Google settles Black employees' racial bias lawsuit for $50 million
Google agreed to pay $50 million to settle a lawsuit accusing the search engine company of systemic racial bias against Black employees.
A preliminary settlement covering more than 4,000 Google employees in California and New York was filed on Thursday evening in the Oakland, California federal court, and requires a judge's approval.
Plaintiffs in the proposed class action said Google has a "racially biased corporate culture" where management steers Black employees to lower-level jobs, pays them less, downgrades their performance ratings and denies them opportunities to advance.
According to the complaint, Black employees comprised only 4.4% of Google's workforce and 3% of its leadership in 2021.
The plaintiff April Curley, hired to expand outreach to historically Black colleges, said Google denied her promotions, stereotyped her as an "angry" Black woman, and fired her after six years as she prepared a report on its alleged racial bias.
Managers also allegedly denigrated Black employees by declaring they were not "Googley" enough or lacked "Googleyness," which the plaintiffs called racial dog whistles.
Google, a unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet , denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle, and said it fully complied with all applicable laws.
"We strongly disagree with the allegations that we treated anyone improperly and we remain committed to paying, hiring and leveling all employees consistently," Google spokeswoman Courtenay Mencini said in an emailed statement on Friday.
The lawsuit began in March 2022 after a regulator now known as the California Civil Rights Department started investigating Google's treatment of Black female employees.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs may seek up to $12.5 million of the settlement fund in fees. On Monday, the lawyers dismissed related claims brought on behalf of job applicants, citing evidence they had gathered and Google's "reasoned arguments."
The case is Curley et al v Google LLC, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-01735.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
In a first in UP, 25 automobile dealers lose trade licenses for a month
In a first-of-its-kind action, the Uttar Pradesh Transport Department has suspended the trade licenses of 25 automobile dealers across the state for a month, citing continued failure to comply with vehicle registration procedures. A senior transport department official on Friday confirmed that this is the first time such disciplinary action has been taken against dealers for violating registration norms. The suspended dealers, spread across districts including Lucknow, Barabanki, Sitapur, Kushinagar, Moradabad, and Prayagraj, have been barred from selling vehicles or uploading registration requests on the VAHAN portal during the suspension period that began on June 3. After being repeatedly warned, the dealers were served show-cause notices on April 21 and May 15 this year after a detailed analysis of pending registrations from January to May 2025. Despite being given adequate time, they failed to improve their performance or respond satisfactorily, the Office of the Transport Commissioner said in a statement. The department asserted that these actions are part of an ongoing effort to ensure transparent and citizen-focused service delivery in vehicle registration. "Persistent non-compliance with Rule 39 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR) and relevant provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules has led to this action, which is aimed at reinforcing accountability and discipline in the vehicle registration process," the statement read. Among those penalised is a prominent dealership in Lucknow, Aarna Megacorp Pvt. Ltd., "highlighting the department's intent to enforce rules uniformly, irrespective of a dealer's location or scale." In Barabanki, the affected dealers are Barabanki Auto Sales & Service, Bright 2 Wheel Sales, and Kalyan Motors. Sitapur-based dealers Narendra Automobiles, Agarwal Auto Sales, and M/s Budhram Auto have also been suspended. From Kushinagar, similar action has been taken against Gupta Automobiles and Gupta Auto Sales. In Sambhal, Badar Motors faced suspension, while in Pratapgarh, M/s Janta Trading Company was penalised. Dealers from Maharajganj include Shubham Automobiles and Chandra Sales, while Shakti Autos from Raebareli and M/s Auto Wheels from Jaunpur were also among the defaulters. In Sant Kabir Nagar, Bharat Auto Sales faced suspension, along with Shyam Motors in Fatehpur and Shiva Auto Sales in Ghazipur. RN Motors in Rampur and Shyam Motors in Auraiya were also on the list. Further, Jai Auto Mobiles in Ambedkar Nagar, Cross Wheel Auto Pvt. Ltd. in Moradabad, and Uplife Solutions Pvt. Ltd. in Basti were suspended. Saraswati Motors in Prayagraj and Vishal Motors in Unnao were among the final names on the list. In a parallel move, the department has also issued show cause notices to 50 other dealers across the state with high registration pendency. These dealers have been given a 14-day deadline to clear pending files or face similar suspension.
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
YouTube's latest tactic targets ad blockers with fresh measures to make users pay for Premium subscription
Ad blockers mustn't flourish - at least according to YouTube. The Alphabet-owned video platform has been cracking down on viewers who continue to use ad blockers on its site, all because they must submit to the demands of major tech companies eager for your money. If you have an ad blocker extension turned on, YouTube no longer allows playback until you disable it. In its current iteration, YouTube is mostly successful in ensuring that free users can't get away with using ad blockers. Now, the company has added another layer of defence against ad blockers. According to many Reddit users, popular workarounds like uBlock Origin and AdBlock are no longer effective against YouTube ads. That means users are now seeing warnings to stop using ad blockers. For some who rely on these services, the YouTube page appears completely blank. Naturally, this has led to an uproar against Google for its strong stance against ad blockers. Even if we acknowledge that ads help creators generate revenue from their videos, it's clear that Google is ultimately looking out for its own interests. As always, though, users will likely devise new ways to bypass these restrictions. We're at an impasse: users don't want to pay for Premium, and YouTube doesn't want anyone to bypass ads. It's hard to imagine, but there was a time when the internet was virtually ad-free. Sure, pop-ups existed here and there, but you didn't have to pay for every service just to enjoy it without ads. Over the last decade, that has changed. Every company has gradually shifted to premium models that promise an ad-free experience. While many users have caved and paid for these services, it feels like a never-ending battle. For example, companies could randomly introduce a new subscription tier for users who want to pay less but are okay with a few ads. Recently, Prime Video announced that, starting June 17, users would have to pay extra if they don't want to see ads while watching content. That's especially strange considering users already pay for a Prime subscription. Now, the ad-free tier is an add-on for subscribers who don't want ads. This has caused a lot of uproar on social media, but Amazon is moving ahead with its new subscription model in India. As more companies play with subscription tiers to offer users more options regarding ads, it's also becoming unclear what exactly we're paying for besides content. Who wins at the end of all this? In most cases, it's just the companies making massive profits.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Dino Morea summoned by ED in Mithi River Distilling case
Dino Morea is in trouble. The Enforcement Directorate summoned the Bollywood actor. This is regarding the Rs 65 crore Mithi River desilting scam. Raids occurred at his Mumbai home and other locations. His brother Santino is also under investigation. The ED case is based on a Mumbai Police FIR. It alleges irregularities in Mithi River desilting tenders from 2017-2023. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Enforcement Directorate on Saturday summoned Bollywood actor Dino Morea to appear before it next week in the Rs 65 crore Mithi River Desilting scam Thursday, the agency had raided 15 locations, including the actor's home in Bandra (West), Mumbai . The raids covered other premises located in Mumbai in Maharashtra and Kochi in linked to Morea's brother Santino were also raided, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) officials, contractors and some others, the sources said on Thursday. The investigation is being conducted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), they ED case stems from a Mumbai Police economic offences wing (EOW) FIR filed in May against 13 people, including contractors and civic officials, for an alleged Rs 65.54 crore scam in the tenders awarded from 2017-2023 for desilting of the Mithi river which flows through Mumbai and acts as a stormwater drainage channel for the metro Uddhav Thackeray-led undivided Shiv Sena controlled the cash-rich BMC from 1997 till the party's split in 2022. After the expiry of the general body in 2022, the civic body was controlled by the state government, which was then headed by Eknath was alleged by the police in its complaint that BMC officials tailored the tender for the desilting contract in such a way that it benefited a particular supplier of machinery, and the contractors reportedly generated fraudulent bills for transporting the sludge out of and his brother were questioned by the Mumbai Police EOW in this case last month. The 49-year-old actor has been questioned twice by Morea brothers were questioned by the police about their alleged links with alleged middleman Ketan Kadam, arrested in the case along with another accused, Jai Joshi, apart from some financial transactions made in a company linked to is the second time that the actor has been in the crosshairs of the ED, In 2021, the agency had attached his assets as part of a money laundering investigation linked to an alleged bank fraud case against Gujarat-based pharmaceutical company Sterling Biotech and its plan to desilt the river was planned by the Mumbai civic authorities following the 2005 floods, which brought the city to a grinding halt.
