SESSION SNAPSHOT: Lawmakers show support for curtailing cellphone access, diversity initiatives
The third week of Arkansas' 95th General Assembly saw a slight increase in action as committees considered more bills. New legislation continued to be filed, including one bill touted by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders at a mental health event Wednesday that would make good on her promise to ban cellphones in public schools.
Supporters of Senate Bill 142 said it would help students better focus on their education and address a root cause of the decline in children's mental health — unrestricted access to social media.
The bill would require districts' phone policies to include exemptions for health reasons, Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), extracurricular activities and emergencies.
Echoing conversations at the federal level, Arkansas lawmakers this week engaged in discussions around diversity, equity and inclusion, beginning with an Arkansas Legislative Black Caucus meeting Monday focused on Walmart rolling back its DEI initiatives.
Company officials said they remain committed to creating a culture of 'belonging' for associates, and insisted bullying and harassment would not be tolerated. Black lawmakers questioned if they could again count on the global retailer's support against Senate Bill 3, which mirrors a 2023 bill to 'end state-sponsored discrimination.' Lawmakers noted Walmart's opposition to the 2023 bill, but officials said the company had no position on SB 3.
Again sponsored by Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Jonesboro, SB 3 targets diversity-related initiatives and would, among other things, amend a scholarship designed to attract qualified minority teachers to the Delta, a rural area with a significant Black population and a known teacher shortage.
Despite concerns presented in committee and on the Senate floor, the full Senate approved the bill Wednesday, which will likely be considered by a House committee next week.
The Arkansas Senate confirmed more than three dozen governor-nominated members to state boards and commissions Tuesday, with the only opposition directed at a former Republican lawmaker who now works for a Little Rock lobbying firm.
Sen. Bryan King, R-Green Forest, requested that the Senate vote separately on Grant Hodges' appointment to the Board of Corrections. King argued the former state representative from Centerton wasn't qualified for the position. Two other Republicans joined King in voting against Hodges' appointment, which passed on a voice vote.
Arkansas Senate confirms ex-lawmaker to state prison board over one member's objection
King, who's been a vocal opponent of the state's plan to construct a 3,000-bed prison in Franklin County, announced during a press conference Thursday morning that he filed six pieces of legislation related to public safety.
'We've had a series of soft-on-crime bills, catch-and-release bills, and we've had a consistent pattern of underfunding corrections and public safety,' King said. 'What's happened today is it's created a three-headed monster — we have a high incarceration rate, we have a high crime rate and we have a high prison overcrowding rate.'
Senate Bill 143 proposes transfering $100,000 from sales tax collections to Arkansas State Police for crime reduction and prevention programs, and to assist the Division of Community Correction in the provision of probation, parole and post-release supervision services. Senate Bill 145 would require money the state receives from lawsuits concerning funds from the General Improvement Fund or its successor be used for the same purposes.
Senate Bill 144 would allow counties to enter into an 'inmate close-to-home partnership' to construct or expand a facility for a shared county jail to house inmates awaiting transfer to the Division of Correction. At least one county must be one of the eight that contribute the most inmates to the Division of Corrections' total population.
Senate Joint Resolutions 7 and 8 propose amending the Arkansas Constitution concerning medical marijuana and casino gaming, respectively. SJR 6 would allow proceeds from the sale of medical marijuana and casino gaming to support crime reduction and recidivism initiatives.
King's hope is to increase public safety by lowering the number of people going to jail and the recidivism rate, but that will take money, he said.
Arkansas lawmakers filed more than 200 new bills and resolutions this week, including:
House Bill 1243 from Rep. Kendon Underwood, R-Cave Springs, aims to increase transparency with campaign contributions and expenditures.
House Bill 1280 by Rep. Mindy McAlindon, R-Centerton, would prohibit state agencies from using public funds to purchase promotional items made in China. McAlindon's House Bill 1323 would limit the investment of Arkansas' pension and retirement system funds in entities 'closely connected' with China and its governing party.
House Bill 1283 by Rep. Julie Mayberry, R-Hensley, would require the Division of Elementary and Secondary Education to establish K-12 digital media standards.
House Bill 1297 by Rep. Lee Johnson, R-Greenwood, would regulate the use of artificial intelligence, algorithms and other automated technologies by healthcare insurers.
An amusing quirk of the Legislature is the duty of Rep. Stephen Meeks, a Greenbrier Republican and most senior House member, to rattle off a procedural list (ala an auctioneer) at the end of each House session before lawmakers can formally adjourn.
That tradition came to an end Thursday, when his colleagues approved updated House rules allowing him to declare an abbreviated version from now on.
In case you hadn't had the chance to enjoy this in person, you can see his final (at least for now) lengthy proclamation here at the 2:33 p.m. mark.
No legislative meetings are scheduled for Friday, but lawmakers will resume their work on Monday. You can find an updated schedule of meetings and agendas on the Arkansas Legislature's website.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?
'Destroying democracy' — the latest theme of the left — can be defined in many ways. How about attempting to destroy constitutional, ancient and hallowed institutions simply to suit short-term political gains? So, who in 2020, and now once again, has boasted about packing the 156-year-old, nine-justice Supreme Court? Who talks frequently about destroying the 187-year-old Senate filibuster — though only when they hold a Senate majority? Who wants to bring in an insolvent left-wing Puerto Rico and redefine the 235-year-old District of Columbia — by altering the Constitution — as two new states solely to obtain four additional liberal senators? Who is trying to destroy the constitutionally mandated 235-year Electoral College by circumventing it with the surrogate 'The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?' Does destroying democracy also entail weaponizing federal bureaucracies, turning them into rogue partisan arms of a president? So who ordered the CIA to concoct bogus charges of 'collusion' to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, the 2016-2017 transition, and the first 22 months of Trump's first term? Who prompted a cabal of '51 former intelligence officials' to lie to the American people on the eve of the last debate of the 2020 election that the FBI-authenticated Hunter Biden laptop was instead the work of a 'Russian intelligence operation?' Who ordered the FBI to connive and partner with social-media conglomerates to censor accurate news deemed unhelpful to the 2020 Biden campaign? Who pulled off the greatest presidential coup in history by using surrogates in the shadows to run the cognitively debilitated Biden presidency, then by fiat canceled his reelection effort and finally anointed as his replacement the new nominee Kamala Harris, who had never won a single primary delegate? Who ordered FBI SWAT teams to invade the home of a former president because of a classification dispute over 102 files out of some 13,000 stored there? Who tried to remove an ex-president and leader of his party from at least 25 state ballots to deprive millions of Americans of the opportunity to vote for or against him? Who coordinated four local, state and federal prosecutors to destroy a former and future president by charging him with fantasy crimes that were never before, and will never again be, lodged against anyone else? Who appointed a federal prosecutor to go after the ex-president, who arranged for a high-ranking Justice Department official to step down to join a New York prosecutor's efforts to destroy an ex-president, and who met in the White House with a Georgia county prosecutor seeking to destroy an ex-president — all on the same day — a mere 72 hours after Trump announced his 2024 reelection bid? Who but the current Democrats ever impeached a president twice? Has any party ever tried an ex-president in the Senate when he was out of office and a mere private citizen? When have there ever been two near-miss assassination attempts on a major party presidential candidate during a single presidential campaign? Who destroyed the southern border and broke federal law to allow in, without criminal or health background audits, some 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens? Who created 600 'sanctuary jurisdictions' for the sole purpose of nullifying federal immigration law, in the eerie spirit of the renegade old Confederacy? Who allowed tens of thousands of rioters, arsonists and violent protesters over four months in 2020 to destroy over $2 billion in property, kill some 35 people, injure 1,500 police officers and torch a federal courthouse, a police precinct and a historic church — all with de facto legal impunity? How do the purported destroyers of democracy find themselves winning 60% to 70% approval on most of the key issues of our times, while the supposed saviors of democracy are on the losing side of popular opinion? How does a president 'destroy democracy' by his party winning the White House by both the popular and Electoral College vote, winning majorities in both the Senate and House by popular votes and enjoying a 6-3 edge in the Supreme Court through judges appointed by popularly elected presidents? So what is behind these absurd charges? Three catalysts: One, the new anguished elitist Democratic Party alienated the middle classes through its Jacobin agenda and therefore lost the Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court, and now has no federal political power. Two, the Democratic Party is polling at record lows and yet remains hellbent on alienating the traditional sources of its power — minorities, youth and Independents. Three, Democrats cannot find any issues that the people support, nor any leaders to convince the people to embrace them. So it is no surprise that the panicked Democrats bark at the shadows — given that they know their revolutionary, neo-socialist agenda is destroying them. And yet, like all addicts, they choose destruction over abandoning their self-destructive fixations. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Walmart's view on tariff impacts will move this week's markets
Walmart's view on tariff impacts will move this week's markets originally appeared on TheStreet. This has been a summer where big tech has largely showered us with huge earnings, bigger estimates of their capital spending and fairly fantastic stock gains. Palantir Technologies () , for example, may have finished the week down 5.24%, but the big data company that makes sense out of seemingly random data points is still up 134% this year. Nvidia () is up 34.4%. Facebook parent Meta Platforms () is up 34.1%.This week, the focus changes. First, investors must deal with the aftermath of President Trump's meeting with Russia President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska. The meeting ended with no major agreements, especially on Ukraine. Much attention will be focused on interest rates and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's speech Friday at a symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo. A rate cut is probable in September; the size is the market's attention turns to blocking and tackling as retailers, who deal with customers buying back-to-school supplies, peaches, hamburger and the like, give us detailed looks at the consumer's world as job growth slows but inflation doesn't go away. We're talking Walmart () , Target () , Home Depot () , Lowe's Companies () , TJ Maxx parent TJX Companies () and Ross Stores () . They have to deal with several realities: Dealing with increasingly budget-conscious consumers. Intense competition, including from the colossus called () . How to price their wares when much their inventories are subject to the highest tariffs since the 1930s. How to deal with the Trump Administration's insistence retailers find a way not to raise prices. So far, inflation at the consumer level has been pretty tame. Walmart, which reports before Thursday's open, is by far the leader of this group with stores all over the world. The consensus revenue estimate for Walmart's second quarter is $174 billion, up 3.2% from a year ago, with earnings projected at 73 cents a share, up nearly 9%. A note: The revenue estimate is larger than the combined estimates for retailers reporting this week: Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, TJX, Ross Stores, plus BJ's Wholesale () and La-Z-Boy () . The big issue for Walmart will be how CEO Doug McMillion discusses the Administration's tariffs after the retail giant announces earnings before Thursday's open,.At Walmart's first-quarter earnings call in May, McMillon warned that "higher tariffs will result in higher prices." He couldn't be more specific. Except to say that tariffs should not affect prices of goods the company buys from domestic vendors. President Trump wrote on Truth Social a few days later, "Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain." The question will come up on Walmart's call as well as all the earnings call this week. It came up this past Thursday when farm-equipment giant John Deere () predicted tariff costs in 2025 could total $600 million. Though Deere's earnings beat estimates, its shares fell 6.8%. They recovered a little on Friday to $488.80 and are up 15.4% this year. More Tariffs: Ford CEO Jim Farley supports US tariffs despite $2 billion cost Luxury carmaker begs UK government to stand up to tariffs EU and US automakers both lose big in latest tariff deal A quick review of the week Not a bad week. The Dow had a 1.74% gain, mostly because of two days when the index managed a total of 947 points of gains in two days. The blue chip index briefly crossed 45,000 on Friday for the first time but ended with a 35-point gain at 44, stock — UnitedHealth Group () — shot up nearly 12% on Friday as Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway () and () disclosed it had taken a stake in the troubled health insurer. The gain by itself added 200 points to the Dow's performance. Without United Health, the index would been a loser on the day, just like the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and the Nasdaq Composite. Weekly performances: The Russell 2000 was the winner, up 3.1% on the week and the Dow, as noted, up 1.74%. The Dow and Russell are up six of the last eight weeks. The S&P 500 rose 0.94% for the week, with the Nasdaq up 0.8% and the Nasdaq-100 Index, up 0.4%. The trio are up seven of the last eight weeks. Inflation: Flat to lower on consumer prices. Higher than expected on producer prices: Producer prices are producers get for their goods and services. Energy: Crude oil fell 1.1% on the week to $65.85 barrel. Crude is down 12.4% in 2025. Gasoline prices are down to $3.13 a gallon nationally from $3.26 in early spring. Interest rates: The 10-year Treasury yield ended the week at 4.321%, up slightly from a week ago. Down from a January peak of 4.8%. Mortgage rates: 6.58% as of Friday, about even with a week ago. Down from 6.73% on July 3, according to Mortgage News view on tariff impacts will move this week's markets first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 17, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 17, 2025, where it first appeared. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Disgraced ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner makes blunt prediction about Zohran Mamdani, top Dems in NYC mayoral race: ‘It's inevitable'
Top New York Democrats will swallow hard and eventually endorse lefty socialist Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani for mayor, ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner predicts. Weiner, the convicted perv whose own career crashed amid sexting scandals, said it was 'inevitable' that the nation's leading Democrats in Congress — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — would eventually back Mamdani. 'At the end of the day, people like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, they are going to have to endorse the nominee of their party [Mamdani],' Weiner said Sunday on 'The Cats Roundtable' radio program on WABC 770 AM. 6 Ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner predicts New York Democrats will eventually endorse Zohran Mamdani for mayor. AP 6 'At the end of the day, people like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, they are going to have to endorse the nominee of their party [Mamdani],' Weiner said on 'The Cats Roundtable' radio program. Getty Images 'I think it's inevitable,' he told host John Catsimatidis of the two lawmakers from Brooklyn. Some moderate Democrats who detest Mamdani's views will not endorse him — but Schumer and Jeffries as party leaders can't avoid the spotlight, he said. 'Some people can stay on the sidelines, and I think you're going to see a lot of people do that. but the leaders of the party, which Chuck and Hakeem are, are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea,' he said. 6 'They don't want to harm their moderate candidates all around the country, which are the ones they need to take back the House and Senate,' Weiner said about why Schumer and Jeffries have not endorsed the democratic socialist yet. REUTERS 'They've got the Democratic Party, who's now chosen their nominee,' Weiner said. Top Dems like Schumer and Jeffries have been dragging their feet on endorsing Mamdani to avoid harming moderate members of their party in the 2026 midterms, Weiner opined. 'The reason Chuck and Hakeem have been so slow to endorse Zohran is because they don't want to harm their moderate candidates all around the country, which are the ones they need to take back the House and Senate,' he said. 'That's a political question for them.' 6 According to Weiner, 'unfortunately, or fortunately … I think we're going to have Zohran Mamdani as the mayor in New York City.' James Keivom Republicans are already trying to link their Democratic rivals to Mamdani in this year's municipal elections across the Empire state. Weiner also predicted that Mamdani, as the Democratic nominee, will win the mayoralty. 'Unfortunately, or fortunately … I think we're going to have Zohran Mamdani as the mayor in New York City,' he said. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Catsimatidis noted that two other Democrats are running as independent candidates in the November election — incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who didn't run in the June Democratic primary, and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who lost badly to Mamdani in that race. But Weiner dismissed their chances at winning while running on independent ballot lines in the general contest. Weiner attempted his second comeback, running for a City Council seat in District 2 on Manhattan's East Side in June, but lost badly to Assemblyman Harvey Epstein. 6 Weiner, whose career crashed amid sexting scandals, attempted his second comeback by running for a City Council seat in District 2 on Manhattan's East Side in June, but lost. Paul Martinka Weiner's downfall began in 2011, when he resigned from Congress after admitting he'd sent salacious selfies to at least six women. He then saw his comeback campaign for mayor in 2013 go down in flames when it was revealed he resumed the pervy activity using the pseudonym 'Carlos Danger.' Weiner later developed a months-long online relationship with a 15-year-old girl, whom he asked to dress up in school uniforms and be part of 'rape fantasies,' prosecutors charged. He pleaded guilty to sexting with a minor and did some prison time. His scandal-scarred baggage and criminal conviction may make him unelectable — but Weiner suggested his more moderate brand of politics played a role. 6 Weiner had previously resigned from Congress after admitting he'd sent salacious selfies to women. Angelina Katsanis/AP 'Right now, the Democratic Party in a lot of parts of New York … is very, very left to the point of falling off the edge of the cliff,' he told Catsimatidis. Many mainstream or moderate Democratic lawmakers are 'looking over their shoulders wondering if the next AOC [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] or Zohran Mamdani is going to be coming out of the woodwork to win in a primary,' Weiner said. While leftist or Democratic socialist candidates have won some races, they haven't shown yet that they can govern effectively, he said. 'The one thing that the left hasn't shown that they can do – if you look at Chicago and San Francisco – they haven't shown that they can govern yet,' Weiner said. 'The bigger problem is what outcomes are we going to get as citizens and taxpayers if these candidates are successful? Unfortunately, it looks like we're going to find out in New York City.'
