EXCLUSIVE: Council in Dundee aware of Raac issues nearly 50 years ago
Documents from the local authority archives reveal that concerns were first raised about Siporex, a brand of Raac, as far back as 1977.
The issue was discovered in 34 homes.
In 1977, the depute chief architect of City of Dundee District Council – as it was called then – wrote a report called 'Craigie Drive 3rd Development – Defective Ceilings'.
The architect stated that the moisture content of Siporex 'was higher than normally would be expected' in units built nine years previously in 1968/69.
The architect, Ian M. Dunsire, speaks of the concrete 'blistering'.
He reports: 'These blisters are sufficiently loose to be easily removed and leave a small crater on the underside of the ceiling.'
Siporex problems were identified in three estates, known then as Craigie Drive 3rd development, and Kirk Street 1st and 2nd developments.
The Courier understands they are now called Southampton Place, Kirk Street and Yeamans Lane.
All three streets have been found to contain Raac since 2023 through testing by Dundee City Council.
In 1978, the director of technical services at the City of Dundee District Council submitted a report detailing the probable costs for 'the repair of Siporex ceilings' at the three developments.
£70,000 was set aside in 1978 to address the issue.
The Right to Buy scheme, through which many Raac properties were purchased from the council, did not begin until 1980.
Nearly 800 homes in Dundee are now known to contain Raac, the highest number of affected residential properties in Scotland.
Dundee City Council has repeatedly told homeowners they must pay for their own repairs.
A statement on the local authority's website states: 'The council has no ongoing maintenance responsibilities and no liability towards owners who bought their former council properties under the 'Right to Buy' scheme, or any subsequent owners.'
As part of our Trapped by Raac campaign, The Courier is asking people to sign this petition to help homeowners affected by the crisis.
The Courier asked Dundee City Council if it accepts that Raac was known to be in homes, and that there were issues with the product, before the properties were sold to private homeowners through the Right to Buy Scheme.
In response, a spokesperson for Dundee City Council said: 'These are historic records which relate to consideration of work at 34 properties.
'There was no suggestion of wider remedial work being identified across the rest of the development, or in other developments where Siporex might have been used, indicating that this was being treated as a localised issue.
'Defects can happen in properties of all construction types and there was no prior equivalent industry-wide concern about Raac until the issues came to light in schools in England from 2019 onwards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 days ago
- BBC News
Reigate theatre Raac concrete repairs of £4.5m approved
Plans to spend £4.5m repairing a closed theatre in Surrey have been approved by Theatre in Redhill closed in 2023 after reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) was discovered at the site, which can pose safety future of the theatre, cinema and community space had hung in the balance Biggs, leader of Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, said: "Our priority is to get it open, our priority is to actually get the work commenced." The theatre is expected to be ready to welcome back audiences by funds will allow for the removal of all Raac from within the building and for other essential works that will allow it to reopen at its previous capacity, the council said. The sum approved for repairs falls significantly short of the £10m the council had been considering, which would have included major upgrades to the building, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The council ruled against a quicker fix option that would have kept the Raac in place and required regular safety inspections, opting instead for the longer – but longer lasting – for a second performing arts and culture building in the town were approved earlier in July. The council has been advised to appoint a specialist company to market and seek expressions of interest for the Harlequin Theatre to be run by a third-party operator.
BBC News
18-07-2025
- BBC News
Council to pay £6m to remove Raac from Grimsby shopping centre
More than £6m will be spent on removing concrete from a shopping centre amid concerns over its safety. North East Lincolnshire Council has agreed to replace the reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) after it was found in non-public areas of Freshney of buildings around the country, including schools, have been closed for remedial work because of fears for the structural integrity of Raac, which was used between the 1950s and 1990s and has a lifespan of about 30 is expected to start early next year and is due to be completed by the end of 2027. The Grimsby shopping centre was bought by the council in August 2022 and is being revamped as part of a £50m redevelopment of the to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the money for the repairs will be borrowed, with the council planning to recoup the cost later from service was developed as a cheaper alternative to standard concrete. It was commonly used in flat roofs, as well as in floors and wallsIt is aerated, or "bubbly", like an Aero chocolate bar, but is less durable and has a lifespan of around 30 affected areas at Freshney Place have been propped up to reduce the risk of concrete will be removed and replaced, rather than being strengthened by steel supports, to avoid any future problems with the to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices.
The National
14-07-2025
- The National
No need to wait for UK. Scotland can launch own form of wealth tax
Wealth inequality is increasing at an unimaginable rate and is currently substantially higher than income inequality. The rich are taking from all of us far more than they need and are giving back far less than what they are able to. This is a self-reinforcing problem, such as where people who were able to buy houses when they were cheap (perhaps during Thatcher's Right to Buy demolition of the social housing sector) became able to rent them out at ever increasing rates to people who can't now afford to save a deposit to buy a house because prices are rising faster than they can save due to the amount they have to spend on rent. READ MORE: Richard Murphy: Why the UK will not see economic growth under Rachel Reeves Even the Office for Budget Responsibility is now warning (as I did several years ago in my book All Of Our Futures) of the fiscal risks looming due to the number of people still privately renting when they retire and who will simultaneously be unable to afford to keep paying those rents and won't have any capital saved in their house to subsidise their inadequate state pensions. It's not for no reason that the British public is increasingly demanding that the UK Government brings in a wealth tax to rebalance our increasingly unstable economy. I will say there are good reasons for the UK to not bring in 'a wealth tax' – by which I mean a single annual payment calculated as a certain percentage of the value of all of the assets and possessions that you own. Professor Richard Murphy has articulated many of them well. It's hard to value those possessions, and easy to hide them. And there are other taxes that the UK could use – such as reforms to taxes on stocks, shares, pensions and capital gains – that would achieve much of the same result. Not that the UK Government is going to do any of that either, unless the pressure escalates to the point that the impossible becomes inevitable. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: PA) Let's say, however, that the Scottish Government wants to take the first step. Could we do it here instead of waiting for the UK? The patterns of wealth ownership in Scotland are substantially different than in the rest of the UK, particularly London and the south-east of England. We don't have quite as many billionaires floating about the place. We also don't have as much wealth in stocks and shares – mostly because we don't have a stock exchange in Scotland any more. And our generally lower rates of pay mean comparatively lower rates of wealth stored in pensions. There are, however, two sectors in Scotland where wealth is substantially stored and which could be taxed using devolved tax powers: land and buildings. Scotland already has its Land and Buildings Transaction Tax, but despite the Scottish Greens seeking to apply what they called a 'mansion tax' to it, this would remain merely a surcharge on the transfer of assets, not a wealth tax applied to the holding of them. If you never bought another mansion, you'd never pay the mansion tax. READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: The SNP must take up zonal pricing fight – why aren't they? Meanwhile, Council Tax is the most outdated and badly broken tax Scotland still insists on inflicting on the poor. The Scottish Government has stated it is not even going to think about reforming it until the end of this decade. This is completely unacceptable, especially as the solution is obvious. We need to scrap Council Tax and replace it with a tax based on a percentage of the present market value of the property. Common Weal argued that a rate of 0.63% would have been revenue neutral compared to Council Tax at the time we published the paper. That number could be recalculated now, but we estimated then that a 'revenue neutral' rate would actually mean a tax cut for eight out of 10 households as the burden of paying the tax would be placed more fairly on those who lived in the most expensive houses. We calculated that the 'break even' point then would have been a house worth something like £400,000. This is based on a flat rate of tax, too. We would argue that councils should have the power to add progressive rates on extremely valuable properties, such as £1 million-plus mansions or, as is the case with the current Council Tax, additional multipliers for multiple home ownership. This would immediately act as a wealth tax both on the most expensive properties but also on multiple property ownership. Unlike Council Tax, which is paid by occupants, our Property Tax would be paid by property owners and they could only pass on to their tenants the basic rate of tax. Landlords would have to pay any multiple ownership surcharges themselves. The second wealth store in Scotland, land, is probably the greatest store of almost untaxed wealth in the country. Many countries tax the ownership of land as a distinct tax from properties built on it, sometimes because of local democracy – for example, you might pay a land tax to your municipal government and property tax to your regional government. In Scotland there may be good reason to not do that but to simply extend the Property Tax to cover not just the land under and around your mansion but also the broader estate you own with it. Given that the two are often sold together, this would be much easier to put a price on than trying to calculate a separate Land Value Tax. We've estimated that doing this at the same flat rate as the Property Tax would bring in around £450 million a year in revenue – though this could be adjusted down to account for subsidies for small farms or up to better tax the 422 people who own half of Scotland. One of the major advantages of both of these taxes – one that negates objections from both the UK and Scottish Government whenever taxes on the wealth have been suggested – is that they completely bypass the idea that the rich will simply leave the country. Recent studies have shown that the idea of 'millionaire flight' basically isn't a thing. READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: Welsh Labour can call out their UK boss. Why can't the Scottish branch? It's not just a huge logistical hassle for comparatively little financial gain to pack everything up to go and live in a tax haven, even millionaires have friends and family as do their kids and tearing up those social bonds to save a bit of money just isn't worth it. However, this hasn't stopped the media pushing that line anyway. Even if it was true, the wealth people have locked up in Scottish land and housing can't move with them. The tax still needs to be paid by whoever owns them regardless of where they live (and many of the largest landowners in Scotland don't live here, so the point is particularly moot there). One of the biggest sources of instability in our current society and economy is wealth inequality. It urgently needs to be reined in and reversed. If the UK Government persists in refusing to do it then there is at least something the Scottish Government can do without having to wait for them. And if the current Scottish Government doesn't want to do it either well, there are elections next year. Maybe politicians could suggest who we should vote for who will?
