logo
Blissful isolation: wild camping on Dartmoor to celebrate a protected right

Blissful isolation: wild camping on Dartmoor to celebrate a protected right

The Guardian23-05-2025

Gentle bird song and the soothing gurgle of water flowing over boulders wake me at dawn. The spring sun is not visible yet, but its pale-yellow light is catching the tops of the steep, tussock-clad valley where I spent the night. I am completely alone; it's just me and my thoughts.
These are the kinds of moments of peace and blissful contentment in nature that cannot be commodified and have been under threat since the owner of the land where I pitched my tent launched a legal case two years ago to curtail the right for the public to backpack camp on Dartmoor.
Alexander Darwall, a multimillionaire hedge fund manager, and his wife, Diana Darwall, claimed that wild camping was hindering their conservation efforts and putting their cattle at risk on their 1,619-hectare (4,000-acre) estate on the southern edges of the moor.
But this week, the supreme court rejected Darwall's lawyers' argument that the act giving the public access to the moor for 'open air recreation' only referred to walking and horse riding. The three judges ruled that recreation should be understood far more widely, including wild camping.
This landmark ruling means Dartmoor remains the only place in England where it is legal to wild camp without a landowner's permission. I passed the Darwalls' grand home – Blachford Manor – on the tough three-hour walk up on to the moor. Through a thick hawthorn hedge and barbed wire fence, I caught fleeting glimpses of the couple's shimmering fish pond and extensive deer park. But I didn't need to knock on his door and beg to camp on their open moorland: I just went ahead.
In Scotland, people are allowed to pitch their tents where they please, provided they do not stray on to enclosed land, such as fields of crops. In England it's a different story, although many hikers, bikers and climbers do it anyway in remote uplands. Usually they are tolerated as long as they are discreet and responsible, but it is not a right.
Countryside access campaigners hope the Dartmoor ruling will push Labour to open up more land to the public (as they once promised in opposition, with a right to roam). Some wonder if the judgment could prompt other national parks to allow responsible backpacking camping, as it makes clear that wild camping counts as open-air recreation. After all, the postwar bill establishing the national parks was designed to give people in bombed-out cities 'opportunities for open air recreation'.
As the sunlight creeps down the sides of the valley, I fetch water from the River Erme and heat it on my stove. Soon, I have a warming mug of tea in my hands. This is very different from camping on a commercial site: there are no facilities or bins. You must carry out what you bring in – although you may carefully bury your own waste.
It is not for everyone, but for those who love adventure and resent paying to be crammed between a palatial air-tent and an SUV with a safari-style roof tent in rural Suffolk. No one has staked out their group's patch with a fortification of wind breaks in something resembling a land grab. There are no queues and acrid smoke from burnt meat.
The sense of freedom you get pitching your tent in open country is exhilarating. But of course, it brings a certain level of responsibility, and it is true some do not follow the rules. I reported on the spate of fly camping, where large groups left behind piles of rubbish and tents, during the pandemic.
However, the supreme court judges made the point that it was far more effective for Dartmoor national park, which resisted Darwall's efforts along with a coalition of campaigners, to deal with irresponsible camping than leave it to private landowners to take action in the civil courts.
Whatever the transgressions of this tiny minority, they pale into insignificance compared with the damage caused by irresponsible landowners across the UK. We live in one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world. Intensive farming coupled with the climate crisis has sent wildlife into decline, with nearly 1 in 6 species now threatened with extinction.
Dartmoor itself is being overgrazed, particularly by sheep. The problem, which has prompted warnings from Natural England and a government action plan, is destroying habitats and putting rare birds at risk of local extinction. Darwall, who offers pheasant shoots, deer stalking and holiday rentals on his land, has been accused of endangering a rare beetle by releasing pheasants next to an ecologically important woodland.
On my 17km hike through rugged moorland, rushing rivers and moss-draped woodlands, I didn't see a single piece of litter or scorch marks from a fire. The only rubbish I saw was feed bags and boxes left by farmers.
As I descend off the moor, I follow the route of one of the largest ever countryside access protests ever seen in the UK. After Darwall won his initial court case in the high court in 2023, thousands came together to defend the right to wild camp. It is a testament to their efforts that this special place remains open to all.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appleby Horse Fair: Rain and mud fail to dampen spirits
Appleby Horse Fair: Rain and mud fail to dampen spirits

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Appleby Horse Fair: Rain and mud fail to dampen spirits

Thousands of people braved wet and muddy conditions to attend the Appleby Horse 10,000 people from the Gypsy and traveller community were expected to attend the annual gathering in Cumbria, along with with 30,000 Debbie Todd, from Consett in County Durham, said people were "really enjoying themselves" despite the soggy are some of her photographs. The Appleby Horse Fair is one of the biggest events in the Gypsy and traveller Todd said there was "loads of energy [and] people enjoying themselves". Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Travellers camped on park-and-ride win battle to stay after judge rules eviction by council was breach of human rights
Travellers camped on park-and-ride win battle to stay after judge rules eviction by council was breach of human rights

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Travellers camped on park-and-ride win battle to stay after judge rules eviction by council was breach of human rights

A group of travellers have won a landmark court case to stay at a park-and-ride site after a judge ruled a council was wrong to try and evict them. Medway Council, in Kent, had tried to turf out the Romani Gypsy families who had set up home at the Wigmore Coach Park, off the M2. A court heard earlier this year how the group of 15 adults and 14 children were moved to the location by the local authority in the summer of 2023. They had been granted permission to stay at the site for three months if they paid a monthly fee and stuck to certain rules. But in October, they were handed an eviction notice, with the council saying they planned to sell the land in the near future. However, a judge has now ruled the authority had interfered with their human rights by trying to kick them out, after hearing no steps had been taken to sell the site. This means the travellers can remain in place - though they do not have a permanent right to stay at the car park. The court judgment - thought to be one of the first wins of its kind in the last decade - explained that circumstances 'may shift the balance in favour of eviction'. The group of families have applied for planning permission to turn the park and ride - previously used by those commuting to London - into an official traveller site. An initial planning application was submitted last May but was refused just two months later. An appeal against the refusal is due to take place on Wednesday. Concerning the eviction, Canterbury County Court heard the travellers were moved to the site, which was a park-and-ride until the pandemic, by the council in July 2023. They had originally pitched up at the nearby Laburnum Road Recreation Ground in Strood, and council officers discovered that some members were 'heavily pregnant' while others were suffering from 'serious health conditions'. They were granted permission to stay at Wigmore for three months, as long as they paid a weekly licence fee of £285 and stuck to certain rules. But in the October of that year, the council issued them a notice to leave despite the group insisting they had kept to the stated rules. When they didn't move on, a possession order for the land was issued at the end of the year. Medway Council claimed its reason for issuing the order was that it had planned to sell the land in the 'near future'. Pictured is one of the families who are based at the former park-and-ride facility But during the hearing at the county court it was revealed no steps had been taken to sell it. The authority also accepted it had not set pitch targets which make 'satisfactory provision' for gypsy and traveller sites - of which there is a chronic national shortage. It comes as some members of the group reported having had their names on waiting lists for as many as 10 different traveller sites over the last decade. Tina Herring, who lives at the site, said: 'I think that it's down to the council and the government to supply permanent places for each and every one who needs them and to not just keep moving us around because they're not going to solve the problem, are they? 'They just push it on from one county to another, and no one wants to deal with you. It's a vicious circle going round and round and round.' On the council's attempts to remove them, she added: 'When we got the lease for this, [the condition] was to keep things tidy, which we do anyway. We don't need to be told that. '"No anti-social behaviour" - we have no problems with the police. "No work, no fires, keep all these rules, and then we'll probably give you a longer lease". We've obeyed all the rules.' A solicitor acting for some of the group described the court win as the first of its kind in a decade. Medway Council, however, said it was deciding 'how best to move forward' - saying the decision was 'disappointing'. Cllr Louwella Prenter, Medway's housing boss, said: 'We are disappointed with the county court judgement not to grant possession of the former Wigmore commuter car park in Maidstone Road, back to Medway Council. 'This is a lengthy and detailed decision, and we will give it due consideration before deciding how best to move forward. 'Granting use of the site was only ever intended as a temporary three-month measure, and the car park is not deemed to be suitable as a long-term site for permanent occupation.' Previous investigations have shown that many local authorities in Kent are still failing to meet the accommodation needs of the travelling community, despite it being a legal requirement. After legislation was introduced allowing local authorities to evict, fine or arrest travellers setting up unauthorised encampments, they are often left being moved from roadside to roadside. Marie Conde, another member of the group, likened living there with the looming threat of eviction to a state of 'limbo'. 'You could never plan to make a Sunday roast because you knew you'd get a move,' she said. 'You could never plan to take the kids out for a day because you couldn't go and leave the place.' Ms Herring added: 'Everybody thinks this life is beautiful - it is, to an extent, but you can't lie your head down at night. 'You never know when that petrol bomb is going to be thrown at you. They've got to stand up and meet our needs instead of keep pushing us on.' The group is now 'praying' the planning permission application is granted. With no permanent place to stay, members of the group have no postcode and have no access to essential services such as healthcare and education. 'We're speaking for the children, the grandchildren and the great grandchildren and children to come,' Ms Herring said. 'They do need their schooling. They do need regular health checks from a doctor. Please, people, accept us - we've been here long enough. 'When are you going to accept us, as human beings? I don't want to hurt anybody by saying that, but we need to be accepted into society as equals.'

A5 near Shrewsbury facing overnight closures
A5 near Shrewsbury facing overnight closures

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

A5 near Shrewsbury facing overnight closures

Drivers have been warned of more than a week of overnight closures to a main road in 11 to 16 June, the A5 near Shrewsbury will be closed eastbound from Edgebold Roundabout to Emstrey Island between 21:00 and 06:00 westbound carriageway will then close from Emstrey Island to Bayston Hill Roundabout during the same hours between 17 and 23 closures are to allow for resurfacing work, with the second stint including a closure of the A49 northbound from Sharpstones Lane to Bayston Hill Roundabout. National Highways said the closures would only be on weeknights and the resurfacing would allow road users "safer, smoother journeys".It warned drivers to leave extra time for travelling and to follow signed diversions. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store