Ticking Water Bomb: How Chinas Brahmaputra Dam Puts India & Bangladesh On Edge? IN PICS
1 / 9
China officially began building a huge USD 167.8 billion dam scheme across the Brahmaputra River in Tibet, close to its border with India's Arunachal Pradesh. This ambitious hydropower project, in Nyingchi City at the lower reaches of the river (also called Yarlung Zangbo in Tibet), has put the downstream countries on high alert straight away, especially India and Bangladesh. Li Qiang Unveils $167.8B Yarlung Dam
2 / 9
Chinese Premier Li Qiang formally declared the start of the project on Saturday, as per reports from official media. This gigantic project is planned as the globe's largest infrastructure project, with five cascade hydropower stations to be built at a substantial total investment of around 1.2 trillion Yuan (roughly USD 167.8 billion). The selected location close to the "Great Bend" of the Yarlung Tsangpo is of strategic importance for hydropower development because the river has a steep 2,000-meter fall over a short distance of just 50 kilometers. To give a point of reference, China's largest dam at present, the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River, has an installed capacity of 22.5 gigawatts. Brahmaputra Dam Threatens Downstream Flow
3 / 9
The building of such a massive dam is causing great apprehensions in the lower riparian nations. The siting of the proposed dam, where the Brahmaputra makes a sudden U-turn before entering into Arunachal Pradesh (where it becomes known as Siang/Dihang) and then flowing into Bangladesh (as the Jamuna), stands to directly endanger the natural flow of the river. Brahmaputra Dam: Agri, Eco Threats Loom
4 / 9
This perturbation would have dire implications for agricultural yields, particularly for the critical crops of rice and jute, and would imperil biodiversity hotspots like ecologically fragile Eastern Himalayas. China highlighted the significance of the project to meet its renewable energy goals, while India and Bangladesh remain susceptible to the possibility of damage to water flow, environmental stability, and larger regional geopolitics. A River Across 4 Nations
5 / 9
The Brahmaputra is an important transboundary river, with its extensive basin covering about 580,000 square kilometers over four nations: China (50.5%), India (33.3%), Bangladesh (8.1%), and Bhutan (7.8%). In India alone, it extends over about 194,413 square kilometers, covering areas in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim, and West Bengal. River's Journey: Tsangpo to Jamuna
6 / 9
From its source in the Chemayungdung Glacier in the Kailash mountains of Tibet, east of Lake Mansarovar, the river drifts east for almost 1,200 kilometers as the Yarlung Tsangpo. It makes a unique 'U' bend at Namcha Barwa, popularly called the Great Bend, entering India by way of Arunachal Pradesh. Joining the Dibang and the Lohit rivers, it becomes the Brahmaputra. Its major right-bank tributaries in India are the Subansiri, Kameng, Manas, and Sankosh. The river further continues into Bangladesh close to Dhubri, Assam, and is called Jamuna after confluence with the Teesta, finally merging with the Padma before emptying into the Bay of Bengal. Power Potential vs. Floods
7 / 9
The flow of Brahmaputra is special; it flows in diametrically opposite directions – west to east in Tibet and east to west in Assam. In Tibet, it is less full of water and silt because of the cold and dry climate, but in its passage through India, it is supplemented with many rain-fed tributaries, resulting in heavy siltation, recurring floods, and the development of braided channels and river islands, such as Majuli, the largest in the world. Tibet's high gradient of a fall of some 4,800 meters in 1,700 kilometers provides enormous hydroelectric potential, a characteristic much diminished on its passage into the Assam Valley. India-China River Talks Stalled
8 / 9
Notwithstanding the shared character of the Brahmaputra, coordination processes between China and India on transboundary rivers seem to be limited and interrupted. For Ashok Kantha, a former Indian Ambassador to China, an umbrella Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on cooperation on transboundary rivers was signed in 2013 with no termination date, but "no activity" is presently being pursued under it, according to the Jal Shakti Ministry's website. Transboundary River Data Standoff
9 / 9
Two separate MoUs exist for the Brahmaputra and Sutlej rivers. The Brahmaputra MoU, renewable every five years, reportedly lapsed in 2023, with renewal processes ongoing through diplomatic channels. The Sutlej MoU, prompted by the Parechu incident, is pending renewal, with China not agreeing to year-round data provision. An Expert Level Mechanism, established in 2006 for annual meetings, has also seen interruptions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
44 minutes ago
- Economic Times
China shoots down US naval stealth cloak, deploys fifth generation Shenyang J-35 on aircraft carriers, F-35C has competition
For long the United States of America was the only naval power to operate a stealth fighter with the F-35C Lightning II deployed on its aircraft carriers. Now, the US will have to contend with China's growing and rapidly modernizing navy which has got its first operational stealth fighters in the form of Shenyang People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has received its first two J-35 carrier-based stealth fighter, directly challenging the US naval stealth jet superiority. While the US Navy has over 110 F-35Cs on its aircraft carriers, China is still in the nascent phase of deploying its naval stealth fighters. But given the speed and scale at which the Chinese defence shipyards have churned out aircraft carriers in the last few years, it won't be a surprise if it catches up with the US before Read: Delta pilot's daring move: how a split-second decision saved flight from mid-air B-52 disasterCompared to 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in the US Navy, the most by any country, China has only two - the Liaoning and Shandong - in active service. China's third carrier Fujian is undergoing sea trials. It is also building a fourth aircraft carrier, codenamed "Type 004". The first three Chinses aircraft carriers are conventionally powered but Type 004 will have nuclear propulsion. — RupprechtDeino (@RupprechtDeino) A series of photos posted on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo show two J-35s flying with their tail number clearly visible. One of the J-35 has the number 0011 and the second one is 0012. But the aircraft carrier on which the stealth fighters have been deployed is still not clear although a closeup analysis of the photos show the pilots wearing bright blue helmets, a standard issue for Chinese naval pilots. The jets were photographed flying together and with the J-15B, a fourth+ generation jet in service with the Chinese Navy. Shark markings, the same as those on the other naval fighter J-15B, on J-35s indicate they are already in service with with the Chinese has bulit a massive 270,000-square-meter facility in the Shenbei New District where Shenyang Aircraft Corporation will produce the J-35 stealth fighters. According to indedpendent western analysts, the new facility is capable of churning out 100 aircraft annually, showcasing the Chinese desire and ability to quickly reach a level where it can pose a strong challenge to the US Read: Corey Adams to Alex Foster: Rising US college stars killed in senseless shootingsA few months back, there was a chatter on Chinese social media that the J-35 were undergoing trials on another first, China's Liaoning and Shandong aircraft carriers in June 2025 operated together in the Pacific Ocean, another signal to the US that its naval supremacy was no longer a certainty. The two ships conducted combat maneuvres and sent their fighters on F-35C is in service with many American aircraft carriers. The naval version of the F-35A and B, the C has bigger but foladable wings for carrier operations. The larger wing area gives the F-35C a bigger range and heavier payload carrying capability. It also helps the F-35C reduce its landing speed rapidly as it descends on the deck of an aircraft carrier. It features additional ailerons along the folding sections of the wings. The fighter's 25 mm GAU-22A cannon has 220 rounds for close quarter combat. F-35Cs deployed on USS Abraham Lincoln made their combat debut during an operation against Iranian-backed Houthi armed group in Yemen in November 2024.
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India joins international support campaign for Bangladesh after air force jet crashed in Dhaka
The Government of India on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) reached out to Bangladesh offering assistance to deal with the aftermath of the tragic crash of an aircraft from the Bangladesh Air Force that led to the death of at least 20 students and teachers and injury for more than a hundred others in a school in capital Dhaka. In a statement, the Ministry of External Affairs announced that a team of doctors will be visiting Bangladesh soon. 'A team of burn-specialist doctors and nurses with necessary medical support are scheduled to visit Dhaka shortly to treat the victims. They will make an assessment of the condition of patients with recommendation for further treatment and specialized care in India as necessary. Additional medical teams may also follow depending on their preliminary assessement and treatment,' said the Ministry of External Affairs in a statement on Tuesday. The crash took place on Monday (July 21, 2025) when a Chinese-made aircraft crashed in the school where students and teachers were getting ready for the day ahead. Subsequently, India, China and Japan were among the first countries to offer support to Bangladesh. Foreign Affairs Adviser of the interim government, Touhid Hossein said, 'As of now, we require doctors, nurse, some special medicines, and some emergency medicine equipment – Accordingly we will seek assistance from these three countries.'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
China, India and the conflict over Buddhism
As headlines trumpet Chinese naval expansion across the Indo-Pacific and India's strategic countermoves in this regard, there is a quieter, higher-altitude contest already reshaping Asia's future. The real geopolitical frontier between India and China lies not in the oceans but in the Himalayas. And at its heart is not oil, trade, or weapons but faith. What looks like a spiritual tradition rooted in non-violence and mysticism has become, in the 21st century, a geopolitical chessboard. Monasteries that once served as centres of meditation and monastic education now sit at the frontlines of national power games. The reincarnation of lamas has become a matter not just of religion but also of sovereignty. And in regions such as Ladakh, Tawang, and even remote Bhutan, Buddhist culture is increasingly shaped not only by the sacred but also by strategy. China's campaign has escalated Both India and China understand that influence over Himalayan Buddhism is influence over identity, and in borderlands where lines on a map are fuzzy, identity is everything. For China, this means turning Buddhism into a tool of statecraft. Since the 1950s, Beijing has worked to dominate Tibetan religious life: it exiled or marginalised independent lamas, co-opted institutions, and, most crucially, claimed the sole right to approve reincarnations. In 2007, the Chinese government formally asserted that any 'Living Buddha' must be sanctioned by the state. The message was clear: spiritual legitimacy flows from political authority. This campaign has escalated in recent years. China now maintains a database of officially recognised reincarnate lamas, monitors monastery activities across Tibet, and has launched an ambitious Buddhist diplomacy campaign across the Himalayas. Sacred sites are being repurposed as instruments of soft power. Roads lead to shrines built with Beijing's help. Conference invitations are extended to Himalayan monks who return home with subtle shifts in loyalty. Meanwhile, India has largely played catch-up. Hosting the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan exile government since 1959 gave India moral clout but little strategic advantage — until recently. Only in the last decade has New Delhi begun to engage seriously with Buddhism as a tool of influence, promoting its heritage as the Buddha's birthplace and funding regional pilgrimage circuits. Yet, these efforts remain fragmented when compared to China's centralised vision. As one scholar puts it, India practises Buddhist diplomacy: China practises Buddhist statecraft. Nowhere is the tension more visible than in the looming succession of the 14th Dalai Lama. The spiritual leader who turned 90 in July, has signalled that he intends to reincarnate outside Chinese territory — most likely in India. Beijing, predictably, has vowed to appoint its own Dalai Lama, using the centuries-old 'Golden Urn' method. The result will almost certainly be two rival Dalai Lamas: one recognised by the Tibetan exile community and much of the global Buddhist diaspora, and one endorsed by Beijing and installed in Lhasa under heavy guard. This schism would not just split Tibetan Buddhism. It would force Buddhist communities across the Himalayan rim — in Ladakh, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nepal, and Bhutan — to pick sides. In doing so, it could reshape the geopolitical allegiances of entire regions. If the spiritual figure they revere sits in India, loyalty may deepen toward New Delhi. If he is seated in Lhasa, with Chinese backing and resources, the gravitational pull could shift east. Already, signs of this tug-of-war are visible. In Arunachal Pradesh, China asserts its claim to Tawang, birthplace of the sixth Dalai Lama — not only through military posturing but also through spurious cultural logic. 'It is Tibetan,' Beijing summarily argues, 'and therefore ours'. In Nepal, Beijing has invested heavily in Buddhist infrastructure, especially around Lumbini, the Buddha's birthplace. And in Bhutan, China subtly courts monastic communities even as the kingdom maintains a tight control over religious affairs. Working on internal disagreements What is striking is how even internal Buddhist disagreements are now strategic openings. The Karma Kagyu school — one of Tibetan Buddhism's major lineages — has two rival Karmapas, each claiming rightful leadership. China and India have found ways to align with different sides of the split, transforming a spiritual dispute into a proxy conflict. Similarly, the contentious Dorje Shugden sect, ostracised by the Dalai Lama, has found unexpected empathy from Chinese authorities eager to weaken the exile hierarchy. The battle for Buddhism is not about dogma — it is about who gets to define legitimacy, and in doing so, shape the loyalties of border populations. This is particularly relevant in places such as Ladakh, where the Buddhist identity coexists with a deep nationalist pride that is Indian. India's challenge is to ensure that spiritual allegiance does not drift toward foreign-controlled lineages, especially when those lineages sit across the Line of Actual Control. It is tempting to dismiss all this as secondary — religious pageantry in the face of realpolitik. But that would be a mistake. In the Himalayas, where territory is often inaccessible and infrastructure scarce, soft power is hard power. A monastery that shifts allegiance is a strategic loss. A high lama that pledges loyalty across the border can change the balance of influence in a valley, or even a district. And the stakes are only rising. After the Dalai Lama's time, the question of succession will become a global issue. Countries with significant Buddhist populations, from Mongolia to Sri Lanka, may be asked to take sides. The diplomatic fallout could be severe. For India, hosting the next Dalai Lama will be both an opportunity and a challenge: a chance to cement spiritual influence in the region, but also a trigger for intense Chinese pressure. The stage In this unfolding story, the Himalayas are not a backwater. They are the stage. The monasteries-in-the-clouds, the chanting monks, the adorned prayer wheels; they are not just relics of a bygone age, but instruments of power in a new one. This is where China and India are already competing — not with missiles, but with a spiritual succession crisis. And that is why, even as the world watches for signs of confrontation in the oceanic waters of the Indo-Pacific, the real front may lie higher — among the clouds and the cliffs, in the realm where the spiritual becomes geopolitical. The next great struggle between Asia's two giants could well be fought not with submarines and aircraft carriers, but with threngwas (prayer beads in Tibetan) and reincarnations. Nirupama Rao is a former Foreign Secretary and the author of 'The Fractured Himalaya; India, Tibet, China: 1949 to 1962'She posts on X as @NMenonRao
