Bill could upend Utah committee that decides on access to public records
When the public, media, or groups file a public records request to a state agency, also known as a Government Records and Management Act (GRAMA) request, and that request gets denied the state records committee is tasked with determining whether that denial should be upheld if the requestor appeals.
Under S.B. 277, sponsored by Sen. Mike McKell (R-Spanish Fork) the makeup of that committee would change. It's currently including news media representatives, citizens appointed by the governor, and an archive representative. The bill swaps that out for an administrative law judge appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate.
McKell told reporters this week that the process to appeal records committee decisions to a district court wouldn't change, but he believes someone with a trained legal background should be making the ultimate decisions.
More Justices? Utah's Supreme Court may expand under newly opened bill
'The purpose (of the state records committee) is to follow the law and apply the law,' McKell said. 'Having an administrative law judge who's bound by ethical rules and the Utah State Bar to me feels like the better model.'
The bill also gets rid of what's known as a balancing test – a standard to decide if the public interest in making the records public warrants releasing the otherwise private information.
That means the information wouldn't be able to be released even if the public interest warrants it.
McKell said he believes the current committee has 'missed the mark' on many cases, but wouldn't cite which ones. He said he's worried about making sure government entities that follow the law but are dealing with sensitive cases like active investigations or those who may have been falsely accused are protected.
'Let's say there's an allegation of sex abuse. For me, I think that's a concern because we're not protecting both the accused and the accuser,' McKell said.
Critics of the bill worry that the change will deny the public access to critical information like uncovering possible corruption in government or the actions of public employees like police officers.
One recent high-profile case that went against Utah's executive branch started with an appeal to the state records committee that was ultimately upheld on appeal by a district court. That and other cases have fueled speculation that McKell's bill is in response. Two local media outlets sought to obtain the calendar of Attorney General Sean Reyes before he left office. That calendar was ultimately ordered by a judge to be released.
McKell, who's also the Senate's Assistant Majority Whip, said his bill was about the committee being tasked with 'quasi-judicial actions.'
The bill will likely be heard in the Utah legislature.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Texas Democrats plea for donations to extend their walkout and block Trump's redistricting plan
After leaving Texas for Illinois to prevent a legislative vote on a Republican redistricting plan, state House Democratic leader Gene Wu needed a means to project his voice — and viewpoints — to a national audience. So he tapped his campaign account to buy a microphone for news conferences. When it came to covering the hefty hotel bill for Wu and his roughly 50 colleagues, the lawmaker said he relied on money from his chamber's Democratic Caucus. Now Texas Democrats are pleading for donations to help finance what could be a walkout of weeks — if not months — in a high-stakes attempt to prevent the Republican majority from passing a plan sought by President Donald Trump. The president is urging Texas and other GOP-controlled states to redraw their congressional districts to help Republicans maintain control of the U.S. House in next year's midterm elections. 'We're getting a lot of small-dollar donations,' Wu told The Associated Press, "and that's going to be used to help keep this thing going.' A political group led by Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who ran unsuccessfully for governor and Senate, gave money to the Texas House Democratic Caucus to help cover the up-front costs, according to a spokesperson for the group, Powered by People. O'Rourke this week has been holding events in red states to fire up Democrats and encourage donations. Powered by People has not disclosed how much it contributed. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said Wednesday he's launching an investigation into whether O'Rourke's group has committed bribery by a 'financial influence scheme' benefiting Democrats who left Texas. In response, O'Rourke said he would be undeterred by the threat of an investigation and used it as a fundraising opportunity. Lawmakers face travel costs and potentially huge fines By departing the state, Democratic lawmakers have prevented Republicans from obtaining the quorum needed to conduct business. Democrats hope to run out the clock on a special legislative session that ends Aug. 19. But Republican Gov. Greg Abbott could immediately call another session, raising the prospect of a prolonged and an expensive holdout. Not only could Texas Democrats face thousands of dollars in out-of-state lodging and dining costs, they also could eventually face fines of $500 for each day they are absent, which under House rules cannot be paid from their office budgets or political contributions. Texas has a part-time Legislature where lawmakers receive $600 a month, plus an additional $221 for expenses each day they are in session. On Wednesday, state Sen. Jose Menendez joined Democrats from other states at a rally in Boston, where he noted that the potential daily fine for quorum-breaking lawmakers is nearly as large as their entire monthly legislative salary. 'They need your prayers, they need your thoughts and they need you to get behind them,' he said. Some Democrats in the Texas Senate have traveled out of state this week to support their House colleagues, but lawmakers in that chamber are not leaving the state to hold up legislative business. 'This fight is for the people' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat and billionaire, has welcomed the Texas lawmakers to his state but said he has not financially supported them. Texas state Rep. James Talarico, who has built a national following in recent weeks, said the lawmakers told Pritzker they didn't want him to fund their trip. 'We've already been inundated with donations from across the state of Texas, from across the country, just regular people donating $5, $10, $15,' Talarico said this week. 'And that's appropriate, because this fight is for the people and it should be funded by the people. We don't have billionaires who are funding this operation.' The House Democratic Caucus has set up a website seeking donations of between $25 and $2,500 — with a default amount of $250. Earlier this week, Abbott asked the state's highest court to remove Wu from office and ordered the Texas Rangers to investigate possible bribery charges related to how Democrats are paying for the walkout, alleging anyone who financially helped them could be culpable. Wu, a former prosecutor from Houston, said the bribery suggestion is 'monstrously stupid.' 'No member is leaving because they might get a campaign contribution that might restore some of the money that they're spending,' he said. How left-leaning groups are helping Before Democrats decided to leave Texas, Wu said he called potential allies for assurance 'that there would be resources that would come to our assistance.' But he said that's no different from an aspiring candidate asking others for support before officially launching a campaign. Wu, who is chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said he has participated in online sessions with representatives of dozens of Democratic, progressive and redistricting-oriented groups. Not all are financial supporters. Some are providing help in other ways, such as by coordinating publicity. The Democratic National Committee has helped with communications and organizing, as well as providing help from a data analytics team, Chair Ken Martin said. Texas Democrats aren't worried that they'll be forced to return home in the near future because of a lack of money, said Luke Warford, founder of Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund, a Texas fundraising and organizing group. He said longtime Democratic funders understand the high cost of competing in tougher U.S. House races if Republicans succeed in redrawing the map. "Of course having most of the delegation out of the state is going to rack up a bill,' Warford said. But "when you think about it in the context of what Donald Trump has to gain and what Democrats might lose in the short term, it's just not even close to the cost of trying to win back either these races or a bunch of other races in the country.' The Democratic lawmakers have been holed up at a hotel and conference center outside Chicago that was evacuated Wednesday after an unfounded bomb threat. Many lawmakers have been dining and meeting together, and are prepared to keep doing so. Democratic state Rep. John Bucy III, speaking by phone from the hotel, said he isn't concerned about how the costs ultimately get covered. 'There's too much at stake here to be worried about those things,' Bucy said. "Our hotel bills seem so minor compared to what we're trying to do — to protect democracy.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bitter partisanship threatens to engulf Senate as critical deadlines loom
The battle over nominations is spelling trouble for the Senate in other areas, as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle feel the pressure to ratchet up the partisanship in an extended tit for tat with no obvious off-ramp in sight. The Senate adjourned Saturday until next month after protracted talks to expedite the confirmation of dozens of President Trump's lower-level nominees in the face of Democratic resistance went belly up. This left Republicans fuming and increasingly likely to 'go nuclear' by changing the chamber's rules to quicken the confirmation process. At the same time, Democrats are under pressure to oppose Trump at every turn, with the confirmation process and the looming government funding fight being the most immediate examples. It's all leading much of Washington to wonder if the bipartisanship train can get back on the tracks — and at a crucial time. 'I think it is a complete breakdown of the Senate and just absolutely destructive that there can't be a deal reached on nominations, appropriations, confirmations,' said Jon Kott, a longtime top aide to former Sen. Joe Manchin ( 'The Senate used to work pretty easily in a bipartisan way on those three issues,' Kott continued. 'And when you break down on those three, you're really close to breaking the Senate and turning it into the House.' While the Senate hasn't had a sea change moment along the lines of eliminating the filibuster, the chamber could be on the precipice of a major overhaul starting next month. Chief among them are potential rule changes eyed by Senate Republicans, who were outwardly exasperated toward the final days before August recess over the Democratic blockade of Trump nominees. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) told reporters Tuesday that talks have centered on chopping down the amount of time between cloture and confirmation votes. Other members have raised the idea of eliminating a cloture vote altogether, or the possibility of working through multiple nominees at the same time. The South Dakota Republican also said that if he had his druthers, members would change the law to shift one-quarter to one-third of the roughly 1,200 jobs that currently require Senate approval to just need a presidential appointment. 'That's too many,' Rounds said. 'Most members of the Senate will tell you that they don't believe it is necessary to go that deep into government to have Senate approval on them.' Under regular order, Senate rule changes require 67 votes. But Republicans could use a shortcut that requires only 51 votes, giving them the ability to bypass Democratic opposition. That rarely used shortcut, which more and more Republicans are floating, is known as the 'nuclear option' because it is viewed as a major escalation of partisanship. Going that route could have major ramifications for Senate work coming down the rails, and not just on nominations. Congress faces a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline, and while the Senate passed its first three-bill government funding package prior to breaking for recess, that lone bit of bipartisan work could be overtaken by the one-two punch of a rule change or a second bill to claw back already appropriated funding. Democrats were already outraged last month when Congress passed a first package with only GOP votes to claw back funds that had been previously appropriated through a bipartisan process. They warned a second such bill would only poison the well further — as a rule change without Democratic buy-in would also likely do. 'One of these days, Trump is going to have to learn that he needs to work with Democrats to help the American people,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters Saturday. 'The Trump-Republican 'go-it-alone' strategy ain't working, and the American people aren't happy.' Complicating the state of play is the pressure both leaders are facing. Schumer, in particular, in a tricky bind as he attempts to manage a conference that wants to take on Trump at every juncture, but faces a government funding deadline next month. He came under heavy fire for marshaling Democrats to help pass a GOP spending bill in March, and lawmakers in his party are already warning him against doing so again. In addition, the Democratic leader will have to balance home-state politics, where the New York City mayoral race is among the preeminent races this fall, with progressives and Democrats siding with Zohran Mamdani over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the primary. According to a recent survey, Schumer is underwater by 18 percentage points with the electorate in his backyard, with 70 percent of respondents also saying they are dissatisfied with the direction of the city. Fifty-one percent also said that they want the next mayor to 'stand up' to the president rather than work with him to secure federal funding. Across the aisle, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has gotten high marks for his opening months atop the conference, having helped shepherd members through the passage of Trump's mammoth tax package and the rescissions bill, as well as the confirmation of a number of high-stakes nominees. But balancing a potential rule change with the government funding process and maintaining as much harmony as possible will be a difficult task. In the background are his past calls to uphold the filibuster, which he maintained during his leadership bid that he will not weaken. 'I do think they see the value in the Senate's role as the cooling saucer for the hot cup of tea. I think that you can still say that with a straight face,' one former Senate GOP leadership aide said. 'I don't think it's in anyone's interest, and I don't think Republicans want to do it first,' the former aide continued. 'But I do think all the pressure building up on the noms [nominations] side needs a valve, and it probably will get and needs the valve on the personnel side.' Over the last 15 years, the filibuster has remained despite a number of attempts to chip away at it. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) decision to change the threshold for lower-court judicial nominees from 60 votes to 51 votes creaked open the door, which was finally blasted open by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) when he extended that threshold to Supreme Court nominees. Senate Democrats twice during former President Biden's tenure also pushed to overturn the legislative filibuster, but were thwarted by Manchin and former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.). Whether there is a way out of this tumult remains to be seen. Rounds believes the government funding exercise coupled with the upcoming work on the annual National Defense Authorization Act is a prime chance to steer in a bipartisan direction. But the rules change for nominees and a second rescissions bill looms, potentially dashing those hopes. 'If you turn [the Senate] into the House, you're going to lose a lot of the top people who want to be in the Senate, who want to actually get huge legislative wins done for the country,' Kott warned. 'And that … will be the death knell for Congress if that happens.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump's hands
Republican senators are getting ready to leave Washington without advancing a major sanctions bill against Russia, giving President Trump sole discretion over whether to follow through on his threats against Russian President Vladimir Putin if he refuses to halt his war against Ukraine. Trump has given an Aug. 8 deadline for Putin to stop fighting or risk tariffs on countries that import Russian oil. As a preview, he announced 25 percent tariffs on India, a major importer of Russian energy. That's far below the 500 percent secondary tariff power Congress laid out in draft legislation. While Senate Ukraine hawks wanted to see their sanctions bill pass before the monthlong break, they ultimately left the decision entirely in Trump's hands, at least for the summer. 'I think he's going to be very careful about what he does,' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said when asked by The Hill if Trump can be trusted to impose costs on Putin. 'But I think he is clearly disappointed in Putin and I think he is now coming around to recognizing that many of us were right.' Democrats have expressed skepticism Trump will punish Putin, even as the president has shown increasing frustration with the Russian leader's refusal to accept a ceasefire. Trump said Friday he ordered nuclear submarines to the region in response to threats of nuclear weapons use from Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president, current deputy chair of the security council and frequent online provocateur. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' Trump posted on his social media site Truth Social. Trump told reporters Thursday that his special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff, is expected to travel to Russia following a visit to Israel on Friday. Trump described Russia's ongoing attacks against Ukraine as 'disgusting.' 'We have about eight days. … We're going to put sanctions,' he said. Even as Trump has shortened the deadline for Russia to get serious about peace talks, the president is hedging on the impact U.S. financial penalties will have on Putin's country. 'I don't know that sanctions bother him. You know? They know about sanctions. I know better than anybody about sanctions, and tariffs and everything else. I don't know if that has any effect. But we're going to do it.' While the U.S. has steadily ramped up sanctions on Russia throughout the war, the Senate bill would have marked a major economic escalation, seeking to isolate Moscow from trading partners that have kept its wartime economy afloat. 'Maintaining pressure on Russia economically, and going after its oil revenues in particular, remain crucial to containing and limiting Russia's current and future military and foreign policy options,' experts with the Center for Strategic and International Studies wrote in a report late last month. Steep tariffs on Russia's trading partners would also risk shocks to the global energy market and further strain on U.S. relations with major economies such as India, China and Brazil. Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said deciding which sanctions are imposed — if Russia passes Trump's deadline — 'are a work in progress,' speaking with The Hill on Friday. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), coauthor of the Russia sanctions bill with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said he would view it as a win if Trump imposed even a fifth of what the Senate was proposing. 'We propose in our bill 500 percent. If it's 250 percent, I could live with it. Even if it's 100 percent, possibly. But you ought to impose bone-crushing sanctions that will stop them from fueling Russia's war machine,' Blumenthal said. The Connecticut senator said even as he holds out hope for Trump to give Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) the green light to bring the sanctions bill to the floor, the bill has already moved U.S. policy. 'It has given credibility and momentum to the idea of sanctions so that now, even President Trump, who was seemingly Putin's best buddy, is giving him deadlines to stop the war or face sanctions,' he said. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pointed to Trump's 25 percent tariffs on India as further evidence of this impact. Indian state oil refiners have already moved to pause imports of Russian oil, with the tariff set to go into effect Aug. 7. 'Clearly, India was paying attention to that. I think it's positive progress that the president is looking at ways in which he can put more pressure on Russia,' she said. Graham said Trump has 'adopted the theory of the case' — going after countries that purchase Russian oil and don't help Ukraine. 'He can do it through executive action, or with the bill,' he said. 'I think the bill, as you say, gives him leverage, and we're in good discussions, so stay tuned.' But some Republican senators pointed to a missed opportunity in adjourning before a vote on the Graham-Blumenthal bill. 'I don't think there are enough sanctions we can place on Russia. I think we should keep hammering them and make sure Ukraine's armed,' said Sen. Pete Ricketts (Neb.), the No. 2 Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Rounds told The Hill he believed the time is now to put the sanctions bill on the floor. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on Europe and Regional Security Cooperation, said he wanted a Senate vote on the sanctions package so the House could be ready to take it up when they come back in September. 'I think having that tool in your tool chest, ready to go, would be a good thing and keep the pressure on Russia,' he said. 'I think it gives [Trump] more leverage. You can always hold it ready to go, send it over to the House if needed and then to the president's desk. I think that's not a bad strategy.' Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), also a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, agreed. 'I think that's why it's important for us to have this teed up and ready — it gives [Trump] an option, and the more options he has the better,' he said. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday that Thune was 'absolutely aware' of his desire to vote on the Russia sanctions bill before the August recess. 'I certainly think it would be an excellent thing to do.' Thune's office told The Hill on Friday it had no scheduling announcements related to the Graham-Blumenthal bill. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
