Woman claims BMW Financial Services' non-cooperation led to R787,000 debt
Image: Supplied
A woman who bought a car through BMW Financial Services is accusing the motor company of failing to cooperate when she indicated that she was unable to continue making payments to her car.
The woman, who has chosen to remain anonymous, purchased a BMW 218i Gran Coupe M Sport in October 2021, with the vehicle being financed through BMW Financial Services. According to the terms of the agreement, she was granted a credit facility exceeding R787,000 to cover the cost of the vehicle. This financing arrangement came with an estimated monthly repayment obligation of more than R11,000, placing a significant financial commitment on her.
She was able to maintain her monthly instalments for just over six months before coming to a realisation that the monthly instalments were financially not viable as it was consuming nearly half her salary leaving her with insufficient funds to cover her basic financial needs and other financial obligations. This growing strain on her finances forced her to reassess her ability to continue honouring the credit agreement, prompting her to reach out to BMW Financial Services to seek relief or explore alternative solutions.
She explained that after recognising the financial strain, she approached BMW Financial Services to request assistance in selling the vehicle, hoping to find a solution that would alleviate her debt burden. However, she was informed by the motor company that the total amount required to settle the outstanding debt on the vehicle was R814,000. At the same time, BMW offered to purchase the vehicle for only R600,000, which would leave her with a significant shortfall of R214,000. Despite her efforts to engage and find a mutually beneficial resolution, she alleges that no further assistance, guidance, or alternative options were provided by the company. This left her feeling abandoned and solely responsible for the substantial debt, with no meaningful support from the institution that had financed the purchase.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
"After mounting arrears and further attempts to engage BMW, our client voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on June 7, 2022 – the valuation provided by BMW reflected a large shortfall, and she took back the vehicle in an effort to secure a better private offer," said her attorney, Liesel Kriel.
After relocating from Gauteng to Durban in an effort to improve her financial circumstances, she said she actively sought out better trade-in or resale offers for the vehicle. She managed to secure more favourable valuations from multiple third-party dealers, which exceeded the initial offer made by BMW. In a bid to resolve the matter, she submitted the alternative quotes to BMW Financial Services, along with supporting financial documentation detailing her income and financial hardship. However, despite her proactive approach and willingness to cooperate, she claims that BMW failed to respond and completely ignored her submissions.
To her shock, she later discovered in November 2022 that the vehicle had been transferred out of her name as far back as June 2022 without her knowledge, permission, or any formal notification. This discovery raised serious concerns for her, not only about the handling of the vehicle but also about the lack of transparency and communication from BMW Financial Services throughout the process.
After the shocking discovery she lodged a complaint against BMW with the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa (MIOSA), which directed her to the National Credit Regulator (NCR) due to the matter relating to reckless lending.
According to her, it was around this time that , she was also informed that legal proceedings had been instituted against her by BMW Financial Services. She expressed shock and frustration, particularly because she had previously notified BMW in writing, via email, of her change of address following her relocation from Gauteng to Durban. Despite this clear communication, she claims that BMW continued to serve legal documents at her former address, effectively depriving her of the opportunity to respond to or engage with the legal process in a timely and meaningful manner. As a result, she believes that BMW acted negligently and unfairly, further compounding her distress and legal vulnerability.
She said the NCR process was plagued with delays – it was only in June 2024 that the NCR advised her the matter had not been considered and then issued a non-referral notice, prompting her to refer the matter to the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT).
During the tribunal proceedings, it was noted that woman had opted not to defend herself when the case was in the High Court, and as a result, her claims of reckless lending against BMW were not considered.
In February 2025, the NCT held that the high court is a competent forum that had already reached a decisive conclusion on her failure to honour her financial commitments.
"Any subsequent ruling by the tribunal regarding reckless lending will impact the high court's judgment, which goes against the principle of res judicata," said the tribunal.
She said following the judgment, in March 2025, BMW attempted to enforce the judgment and execute the warrant at her erstwhile address – the address was later amended.
"Due to BMW's lack of cooperation, our client had no choice but to obtain legal assistance and as such our offices proceeded to launch a rescission application based on the pending regulatory processes and improper service," said Kriel.
Kriel said BMW has opposed the rescission application, raising technical defences, including the time delay in bringing the application.
"BMW maintains that our client was aware of the proceedings, had a chance to respond, and that the regulatory complaints were merely delay tactics," Kriel added.
When approached for comment, BMW declined to speak on the matter, stating that it remained sub judice.
"I have, however, determined the matter is still being considered by a court. We cannot, therefore, provide comments to you at this time," said BMW spokesperson, Hailey Philander.
In closing, the woman's case reflects the complex and often frustrating journey consumers face when navigating disputes with large financial institutions. Despite her efforts to seek assistance from BMW Financial Services, the National Credit Regulator, and eventually the National Consumer Tribunal, procedural technicalities and jurisdictional limitations ultimately stood in the way of her reckless lending claim being meaningfully assessed. The High Court's prior ruling based on her failure to defend the matter effectively closed the door to further adjudication by the Tribunal, citing the legal principle of res judicata, which prevents re-litigation of issues already decided by a competent court.
The attempted enforcement of the judgment at her former address and the subsequent legal wrangling over the rescission application have only added to the woman's sense of being sidelined by a system she believes failed to accommodate her financial vulnerability. Her legal representative, Kriel, argues that the mishandling of notices and the disregard of pending regulatory processes justify reopening the case. BMW, however, continues to oppose the rescission, framing the delays and regulatory complaints as tactical manoeuvres rather than legitimate grievances.
With BMW declining to comment further due to the matter being sub judice, the case remains in legal limbo highlighting the wider challenges consumers face when trying to assert their rights in the face of institutional power and procedural complexity.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
31 minutes ago
- IOL News
Anger mounts as Trump's tariffs set to bite
Demonstrators burn a US flag and a picture of US President Donald Trump during a protest in defence of national sovereignty following the US government trade taxes and sanctions on Brazil, near the US consulate, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on August 1, 2025. Thabo Makwakwa Analysts warn that the path ahead is fraught with challenges, including potential irreversible damage to sectors already under pressure following the recent imposition of a 30% tariff by the United States on key South African exports. They raised concerns about long-term economic stability, job security, and export revenue. Effective August 1, 2025, the new tariffs target key industries, including citrus, macadamia nuts, automotive components, steel, and aluminum. South Africa's citrus industry, which supports over 35,000 jobs and contributes more than R38 billion annually, faces disproportionate risk. Speaking to Sunday Independent on Friday, Dr. Iraj Abedian, Chief Economist at Pan-African Investments Research Services, highlighted the severity of the situation. "The tariffs will have a dire impact on our automotive and citrus industries. We're looking at an initial loss of around 100,000 jobs, especially in motor manufacturing, which feeds into a broader supply chain of tire, component, and leather producers." Abedian further explained that the Western Cape's citrus sector is uniquely vulnerable due to its climatic resilience against certain citrus diseases like black spot, which restricts exports to the US. Other regions lacking this advantage could see prices plummet, affecting the entire supply chain. "When the Western Cape exports are constrained, it affects prices and volumes in other markets like the Middle East, Europe, China, and Russia, creating a ripple effect across the industry." Beyond immediate impacts, industry experts warn of potentially permanent damage. Wandile Sihlobo, Chief Economist, emphasized that the tariffs threaten the fabric of South Africa's manufacturing sector, particularly those producing vehicles tailored for the US market. "When factories close due to these tariffs, they don't reopen easily, even years later. The investment required to establish a foothold in the US market is extensive, and once lost, it's nearly impossible to regain." He pointed out that industries such as automotive manufacturing, which produce both right- and left-hand drive vehicles for export, face the risk of shuttering facilities entirely. The consequences extend beyond jobs, impacting revenue streams and the country's long-term industrial capacity. Sihlobo also highlighted the broader implications for South Africa's trade relations. The US's move increases the vulnerability of South African agricultural exports, such as ostrich products, table grapes, nuts, and wines, to competitors from nations like Peru and Chile, which face lower tariffs. "South Africa now faces a significant disadvantage, as our exports are taxed at around 30%, while Peru and Chile enjoy tariffs closer to 10%. This disparity undermines our competitiveness." He noted ongoing negotiations between South Africa and US officials, with the government actively seeking more favorable terms. However, Sihlobo cautioned that such talks are complex and protracted, especially given the US's recent trade tensions with other major partners like the European Union and Japan. "The negotiations are challenging, and the current environment of global uncertainty makes it difficult to predict outcomes. Still, we continue to support our government's efforts to advocate for our industries," he said. With the US accounting for approximately 8% of South Africa's total exports, particularly in vehicles (17%) and agriculture (5%), the impact of these tariffs could be profound. Higher costs for US buyers are expected to reduce demand, threaten supply chains, and diminish South Africa's export earnings. Economic analysts warn that the tariffs could accelerate job losses, depress public revenues, and deepen existing economic vulnerabilities. "This is not just a short-term setback. The damage could be long-lasting, and reversing it will require years of concerted effort and strategic investment, said Abedien. The experts warned that South Africa's industries must brace for a challenging period ahead. The Federation of Unions of South Africa (Fedusa) said that while it did not subscribe to alarmist projections of a 'jobs bloodbath,' it was mindful that implementing such measures could profoundly impact South Africa's export-led industries, particularly the automotive sector. 'The proposed tariff would render South African automotive and manufactured goods significantly more expensive and less competitive in a vital export market. 'A contraction in demand would almost certainly force firms to scale down production, with downstream effects that include shift reductions, deferred investments, and potential job losses over time,' Fedusa said. The president of the General Industries Workers Union of South Africa, Mametlwe Sebei, said the country risks losing access to the US market due to unmet requirements influenced by shifting global politics and policies. 'When you look at AGOA, the US Congress has specific requirements for Africa, and many US Congress members have pointed out that South Africa is not meeting these. This has been an ongoing issue, even in the past. 'Secondly, given policies on Israel-Palestine, and the current focus on China and Russia as a bloc, the global economy is shifting, and it's unlikely that South Africa will maintain the privileged access it currently enjoys to the US market,' said Sebei. He argued that if South Africa wants to transition toward manufacturing vehicles, it must mobilize resources and industry capacity to meet the country's transport and manufacturing needs. However, he expressed skepticism about current ambitions and the capacity to achieve these goals. Meanwhile, President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced that negotiations with the United States will continue over the next week. Ramaphosa said that ongoing communications between South Africa and US officials continued on Friday, adding that the government has submitted a Framework Deal to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations.
The Citizen
35 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Oh crack! Will your windscreen pass a roadworthy?
The chairperson of the Tyre, Equipment, Parts Association (TEPA), Johann van de Merwe, says a windscreen is no longer just a pane of glass; it's an essential structural component that plays a critical role in passenger safety. Beyond providing visibility, a windscreen also ensures correct airbag deployment, protects occupants from ejection during an accident and supports the roof during rollovers. 'Laminated glass, which came to the fore in the 1990s, was a turning point for windscreen quality because it doesn't shatter upon impact. Instead, the inner layer holds the fragments in place, dramatically improving crash safety,' van de Merwe said. 'With the influx of affordable imported vehicles, we can expect to see an increase in ADAS, augmented reality HUDs (head-up displays), biometric sensors and even electrochromic glass that adjusts tint automatically. Some manufacturers are also exploring windscreen-integrated solar panels.' ALSO READ: Repair those pesky windscreen chips Van de Merwe warned that even a small chip can weaken the structural integrity of a windscreen. 'It may seem cosmetic, but under pressure, like from a pothole or speed bump, that chip can suddenly spread and shatter the windscreen.' He added that South African law prohibits driving with a windscreen that impairs visibility. 'You can be fined or even fail a roadworthy test. Cracks larger than 150mm or within the driver's vision won't pass a roadworthy.' TEPA'S top eight windscreen tips: • Don't blow hot air on a cold windscreen. • Avoid slamming doors with windows closed. • Use gentle wipers and top-up washer fluid. • If a chip is smaller than a 10c coin and not in the driver's line of sight, a repair may be possible. Cracks or damage near the screen's edge almost always require full replacement. • Always use an accredited glass fitment centre where SABS-approved glass is used and there are trained technicians doing the work. • ADAS cameras rely on precise angles. When the windscreen is replaced, the system must be recalibrated; otherwise, it can misread distances or lane markings, leading to increased crash risk for drivers and possible liability claims for insurers. 'What's important is that a lot rides on the integrity of your windscreen. Incorrect fitment, poor-quality glass and a lack of calibration could render all the safety tech in your vehicle useless.' ALSO READ: How road-ready is your 'mom's taxi'?
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
30% Tariffs from the US government, 0% Leadership from the GNU government
Trade tensions between SA and the US, and represents a direct threat to thousands of South African jobs in key export sectors such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. Image: Armand Hough /Independent Newspapers Build One South Africa (BOSA) expresses deep concern over the imposition of 30% tariffs on most South African imports to the United States, which will come into effect after a seven-day window. This marks a serious escalation in trade tensions between SA and the US, and represents a direct threat to thousands of South African jobs in key export sectors such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. The outcome is not solely the result of an increasingly protectionist White House. It is a self-inflicted wound caused by years of incoherent and ideologically driven foreign policy from the South African government. What should have been a moment for skilled diplomacy and strategic engagement has instead become a textbook case in diplomatic failure. Key opportunities to repair and restore trust with US lawmakers and officials were squandered. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Even under the more diplomatic Biden administration, South Africa failed to rebuild trust. We did not use the opportunity to engage, negotiate, or reassure. And now, under a more transactional Trump presidency, patience has run out. What is clear is that South Africa urgently needs a foreign policy rooted in clear principles and strategic interests instead of nostalgia and ideology. Our diplomacy must be led by the state, above party politics, and laser-focused on three core objectives: expanding trade and economic growth, defending human rights, and advancing democracy on the continent and beyond. The current bipolar approach, with mixed signals from different actors, is unsustainable and deeply damaging. BOSA calls for five urgent steps to arrest this crisis and rebuild South Africa's credibility in Washington: Reassert official diplomatic leadership and prevent political freelancing that undermines national trade priorities. South Africa must speak with one credible, united voice. Engage directly with the US Congress, where AGOA's future will ultimately be decided. The case must be made for the mutual benefits of continued trade cooperation and use the over 500,000 US jobs linked to trade with South Africa as leverage. Present a credible trade and investment plan that highlights the potential of key export sectors and aligns with US strategic interests, especially in green energy and technology. Commission an urgent economic risk assessment to quantify the impact of these tariffs on jobs and industries, and guide responsive, sector-specific relief measures. Appoint a qualified ambassador to Washington who understands the intersection of economics and diplomacy and can lead the high-level engagements needed to restore trust and rebuild lost ground. South Africa cannot afford more indecision, ideological posturing, or diplomatic negligence. Our future economic growth depends on pragmatic, clear-headed leadership in foreign policy that puts South African jobs front and centre. Roger Solomons - BOSA Spokesperson
