Three women arrested on terror charges after van driven into defense factory
The van rammed into a fence outside the Leonardo factory in the Crewe Road North area of Edinburgh earlier tonight.
Police Scotland said three women, aged 31, 34 and 42, have been arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000.
The three women photographed on the van smiled at the cameras, and one even showed off her handcuffs.
Photos shared by the activist group 'Shut Down Leonardo' showed the van sticking partially out of the fence.
The group says the Leonardo factory in Edinburgh helps make components for Israel's F-35 fighter jets.
In early June, Leonardo was listed as one of the companies as part of what Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory, called the 'economy of genocide'.
Leonardo has previously been the target of aggressive protests. In October, the company put barbed wire on top of their fences after projectiles were thrown into the building's windows.
The force said its Counter Terrorism Unit is leading the investigation, and inquiries are ongoing.
A Leonardo spokesperson said: 'Leonardo UK is subject to UK government export controls and does not supply equipment directly to Israel.
'The right to peaceful protest is an important principle in our society; however, aggressive and violent activity should have no place in protest. More Trending
'The intimidation of our people, who work hard to support the security and defence of the UK, is not acceptable.
'Our main customer is the UK Armed Forces. We are proud to manufacture technology that supports our service personnel and helps keep them safe. Their dedication underpins the freedom on which our society is based.'
Shut Down Leonardo was approached for comment.
In March this year, Shut Down Leonardo cut off the electricity from the factory in Edinburgh. In December, 100 activists blocked the entrance to the site.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Teen dies after getting sucked into meat grinder at burrito factory
MORE: Man stabbed in heart on Christmas Day 'by abusive ex when she saw him on Tinder'
MORE: Up to 280 locations of popular store chain are facing closure amid bankruptcy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults
Read on for the story of an Iranian national who claimed to be 17 despite having grey hairs and black stubble MIGRANT 'KID' BLUNDERS Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SMALL boat migrants who claim to be children are being given the benefit of the doubt by immigration staff - despite more than half turning out to actually be adults. A report has found that workers show a 'lack of curiosity' about the real age of asylum seekers arriving across the Channel. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task' Credit: Richard Townshend Photography AI tech is set to be rolled out in 2026 which can accurately assess how old a person really is. Currently, anyone who says they are under 18 are treated as minors unless they look 'significantly' older. In one case highlighted by Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration David Bolt, an Iranian national who had grey hairs was treated as a child despite assessors thinking he was probably around 22. In 2024, over half - 56 per cent - of the individuals who claimed on arrival to be children were either later assessed to be adults or admitted that they were 18 or over. READ MORE ON IMMIGRATION RULING FEARS Palestinian gran wins right to come to UK for medical treatment sparking fears The two-day training given to assessors 'instructs officers that they should always give the benefit of the doubt to the individual where they are not sure about someone's claimed age and do not judge them to be significantly over 18'. The report states that a Vietnamese national was 'initially given the benefit of the doubt' as a child because workers said he had a 'soft face'. Another officer then raised concerns about his age because of his 'developed shoulders', 'huge hands' and a 'tiny bit of stubble'. In other assessments 'arrogance' was used as a sign that a migrant was an adult. One Iranian national presented with some grey hairs and black stubble on his face and claimed to be 17. Despite being assessed as actually 22 years old, he was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and treated as a child pending further assessment. Man believed to be running meet and greet service arrested in dawn raid as part of Channel crackdown It is acknowledged by the report that it is not always possible to assess the age of a young person through their physical appearance or demeanour, because different life experiences can stunt growth or change behaviours. David Bolt made eight key recommendations to the Home Office on the age assessment process, including reviewing the training given to officers by the end of year. In response, the Government accepted all recommendations and pointed out that they are rolling out Facial Age Estimation technology next year pending a trial. It has been trained on millions of images where an individual's age is known. Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said in a written statement: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task, and the Home Office has spent a number of years analysing which scientific and technological methods would best assist the current process, including looking at the role that Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology can play. 'In a situation where those involved in the age assessment process are unsure whether an individual is aged over or under 18, or do not accept the age an individual is claiming to be, Facial Age Estimation offers a potentially rapid and simple means to test their judgements against the estimates produced by the technology.' A procurement process is currently underway with the new tech set to be integrated into the current system 'over the course of 2026'.
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Police update on Palestine Action protest during Trump visit
Police are preparing for protests at locations where the US President visits and in city centres, including Glasgow. Protests against Israel's offensive in Gaza are likely given the US support for Israel. (Image: AP) READ NEXT:Trump visit will be biggest police operation since Queen's funeral A number of people have been arrested in the last week for showing support for the group Palestine Action, which is proscribed under the Terrorism Act. Last Friday in Glasgow, activist Sean Clerkin was arrested under the act after he displayed a sign stating Genocide in Palestine Time for Action with the words Palestine and action in larger letters. He has been bailed under the condition he doesn't enter the city centre until his court date. Police preparing for the President's visit said the law will be applied to anyone showing support for the group. READ NEXT:Police prepared for Glasgow protests during Donald Trumps visit to Scotland Assistant Chief Constable, Emma Bond, Gold Commander for the police operation during the President's visit said assessments will be made by officers. (Image: Colin Mearns) She said: 'We will make decisions. Any support for Palestine Action, be that in terms of clothes worn, be that in terms of banners held, is now an offence under the Terrorism Act and people are liable to arrest for those offences. 'There is a requirement create that link in terms of showing support, so we will arrest at that stage to enable the further gathering of evidence to enable a case to be put forward to the Crown Office but I couldn't be specifically prescriptive. 'It is down to what we assess on the ground and not everything is as clear cut as it necessarily might be in some circumstances. 'We have had some cases where individuals have worn a t-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action'. 'Those things are far clearer than we might face in other circumstances, so I couldn't be prescriptive but again, the responsibility will be on us to show the actions demonstrate support for Palestine action if there are arrests made.'
North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Mass protest planned by 500 Palestine Action supporters in bid to get ban lifted
The action planned for August 9 in central London will see protesters holding signs that say: 'I Oppose Genocide, I Support Palestine Action' with 'non violent composure' for an hour or until they are arrested. A planning document has been posted online that says: 'Five hundred is more than double the total number of people arrested under the Terrorism Act in 2024. 'It would be practically and politically difficult for the state to respond to an action on this scale. 'Even assuming it had the physical capacity to arrest so many people on the same day, the political fallout from such an operation would be incalculable, causing irreparable damage to the reputation of the government and the police. We demand that you lift the ban on Palestine Action. Our government is actively involved in a genocide. The UK government is using anti-terror laws to silence people who are taking action against this genocide. Sign up at for a mass-action on August 9th. — Defend our Juries (@DefendourJuries) July 20, 2025 'Our assessment is that an action on this scale could be enough for the ban to be lifted. 'Charging and prosecuting at least 500 more people, in addition to the 200 people already arrested, is likely to be beyond the capacity of the state, given the current situation in the criminal justice system.' Palestine Action has been banned by the Government under terrorism laws, after it claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. A legal bid to challenge the ban at the High Court by the group's co-founder, Huda Ammori, is ongoing.
