Coca-Cola refutes Trump's sugar claim, backs corn syrup as ‘safe'
'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump said in a Truth Social post late Tuesday. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'
Coca-Cola initially issued a polite statement thanking 'President Trump's enthusiasm' for the brand, saying it looked forward to 'new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range.'
But by Thursday, the beverage giant issued a more detailed defence of HFCS, a sweetener that has long been controversial and blamed by some for contributing to rising obesity rates in the US.
'The name sounds complex, but high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) – which we use to sweeten some of our beverages – is actually just a sweetener made from corn,' the company said in a statement, The Guardian reported. 'It's safe; it has about the same number of calories per serving as table sugar and is metabolized in a similar way by your body.'
The company cited the American Medical Association (AMA), saying it 'has confirmed that HFCS is no more likely to contribute to obesity than table sugar or other full-calorie sweeteners,' and added, 'Please be assured that Coca-Cola brand soft drinks do not contain any harmful substances.'
In 2023, the AMA had stated that 'insufficient evidence exists to specifically restrict use of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or other fructose-containing sweeteners in the food supply or to require the use of warning labels on products containing HFCS.'
As per report by The Guardian, Trump's fondness for Diet Coke is well known — including the installation of a red button in the Oval Office that summoned a butler with a can of the beverage. Diet Coke, however, does not use corn syrup or cane sugar; it's sweetened with aspartame, a low-calorie artificial sweetener.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
19 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Unmasking TRF: US designation marks turning point in fight against proxy terror
Srinagar: In a major international move that underscores growing global concern over South Asia's emerging terror networks, the United States on Friday designated The Resistance Front (TRF) as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT).The announcement, made by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, follows closely on the heels of the horrific Pahalgam massacre in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22, where 26 civilians were killed — making it one of the deadliest attacks in the Valley in recent designation is more than symbolic; it represents a firm global stance against the use of front groups by banned outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Indian security agencies have long argued that TRF is simply LeT in disguise, created to avoid international scrutiny by adopting a seemingly secular name and operating through indirect channels.'These actions taken by the Department of State demonstrate the Trump Administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack," Marco Rubio said in a emerged in late 2019, shortly after the government of India revoked Article 370 and reorganized Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories. With the spotlight on Pakistan's terror infrastructure and pressure mounting from global bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), outfits like LeT began rebranding themselves. TRF was born out of that need — a new name, but old networks, old leadership, and old group quickly made its mark with high-quality propaganda, encrypted communication methods, and targeted attacks that mirrored the Lashkar playbook. Intelligence officials say TRF is not an independent entity but part of a 'branding shift' to portray militancy as local resistance rather than cross-border terrorism.'This is basically a front of the LeT… created particularly when Pakistan was under FATF pressure and needed plausible deniability,' said Dr. Ajai Sahni, head of the South Asia Terrorism distinguishes TRF from Hizb-ul-Mujahideen or Jaish-e-Mohammed is its embrace of digital warfare. The outfit has no known public leadership. Recruits are radicalized online, handlers operate from across the border, and the group communicates via encrypted platforms like describe TRF's strategy as 'headless' — meaning there's no singular leadership structure to target. Known LeT operatives rotate under TRF banners, ensuring continuity while avoiding long-term exposure. TRF has claimed responsibility for attacks on off-duty police personnel, BJP workers, and migrant labourers — acts designed to instill fear and disrupt social cohesion while projecting a façade of homegrown April 22 attack in Pahalgam changed everything. Masked TRF operatives ambushed a tourist bus, opening fire and killing 26 civilians, including several women and children. The scale and brutality of the attack drew widespread condemnation and forced international actors to reconsider the TRF's many, the massacre was a grim echo of past Lashkar atrocities, particularly the 2008 Mumbai attacks. It was also a political flashpoint. In India, Operation Sindoor — a counter-terror offensive — was launched in its aftermath. Globally, it generated the political will needed to was quick to welcome the US designation. 'Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF—a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack. Zero tolerance for Terrorism. #OpSindoor," External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar posted on the move is a diplomatic and symbolic victory, security analysts warn that TRF — like other LeT proxies — could regroup under a different banner or mutate into smaller cells. The fight, they say, must now go beyond designations and focus on dismantling the transnational terror networks that sustain such fronts.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US designation of The Resistance Front 'timely and important' step: MEA
India on Friday welcomed the US designating The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, a global terrorist outfit over the Pahalgam attack with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar describing it as a "strong affirmation" of India-US counter-terror cooperation. New Delhi said the designation of TRF is a "timely and important" step and asserted that it has consistently emphasised the need for global cooperation in the fight against terrorism. India's reaction came hours after the US State Department announced adding the TRF as a "designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT)" and cited its claim taking responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said India remains committed to a "policy of zero tolerance" towards terrorism and will continue to work closely with its international partners to ensure that terrorist organisations and their proxies are held accountable. In a social media post, Jaishankar specially complimented US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for designating the LeT proxy. "Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF—'a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy'—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack," he said. The MEA said India welcomes the decision of the US State Department to designate TRF as an FTO and SDGT. The TRF, a "proxy" of the Pakistan-based terrorist organisation LeT, has been involved in numerous terror-related activities, including the heinous attack on civilians in Pahalgam for which it twice claimed responsibility, it said. "India has consistently emphasised the need for global cooperation in the fight against terrorism and the dismantling of terror infrastructure," the MEA said in a statement. It said the designation of TRF is a "timely and important step reflecting the deep cooperation between India and the United States on counter-terrorism". "India remains committed to a policy of zero tolerance towards terrorism and will continue to work closely with its international partners to ensure that terrorist organisations and their proxies are held accountable," the statement added. The US State Department also noted that TRF claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack. "This was the deadliest attack on civilians in India since the 2008 Mumbai attacks conducted by LeT," it said. "TRF has also claimed responsibility for several attacks against Indian security forces, including most recently in 2024." The State Department said its actions demonstrate the Trump Administration's commitment to "protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack".
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariff pressure pushes Asia toward American LNG, but at the cost of climate goals
Asian countries are offering to buy more U.S. liquefied natural gas in negotiations with the Trump administration as a way to alleviate tensions over U.S. trade deficits and forestall higher tariffs. Analysts warn that strategy could undermine those countries' long-term climate ambitions and energy security. Buying more U.S. LNG has topped the list of concessions Asian countries have offered in talks with Washington over President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. Vietnam's Prime Minister underlined the need to buy more of the super-chilled fuel in a government meeting, and the government signed a deal in May with an American company to develop a gas import hub. JERA , Japan's largest power generator, signed new 20-year contracts last month to purchase up to 5.5 million metric tons of U.S. gas annually starting around 2030. U.S. efforts to sell more LNG to Asia predate the Trump administration, but they've gained momentum with his intense push to win trade deals. Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is natural gas cooled to a liquid form for easy storage and transport that is used as a fuel for transport, residential cooking and heating and industrial processes. Trump discussed cooperation on a $44 billion Alaska LNG project with South Korea, prompting a visit by officials to the site in June. The U.S. president has promoted the project as a way to supply gas from Alaska's vast North Slope to a liquefication plant at Nikiski in south-central Alaska, with an eye largely on exports to Asian countries while bypassing the Panama Canal Thailand has offered to commit to a long-term deal for American fuel and shown interest in the same Alaska project to build a nearly 810-mile (1,300-kilometer) pipeline that would funnel gas from The Philippines is also considering importing gas from Alaska while India is mulling a plan to scrap import taxes on U.S. energy shipments to help narrow its trade surplus with Washington. "Trump has put pressure on a seeming plethora of Asian trading partners to buy more U.S. LNG," said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy , pointing out that Japan had agreed to buy more despite being so "awash in the fuel" that it was being forced to cancel projects and contracts to offload the excess to Asia's growing economies. "Not good for Southeast Asia's sustainability goals," he said. LNG deals could derail renewable ambitions Experts say LNG purchasing agreements can slow adoption of renewable energy in Asia. Locking into long-term deals could leave countries with outdated infrastructure as the world shifts rapidly toward cleaner energy sources like solar or wind that offer faster, more affordable ways to meet growing power demand, said Indra Overland, head of the Center for Energy Research at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs . Building pipelines, terminals, and even household gas stoves creates systems that are expensive and difficult to replace-making it harder to switch to renewables later. "And you're more likely then to get stuck for longer," he said. Energy companies that profit from gas or coal are powerful vested interests, swaying policy to favor their business models, he said. LNG burns cleaner than coal, but it's still a fossil fuel that emits greenhouse gases and contributes to climate change. Many LNG contracts include "take-or-pay" clauses, obliging governments to pay even if they don't use the fuel. Christopher Doleman of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis warns that if renewable energy grows fast, reducing the need for LNG, countries may still have to pay for gas they no longer need. Pakistan is an example. Soaring LNG costs drove up electricity prices, pushing consumers to install rooftop solar panels. As demand for power drops and gas supply surges, the country is deferring LNG shipments and trying to resell excess fuel. The LNG math doesn't add up Experts said that although countries are signaling a willingness to import more U.S. LNG, they're unlikely to import enough to have a meaningful impact on U.S. trade deficits. South Korea would need to import 121 million metric tons of LNG in a year - 50% more than the total amount of LNG the U.S. exported globally last year and triple what South Korea imported, said Doleman. Vietnam - with a trade surplus with the U.S. twice the size of Korea's - would need to import 181 million metric tons annually, more than double what the U.S. exported last year. Other obstacles stand in the way. The Alaska LNG project is widely considered uneconomic. Both coal and renewable energy in Asia are so much cheaper that U.S. gas would need to cost less than half its current price to compete. Tariffs on Chinese steel could make building building gas pipelines and LNG terminals more expensive, while longstanding delays to build new gas turbines mean new gas power projects may not come online until 2032. Meanwhile, a global glut in LNG will likely drive prices lower, making it even harder for countries to justify locking into long-term deals with the United States at current higher prices. LNG deals raise energy security concerns Committing to long-term U.S. LNG contracts could impact regional energy security at a time of growing geopolitical and market uncertainties, analysts said. A core concern is over the longterm stability of the U.S. as a trading partner, said Overland. "The U.S. is not a very predictable entity. And to rely on energy from there is a very risky proposition," he said. LNG only contributes to energy security when it's available and affordable, says Dario Kenner of Zero Carbon Analytics . "That's the bit that they leave out ... But it's pretty important," he said. This was the concern during the recent potential disruptions to fuel shipments through the Strait of Hormuz and earlier during the war in Ukraine, when LNG cargoes originally destined for Asia were rerouted to Europe. Despite having contracts, Asian countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were outbid by European buyers. "Events in Europe, which can seem very far away, can have an impact on availability and prices in Asia," Kenner said. Asian countries can improve their energy security and make progress toward cutting carbon emissions by building more renewable energy, he said, noting there is vast room for that given that only about 1% of Southeast Asia's solar and wind potential is being used. "There are genuine choices to meet rising electricity demand. It is not just having to build LNG," he said.
