First-quarter US earnings outlook looks less rosy with tariff worries in focus
By Caroline Valetkevitch
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Analysts are turning more cautious on U.S. corporate earnings for the first quarter of this year, with the Trump administration's policies threatening to trigger a global trade war that could undermine economic growth.
Apple, Tesla and Ford Motor are among companies contributing the most to recently lowered estimates for the quarter, along with some insurers, whose projections have been hurt by fires in California early this year, according to Tajinder Dhillon, senior research analyst at LSEG.
S&P 500 forecasts for the first quarter of 2025 have fallen by 4.5 percentage points since January 1, the largest downward revision since the fourth quarter of 2023, he said.
Earnings growth for S&P 500 companies is now seen at 7.7% year-over-year, which would be the lowest since 2023's third quarter and a big decline from 17.1% in the fourth quarter of 2024, based on Friday's LSEG data.
While a handful of companies have already reported on the quarter, the unofficial start of the first-quarter season is still weeks away.
"You know there's this negative bias out there. You just don't know to what degree," said Michael O'Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading in Stamford, Connecticut.
Earnings estimates typically decline in the weeks ahead of a new reporting period as companies guide more conservatively, but the majority of companies often go on to beat those lowered expectations.
Fears that import tariffs and retaliation by U.S. trade partners, along with government cutbacks under President Donald Trump in the first months of his second term, might push the economy into recession have increased in recent weeks.
On March 13, the S&P 500 confirmed it is in a correction by ending down more than 10% from its February 19 record high close.
"A lot of people are worried about things like tariffs ... Really, it's a broad economic slowdown that is the one thing that would be very difficult for companies to contend with," said Sameer Samana, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.
Some investors have hoped that first-quarter earnings could provide a catalyst for gains in the market after the sharp selloff. The S&P 500 is still trading at a multiple of 21 times forward earnings, compared with a 10-year average price-to-earnings ratio of about 18, based on LSEG data.
Apple on January 30 reported earnings for the quarter ended December 28 that beat analysts' expectations, but iPhone sales and China revenue for the holiday quarter were weak because of competition in China and a slow rollout of artificial intelligence features.
On Thursday, the Information reported, citing sources, that Apple is losing more than $1 billion a year on its streaming service Apple TV+.
Tesla sales fell in Scandinavia and France in February from a year ago, according to registration data, as the company faced a brand loyalty test amid CEO Elon Musk's role in the Trump administration's push to cut federal spending.
Even after a nearly 40% drop in Tesla shares since the start of the year, the stock is trading at more than 80 times forward earnings expectations.
Tesla's earnings per share estimate for the March quarter is down to 47 cents from 70 cents in late January, based on LSEG data.
Ford in February projected up to $5.5 billion in losses on its electric vehicle and software operations this year.
Automakers have been in focus, with the White House saying earlier this month that Trump will exempt them from his punishing 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico for one month.
Some analysts see the California wildfires in January as among the costliest natural disasters for insurers. Travelers Companies said in February that it sees $1.7 billion of pre-tax catastrophe losses from the wildfires.
In the airline industry, shares tumbled recently as Delta Air Lines and others sharply cut earnings forecasts, citing uncertainty about consumer spending.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
27 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
The Week That Was, June 1 to June 7, 2025: RBI cuts repo rate by 50 bps, BEL secures Rs 2,323 crore order, Musk-Trump feud escalates, Coal India signs MoU for rail infra
In a week marked by major policy announcements, strategic deals, and sectoral movements, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) took centre stage by delivering a surprise 50 basis points rate cut on June 6, bringing the repo rate down to 5.50%. This marked the third straight reduction in 2025, totaling a 100 bps cut to support growth amid global uncertainty. RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra signaled continued comfort with inflation, lowering the CPI forecast for FY26 to 3.7% from 4% and retaining GDP growth expectations at 6.5% for the year. In a liquidity-boosting move, the central bank also slashed the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) by 100 bps to 3%, to be implemented in four tranches between September and November, unlocking ₹2.5 lakh crore into the banking system. Further, the RBI raised the loan-to-value (LTV) cap for small gold loans up to ₹2.5 lakh from 75% to 85%, a move that significantly benefited gold financing stocks. Among corporate highlights, the RBI gave a clean regulatory signal to IndusInd Bank, affirming its accounting standards, which pushed its shares up by over 5%. Infrastructure firm Ashoka Buildcon, however, faced a setback as its ₹1,673 crore project under CIDCO's NAINA initiative encountered execution hurdles. In the energy and defense sectors, Coal India signed a key MoU with Indian Port Rail & Ropeway Corporation to develop rail infrastructure, while GRSE expanded its global presence by signing MoUs in Sweden and Denmark for cruise vessel and marine propulsion collaboration. Similarly, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) secured orders worth ₹2,323 crore from MDL and GRSE, strengthening its defense manufacturing portfolio. JSW Energy exited Beempow Energy for ₹302.66 crore, completing a strategic realignment, and RailTel bagged a ₹274 crore ITMS project in Maharashtra's Vidarbha Circle, aimed at enhancing road safety across blackspots and accident-prone zones. Meanwhile, KEC International won ₹2,211 crore worth of new orders across international T&D, pipelines, and cable supply businesses, reinforcing its infrastructure footprint in the Middle East and Africa. In the equity markets, Gravita India surged 4% on expectations of a government-backed critical mineral recycling scheme. Tata Investment gained 8% on reports of Tata Capital's impending IPO, while shares of ICICI Lombard and Go Digit also moved higher as the government weighed a 25% hike in third-party motor insurance premiums. Lastly, global cues remained mixed. While Asian markets were relatively steady, U.S. indices such as Nasdaq and S&P 500 dipped amid fresh tariff tensions and a high-profile online spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump—an episode that dented Tesla's valuation and contributed to market volatility. Overall, the week was dominated by aggressive monetary easing, strong defense-industry momentum, and corporate actions that may shape the economic narrative for the weeks ahead. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Who will be Trump's new Silicon Valley bestie?
Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms founder and CEO Zuckerberg was something of a MAGA stan earlier this year. Meta, his company, dropped $1 million on Trump's inauguration, and Zuck even co-hosted a black-tie soirée that night to honor the second-time president. Now, with Meta in the throes of a federal antitrust lawsuit, Zuckerberg may not be on Trump's good side. But the Meta CEO could be playing the long game here: He snapped up a $23 million, 15,000 square-foot DC mega mansion, establishing more of a presence in the capital. Zuck has also been on a bit of a rebrand journey, from a hoodie-wearing founder to a gold chain-wearing CEO with unapologetic swagger. Part of this transformation has included podcast appearances, like an episode with Trump-endorsing Joe Rogan in which Zuck talked about his "masculine energy" and his proclivity for bowhunting. Sam Altman, OpenAI cofounder and CEO Altman has also been circling the throne. First came Stargate: the $100 billion AI infrastructure plan between OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, announced the day after Trump's inauguration. Then, in May, the OpenAI CEO joined Trump on a trip to Saudi Arabia while Altman was working on a massive deal to build one of the world's largest AI data centers in Abu Dhabi. This reportedly rattled Musk enough to tag along at the last minute, according to the Wall Street Journal. OpenAI was ultimately selected for the deal, which Musk allegedly attempted to derail, the Wall Street Journal reported. Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder and executive chairman, Washington Post owner, and Blue Origin founder Back in 2015, Bezos wanted to launch Trump into orbit after the at-the-time presidential candidate fired shots at Bezos on what was Twitter, now X, calling the Washington Post, which Bezos owns, a "tax shelter," Bezos responded that he'd use Blue Origin, a space company Bezos founded, to "#sendDonaldtospace." Times have certainly changed. In January, Bezos said he is "very optimistic" about the administration's space agenda. Behind the scenes, he has reportedly given Trump political advice, allegedly as early as the summer of 2024, according to Axios. There was a brief flare-up in April, though, after Amazon reportedly considered listing Trump's tariffs next to products' prices on the site, according to Punchbowl News. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called the plan a "hostile and political action." The idea, which was never implemented, was scrapped, and an Amazon spokesperson insisted it was only ever meant for its low-cost Haul store. If Trump does cancel Musk's SpaceX government contracts as he threatened to do, Bezos' Blue Origin, and rival to SpaceX, could stand to benefit. Blue Origin already has a $3 billion contract with NASA. Jensen Huang, Nvidia cofounder and CEO While Huang was notably missing from Trump's second inauguration in January, he did attend the Middle East trip in May. Nvidia is partnering with Oracle, SoftBank, and G42 on the OpenAI data center plans in the UAE. But Nvidia hasn't gotten off too easy: In April, Trump banned the chip maker from selling its most advanced chips, the H20, to China, a move that Nvidia says cost it $5.5 billion and reportedly prompted the company to modify the chip for China to circumvent US export controls. Sundar Pichai, Google CEO In April, a federal judge ruled that Google holds an illegal monopoly in some advertising technology markets. This is one of two major legal blows to Google in the past year: Back in August 2024, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust law with its online search. If Google has to sell Chrome, Barclays told clients on Monday, Alphabet stock could fall 25%. This flurry of litigation — and potential divestment of the Chrome business — puts Pichai between a rock and a hard place. While the CEO was spotted with the rest of the technorati at Trump's inauguration, it's hard to say how he might cozy up to Trump, and whether friendly relations would do anything to remedy these rulings.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The only ‘Made in America' smartphone maker has a message for Apple about manufacturing in the Trump tariff era
Todd Weaver has an important message for Apple as it faces growing demands by President Donald Trump to reshore some of its smartphone production: Don't listen to the conventional wisdom. Experts have long said that manufacturing iPhones in the U.S., rather than Asia, as Apple does, would be logistically impossible and ridiculously expensive. But Weaver argues companies can indeed do it successfully, and at a similar or only slightly higher cost—if given several years to navigate the inevitable complications. Weaver should know: His startup, Purism, is among the few, if not the only business, that assembles smartphones in the U.S. In fact, the U.S. pedigree is the main selling point of his company's Made in America device, the Liberty Phone. 'It is challenging to do this in the U.S.,' Weaver acknowledges. 'It's probably the reason I'm the only one.' And yet, he says his company has managed to make it work and has been profitable for the last two years—a real world example of what's possible on a hot-button topic in which political talking points and vested interests often dominate the debate. President Donald Trump recently put U.S. smartphone production in the spotlight as part of his global trade war. On May 23, he used social network Truth Social to publicly attack Apple for importing iPhones into the U.S., rather than making them domestically, and then threatened the company with a 25% tariff if it continued to do so. Whether any of the import taxes will become permanent is unclear given Trump's whiplash decision-making and court challenges by third parties. Still, Apple has long assembled its iPhones overseas, mainly in China, and has resisted relocating any of that production to the U.S. In April, when Trump announced his tariffs, Apple went so far as to shift the sourcing of most U.S.-bound iPhones to India, which faced lower import taxes. U.S. assembly was never publicly mentioned as a possibility. In the past, Apple CEO Cook explained the reluctance by saying the abundance of skilled labor and top-notch suppliers overseas would be difficult to reproduce at home. Weaver's company, of course, is no Apple, which has sold more than 2 billion iPhones globally since introducing the first models in 2007. The devices unleashed a new era in the tech industry in which mobile devices became the prime focus. Purism, in contrast, has sold just tens of thousands of phones since debuting its first model in 2018, according to Weaver. And the company is barely-known outside the world of tech nerds. Its Liberty Phone, manufactured near San Diego, comes with U.S.-made electronics installed on a metal chassis from China. It retails for $1,999. Another phone, the Librem 5, is mostly the same design, except it's made in China with Chinese parts, and costs $799. The company also produces tablet computers, laptops, and servers. Purism pitches its Made in America device as more secure and privacy friendly than those from major manufactures like Apple. Because all the critical parts and assembly are domestic, it's easy to verify that they haven't been tampered with by a foreign adversary that wants to snoop or stuff them with explosives. The phones also run on a Linux-based open source operating system. Anyone with technical know-how who is worried about the security can review the code—unlike with more popular phones, which come with operating systems that can't be easily inspected. Additionally, Purism's phones come with three kill switches that lets users physically disconnect their device from cell service, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, along with its microphone and camera. When turned on, the switches sever the electrical circuit to the features they control and make it impossible for them to be accessed by hackers, Weaver said. Toggling on Airplane Mode, as users often do on more mainstream phones, is less secure, he said, because it's a purely software feature that doesn't cut power to the device's chips. Customers who are especially security conscious can pay extra to have their devices shipped with 'tamper evident tape' on the packaging, among other options, to flag any monkey business during transit. Purism's biggest customers are government agencies, many of which require high security, and individual consumers. The company's clients, Weaver said, include the FBI and the House Select Committee on Intelligence. Weaver said the cost of manufacturing the Purism's two phones is largely the same, despite one being made overseas and the other domestically. The phone that's made in China costs around $600 for parts, manufacturing, and assembly while the U.S.-made one comes in at $650. 'Producing goods in China vs. the U.S. is the same plus or minus 10%,' said Weaver, based mostly on automation. The difference between what Purism charges customers for its two phones is partly due to the higher profit margin the company collects for its U.S.-made device. People who want stronger security are often willing to pay extra for it, Weaver said. It also covers the extra overhead from some customers wanting to verify that Purism's supply chain is secure and the small additional cost of U.S. manufacturing. Purism's assembly line is in Carlsbad, Calif., where up to a dozen workers put together devices. The area is home to a pool of skilled labor thanks to the local defense industry and manufacturing for other mobile carriers. That relatively modest assembly line is a major contrast to the factories that make iPhones, operated by contract manufacturers, mostly in China. Those facilities can be the size of several football fields and employ over 100,000 people who work around-the-clock shifts. Weaver said the U.S. is at a huge disadvantage to China when it comes to skilled workers, who make up a significant part of the workforce in smartphone factories. The only way to reverse the shortage and lay the groundwork for companies to reshore their production is to encourage more people to learn skills that are useful in the manufacturing process, he said. 'If you go over to China you can find buildings and buildings of thousands of electronics engineers. If you look here, you can find maybe five total,' Weaver said. Apple, for example, would risk a catastrophe if it suddenly, in 2026, needed to ramp up staffing in the U.S. to produce millions of iPhones, he said. Training enough people for such a massive undertaking would take years. Weaver said Purism, founded in 2014, took several years to develop its domestic supply chain. The company's small size means it only needs limited quantities of components, which makes it impossible to achieve the economies of scale that come from producing huge numbers of devices. Manufacturing in the U.S. also comes with higher labor costs than in China. But with the help of automation, those extra costs can be kept to a minimum by reserving human labor for tasks performed after production is complete, such as soldering, assembly, repairs, and testing. Apple, on the other hand, would need vast amounts of components to keep its assembly line humming. While the company would likely be able to cut deals with domestic suppliers for most iPhone parts, some, such as high-quality cameras, may be impossible to quickly source in the U.S. and it would therefore have to import them, Weaver said. One analyst has said iPhones could end up costing $3,500 if made in the U.S., to account for the extra costs and hassles. Weaver agrees that it would cost Apple substantially more to produce iPhones in the U.S., if it had to move production quickly. But given enough time, Apple could substantially reduce the cost after developing a new supply chain, finding enough workers, and by relying on extensive automation. For Apple, opening a domestic manufacturing plant would therefore need to be a years' long process, Weaver said. That's why he criticized Trump's tariffs for taking effect almost immediately. Yes, many of those tariffs have since been delayed. But the takeaway for businesses is that they can't plan ahead. And yet, that's exactly what's required for something as complex as shifting manufacturing to the U.S. Trump's tariffs would be far more effective if phased in over many years, Weaver said. In that scenario, companies would have a clear and increasing incentive to reshore production—without being punished right off the bat. Weaver argues his U.S. manufacturing effort is already paying off and that it will gain momentum over time. He hopes the recent scandal involving U.S. officials using the chat app Signal to discuss a military strike against Yemen, and then accidentally inviting a journalist to join them, will help lift sales by encouraging the federal government to focus more on security. Weaver wouldn't get into the specifics of Purism's financials other than to say it has millions in annual revenue and turned profitable in 2023. The Liberty Phone is its biggest seller. Wayne Lam, an analyst with market research firm TechInsights, gave a mixed take on Purism's prospect. In an email, he said: 'They can be a successful niche player, but the odds of success are lower thanks to the bigger brands. They won't be able to compete in the consumer market but government/enterprise/military are all niche markets they can address.' To fund the expansion of his business, Weaver is trying to raise additional investment after taking in $16 million in funding over the years. Some of that money would go to fixing a shortcoming with his phones. Because they don't use Apple's iOS or Google's Android operating systems, they are incompatible with many of the most popular mobile apps like Uber. To get such apps work on its devices, Purism must make technical tweaks for each one. Purism can at least claim one small advantage over the giant companies that dominate the smartphone industry. If Trump's tariffs become permanent, it won't feel much impact from its U.S.-made phone, while the big players and their foreign-made devices could be hammered. This story was originally featured on
