions and collective bargaining, accessible health care and a sustainable environment.
The resolution is almost certain not to gain Republican support — it's been introduced in 2021 and 2023 and didn't advance. Democrats said they put forward the resolution this year "as a reaffirmation of our commitment to these rights" while working on policy in 2025.
Supporters: Reps. Francesca Hong, D-Madison; Angelito Tenorio, D-West Allis; Ryan Clancy, D-Milwaukee; Angelina Cruz, D-Racine; Darrin Madison, D-Milwaukee; Christian Phelps, D-Eau Claire; Robyn Vining, D-Wauwatosa; Sens. Chris Larson, D-Milwaukee; Jeff Smith, D-Brunswick
Lawmakers circulated a package of bills aimed at staffing shortages and funding issues affecting emergency medical services providers across Wisconsin. One bill would allow flexibilities for municipalities that choose to work together or consolidate their EMS services.
Another provides tuition reimbursement for the cost of initial EMS education through the Wisconsin Technical College System. A third bill creates a pilot program for Live911, which lets dispatchers talk to callers via video. Republicans say they intend to include funding for both in the state budget.
Evers also pitched solutions to EMS challenges in his budget, including making it easier for first responders with post-traumatic stress disorder to access worker's compensation, an idea Republicans also support.
Supporters: Reps. Tony Kurtz, R-Wonewoc; Todd Novak, R-Dodgeville; Rob Summerfield, R-Bloomer; Nate Gustafson, R-Fox Crossing; Shannon Zimmerman, R-River Falls; David Armstrong, R-Rice Lake, Sens. Howard Marklein, R-Spring Green; Jesse James, R-Thorp; Andre Jacque, R-New Franken
More: Rising 9-1-1 call loads, recruitment struggles put Wisconsin fire and EMS agencies on shaky ground, new report says
This bill would require restaurants who advertise maple syrup on their menu to serve real maple syrup with the meal, instead of an imitation product. There are no penalties if restaurants don't comply.
The bill is intended to support the maple syrup industry in Wisconsin, which produced nearly half a million gallons in 2024.
In 2023, the same bill got a public hearing but never made it to a vote. Similar "truth-in-labeling" bills, like one that would prohibit plant-based beverages from being marketed as milk, have not made it to the governor.
Wisconsin does have a longstanding law that says restaurants can't substitute margarine for real butter unless the customer asks for it. There are potential fines and jail time, but the law isn't enforced in practice.
Supporters: Rep. Tara Johnson, D-Town of Shelby; Sen. Kelda Roys, D-Madison
This bipartisan bill would designate and mark a stretch of U.S. 12 in Lake Delton as the 'Tom Diehl Memorial Highway.' Diehl, who died last year, was the president and co-owner of the Tommy Bartlett waterskiing show. He also served on Lake Delton's village board.
"Though Tom has departed from us, his unparalleled influence in building the entertainment community and shaping Wisconsin Dells into the tourism landmark it is today will never be forgotten," lawmakers wrote in a memo seeking support.
Other bills naming highways after Wisconsin figures have had success in the Capitol. Evers approved naming 'Corporal Benjamin H. Neal Memorial Highway" in honor of a Orfordville native who died while serving in Afghanistan. Green Bay's Walnut Street Bridge was renamed in honor of Packers legend Bart Starr.
Evers vetoed a 2019 bill that would have established criteria for bills seeing to rename a highway or bridge, objecting to "limiting the ability to commemorate those who have made significant contributions to or sacrifices for the people of Wisconsin."
Supporters: Rep. Tony Kurtz, R-Wonewoc; Sen. Sarah Keyeski, D-Lodi
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Daylight saving time would end under bipartisan bill in Wisconsin

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."

Impeachment wars
Impeachment wars

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

Impeachment wars

Rep. Jasmine Crockett's mere mention of a possible impeachment inquiry into President Trump has touched off negative reactions from some colleagues. "I think she's going to turn off a lot more people than gain," a House Democrat told us. Why it matters: House Democratic leaders are staying neutral. But many Democrats are allergic to the word after they impeached Trump twice only for him to return to power with full control of the government. Crockett (D-Texas), asked in a local news interview if she would pursue impeachment if Democrats retook the House in 2026 and she became Oversight Committee chair, said she would "absolutely at least do an inquiry." The other three candidates for the ranking member job on Oversight, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), told us they wouldn't go that far. 👿 "Turning this ranker race into a proxy for impeachment is unhelpful and unfair to her colleagues," said a House Democrat who predicted Republicans will "try to motivate their base by saying that a Democratic majority will inevitably lead to impeachment." Crockett told us the term "impeachment inquiry" would stress to the public the "next level of gravity" of the subject matter — such as Trump's pardons for big money allies and the Qatari jet scandal. "A lot of times we as Democrats can overthink stuff," Crockett said. "A lot of people ... felt like [Oversight Committee chair] James Comer was an embarrassment. But at the end of the day, who won the House?" The bottom line: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deferred to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), whose panel, he said, "has jurisdiction over impeachment."

US energy loan office should fund oil, gas, White House aide says
US energy loan office should fund oil, gas, White House aide says

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US energy loan office should fund oil, gas, White House aide says

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Energy Department's loan office should fund oil and gas infrastructure, a White House aide said on Tuesday. "One of the big problems is, in the past the ... loan program office has been used for a lot of these renewable projects," Jarrod Agen, a deputy assistant to the president and executive director of the National Energy Dominance Council, said at a Politico conference on energy. The Loan Programs Office grew rapidly under former President Joe Biden, thanks to legislation passed during his term, and has hundreds of billions of dollars in loan and loan guarantee capacity. Agen said the administration is changing the priority of the LPO, which is meant to help finance emerging energy projects that show promise but face difficulties getting bank loans. "So, yes, we want to invest more and prioritize projects that are oil and gas-related, nuclear-related," Agen said. President Donald Trump's new energy dominance council has focused on increasing already record-high oil and gas output and cutting climate and pollution regulations on fossil fuels. In his first term, Trump only used the LPO to finance the Vogtle nuclear plant in Georgia. The Trump administration wants to offer tens of billions of dollars in LPO financing over the next two years to projects developing nuclear and geothermal power and minerals used in everything from wind and solar power to weapons systems, according to the White House budget for fiscal 2026. Republicans in the House have pushed to slash LPO's lending. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store