Outraged CEO shows Daily Mail the hellish truth about downtown Cincinnati in wake of man-on-woman brawl that shocked America
Victor Louis, founder and CEO of local firm One Logistics Network, took the Mail on a grim tour of the beleaguered city on Monday. He said Cincinnati's woke leaders were entirely to blame for its demise.
The city has been thrust into the national spotlight following the mass brawl that erupted, with a man and a woman being violently assaulted during a fight that saw the woman beaten black and blue by a man.
Further outrage ensued when Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge - who is being sued for alleged anti-white racism - scolded journalists for taking the viral clips 'out of context'
Louis told Daily Mail that the brawl was the straw that broke the camel's back for his company after he and his staffers witnessed escalating violence and horror.
He said that: 'Had [the brawl] not happened, I don't know if anybody would believe what's been going on. In one sense it is an isolated incident but things have led up to this.'
Cincinnati is home to eight Fortune 500 headquarters - but during rush hour on Monday morning its streets were near-desolate.
And the people that Daily Mail did see paint a clear picture of why Louis and others are so angry.
Just a few hundred feet from the grandiose and historic City Hall a young woman, around 20-years-old, was seen injecting herself with with a syringe.
Next to her, a mans arm gushed with blood, having also just shot up in Cincinnati's downtown - with no consequences. The brazen display was not a surprise for Louis.
'That's in broad daylight, right by City Hall. Literally someone can look out their window and see this, and nothing is being done', he told the Daily Mail.
'If you can't fix that, why do you think crime circulates. And that was right in front of us, there is no hiding, that girl was also very young.'
He continued: 'Nobody is walking the beat, those people are camped out there. That was blatant, and they aren't even hiding it.'
Other Cincinnati vagrants were seen smoking from glass pipes commonly used to get high on crack, meth or fentanyl.
In one particularly jarring moment, a woman sat on a park bench injected herself with drugs in full view of churchgoers gathering outside their house of worship for a service.
Louis had issued a letter to local leaders last week after the viral clip of the brawl made headlines, saying he was officially done with the downtown district - and was moving his business, which employs 35 people, to the suburbs.
'It's been issue after issue', he added. Louis said his employees no longer feel safe working in the area, adding that: 'They don't want to come down to work here here anymore'.
The most recent sight to sicken Louis was that of a homeless person who yanked down their pants on a sidewalk near his office to defecate.
Others regularly tote weapons while strutting around streets which were once home to bustling shops, offices, restaurants and bars.
The 39-year-old added: 'The city doesn't control violent crime, and they can't maintain litter, and they can't maintain vagrancy. Guess what? Those things just run rampant. And that's what we are seeing around the city.
'When you can't fix these problems like littering and drug abuse, you're not going to be able to fix violent crime. Why ask people to play chess when they can't even play checkers?'
Just last week a woman was shot in the neck and leg in the Over the Rhine neighborhood in the early hours of Wednesday morning.
Before that, hundreds of youths had swamped a 4th of July celebration and burned a police officer with a firework.
Louis also mentioned the killing of fellow Cincinnati business owner Patrick Heringer.
He was murdered in his own home in the city in June, while protecting his family from an intruder who stabbed him multiple times.
Mordecia Black, 38, was indicted in his death and other charges including aggravated burglary and felonious assault.
It later emerged that Black was a convicted felon and had cut his ankle monitor off earlier this year before vanishing from a halfway house. He had managed to evade police for months before allegedly killing Heringer.
In an open letter Louis wrote last week, he added: 'A consistent decline in the conditions for doing business in the city over the past several years has made our continued presence untenable,' he wrote.
'My employees have concerns about their safety and do not feel valued for their contributions to the city.'
Louis is not alone in his concerns. The Cincinnati Restaurant Industry clubbed together to issue their own statement on the brawl and the spat of other issues facing the area.
They said: 'The video circulating from that night is disturbing, and like many in this city, we are calling for accountability and decisive action.
'Our businesses represent thousands of employees and serve tens of thousands of guests each week.
'We've invested heavily in this city - not just financially, but with our time, presence and long-term commitment to Cincinnati's success.
'But we cannot carry this alone. We need clear, proactive, and correctives measures from our city leadership. This is not a moment for vague promises or delayed responses.
'Our community is asking for a real plan, one that addresses this incident and the broader safety concerns that have been raised for months.'
On Friday, Mayor Aftab Pureval said that he would be increasing law enforcement patrols in the city. On Monday the Mail didn't see any police presence in the downtown area, where open drug abuse was the order of the day.
Pureval added: 'There is no place for violent crime in Cincinnati, whether it's a fight or gun violence.
'We will pursue those responsible and we will hold them accountable no matter who they are.'
In her first remarks since the assault, Holly, who is still severely bruised, said it has left her with trauma to the brain.
In an emotional message, she said: 'I want to say thank you to everyone for all of the love and support.
'It's definitely what's keeping me going. And you have just brought back faith in humanity.
'It's been very, very hard, and I'm still recovering. I still have a very bad brain trauma. God bless you all. Thank you.'
Political commentator Benny Johnson shared the video to his X profile after he organized an online fundraiser for her, which has already raised $168,000.
According to the page Holly is a single working-class mother and is out of work due to her injuries as well as living in an undisclosed location due to threats on her life.
The update from Holly comes after a fourth person was arrested in connection with the fight.
Dominique Kittle, 37, was taken into police custody on Friday night and was charged with felonious assault and aggravated riot, his bond was set at $150,000.
He appeared in court on Saturday where his lawyer told the judge that suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, according to WLWT.
Jermaine Matthews, 39, Montianez Merriweather, 34, and Dekyra Vernon, 24, were taken into custody earlier this week after the ordeal, which JD Vance waded in on.
Matthew and Merriweather were initially charged with aggravated riot and assault over the brawl.
New footage has also emerged showing the moments leading up to the attack, with one of the men who police said was a victim using racial slurs.
The video, obtained by The Enquirer, shows the unknown individual say: 'Get him! Get that little n*****.'
Two black men appeared to try and talk to the man to calm him down before the brawl starts. Matthews' attorney Brandon Fox released the video.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Little League begs fans to stop betting on World Series games involving children
Little League has implored fans to stop betting on games involving children and issued a plea on social media as its World Series gets underway. 'While Little League® International continues to monitor the complexity and ever-evolving world of sports betting, we feel strongly that there is no place for betting on Little League games or on any youth sports competition,' league officials said. 'Little League is a trusted place where children are learning the fundamentals of the games and all the important life lessons that come with having fun, celebrating teamwork, and playing with integrity, and no one should be exploiting the success and failures of children playing the game they love for their own personal gain,' the statement concluded. The 2025 Little League World Series is currently underway and is held annually in South Williamsport, Pennsylvania. It features 20 baseball teams, 10 from the United States and 10 international squads, with many games televised regionally and nationally. The participants are between 10 and 12 years old. Major sportsbooks steer clear of taking bets on youth tournaments as states ban markets where most athletes are under 18. However, unregulated overseas operators continue to take bets. These sportsbooks are untaxed and offer no consumer protections. The brand manager of one such site, in its fourth year offering LLWS odds, told the Patch it anticipates more wagers on these games than on any professional tennis or soccer match over the next two weeks. an offshore gambling site based in Panama, remains one of the most visible operators allowing such bets. It is unlicensed in the U.S. and has faced repeated legal challenges, including cease-and-desist orders from state officials, but continues to offer bets markets regardless. Since a 2018 Supreme Court ruling allowed states to legalize sports betting, ads have surged, and major leagues such as MLB, NFL and NBA have partnered with gambling companies. The 2025 Little League World Series has already made headlines after a former security worker at its headquarters was charged with multiple counts of terroristic threats and harassment after allegedly threatening a 'mass casualty event.'
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New York rocked by 'explosion' as black smoke chokes Manhattan neighborhood
An explosion has rocked Manhattan's Upper East Side and sent plumes of smoke into the skies over New York City. The large fire occurred Friday morning around 10am near 95st and 7th Avenue. It is unclear what caused the explosion. Daily Mail has contacted the NYPD for more information. This is a developing story and will be updated as information is confirmed.
Times
16 minutes ago
- Times
Giving critics the cold shoulder does CEOs no favours
Few things, in financial news, make better copy than a good row between the chief executive of a quoted company and the analysts paid to follow that company's fortunes. Plenty of well-known chief executives have become embroiled in such rows. One of the most famous came during a Tesla earnings call in May 2018 when Elon Musk interrupted Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst at Bernstein Research, who had the temerity to ask about the company's capital spending. 'Excuse me. Next,' said Musk. 'Next. Boring bonehead questions are not cool. Next?' Joe Spak of RBC Capital Markets, who followed, received a similarly hostile reply to a question about margins: 'Sorry, these questions are so dry. They're killing me.' More notorious still was the occasion in April 2001 when Jeff Skilling, chief executive of Enron, was asked by Richard Grubman, a fund manager at Highfields Capital Management, why the energy company had not supplied a cash flow statement. 'Well, thank you very much, we appreciate that. Asshole,' Skilling replied. Enron filed for bankruptcy eight months later and Skilling was sentenced to 24 years in prison, later reduced on appeal. There have also been some entertaining bust-ups with analysts on this side of the Atlantic, none more so than in August 2005, when James Eden, of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, asked Sir George Mathewson, chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland, why he thought the bank's shares were so cheap. • The Tesla leaks: what it's really like to work for Elon Musk Asked what he meant, Eden replied: 'There's a perception amongst some investors that [the RBS chief executive] Fred Goodwin's a megalomaniac.' Sir George was recorded as replying, under his breath: 'Shoot him.' Some chief executives try to get around this testiness by speaking only to selected analysts. Netflix raised eyebrows when, eight years ago, it dispensed with open question and answer sessions with sell-side analysts and instead began hosting pre-recorded video interviews with just one analyst. More recently it has taken to collecting 'questions from the analyst community' which are then put to the management by the company's head of investor relations. Similarly, Autonomy, the former FTSE 100 software company, was accused in 2009 of preventing critical analysts from asking questions on earnings calls. The irony is that, according to research recently published in the United States, companies and their chief executives are better off taking on their critics. Jared Flake, assistant professor of accounting at Boise State University in Idaho, analysed 101,225 earnings calls and measured the outcomes of interactions between company managers and analysts regarded as 'unfavourable' — which he defined as 'those who either have an outstanding sell recommendation or have recently downgraded their recommendation'. He found that when a manager answered a question at length from an unfavourable analyst, that analyst was 40 per cent more likely to upgrade their rating of the company's stock than the average unfavourable analyst who did not ask a question. Flake adds: 'I find stronger stock price reactions to forecasts issued by managers who regularly interact with unfavourable analysts.' • Ian King: Substack reels in star investors as media rivals feel the pinch The length of the answer is crucial, though, as it points to an executive giving a considered answer. He found that where a chief executive gave a 'non-answer' such as 'We do not provide this disclosure', or 'I can't give you any specifics', the analyst was 11 per cent less likely to upgrade their rating than the average unfavourable analyst who received a proper answer. Flake says: 'High quality answers, as proxied for by length, further increase analysts' tendency to upgrade … The results suggest that analysts' upward revisions result from not only the opportunity to ask questions, but also from managers' responses.' Although interacting with unfavourable analysts does enhance a chief executive's credibility, not all those taking part in earnings calls will do so, particularly when they have discretion over how much time they allow for questions and the order in which questioners are invited to speak. Unsurprisingly, Flake found that company executives were more likely to interact with unfavourable analysts when compelled to do so, for example after recently disclosing bad news or when a highly rated analyst covering the company was poorly disposed towards it. Yet there are also incentives other than the share price reaction to engage with critics. Flake cites evidence that managers give greater priority to negative questions when they face higher competition, so as to highlight uncertainty and deter rivals. There is also evidence that chief executives allow more critical questions, for similar reasons, to raise their bargaining power during union negotiations. Good chief executives, Flake suggests, will also welcome the extra scrutiny from interacting more with critics because it sets them apart from peers. There may be lessons here for the wider financial services industry. Robert Fullerton, senior research analyst at the wealth manager Hawksmoor Investment Management, observed last week, discussing Flake's research, that it was noticeable how fund managers approached him and his colleagues differently 'if for example the fund has not performed well or something isn't working'. He added: 'The CEO/analyst interaction research suggests this and similar issues are best addressed openly, with some short-term pain paying off in the long run and a better outcome for everyone.' Quite. When the euro replaced legacy currencies, the distinguished financial commentator Christopher Fildes launched his Negroni Index, a way of measuring purchasing power parity. His benchmark was that the cocktail should cost the equivalent of 3,000 old Italian lira to the pound and he noted with pleasure in 2001, when sterling was riding high against the euro, that he could buy three for £10. Fildes's index came to mind during a recent family holiday in Croatia which, since the last visit three years ago, has adopted the euro. In August 2022 a supermarket bottle of Plavac, a popular local red wine, could be obtained for 39 old Croatian kuna — about £4.30 back then. That same bottle now goes for around €10 (about £8.60). Since sterling is only about 2 per cent lower against the euro since August 2022, the conclusion must be that joining the single currency has proved inflationary for Croatia. Either that, or the wine has got better.
