logo
Climate wars are simmering among the NSW Liberals – and they could pose a problem for Mark Speakman

Climate wars are simmering among the NSW Liberals – and they could pose a problem for Mark Speakman

The Guardian16 hours ago
The never-ending war within the Coalition over energy policy and climate targets appears to have infected the New South Wales Liberals, as they struggle to restore the administration of their branch and get traction with voters.
It's bad news for the NSW opposition leader, Mark Speakman, whose hold on the leadership is being increasingly questioned.
Until now, the main battle ground for the renewed climate wars has been Canberra, where the right of the Liberal party and the Nationals from Queensland – aided and abetted by US president Donald Trump – have used every opportunity to foment discontent.
The federal Coalition leader, Sussan Ley, has promised to review the Coalition's energy policy, but there will be no easy answers. She will need to juggle the demands of MPs such as Nationals senator Matt Canavan and Liberal Andrew Hastie that she drop the net zero target, with the views of her city MPs, who know they could go the way of their former colleagues who lost seats to teal independents.
Let alone doing the right thing for the planet.
For the NSW Coalition, energy policy has been an area of mostly bipartisan agreement – until now.
In 2020, the then energy minister Matt Kean, a Liberal who now chairs the Climate Change Authority, released the energy roadmap that showed how NSW would meet its objective to deliver a 70% cut in emissions by 2035 compared to 2005 levels, and net zero by 2050.
It was supported by both sides.
But last week the first signs of an unravelling emerged.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Just before the NSW parliament rose for a long break, the Liberal MP for Goulburn, Wendy Tuckerman, resigned from the shadow ministry over her own party's failure to listen to her concerns about windfarms.
Ostensibly, it was over a failure of the leadership to consult on the electricity infrastructure bill, which the government said was urgent.
The bill gave the energy minister, Penny Sharpe, the power to fast-track investments in synchronous condensers, which are urgently needed for grid stability. According to her office, it did no more than broaden the definition of priority infrastructure to ensure investments in this critical infrastructure by the privately owned electricity distributors could proceed.
Whether it did more than that depends on who you ask.
The Minns government says it doesn't alter the planning and consultation process for major infrastructure such as transmission lines.
But it was a bridge too far for Tuckerman, whose electorate is part of a renewable energy zone and has seen dozens of projects proposed.
'I have had countless calls, emails and comments from community members that feel like they have just been kicked while they are down. They are bearing the brunt of poor planning and by the government's lack of accountability. They are not being listened to,' she said.
'I can no longer in good conscience be a part of a process that sidelines the voices of constituents and regional communities, or which undermines my ability to represent the people that put me here.'
There's no doubt that Tuckerman's electorate is concerned about the scale of windfarm development – as is the Orana region near Dubbo.
But the concerns have been turbocharged and taken to a wider audience by the Daily Telegraph, which has run no fewer than five stories in the space of two weeks about the harm that windfarms were causing farmers in Tuckerman's electorate.
These were then amplified across other News Corp platforms including news.com.au and Sky News, who interviewed the Telegraph journalists about their coverage, and by 2GB.
At the same time, the rightwing advocacy group Advance has announced a campaign to kill off 'weakling' Liberals who support the net zero climate target.
Advance members are being bombarded with emails seeking donations, with the aim to raise $450,000 before the end of August.
Most of Advance's efforts seem focused on the federal Liberals, but the anti-net zero sentiment has reached the NSW Nationals, at least in the grassroots party. At their conference in June in Coffs Harbour, they voted to drop support for net zero.
The problem for Speakman is that the climate issue could quickly become a wedge that will be used by the right to further fuel the leadership speculation that is already bubbling.
Speakman is undoubtedly under pressure. There's no immediate appetite to replace him, among the dominant moderate faction from which he comes.
But there is concern about a lack of cut-through, particularly as a recent Resolve poll in July in the Sydney Morning Herald showed Labor with a commanding primary vote lead over the Coalition of 38% (up five points on the last result in April) to 32% (down four), with the Greens up two to 13%.
The Poll Bludger estimated this would imply a two-party Labor lead of at least 57-43, compared with 54.3-45.7 at the March 2023 election.
A 5% swing would see the Liberals lose another five seats and condemn them to a further two terms of opposition.
'People are starting to worry about saving the furniture,' one Liberal said.
The Kiama byelection on 13 September will be a test for Speakman. If he puts in a good showing, the troops might calm down. But with an election due in March 2027, the window for leadership bloodletting is fast approaching.
Both sides were claiming underdog status in the South Coast seat, which was most recently held by the Liberal turned Independent Gareth Ward, who resigned after being convicted of rape. Ward enjoyed enormous personal support even after the charges were laid, so it's difficult to say whether voters will chose to punish the Liberals or follow the conventional wisdom of byelections and give the government of the day a good kick.
In the meantime, the climate wars are simmering again and they've reached the doors of Macquarie Street.
A NSW parliamentary committee is due to release a report on the renewable energy zones and their impact on rural communities as early as next week. It will provide an opportunity for the opponents of net zero to target more 'weakling' Liberals – and it will test out Speakman's skill in managing a difficult issue for his troops.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Putin talks ended with no deal
Trump says Putin talks ended with no deal

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump says Putin talks ended with no deal

Talks between Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, concluded without a firm agreement on ending the three-year war in Ukraine. Following the nearly three-hour meeting, Putin expressed optimism, claiming 'agreements' were reached and referring to Ukraine as a 'brotherly nation' that Russia wants to help end the conflict. Donald Trump, however, contradicted Putin's claims, stating firmly: 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' and emphasised that any future accord would require assent from the Ukrainian government and NATO allies. Trump described the meeting as 'very productive' with 'many points' agreed upon, suggesting a 'good chance' of a future accord, but stressed that some 'big ones' were still unresolved. The Mayor of Kyiv, Vitali Klitschko, conceded that Ukraine might have to 'give up territory' as a temporary solution for peace, despite Russia currently occupying about a fifth of Ukrainian land.

Trump-Putin summit: No deal reached to end war in Ukraine
Trump-Putin summit: No deal reached to end war in Ukraine

Sky News

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Trump-Putin summit: No deal reached to end war in Ukraine

No deal has been reached to end the war in Ukraine - but Donald Trump has said there are "many points" he and Vladimir Putin agreed on during their highly anticipated summit. Following the meeting in Alaska, which lasted more than two-and-a-half hours, the two leaders gave a short media conference giving little detail about what had been discussed, and without taking questions. Mr Trump described the meeting as "very productive" and said there were "many points that we agreed on... I would say a couple of big ones". 2:20 But there are a few left, he added. "Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there... "We haven't quite got there, we've made some headway. There's no deal until there's a deal." Mr Putin described the negotiations as "thorough and constructive" and said Russia was "seriously interested in putting an end" to the war in Ukraine. He also warned Europe not to "torpedo nascent progress". After much build-up to the summit - with the US president threatening "severe" consequences for Russia should it not go well - it was ultimately not clear whether the talks had produced meaningful steps towards a ceasefire in what has been the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years. Mr Trump said he intended to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, who were excluded from the discussions, to brief them. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, the US leader ended his remarks with a thank you, and said he would probably see Mr Putin again "very soon". When the Russian president suggested that "next time" would be Moscow, he responded by saying he might face criticism, but "I could see it possibly happening". 2:10 The red carpet treatment The news conference came after a grand arrival at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, where the US president stepped down from Air Force One and later greeted his Russian counterpart with a handshake and smiles on a red carpet. Mr Putin even travelled alongside Mr Trump in the presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast". It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies, belying the bloodshed and the suffering in the war. Before the talks, the two presidents ignored frantically-shouted questions from journalists - and Mr Putin appeared to frown when asked by one reporter if he would stop "killing civilians" in Ukraine, putting his hand to his ear as though to indicate he could not hear. 3:22 Our US correspondent Martha Kelner, on the ground in Alaska, said he was shouting "let's go" - apparently in reference to getting the reporters out of the room. 3:02 A '10/10' meeting During his first day back in the White House in January, Mr Trump had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war in Ukraine. But seven months later, after infamously berating Mr Zelenskyy during a meeting at the Oval Office in February, and then stanching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, he still does not appear to have brought a pause to the conflict. In an interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Mr Trump described the meeting with Mr Putin as "warm" and gave it a "10/10", but declined to give details about what they discussed. He also insisted that the onus going forward could be on Mr Zelenskyy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. 7:06 What happens next? Mr Trump is expected to speak to Mr Zelenskyy, Sir Keir Starmer and European leaders about the talks. A meeting of ambassadors from European countries has been scheduled for 8.30am UK time, EU presidency sources have told Sky News. European heads of state and Mr Trump are also likely to have a virtual meeting later in the day. Despite the US president's efforts to bring about a ceasefire, Russian attacks on Ukraine have only intensified in the past few months. On 9 July, Russia carried out its largest aerial attack on Ukraine since the start of the war, launching more than 740 drones and missiles. Furthermore, Mr Zelenskyy has said Russia is preparing for new offensives.

Global News Podcast  Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine: A Global News Podcast special
Global News Podcast  Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine: A Global News Podcast special

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Global News Podcast Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine: A Global News Podcast special

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have finished their meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, held to discuss a potential end to the war in Ukraine. It lasted less than three hours. And while the leaders said it was productive, they failed to reach a deal. In this special edition of the Global News Podcast, we bring you reaction and analysis from Anchorage and gauge the feeling in Ukraine and Russia. We also look at the true cost of the war in lives and money, and find out what's next for Washington, Moscow and Kyiv on the road to peace. The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store