Eamon Ryan lands new role as the EU's housing tsar
The so-called EU housing tsar will chair an expert panel tasked with providing independent policy recommendations on housing.
Europe is seeking to reduce the cost of building, buying and renting homes in EU member states, through loosening public expenditure rules and exploring methods for member state collaboration.
Over 200 people applied to the board, which typically comes with an expenses rate for travel and other costs, as well as reimbursement fees. Ryan is joined by 15 other people from different backgrounds, and expertise on housing policy, on the panel.
Advertisement
He
confirmed the news and explained his new role
in a post to social media this morning.
The Journal
reported last week that the
EU is considering placing restrictions on short-term lets in order to free up housing supply for those living in large cities
. While the EU cannot set housing targets, it can reduce barriers to the market.
It comes after he was appointed as
a high advocate
for Ireland on
a coalition
between governments and green NGOs as part of the UN Environment Programme.
The ex-Minister for Transport and Climate, Communications and the Environment stepped down from this party leadership role in June 2024 after over 13 years in the role. He served as one of three coalition leaders during the last government.
Ryan announced at the time of his leadership resignation that he would not be contesting the 2024 general election and stepping away from politics. He was among a number of senior politicians to do so in the last term.
Former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar and ex Tánaiste Simon Coveney also landed new roles since leaving public office, in an advisory role at the
PR company Penta Group
and a
consultant role to EY Ireland
, respectively.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: Kick in right direction for Gaelic football
The Kerry victory against Donegal arrived in the nick of time to save Gaelic football from extinction. What a relief to see a return to high fielding, long-distance kicking, and a plethora of scores on a regular basis. The data-driven obsession, borrowed from soccer and American football, with its clichès about zonal defence, dominating the middle third, edge of the D, outside and inside the arc, and so on had made this relatively simple and spontaneous game the world's most boring, and unwatchable, except for scoreless soccer games. At last, the new rules have liberated natural and skilful athletes like David Clifford and Michael Murphy to keep going forward toward goal and not sideways and backwards in a dreary process of endless handball. The two points from long distance and long kick-outs from the goalie have also helped, but backward handpassing should be banned completely. Gaelic football still has a long way to go to equal the wizardry and skill of hurling or rugby at its best, but at least it is finally going in the right direction. Maurice O'Callaghan Stillorgan, Co Dublin Leaders complicit in genocide By standing by and watching Israel commit war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, our nations and leaders have become complicit in this genocide. They have shown us that monetary and economic gains far outweigh the value of human lives, that Israel is free to violate international and humanitarian law with impunity. Three formal EU reviews have revealed strong indications that Israel is breaching its obligations with respect to Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. And still the EU did not and does not adopt any corrective measures or sanctions against Israel, while at the same time sanctioning Russia again — clearly highlighting the EU's double standards. Bob Geldof recently called the forced starvation of civilians in Gaza a 'despicable disgrace'. I fully agree. It is a disgrace to humanity and a stain on our nations and conscience. History will not be kind. The people of Israel and Jews worldwide, whether complicit or not, will be condemned for years to come for allowing this to happen. And so will we all. Being German, I know this only too well. The ugly truth is this: The world and our political leaders have failed the people of Gaza by their inaction and complicity. Uttering 'strong' condemnations and empty words does not help. We are long past the point where these are enough. We can no longer let ourselves be distracted by Netanyahu's denials, lies, and constant diversionary tactics. His latest publicity stunt of allowing aid drops into Gaza has already been condemned as a dangerous farce and is merely a concession to mounting international condemnation and pressure. The trickle of aid trucks allowed in will not save those adults, infants, and children that are already beyond saving due to the level of starvation. So to all involved I say this: Enough is enough. This genocide must end now. The remaining hostages must be released and all those responsible must be fully held to account for their crimes. A Haaf Leitrim War bonds As starvation stalks Gaza and scenes reminiscent of our Great Famine fill our screens, the Central Bank's continued involvement in supporting Israeli war bonds borders on the incredulous. Gary Gannon's legal action against the Central Bank is a timely reminder that three fundamental questions need credible answers: Who decided to accept this role for our bank? How is this consistent with our neutrality? What European Central Bank regulations explicitly prevent the bank from stopping this activity? Our Central Bank is not a private bank mandated to facilitate dubious clients. Ethics, human rights, and respect for democratic values should overrule monetary and fiscal policies. Faced with the ongoing genocide in Gaza, institutional independence is not an excuse for inaction. War justifies exceptional measures. The Taoiseach should instruct the Central Bank to stop this activity that besmirches Ireland's name. Penalties would be a small price to pay for a principled stance which would be respected in the court of global public opinion. This would send an unequivocal message that Israel's actions are an affront to our humanity and that our neutrality is more than platitudes. Declan Deasy Former director European Commission, DG DIGIT, Castlebellingham Co Louth Inhumanity of war Those of us raised in the Roman Catholic tradition are familiar with the Madonna and child image. Last week, another image of a Madonna and child was shown on our TV screens and print media. The child showed to the world its emaciated frame displaying the protruded bones of its spine caused by the lack of nourishing food due to the inhumanity of war. How and when did the governments in our world become so impotent, and have our civilised democracies lost their edge and become too polite? Mary Shanahan Tralee Kerry Rote learning is not the way Nathan Barrett (' Beyond the exam hall: Reclaiming the purpose of Irish education', July 8) is correct. The points system is a narrow pressure point memory recall system inflicted on young people every June during the Leaving Certificate. It does not capture academic ability and excludes many students from third level study, especially those who cannot afford grind schools, which Nathan correctly points out, exist outside of the scrutiny of the Department of Education. These schools do exist with no emphasis on pastoral care or any other student development. Regretfully, the Leaving Certificate, as it is, pushes all teachers to focus on rote learning for the terminal Leaving Certificate exams at the expense of real learning. Regretfully, the ASTI will now resist changes to the upcoming Leaving Certificate at the expense of students. As products of the Leaving Certificate, many Irish educators are afraid of changing the system but there is no doubt that the Leaving Certificate is outdated and badly in need of serious reform which will capture students' ability beyond their ability to memorise, which can be assisted by ability to pay for grinds. Adrian Gibbs Deputy principal, Nano Nagle College, Cork Long-term plans give us hope If one were to look at every Irish infrastructure development, particularly the 300,000 houses that the Government intends to deliver with the private sector by 2030, a key constraint there will obviously be the availability of labour. I believe that another key consideration will obviously be what happens with Trump and his tariffs. This could have a huge impact on our tax revenue receipts which, in turn, will seriously inhibit our ability to spend the sort of money that's needed for infrastructural development. It is good to see that this Government is actually committed to addressing the areas that badly need to be addressed in this country. One could say that there is a sense of long-term planning here. I know it's all aspirational, but hopefully it will work. Then there is that old chestnut of the Irish planning system. One wonders what the State has in mind when it comes to dealing with this very complex issue? John O'Brien Clonmel, Co Tipperary
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
The psychology of the Gaza genocide
An Israeli current affairs programme this week hosted commentators mocking a Palestinian woman whose daughter had died of starvation due to the merciless siege imposed by their army. The focus of their humour was the apparent contrast between the mother's relatively healthy appearance and her daughter's frailty. 'This is a woman who may have eaten all her child's food. A woman who ate a whole goat, who ate the girl herself,' one scoffed, after asking for a photo of the grieving mother to be adjusted so the viewers could take a good look at her. This exchange shows how deeply dehumanised Palestinians have become in Israeli society — a necessary condition for the normalisation of genocide. The genocide we have been witnessing for the past 21 months can overwhelm us with rage, paralyse us with despair or prompt us towards activism. Many of us are alternating regularly between these states. Almost as disturbing as the genocide itself have been the silence and complicity of our closest international allies — the EU, Britain, and the US — in the face of endless crimes against humanity. These pillars of Western democracy have lost their moral legitimacy, and with that comes apart some of our own sense of security. We now live in a world where any form of violence or injustice can be inflicted openly and repeatedly on innocent people, without consequence, and where those who protest such crimes can be brutally beaten by police, as we have seen in Germany, or threatened with lengthy prison sentences, as in Britain. The helplessness we feel bearing witness to Gaza's destruction can isolate and paralyse us, particularly when we no longer have any semblance of international justice or a 'rules-based order' to fall back on for comfort In The Drowned and the Saved, Italian Holocaust survivor Primo Levi detailed in a chapter titled 'Useless Violence' some of the cruelties and deprivations the Nazis subjected their victims to prior to their murder in concentration camps. The term 'useless violence' reflected the lack of any rationale to this treatment. The point was to inflict suffering for its own sake. People gather around an impact crater by a destroyed building in the aftermath of overnight Israeli bombardment in northwest of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. There was no toileting facility on box-cars packed with people destined for concentration camps. The severely ill, the elderly, the pregnant were forced to urinate and defecate in view of others on torturous journeys lasting days. Levi described this as 'a trauma to which our civilization does not prepare us, a deep wound inflicted on human dignity'. The genocide in Gaza has been distinguished by repeated and varied patterns of useless violence — seen in the thousands of aid trucks lined up at border crossings as the population starves and what is left of society in Gaza descends into anarchy. Not satisfied with murdering as many Palestinians as possible, the Israeli government is determined to inflict on them suffering beyond anything we can imagine prior to death This comes in many forms — the withholding of pain medication and anaesthetics from people who are in agony due to burns or wounds, and to women giving birth and undergoing Caesarian sections; amputees denied crutches and wheelchairs; infants and disabled adults left without nappies; the targeted bombing of sanitation and sewage facilities to ensure maximum misery for survivors. The genocide is as much about destroying the dignity of Palestinians as it is about annihilating their lives and their culture and land. What does it do to us to bear witness to these scenes and accounts of endless cruelty on our phones and television screens, day in day out —to a point where evil has, to paraphrase a famous book by Hannah Arendt, become banal? In Regarding the Pain of Others, American writer Susan Sontag warned that repeated exposure to images of atrocity risks producing not greater empathy, but indifference. 'Compassion is an unstable emotion,' she wrote. 'It needs to be translated into action, or it withers.' When horrific images circulate endlessly without political consequence or accountability, there is a danger we become passive consumers of suffering rather than witnesses in the moral sense. One antidote to disconnection or despair at this grave time is uniting with others who are also profoundly impacted by what is happening to the Palestinian people. Vigils and demonstrations can feel like pointless symbolism but they help us remain connected with our common humanity, and they demonstrate to Palestinians living in Ireland that care about what their families and friends are enduring. There is a particular anguish and desolation in suffering trauma alone, and if we can alleviate a fraction of those feelings by our continued presence at solidarity events, we are doing good. Liam Quaide is a clinical psychologist and a Social Democrats TD for East Cork
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on X's court defeat: the conflict will continue
The High Court's rejection of X's challenge to Ireland's new online safety code may come to be seen as a milestone in the enforcement of Europe's digital rulebook. It is also a reminder that the battle over online content regulation is not simply a matter of legal interpretation or child protection policy. It sits squarely in the middle of a transatlantic struggle over who sets the rules for the digital economy. Ireland's Online Safety Code, enforced by Coimisiún na Meán, requires platforms to shield children from harmful video content, introduce age checks and parental controls, and prevent the sharing of material that promotes self-harm, eating disorders or bullying. The court ruled these measures fall within the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive and complement the Digital Services Act, dismissing X's claims of overreach. That finding may seem straightforward from a European perspective. The EU has long sought to assert that technology companies must respect European standards if they wish to operate here. But the US views such measures through a different lens, shaped by its dominance in the tech sector and a political culture that prizes free expression in almost absolute terms. The commercial stakes are immense. The global tech services market is overwhelmingly dominated by American firms: Meta, Google, Apple and Amazon. EU regulation is therefore not just a neutral exercise in public protection but, inevitably, a rebalancing of power between the jurisdictions where these companies are based and the markets in which they operate. That tension is heightened by the fact that Ireland is home to the European headquarters of many of these firms, making it the front line in this conflict. READ MORE In Washington, the issues are often couched in the language of principle. Conservative figures such as JD Vance have been vocal in their defence of unfettered online speech, casting regulation as censorship. Such arguments, while grounded in America's First Amendment tradition, also align neatly with the commercial interests of the companies whose revenues depend on maximising user engagement. The defence of principle and the defence of profit are intertwined. The ruling against X will not end these disputes. The tech industry's legal resources are vast, and its political allies influential. But it confirms that Ireland, acting within the EU framework, has the authority to challenge the ethos of the platforms it hosts. That will not be welcomed in boardrooms in California or on Capitol Hill. As the digital economy becomes a key arena of US-EU competition, Ireland's decisions will be read not only as regulatory acts but as statements about where power lies in the online world. Tuesday's judgment suggests that, at least for now, that power may be shifting.
