Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down after Trump funding cuts
The announcement came just over a week after President Donald Trump enacted a rescissions bill clawing back congressionally approved federal funds for public media and foreign aid. Of the $9 billion in canceled funds, $1.1 billion was earmarked for the corporation for the next two years.
'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' CPB president and CEO Patricia Harrison said in a statement. 'CPB remains committed to fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities and supporting our partners through this transition with transparency and care.'
Officials at the organization, which was founded more than 60 years ago, say they are focused on helping local stations figure out how to cope with sudden budget shortfalls. Harrison has warned that some stations, particularly in rural areas, will have to shut down without federal support.
Most larger stations have numerous other funding sources, including viewer and listener donations, to soften the blow dealt by Congress. Still, public media executives have warned that the interconnected system will be weakened in various ways without federal funding as a foundation.
Most of the corporation's roughly 100 staff positions will be eliminated when the money runs out on September 30. The CPB will maintain a small transition team through January to guarantee 'a responsible and orderly closeout of operations,' it said in a statement.
The shuttering is a political victory for Trump, who tried several different methods to defund public broadcasting this year. At one point, he tried to fire three of the corporation's board members, even though he had no authority to do so under the law that created the corporation in 1967.
The corporation went to court to defend its board members, but on Friday, it filed a voluntary dismissal of its lawsuit, in effect acknowledging that Trump has prevailed.
'REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED DOING THIS FOR 40 YEARS, AND FAILED….BUT NO MORE,' Trump wrote on Truth Social after the rescission bill he pushed was approved by both the GOP-controlled House and Senate.
Even after Trump signed the bill into law, some public media advocates held out hope that federal funding could be restored through the normal appropriations process in Congress. Senators advanced a draft bill without any such funding on Thursday, however, signaling that such a plot twist was exceedingly unlikely.
For Trump and other Republican lawmakers, eliminating the corporation is a successful stand against liberal bias, which they allege is a rampant problem at both NPR and PBS.
For public media advocates, it's the end of a noncommercial TV and radio era, taking the federal government out of the funding equation altogether.
'The end of CPB is the direct result of the deep and corrupt failure of Congress and the Trump administration to invest in informing the American public,' Craig Aaron, co-CEO of the progressive media reform group Free Press, said in a statement. 'They have trashed decades of democracy-building work and will deny many journalists, artists, educators and creators the opportunity to be heard.'
Aaron expressed hope that publicly-funded media can be reinvented as 'a bulwark against authoritarianism that meets the civic needs of all our communities.'
Some station leaders have similarly described this moment as an opportunity to rebuild with more local-level support. GBH, the public media powerhouse in Boston, put up a sign outside its headquarters last month that read 'Local. Trusted. Defunded.'
'We're not backing down' despite the federal funding loss, GBH said in a fundraising push, 'but we can't do it without you. Donate now to keep public media strong and independent.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's stock still struggling since May peak
Warren Buffett's stock still struggling since May peak originally appeared on TheStreet. There's a reason why shares of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway () and () have fallen more than 12% since early May. Some of its businesses aren't performing as well as in prior years. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰 The company saw operating profit drop to $11.16 billion, a 3.8% decline from a year earlier, in part because of declines in underwriting earnings in its insurance operations, according to its second-quarter earnings report released Saturday. Plus, it wrote down the value of its investment in Kraft Heinz () , the food giant Berkshire helped put together. Kraft Heinz shares have lost two third of their value since 2017. The pre-tax write-down came to about $5 billion. It still owns 27.4% of the company. Until this spring, Berkshire controlled two of the 12 seats on the Kraft Heinz board. It has given up both seats. The write-down was a rare disappointment for Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway, although analysts believe it was long shares struggle since spring Berkshire's Class A shares closed Friday at $711,480, down $8,370 on the day. The Class B shares ended at $472.84, up 96 cents. Berkshire shares hit intraday peaks of $812,855 and $542.07, respectively, on May 2, the day before the company's annual meeting when Buffett said he would retire as CEO on Dec. 31. The closes for the stock classes translated into year-to-date-gains of 18.5%. The shares then fell through May, June and July. One reason for the declines was the uncertainty created by the announcement. Buffett was a known quantity for Wall Street. Greg Abel, who will succeed the Oracle of Omaha as CEO, is less known. Perhaps as important, the big technology rebound that started in April probably drew money away from less glamorous opportunities. Like Palantir () , Facebook parent Meta Platforms () , Microsoft () and, of course, Nvidia () . Here is how the Berkshire B shares have behaved compared with the S&P 500 over the six months. Despite the shares' fallback since May, Berkshire's A shares are up 4.5% in 2025, with the B shares up 4.3%. The S&P 500 is up 6.1% on the year and up 29% from its April low. (We should note Berkshire rose on Friday as some investors saw it as a safe haven.) And the company has real strength. Berkshire ended the second quarter with $344.1 billion in cash and equivalents, about 37% of total assets. The cash position includes nearly $250 billion in short-term Treasury who turns 95 on Aug. 30, took control of Berkshire in 1965. It was then a struggling textile company in 1965. He has been CEO since 1970. Abel, who is Berkshire's vice chairman of non-insurance operations, is also CEO of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, which operates four electric utilities and related subsidiaries. More Warren Buffett: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway predicts major housing market shift soon Warren Buffett has harsh words for stock market investors Warren Buffett makes worrisome car insurance prediction Former Warren Buffett exec makes bold real estate bet A low-visibility corporate giant Berkshire is a huge conglomerate with about 392,000 employees. Much of its profits come from its insurance businesses. It owns Geico, Allegany and no fewer than 16 other insurance companies. It also owns the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, a host of electric utilities, Fruit of the Loom, Dairy Queen, Duracell, boot-maker Justin Brands and the Pilot chain of truck stops. Most of its companies run semi-autonomously and have been reliably successful and made Buffett and Berkshire shareholders wealthy. The railroad business is based in the western United States and will face new competitive pressures when — and if — rival Union Pacific Corp. () merges with Norfolk Southern Corp. () . The two sides agreed this past week to merge in a deal valued at about $85 billion. Assuming it closes, the result would be the first coast-to-coast railroad operator in the United States. Many analysts believe BNSF will need to find a merger partner of its own to compete. There, however, just five big railroads. Berkshire still is still a large investor in a host of companies with a fair value of $268 billion. The largest holdings are: American Express () . Apple () . Bank of America () . Coca-Cola () . Chevron Corp. () .Warren Buffett's stock still struggling since May peak first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 3, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tells Schumer to 'GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal funding demands after negotiations collapse
Hours of tense negotiations to strike a deal on President Donald Trump's nominees blew up Saturday night, and now lawmakers are headed home. Senate Republicans and Democrats were quick to point the finger at one another for the deal's demise, but it was ultimately Trump who nuked the talks. Pirro Confirmed As D.c. U.s. Attorney Amid Partisan Clash As Dem Nominee Blockade Continues In a lengthy post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of "demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees." "This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted. It is political extortion, by any other name," Trump said. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" "Do not accept the offer," he continued. "Go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country. Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" Read On The Fox News App Dems Dig In, Trump Demands All: Nominee Fight Boils Over In Senate As Gop Looks For A Deal Instead of finding a pathway to vote on as many as 60 of the president's nominees, all of which moved through committee with bipartisan support, lawmakers rapid-fire voted on seven before leaving Washington until September. But Schumer treated Trump's move as a victory for Senate Democrats. He countered that it was the president who gave up on negotiations while he and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., worked to find a bipartisan solution, "provided the White House and Senate Republicans met our demands." "He took his ball, he went home, leaving Democrats and Republicans alike wondering what the hell happened," Schumer said, standing next to a poster-sized version of the president's post. "Trump's all-caps Tweet said it all," he continued. "In a fit of rage, Trump threw in the towel, sent Republicans home, and was unable to do the basic work of negotiating." But prior to the president's edict, both sides of the aisle believed they were on the verge of a breakthrough to both meet Trump's desire to see his nominees confirmed and leave Washington. Thune said that there were "lots of offers" made between him and Schumer over the course of negotiations. "There were several different times where I think either or both sides maybe thought there was a deal in the end," he said. Senate Democrats wanted the White House to unfreeze billions in National Institute of Health and foreign aid funding, in addition to a future agreement that no more clawback packages would come from the White House. In exchange, they would greenlight several of Trump's non-controversial nominees. Recess On Ice As Republicans Hunker Down For High-stakes Nominee Blitz Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., accused Schumer of going "too far" by upping the price tag on his demands. "We've had three different deals since last night," he said. "And every time it's been, every time it's 'I want more,'" Mullin said of Schumer's demands. He said that Republicans weren't caught off guard by Trump's call to halt talks, and noted that the White House had been heavily involved in negotiations. "You get to a realization that there was, it was never about making a deal," he continued. "They want to go out and say the President's being unrealistic, and because he can't answer to his base to make a deal like we have in every other president in history." Now, Republicans won't pursue recess appointments, but Mullin noted that moving ahead with a rule change to the confirmation process when lawmakers return in September was going to happen in response. "The asks evolved on both sides quite a bit over time," Thune said. "But in the end, we never got to a place where we had both sides agree to lock it in." Senate Democrats, on the other hand, countered that their offer never changed, and that Republicans kept increasing the number of nominees they wanted across the line, and attempted to include more controversial, partisan picks. Schumer wouldn't reveal the details of his demands, but charged that any changes to Senate rules would be a "huge mistake," and urged Trump to work with Senate Democrats moving forward, particularly as Congress hurtles toward yet another deadline to fund the government in September. "They should stop listening to him," Schumer said. "If they want to do what's good for the American people, they shouldn't be in blind obeisance to Donald Trump."Original article source: Trump tells Schumer to 'GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal funding demands after negotiations collapse
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MSA Safety (MSA) Reports Q2: Everything You Need To Know Ahead Of Earnings
Safety equipment manufacturer MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) will be reporting results this Monday afternoon. Here's what to look for. MSA Safety beat analysts' revenue expectations by 5% last quarter, reporting revenues of $421.3 million, up 1.9% year on year. It was an exceptional quarter for the company, with an impressive beat of analysts' EPS estimates. Is MSA Safety a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free. This quarter, analysts are expecting MSA Safety's revenue to decline 3.2% year on year to $447.8 million, a reversal from the 3.4% increase it recorded in the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings are expected to come in at $1.76 per share. The majority of analysts covering the company have reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business to stay the course heading into earnings. MSA Safety has missed Wall Street's revenue estimates three times over the last two years. Looking at MSA Safety's peers in the business services & supplies segment, some have already reported their Q2 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. HNI delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 7%, beating analysts' expectations by 3.2%, and MillerKnoll reported revenues up 8.2%, topping estimates by 5.3%. HNI's stock price was unchanged after the resultswhile MillerKnoll was up 12.2%. Read our full analysis of HNI's results here and MillerKnoll's results here. Questions about potential tariffs and corporate tax changes have caused much volatility in 2025. While some of the business services & supplies stocks have shown solid performance in this choppy environment, the group has generally underperformed, with share prices down 4.4% on average over the last month. MSA Safety is up 2.2% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $182.20 (compared to the current share price of $175.23). Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here.
