Maxim Power Corp. Announces that it has Closed the Sale of Summit Coal
The Convertible Note matures on April 29, 2027, and is convertible at MAXIM's election into common shares of Valory upon a convertible event, being a sale, equity raise or maturity and converts at a 30% discount to the corresponding share valuation at the event. Summit was sold with $2.2 million of restricted cash, resulting in net cash proceeds to MAXIM of $8.0 million. The Convertible Note may be redeemed by Valory at any time.
On April 29, 2025, MAXIM and Summit entered into an agreement such that MAXIM will receive a 3% royalty on any raw coal volume produced from the coal leases currently owned by Summit, including any volumes from Summit's Mine 14 project. The royalty will be calculated using a Premium Low Vol Hard Coking Coal benchmark and will be paid in United States dollars. The amount and timing of any royalty payments is contingent on the commencement of production and there is no certainty as to if, or when, production may begin.
Additionally on April 29, 2025, MAXIM, through it's wholly-owned subsidiary Milner Power Inc. ('Milner'), entered into a ground lease at the Milner site, with a nominee of Valory, to allow for construction and operation of a coal processing facility. The term of the ground lease is twelve years commencing on April 29, 2025, however, it is subject to automatic termination if the coal processing facility has not been substantially completed within two years. Lease payments to Milner consist of both a prorated annual $2.1 million fixed payment and a variable throughput payment subject to coal being processed through the leased lands. The variable throughput payment has the potential to be substantial if coal is processed through the leased lands at the Milner site; however, at this time, there is no certainty as to if, or when, the coal processing facility construction will be commenced or completed and coal processed. Accordingly, MAXIM may not realize the benefits of the variable throughput payment. Both the fixed lease payment and variable throughput payment is adjusted for inflation. The first-year pro-rated fixed payment of approximately $1.4 million was received by Milner on April 29, 2025. An updated copy of the ground lease with the full terms and conditions will be available on SEDAR+.
About MAXIM
Based in Calgary, Alberta, MAXIM is one of Canada's largest truly independent power producers. MAXIM is now focused entirely on power projects in Alberta. Its core asset – the 300 MW H.R. Milner Plant, M2, in Grande Cache, AB – is a state-of-the-art combined cycle gas-fired power plant that commissioned in Q4, 2023. MAXIM continues to explore additional development options in Alberta including its currently permitted gas-fired generation project and the permitting of its wind power generation project. MAXIM trades on the TSX under the symbol 'MXG'. For more information about MAXIM, visit our website at
www.maximpowercorp.com
. For further information please contact:
Bob Emmott, President and CEO, (403) 263-3021
Kyle Mitton, CFO and Vice President, Corporate Development, (403) 263-3021
Forward-looking statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively 'forward looking information') within the meaning of applicable securities laws relating to MAXIM's plans and other aspects of MAXIM's anticipated future operations, management focus, objectives, strategies, financial, operating and production results. Forward-looking information typically uses words such as 'anticipate', 'believe', 'project', 'expect', 'goal', 'plan', 'intend', 'may', 'would', 'could' or 'will' or similar words suggesting future outcomes, events or performance. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date thereof and are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Specifically, this press release contains forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, the royalty agreement and ground lease, construction and completion of a coal processing facility and processing of coal, the amount and receipt royalties and lease payments.
Forward-looking information is based on certain assumptions and analysis made by MAXIM in light of our experience and MAXIM's perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors MAXIM believes appropriate under the circumstances.
MAXIM's actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that MAXIM will derive there from. Risk factors include that the coal processing facility is not constructed and no coal is produced, Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect MAXIM's business, operations or financial results are included in the reports on file with applicable securities regulatory authorities, including but not limited to MAXIM's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, which may be accessed on MAXIM's SEDAR+ profile at
www.sedarplus.ca
. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release and MAXIM disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, other than as required by applicable securities laws.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shelby and Story counties to pursue U.S. Supreme Court action on local pipeline ordinance case
The Shelby County Board of Supervisors voted Aug. 19 to petition the county's case against Summit Carbon Solutions to the U.S. Supreme Court. (Photo by Cami Koons/Iowa Capital Dispatch) HARLAN – County supervisors in Shelby and Story counties voted Tuesday to pursue further legal action in their case against Summit Carbon Solutions pertaining to county-specific ordinances on hazardous liquid pipelines. A U.S. district judge and federal appeals judges have previously ruled on the case in favor of Summit and now the counties are seeking a review of the rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court, though a Summit filing holds the ordinances would still be preempted by state laws. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In Harlan, at the Shelby County Courthouse, landowners opposed to the pipeline gathered to thank the supervisors. Sherri Webb, an affected Shelby County landowner, said Iowans across the state look to Shelby County and say 'I wish you were our supervisors.' 'Thank you,' Webb said, noting that it's no small feat to decide to appear before the Supreme Court. 'No matter what, I'm behind you guys,' Webb said. Another landowner, Jan Norris who lives in Montgomery County and is a neighbor to the pipeline route, called the board a David standing up to a 'well-resourced and motivated' Goliath. 'Your constituents may not know how lucky they are, but I do,' Norris said. 'Because my board has chosen to play it safe and avoid the fight.' Norris and Webb have been active at their respective county supervisor meetings since they first learned of the Summit project several years ago. The pipeline would connect to biorefineries across the state and transport liquid carbon dioxide through Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota and to underground storage in North Dakota. The two said the actions of the Board of Supervisors are important for maintaining local control and working toward standards they believe will be safer and better for their properties. Norris said if the outcome of the case is reversed and in favor of the counties, it will benefit many Iowa counties, and other states impacted by the pipeline and similar projects. 'You guys are doing your job and you shouldn't be sued for doing your job,' Webb said. Cindy Hansen, who lives in Ankeny but owns affected land in Shelby County with her sister, said the supervisors have restored some of the hope in the state that she had lost from the actions of the Iowa Utilities Commission and state legislators. The Shelby County board said the cost of the lawsuits 'have mounted,' but have been covered by the county's insurer, ICAP, and by a fund the board created, shortly after it was sued by Summit in November 2022, that uses American Rescue Plan Act dollars to cover the costs. A copy of both counties' letter of engagement, obtained by Iowa Capital Dispatch, shows fees for the endeavor would be capped at $60,000. Mike Kolbe, one of the Shelby County board members, said the budget was a consideration in the decision, but with the fund and continued coverage from ICAP, Kolbe said the county can afford it 'with no cost to the taxpayers.' Bryce Schaben, the chair of the Shelby board, said the feedback he has received from his community showed there was only one way forward. 'Everything we've heard is to do what we did today,' Schaben said following the meeting. 'When you get that kind of support, it's an easy decision.' Schaben said if the Supreme Court follows the direction of the previous courts on the case, he will be confused. 'It's very confusing that the rulings don't want to make our counties safe,' Schaben said. 'That's what it comes down to.' Ordinances in both counties established setbacks and permitting requirements for the pipeline company to construct in the county. Summit argued, and a federal judge in the Southern District of Iowa ruled, the ordinances were preempted by federal pipeline safety standards. The counties appealed the case, and judges for the Eighth Circuit court of appeals concurred with the lower court, though one judge partially dissented on the case. Story County supervisors approved the decision as part of a consent agenda and did not discuss the decision to engage the D.C. law firm on the suit. Steve Kenkel, a former Shelby County supervisor who now serves as an adviser to the board on topics related to the pipeline, quoted Iowa Code where it directs county supervisors to 'protect and preserve the rights of their constituents.' 'That's what we're trying to do here,' Kenkel said. 'Without county zoning ordinances, the tools supervisors presently have in their tool box … will be tools of the past if this ruling is allowed to stand.' Both counties voted to engage Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick P.L.L.C. to petition the Supreme Court. Summit has sued several counties for similar county ordinance issues, including Emmet, Kossuth and Palo Alto counties. The later-filed cases have been paused while Shelby and Story counties' case was heard and then appealed. The two counties also petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit for an en banc rehearing of the case in July, which the court denied. The other affected counties have requested stays through this process again as Shelby and Story counties decided to take the case to the Supreme Court. Summit's legal team submitted a motion to lift the stay for these other counties, arguing that regardless of the outcome of the Supreme Court petition, the county ordinances would be preempted by state laws. 'Any county ordinance—including the one here—that attempts to impose additional permitting requirements, control pipeline routes, or regulate construction and operation is preempted by state law,' the motion said. The Summit motion for leave of stay in Kossuth County also said certiorari from the Supreme Court was 'unlikely in general' and 'particularly unlikely' in Shelby and Story counties' case. The motion holds that the Supreme Court could only review whether or not the ordinances were preempted by federal pipeline laws. Still in place, it argues, would be a piece of Iowa Code that gives the Iowa Utilities Commission the authority to set pipeline routes. This was noted in the ruling from the Eighth Circuit. Here, the judges explained that a county would be inconsistent with state law, and therefore preempted, if it denied a local zoning permit application from the pipeline company to build on a location that had been approved by the IUC. The appellate court decision notes some other states cede this power to local governments and might not be preempted as Iowa counties are. Kenkel argued Tuesday that if the Supreme Court did not act in the counties' favor, the IUC would not be able to route the pipeline based on safety considerations. These and permitting and setback regulations, he said, would instead be up to the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration's rules. State Auditor Rob Sand, a Democrat who is running for governor, stopped in Harlan Tuesday as part of his campaign tour across the state. Among the things he was asked by the bipartisan crowd at Milk & Honey restaurant downtown: How would he protect property rights from such projects? Sand said he does not support eminent domain for CO2 pipelines, 'period.' The comment was met with applause, especially considering some of the crowd had filed across the street to the restaurant after the board meeting. Sand said there are two main reasons why he feels this way. He said he is 'deeply skeptical' that a carbon capture pipeline can be considered a common carrier and if 'there is a true public purpose' to the project. 'You can be a supporter of agriculture in the state of Iowa and a supporter of ethanol, and say that the carbon capture pipeline ain't it,' Sand said. Sand said there are other options to sequester CO2 that have an established market. Sand said Gov. Kim Reynolds' lack of action, or public opinion on the issue has been her 'single biggest failure.' 'Never in the state of Iowa, if there's a tremendous issue with lots of people showing up at the state capitol every single year for the legislative session, will I let five years go by before I decide to maybe share my opinion, only after a bill gets passed,' Sand said. Reynolds, a Republican, is not seeking reelection. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Putin, Zelenskiy Summit Plan, MTA to Expand 2nd Ave Subway
On today's episode of Bloomberg Businessweek Daily, Tim Stenovec and Emily Graffeo discuss Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Russia President Vladimir Putin preparing to hold a face to face summit despite logistics still being in flux. On today's show Jennifer Dlouhy discusses whats next for the two leaders as they prepare to meet, Mike McKee breaks down his conversation with Fed Governor Michelle Bowman, and Metro Transit Authority Chief Financial Officer Jai Patel on planned expansion of the 2nd Avenue subway. Also on the show, NANO Nuclear Energy Chief Executive Officer James Walker talks next-gen nuclear power, and Norah Mulinda has stocks on the move. (Source: Bloomberg)
Business Wire
6 hours ago
- Business Wire
Anaergia S.r.l. Announces Agreement to Provide Infrastructure and Equipment for New Biomethane Plants in Spain
TREVIGLIO, Italy & BURLINGTON, Ontario--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Anaergia Inc. ('Anaergia', the 'Company', 'us', or 'our') (TSX:ANRG; OTCQX:ANRGF), through its subsidiary Anaergia S.r.l., has signed a Binding Agreement ('Agreement') with a leading Spanish company specializing in renewable gas infrastructure projects. Under the terms of the Agreement, Anaergia will provide a range of services as well as its cutting-edge technology and equipment for over 15 new biomethane production plants across Spain. Anaergia will be responsible for the supply and construction of concrete tanks with Triton™ digesters, a proprietary technology featuring a patented configuration that significantly enhances process efficiency. In addition, the company will supply advanced mixing systems, also part of its proprietary technology, along with other critical components to facilitate the seamless operations of the plants. Anaergia is to commence activities on the first project this month, with all the projects in the development plan expected to be fully operational and integrated into Spain's gas pipeline network within forty-eight months. Anaergia anticipates total revenue of C$184 million from this Agreement, making it the Company's largest capital sale to date. 'This agreement marks a significant milestone in advancing Spain's renewable energy sector, fostering economic growth and environmental sustainability. The scale of this historic Agreement for Anaergia highlights the advantages of our strategic focus on leveraging proprietary technologies for the benefit of our customers, and underscores our growing presence and activities in Europe,' said Assaf Onn, CEO of Anaergia. 'We are most excited about this opportunity to demonstrate the value of our innovative solutions and to support the global transition to renewable energy.' About Anaergia Anaergia is a pioneering technology company in the renewable natural gas (RNG) sector, with over 250 patents dedicated to converting organic waste into sustainable solutions such as RNG, fertilizer, and water. We are committed to addressing a significant source of greenhouse gases (GHGs) through cost-effective processes. Our proprietary technologies, combined with our engineering expertise and vast experience in facility design, construction, and operation, position Anaergia as a leader in the RNG industry. With a proven track record of delivering hundreds of innovative projects over the past decade, we are well-equipped to tackle today's critical resource recovery challenges through diverse project delivery methods. As one of the few companies worldwide offering an integrated portfolio of end-to-end solutions, we effectively combine solid waste processing, wastewater treatment, organics recovery, high-efficiency anaerobic digestion, and biomethane production. Additionally, we operate RNG facilities owned by both third parties and Anaergia. This comprehensive approach not only reduces environmental impact but also significantly lowers costs associated with waste and wastewater treatment while mitigating GHG emissions. For further information please see: Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, which reflects Anaergia's current expectations regarding future events, including but not limited to, counterparty contractual performance, the capability of the Company's technology and performance with respect to the project objectives. Forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions, including, but not limited to counterparty contractual performance, the full development, timing and funding of construction of the sixteen facilities, the capability of the Company's technology and performance with respect to the project objectives, the expected revenue from the agreement, and the sufficient sourcing of food waste and power generation. The Company is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's control. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed under 'Risk Factors' in the Company's annual information form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and under 'Risks and Uncertainties' in the Company's most recent management's discussion and analysis. Actual results could differ materially from those projected herein. Anaergia does not undertake any obligation to update such forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as expressly required under applicable securities laws. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect Anaergia's operations or financial results are included in Anaergia's reports on file with Canadian regulatory authorities.
