Texas legislature moves to finalize bills in the final days of session
At this point in the session, House bills amended by the Senate and Senate bills amended by the House are being returned to their originating chamber for final approval. The sponsor of the bill must tell each body if they concur with the changes made to their legislation.
If not, the bill moves on to conference committee, like House Bill 3071 by State Rep. Charlie Geren, a Republican from Fort Worth. He got up to the front mic of the House chamber to talk about amendments made to his bill, which relates to the cancellation of certain solid waste disposal permits.
'They're not any good and I am requesting to go to conference,' Geren said to thunderous cheers in the chamber, a point of levity after long consecutive days and nights of debating and voting.
When a conference committee request is approved there are five members selected, known as conferees, from each chamber, including the two bill sponsors. What has been described as a closed-door negotiation between the ten members is actually more like a negotiation between two people. Dennis Bonnen, the former Speaker of the House, said most of the time negotiations begin even before a conference committee is called.
'Your lead author in the House, your lead author in the Senate, they're already talking. They've been talking through the whole process,' Bonnen explained.
In fact, the other conferees are more symbolic and only provide a signature once an agreement has been made between the bill authors. Mark Strama, a former state lawmaker, and Bonnen both agreed they forgot they were conferees on a conference committee until they were asked to sign on to the final language of the bill.
For a bill to pass out of conference committee it needs three signatures of approval from each coalition of conferees. It then goes back to each chamber for final approval from the full body.
A majority of conference committees work just like that, but there are instances where legislation is significant enough that all members of the conference committee are contributing to the solution. One prime example is the appropriations bill, which funds the state over a two-year period.
'They're bigger issues. They're more significant. There's more volume to be dealt with,' Bonnen explained. This session, Bonnen believes the state's Compassionate Use Program (TCUP) is one of those bills that will need all hands on deck.
Negotiations between the Senate and House have been ongoing for the past couple of weeks as the legislature moved to ban all hemp-derived intoxicants. There is a push to expand the TCUP to allow more people to be eligible for the medical cannabis program, and make it easier for patients to get their prescription.
Strama also pointed out that conference committees can be used to revive bills that died either on the chamber floor or in committees. For the most part, conference committees are deciding between the differences in a House-approved and Senate-approved bill. But there is a procedure where the committee conferees could go out of bounds to add in additional provisions from other bills. It's known as going 'out of bounds.'
To do this, the conference committee would have to go to each floor and ask for a resolution to go out of bounds. A majority of both chambers would need to approve that resolution.
'When you're out of power, you're looking for ways to stretch a conference committee report to extend to something to one of your bills that failed,' Strama said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP mayoral candidate urges Trump to stay out of New York City race
New York City Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa said that President Trump's interference in the New York election could embolden Democratic candidate Zohran Mandani. 'In this situation, it doesn't help if he intervenes in New York City,' Silwa told Fox 5's Morgan McKay on 'Politics Unusual' on Friday. 'Every day it's Trump versus Zohran Mamdani, it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani. Every day that Cuomo and Adams talks about you, 'you drop out, you job out,' it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani,' he continued. The New York City race for mayor has sparked heavy tensions. Zohran Mamdani, the democratic nominee, surprisingly won the Democratic primary against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo is now running as an independent alongside the current NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Trump has been adamantly opposed to Mamdani's campaign for NYC mayor. He has called him a ' communist lunatic ' and said that if he is elected in November, 'He better behave. Otherwise, he will have big problems.' The New York Times reported on Wednesday that Trump had multiple phone calls with Cuomo and was considering 'getting involved' in the mayoral race. Sliwa, who is the only Republican candidate and in an underdog position, said he was not surprised that the president called Cuomo, as 'Cuomo's been talking to Trump for years.' He added, 'I would just say to the president, spend your time where it's needed more, on geopolitical interests that affect all Americans. This election in New York City does not affect all Americans.' Other candidates also raged against Trump's move. Mamdani posted on X, 'Today we learned Andrew Cuomo is directly coordinating with Donald Trump, even as this President sends masked agents to rip our neighbors off the streets and guts the social services so many New Yorkers rely on,' posted Mamdani on X. 'It's disqualifying and a betrayal of our city,' he added. But Cuomo on Thursday pushed back on the report. 'I can't remember the last time I spoke to President Trump,' Cuomo said during a press conference, adding that he has 'never spoken to him about the mayor's race.' Silwa has previously attacked Mandani and blamed Adam's mayoral term for Mandani's win in the Democratic primary. 'There is no Zohran Mamdani if Eric Adams had done a decent job,' Sliwa said.


Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Republican Winsome Earle-Sears is on the defensive in Virginia's race for governor
HOPEWELL, Va. — Against an olive drab backdrop in a barbecue joint filled with the aroma of pulled pork and the sweat of a Virginia summer, Republican Winsome Earle-Sears told voters she was running her campaign for governor like a military-style operation. The lieutenant governor, a former Marine, said she would protect Virginia just as she did America. The way Earle-Sears tells it, not all attacks come from soldiers.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Senate Republicans reveal dramatic dealmaking behind Trump's $3.3T megabill passage
Senate Republicans left Washington this week to sell President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," but the road to creating and passing the legislation began just over a year and a half ago. Trump's $3.3 trillion megabill, crammed with his legislative priorities on border security, defense and energy, was a product months in the making. And it was the marquee policy in the bill, which was to extend or make permanent many of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, that was the driving force behind Republicans' desire to pass it. But Senate Republicans have had little time to rest on their laurels and celebrate the bill's passage, spending the month since Trump signed it advancing a $9 billion clawback package and trying to ram through Senate Democrats' blockade of the president's nominees. The journey to pass the bill began well before Republicans had a trifecta in Washington in early 2024, when then-Senate Republican Conference Chair John Barrasso, R-Wyo., hosted a policy retreat with Senate Republicans to hash out what the GOP's agenda could look like should the win out in November. And months later, Trump visited with Senate Republicans to discuss the strategy they had been working on behind-the-scenes. "With President Trump in the White House, we discussed how Republicans will get America back on track," Barrasso said at the time. "That starts with helping families escape the pain of Democrat high prices, unleashing American energy, stopping Democrat tax increases, and securing the Southern Border. Republicans are united." The real, nitty-gritty work began in January where concepts were taken and fleshed out into legislation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., opted to leapfrog the House and move forward with the Senate's own budget framework, which initially divided the "big, beautiful bill" into two chunks. That added pressure on Republicans in the lower chamber to coalesce behind a plan of their own. For much of the earlier part of this year, however, the Senate was waiting on the House to fine-tune and pass their own version of the bill. Still, Thune and his leadership team, including Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., worked to get a product from one side of the building to the other that the Senate GOP could work with. And when the bill made its way to the upper chamber in early June, the pressure was on to deliver a finished product to Trump by July 4, an artificial deadline used to help corral lawmakers into finishing work on the bill. One of the major disagreements in the upper chamber before the bill ever hit the floor was over the nature of cuts to Medicaid, particularly aimed at the provider tax rate. The issue was eventually smoothed over through the creation of a $50 billion rural hospital fund, but lawmakers who sounded the alarm against it vowed to ensure that the changes to the provider would never take effect. "I think it was a huge mistake," Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said at the time. "I think this has been an unhappy episode here in Congress, this effort to cut Medicaid." "And I think, frankly, my party needs to do some soul-searching," he continued. "If you want to be a working class party, you've got to get delivered for working class people. You cannot take away health care from working people." And when the bill did finally hit the floor for what would evolve into a multi-day affair of passing through procedural hurdles, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., forcing the reading of the entire bill and a marathon vote-a-rama, Senate Republicans were still not entirely on board. At first, a cohort of fiscal hawks led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., appeared to not support the package — they wanted even deeper cuts to Medicaid by tweaking the percentage that the federal government pays for healthcare in states that opted into Obamacare, which they argued would have saved billions extra. They were offered an amendment that eventually never came to the floor, but was enough for them to back down from tanking the bill. And their resistance began in the first of a handful of huddles inside Thune's office outside the Senate floor. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., joined them for the closed-door conversations, and told Fox News Digital that while her vote was not contingent on getting the change added, she wanted to make the case for why it should be. "It saved a lot of money," she said. "It saved a lot of money, and so I was anxious to see us use the opportunity, since we were able to open up mandatory spending, use the opportunity to really save some money." And later on, in the wee hours of the night, Republicans were bouncing from Thune's office to the Senate floor, hashing out deals as they went to get Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, to support the bill, knowing that Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., could vote against it. "Sometimes it's got to be put on a clock, because at some point the argument has to come to an end," Mullin told Fox News Digital. "And that's why we had to do some of it on the floor. We had to, we had to force the hand." And in the end, only three Republicans, Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Collins and Tillis voted against the bill. From there it went to the House, where Republicans in the lower chamber had their own dramatic rally to pass the legislative behemoth. And now, as Republicans scatter to their home states to sell the bill to their constituents, Tillis said that the "foundational" piece of information that lawmakers can share is that they averted a nationwide tax hike. "The shame of the Medicaid provision is that the vast majority of the bill is supported," he told Fox News Digital. "I think we have to remind them the problem with the tax bill is they're not going to see a cut, but if we hadn't done it, they would have seen a historic increase." "So we need to remind them of what we're doing is continuing what we started, and the economy that we created, it was able to withstand COVID," he continued. "And I firmly believe if we hadn't passed it. We'd have been in a different posture."