Federal Maritime Law review aims to harmonise, not centralise: Loke
'We are not taking over state powers. Maritime rights under the Malaysian Agreement 1963 (MA63) will be fully respected.
'What we want is to harmonise so that if there are inconsistencies between the laws in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, and Sarawak, we can align them with everyone's agreement,' he said at a press conference after officiating the launch of Malaysian Maritime Week 2025.
Loke said both state governments are involved in the ongoing legal review and have appointed representatives to the Maritime Law Reform and Review Committee, chaired by Federal Court judge Tan Sri Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan.
The committee is currently reviewing six key maritime-related laws, including the Malaysia Shipping Ordinance, the Sabah and Sarawak Merchant Shipping Ordinances and legislation on port operations and privatisation.
'Many of these laws were written decades ago, some even before independence and they no longer reflect the needs of today's industry.
'We need to update them so our maritime sector can stay competitive and ready for the future,' Loke said.
The committee has been given a one-year timeline, but Loke said the government is prepared to proceed with any proposed changes as soon as they are ready — even if that's earlier than expected.
Loke also said that the government is preparing to table a new bill to establish a special court for maritime cases under the existing High Court structure.
'Right now, there's no dedicated court for maritime matters. We want to set one up so we can better handle legal issues in this field,' he added.
The ministry is expected to table the first batch of legal amendments in Parliament by December this year, before the end of the Fifteenth Parliament session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
TNB receives additional RM840.13mil tax bill for YA2022
KUALA LUMPUR: Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) has received a notice of additional assessment from the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) for the year of assessment (YA) 2022 amounting to RM840.13mil, it said in stock exchange filing today. The energy utility said it received the notice on July 24, 2025, and - given the Federal Court's decision pertaining to a similar notice of additional assessment it received for YA 2018 - it is currently evaluating its available legal options. "This evaluation takes into consideration that TNB has already submitted an application for Investment Allowance under Schedule 7B of the Income Tax Act 1967 (including those for YA 2022) to the Minister of Finance," it said. Earlier this month, the Federal Court ruled in favour of the IRB concerning an additional tax assessment for the financial year ended December 2018. The court overturned earlier High Court and Court of Appeal decisions that had favoured TNB, reinstating a tax bill initially set at RM1.81bil, which was reduced to RM1.25bil after a penalty remission in December 2020. On July 22, 2025, the High Court granted leave to TNB, through its subsidiary TNB Western Energy Bhd, to commence judicial review against the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) in relation to a tax assessment totalling RM291.6mil for the financial year ended December 2018. TNB said in a stock exchange filing it was also granted an interim stay of all further proceedings, including the enforcement of the assessment notice, until the disposal of the substantive hearing. The High Court scheduled a case management on Aug 5 for further directions.
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Rallies are just a game of one-upmanship
FOLLOWING the Federal Court decision that ruled a section of the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012 criminalising not giving notice of assemblies to the authorities as unconstitutional, it has been smooth sailing for holding the anti-Anwar Ibrahim rally this Saturday. The police will not be closing any roads in Kuala Lumpur ahead of the rally, and are expecting to have 10,000 to 15,000 participants converging at Dataran Merdeka. However, the actual number may well be swelled by curious onlookers or those out to have some fun. AI created videos of people travelling to and attending the rally, which has yet to take place. These videos have gone viral, and many more videos would follow suit during and after the rally. Just like many fake videos in the past, many viewers would swallow them hook, line and sinker. Similarly, most people accept misinformation and disinformation as truth without realising that statements made by the same politicians often contradict, depending on whether they are in the government or opposition, to retain or gain power for themselves, not the interest of the rakyat. The fact is, there will be little change in our country, regardless of which block of parties are in the government. Many have resigned to the fact that we will be choosing the lesser of two evils come election day. Only the blind and ignorant, and staunch party supporters hoping for handouts, will continue to show support for their leaders, and will try to bring others down, including the sitting prime minister, but could not name a more capable replacement. The turnout for this Saturday's rally could be small, medium or large. If confined to ardent protestors, the number may be insignificant. But it could be swelled by paid protestors or curious onlookers, including foreign and domestic visitors attracted to historic sites around the area. Even if the number is large, made possible by great logistics, it will be a short-lived victory for the organisers and protestors. The other camp is not going to take it lying down and is likely to organise a mammoth pro-Anwar rally to show who is more popular in a game of one-upmanship. If so, this Saturday's rally would not only be an exercise in futility, but could also make Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim more popular than what he is today. As usual, rhetoric may impress the naive, but is more like hot air. ‒ July 25, 2025 YS Chan is master trainer for Mesra Malaysia and Travel and Tours Enhancement Course and an Asean Tourism Master Trainer. He is also a tourism and transport business consultant. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Scoop/
Borneo Post
3 hours ago
- Borneo Post
High Court sets aside travel ban on company directors in GST refund case
The court found that the Customs Department acted unlawfully in issuing a notice under Section 49 of the GST Act 2014 to prevent the directors from leaving Malaysia. – Photo by Chimon Upon KUCHING (July 25): The High Court here has ruled in favour of three company directors, setting aside a travel ban imposed on them by the Royal Malaysian Customs Department in connection with a disputed Goods and Services Tax (GST) refund. The court found that the Customs Department acted unlawfully in issuing a notice under Section 49 of the GST Act 2014 to prevent the directors from leaving Malaysia. The ban was imposed despite the fact that the alleged tax liability was owed by the company, not the directors personally, and the company remains solvent and in operation. The case stemmed from a GST refund initially approved and paid to the company in 2018. In 2020, following a second audit, Customs demanded repayment of RM1.68 million and later issued a travel ban in 2023 without notifying the directors directly. The directors only learned of the restriction days later. In its decision, the court held that the legal conditions under Sections 49 and 53 of the GST Act were not satisfied. It ruled that personal liability could only arise if the company was insolvent and its assets insufficient to cover the tax liability – circumstances that did not exist in this case. The court further found that the failure to serve the travel ban notice directly to the individuals, as required under Section 49(3), constituted a breach of procedural fairness and natural justice. The judicial review was allowed, and the court ordered the travel ban to be lifted. Costs of RM8,000 were awarded to the applicants. This case highlights the importance of adhering to legal safeguards when enforcing tax recovery measures and reinforces the protection of individual rights under administrative law. The company directors are represented by Adrian Lee Chew and Chan Yin Xi of Battenberg & Talma, assisted by Lam Kam Wing and Toh Yong Lai of JK Tax Services Sdn Bhd. GST refund Kuching travel ban
