Sussex Police needs to improve staff vetting
Sussex Police needs to improve its vetting of staff, professional standards and anti-corruption processes to ensure it is serving the public, a watchdog has found.His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) report stated there was a "huge backlog of vetting" to be done for the force's staff and that some employees were working in a job "without the proper level of clearance".Inspectors found the force's anti-corruption unit to be "understaffed" and said it was "not acting fast enough" on complaints from the public. A Sussex Police spokesperson said: "We accept the findings and are fully committed to continuing the work that's already ongoing to optimise these improvements."
The HMIC report stated the force's vetting unit "doesn't have enough staff to meet the demand it faces". It said Sussex Police "should understand the level of vetting" required for all posts and that "all staff should have been vetted to a high enough level for the posts they hold". At the time of the inspection, the force had a workload of 1,178 applications waiting to be processed. "It acknowledged that it isn't taking effective steps to prioritise higher-risk cases within this workload," the report said.
'A challenge for the force'
The HMIC report highlighted the need to improve timeliness in recording and handling of complaint and conduct allegations, the standard of investigation and resolution of conduct allegations as well as the documentation of complaints and conduct allegations.It stated many complaints were suitable for resolution by the public confidence team. Such complaints should be dealt with "in a timely manner", the report said. "At the time of our inspection, this is a challenge for the force."Inspectors found staffing levels in the force's anti-corruption unit "don't meet current demand".The report said: "The force lacks capacity to monitor its computer systems, including mobile data. "It needs such monitoring to protect its data and to identify misconduct, data breaches, and computer misuse."Deputy Chief Constable Dave McLaren, from Sussex Police, said: "We absolutely recognise the importance of police legitimacy and how crucial it is that the public have confidence in us as a force to uphold the expected standards of professional behaviour."The force has worked hard to improve internal culture and standards."We have also introduced new governance and new process and practice to improve culture and leadership throughout Sussex Police."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Motorcyclist dies in crash on M6 Toll motorway at Burntwood
A motorcyclist died when he was involved in a crash on the M6 Toll serious accident involving a black, red and silver Ducati motorcycle happened at about 17:45 BST on Friday, Staffordshire Police efforts of motorists and paramedics to save the 35-year-old man, he died at the scene on the southbound carriageway, just after junction six at force has urged anyone with CCTV or dashcam footage to get in touch. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Cyber security experts reveal the chilling number of images predators need to make deepfakes of children
Cybersecurity experts have revealed that predators need just 20 images to create deepfake videos of children, prompting urgent warnings over the growing dangers of sharing family photos online. Professor Carsten Maple, a leading expert from the University of Warwick and the Alan Turing Institute, said advanced AI tools can use a shockingly small number of pictures to generate realistic fake profiles and videos of minors. The consequences, he warned, can include identity theft, blackmail, and online exploitation. Parents are unknowingly giving criminals exactly what they need, with many doing it simply by uploading family pictures to social media and cloud storage platforms. 'It takes just 20 images for sophisticated AI tools to create a realistic profile of someone, or even a 30-second video,' said Professor Maple. New research commissioned by privacy tech firm Proton found that UK parents share an average of 63 photos each month, most of them including children. One in five parents post family pictures multiple times a week. Two in five do so several times a month. The findings suggest today's children often have a digital footprint from birth, long before they understand the internet, or can give consent. But it's not just criminals that experts are worried about. Big tech firms are also harvesting these images for their own purposes. Professor Maple pointed to Instagram's recent policy change, which allows the platform to use user photos to train its AI systems. He called the move 'deeply concerning.' He said: 'These companies use consumer data to build advertising profiles, analyse trends, train algorithms and track behaviour — often without people fully realising what's being collected.' Over half of parents now automatically back up their family images to cloud storage. The average parent has around 185 photos of their child saved online at any given time. Yet almost half admit they didn't know that tech companies can access and analyse those photos. The study found four in ten parents believe tech firms only gather basic metadata, things like time, location, or device used, while 11 percent had no idea what kind of information is being collected at all. Experts now warn that a generation of children could face serious long-term risks — including fraud, grooming, and deepfake abuse, simply because of the volume of images being shared. 'Oversharing can lead to digital records that are difficult or impossible to delete,' said Professor Maple. 'This opens the door not just to identity fraud, but also to more sinister forms of exploitation.' Despite this, many parents remain unaware of how vulnerable their images really are. While 72 per cent say photo privacy is important to them, a staggering 94 per cent believe tech firms should be more transparent about how they use stored data. Parental anxiety appears to be rising, with around 32 per cent of parents saying they are constantly worried about their phone or cloud accounts being hacked. Nearly half say they worry about it from time to time. More than half have already taken extra security steps, using Face ID, PIN codes, limiting app downloads, and keeping devices updated. But Professor Maple says that's not enough. With the rapid growth of AI and rising numbers of data breaches, the need to strengthen protection for children has never been more urgent. 'We are building digital profiles of children without their consent,' he said. 'The risks are real, and the damage, in many cases, irreversible.'
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK steelmakers call Trump doubling tariffs 'another body blow'
UK steelmakers said US President Donald Trump's decision to double import taxes on steel and aluminium to 50% is "yet another body blow" to the industry. Trade group UK Steel warned some orders could be delayed or cancelled, with uncertainty surrounding some shipments which are already halfway across the Atlantic. Trump's new 50% import tax will come into effect on Wednesday. It will replace the 25% import tax that Trump announced earlier this year. A UK government spokesperson said it was engaging with the US on the implications of the latest tariff announcement to provide clarity to the industry. The US agreed on 8 May to drop import taxes on UK steel as part of a trade deal with the UK, but the original 25% tariff has been kept in place while the details of the deal are worked Steel director general Gareth Stace said: "The deal that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and President Donald Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into is yet another body blow for all UK steelmakers in this torrid time. "UK steel companies are this morning fearful that orders will now be cancelled, some of which are likely being shipped across the Atlantic as we speak."Mr Stace said the trade group would now be "pressing our government to finalise the agreement to eliminate UK steel import tax and for it to come into effect urgently". "UK steelmakers should not have to shell out for this new steep hike in US steel tariffs - all we want is to continue producing the steel our US customers value so highly," he said. A spokesperson for the UK government said: "The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel."The Guardian reported on Saturday that UK business secretary Jonathan Reynolds will meet his US counterpart Jamieson Greer at an OECD meeting - a global policy forum - in Paris next week, where they will seek to agree a timeline for exempting the UK from the US steel to double tariffs on steel imports The UK exports a relatively small amount of steel and aluminium to the US - about £700m-worth a year in total - but it is an important UK situation should be relatively simple to resolve but until details of the UK-US deal are worked out, business with America is about to become more complicated and more expensive. It is unclear how long for. The type of specialist steel the UK exports to America - which is often used in things like nuclear submarines - means the US would struggle to source it trade is mutually beneficial. But this is yet another reminder that with Trump, nothing can be ruled out.
