logo
Israeli Knesset targets Palestinian rights NGOs

Israeli Knesset targets Palestinian rights NGOs

LeMonde08-06-2025
At the end of March, activists from the far-right Zionist group Im Tirtzu gathered outside the Supreme Court in Jerusalem to confront human rights attorney Nadia Daqqa. "Who funds you?" they asked her, filming the scene. "Germany, the European Union, the Palestinian Authority?" Through such tactics, Im Tirtzu activists sought to discredit Israeli organizations that condemn human rights abuses against Palestinians. They have joined forces with Ariel Kallner, a member of the Likud party (the right-wing party of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu), to draft a bill that would impose an 80% tax on foreign government funding received by Israeli NGOs.
The bill would also strip these organizations of their right to petition the Supreme Court. This legal recourse is one of the few tools available to human rights NGOs to slow violations of Palestinian rights – even though, as the Israeli daily Haaretz wrote on May 23, the country's highest court "has denied all requests to protect Gazans." The bill targets Israeli NGOs whose budgets are mostly funded by foreign governments or by international NGOs, themselves financed by foreign governments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelensky says Russia refusing ceasefire 'complicates the situation'
Zelensky says Russia refusing ceasefire 'complicates the situation'

LeMonde

time4 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Zelensky says Russia refusing ceasefire 'complicates the situation'

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia refusing to accept a ceasefire was complicating efforts to end Moscow's more than three-year-long conflict against his country. "We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. This complicates the situation," he said in a social media post late Saturday, August 16. "If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades." Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit The comment comes after Donald Trump earlier on Saturday dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favor of pursuing a full peace accord – a major shift announced hours after his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin yielded no clear breakthrough. Prior to the high-stakes meeting in Alaska, securing an immediate cessation of hostilities had been a core demand of Trump – who had threatened "severe consequences" on Russia – and European leaders, including Zelensky, who will visit Washington on Monday. The shift away from ceasefire would seem to favor Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal – a strategy that Ukraine and its European allies have criticized as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances. Trump spoke with Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back to Washington, saying afterward that "it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war." Ceasefire agreements "often times do not hold up," Trump added on his Truth Social platform. In the call, Trump expressed support for a proposal by Putin to take full control of two largely Russian-held Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP. Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas," an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, whose main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them. "The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas," the source said. Trump notably also said the United States was prepared to provide Ukraine security guarantees, an assurance German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hailed as "significant progress." But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to "drag out negotiations" with no commitment to end the bloodshed. "The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon," Kallas said. Zelensky back in White House The main diplomatic focus now switches to Zelensky's talks at the White House on Monday. An EU source told AFP that a number of European leaders had also been invited to attend. The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid. Zelensky said Saturday after a "substantive" conversation with Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing "all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war." In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin. "It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said. "And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit, but it's up to President Zelensky." European pressure The leaders of France, Britain and Germany are due to host a video call Sunday for their so-called "coalition of the willing" to discuss the way forward. In an earlier statement, they welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit, but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire. "We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace," the statement said. Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with Kyiv announcing Saturday that Russia had launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night. Back in Moscow, Putin said his summit talks with Trump had been "timely" and "very useful." "The conversation was very frank, substantive, and, in my opinion, brings us closer to the necessary decisions," he said. In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could disrupt what he called "this emerging progress."

France urges Israel to abandon controversial West Bank E1 settlement plan
France urges Israel to abandon controversial West Bank E1 settlement plan

France 24

time13 hours ago

  • France 24

France urges Israel to abandon controversial West Bank E1 settlement plan

France 's foreign ministry Saturday called on Israel to drop a plan to build thousands of new homes in the West Bank, calling the project "a serious violation of international law". "France calls on Israel to abandon this project, which constitutes a serious violation of international law," said a French foreign ministry statement. It came days after Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has approved plans for a settlement that would split East Jerusalem from the occupied West Bank, a move his office said would bury the idea of a Palestinian state. The construction on a tract of land east of Jerusalem named E1 has been under consideration for more than two decades, and is especially controversial because it is one of the last geographic links between the major West Bank cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem. "France strongly condemns the decision by the Israeli authorities to approve the E1 settlement project, which involves the construction of more than 3,000 housing units east of Jerusalem," said the statement. "Its implementation would cut the West Bank in two and seriously undermine the two-state solution, which is the only way to guarantee lasting peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians. France reiterates its condemnation of settlement activity and all the tensions and violence it provokes," the statement added. The UN human rights office on Friday said Israel's decision to build the new settlement was illegal under international law and that it put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime. Development in E1 was long frozen, largely due to US pressure during previous administrations. On Thursday, Smotrich praised US President Donald Trump and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee as 'true friends of Israel as we have never had before'. The E1 plan is expected to receive final approval on August 20, capping off 20 years of bureaucratic wrangling. The planning committee on August 6 rejected all of the petitions to stop the construction filed by rights groups and activists, according to Peace Now, which tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank and filed opposition. While some bureaucratic steps remain, if the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year, according to experts. Smotrich on Thursday boasted that the construction, which is expected to get final approval later this month, could thwart Palestinian statehood plans. His announcement came as many countries, including France, Australia, Britain and Canada say they will recognise a Palestinian state in September, at the UN General Assembly.

'The decision to 'take control' of the Gaza Strip sheds light on the ideological consistency of the Israeli prime minister'
'The decision to 'take control' of the Gaza Strip sheds light on the ideological consistency of the Israeli prime minister'

LeMonde

timea day ago

  • LeMonde

'The decision to 'take control' of the Gaza Strip sheds light on the ideological consistency of the Israeli prime minister'

On Friday, August 8, the Israeli security cabinet decided to evacuate the city of Gaza – meaning more than 1,000,000 people who had already been displaced – aiming to complete the operation by October 7. The same cabinet also approved "taking control" of the Gaza Strip. This term was chosen instead of "occupation" because it carries no legal implications; After all, an occupation regime grants rights to the occupied population and specifically protects them against forced displacement. The decision reveals the ideological consistency of the Israeli prime minister. Often depicted as motivated solely by the desire to stay in office and to avoid his court cases – essentially as a master opportunist – Benjamin Netanyahu has, in reality, consistently pursued a structured political project: the destruction of the Palestinian national project in favor of a "Greater Israel." Aligned with the views of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, Netanyahu has always rejected the idea of a Palestinian state. To oppose the Oslo Accords, he participated in vehement protests shortly before the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin and has always refused to meet with Mahmoud Abbas. In both his writings and speeches, he asserts that Palestinians do not exist − only "Arabs" − thus denying the historical existence of these people. Netanyahu's objective now appears clear: To make Gaza ungovernable and unlivable, to empty the territory of its population and to establish Jewish settlements there, reducing Palestinians to a minority living under Israeli domination. To those who still doubt, let us remember his advice in 2015 regarding the Iranian nuclear program: "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, then what is it? (...) It's a duck." In this case, it is indeed a project of annexation and forced displacement of Palestinians, whether in Gaza or in the occupied territories. Internal consequences across Israel In Gaza, however, the occupation will be even harsher than in the West Bank. The scenario being considered is one of strict military control, with areas forbidden to Palestinians, the sorting of the population through checkpoints aided by artificial intelligence and an encouragement to leave. A report by the Boston Consulting Group even mentions the possibility of transferring 25% of Gazans to Ethiopia or Somalia. At the government level, mechanisms to implement this "departure" policy have already been created.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store