logo
Lord Biggar: The Left use ‘fascist' to silence people they don't like

Lord Biggar: The Left use ‘fascist' to silence people they don't like

Telegraph04-04-2025

The Left is using the term 'fascist' to label anyone it wants to silence, according to an academic 'cancelled' for his views on colonialism.
Lord Biggar told an audience at the Oxford Literary Festival that the word had been co-opted to shut down freedom of speech.
The Oxford University emeritus professor made headlines in 2018 when fellow historians opposed his project exploring the ethics of the British Empire, after he suggested that Britain should take pride in some aspects of its colonial past.
He discussed the backlash in a debate at the festival on whether fascism was on the rise.
'In my experience of the word, it is used to label something or someone so that, from now on, we don't have to listen to them. 'Biggar's a fascist therefore don't listen to him.' It's not a word that is used to illuminate, it's used to shut the ears. The same would go, often-times, for 'racist' or 'white supremacist' or whatever it is.
'It's not helpful. It doesn't advance our understanding at all,' said Lord Biggar, who is chairman of the Free Speech Union and sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords.
'Some people think I am a fascist. Why would they think that? Well, because I wrote a book about British colonialism that reckons the British Empire chalked up some signal achievements as well as presiding over some things we should lament. I also don't think empire is necessarily an illegitimate form of rule; most people lived under empires.
'And, what's more, I do think it is not racist to say that sometimes one culture is superior to another in certain respects, so a culture that has figured out how to build ocean-going ships is superior in terms of maritime technology to one that has only developed canoes to go around coastal waters.
'As long as it's not discriminatory, it is perfectly fair to say that at a certain time this culture is more advanced than another in a certain respect. So it may be for those reasons that some people for the last eight years have regarded me as being a fascist or a white supremacist.'
Lord Biggar also said it was important that 'we should not think of fascism as a monopoly of the Right'.
He said: 'In my own limited experience of the culture wars, as I have experienced aggression and abuse online it has come from the cultural Left. Of course people online are much nastier and more disinhibited than they are in real life, I get that, but I have been struck by the lack of scruple from some people on the Left.'
'Fascist' label applied to Trump supporters
He was joined in the debate by Prof Justin Schlosberg, professor of media and communications at the University of Westminster and a fellow at Harvard.
Discussing the US, Prof Schlosberg said there was a 'knee-jerk labelling' of Donald Trump and his supporters.
'A lot of Trump's support base, like in this country, encompasses at the margins people who I really would consider fascists or at least sympathetic to certain fascist ideas, but in its mainstream are actually just people with conservative values.
'But what the liberal establishment does is, it seeks to label all of this mass – 70 million voters in America, 20 million here – as far-Right and attendant words like 'fascist',' he said.
In a separate talk at the festival, Alexander McCall Smith, the bestselling author, poked fun at the absurdities of trigger warnings and 'the extent to which universities are pandering to an exaggerated sense of vulnerability on the part of students'.
The author, whose prolific output includes the No 1 Ladies' Detective Agency novels, said: 'Students say they have a right not to feel uncomfortable. That, to my mind, is really the opposite of what education really is.
'Education requires that you be open to ideas that you disagree with and may make you feel uncomfortable. You can't say you have a right to not be exposed to them. This is not in the spirit of enquiry.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Gavin Newsom just made his bid for the presidency?
Has Gavin Newsom just made his bid for the presidency?

Sky News

time33 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Has Gavin Newsom just made his bid for the presidency?

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 On day 143 of Donald Trump's presidency, Martha Kelner and James Matthews discuss California Governor Gavin Newsom's 'presidential' televised address to the nation, and his case that Donald Trump's extraordinary decision to send troops to LA against his wishes has put the country on the brink of authoritarianism. Plus, billionaire Elon Musk has apologised to Trump over his explosive social media posts following his departure from the administration. But is it enough for the pair to make up? If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA
Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA

A federal court hearing is scheduled for Thursday on whether the Trump administration can use the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles. California Gov. Newsom has depicted the federal military intervention in the nation's second largest city as the onset of a much broader effort by Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed that, saying the deployment of troops was unnecessary and meant to undermine local jurisdictions and intimidate the city's large immigrant population. Newsom filed an emergency motion requesting the court's intervention after President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response on Wednesday. The Democratic governor argued the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and said sending troops to help support immigration raids would only promote civil unrest. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the National Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. Most demonstrations have been peaceful but this weekend some turned raucous with protesters setting cars on fire in downtown Los Angeles. The city has imposed a nightly curfew covering a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometer) section where protests have occurred in the sprawling metropolis of 4 million people. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Newsom filed the motion Tuesday, the same day the military announced some members of the National Guard were now standing in protection around federal agents. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations as Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement. Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer chose not to rule immediately but set the hearing for Thursday in federal court in San Francisco. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.

Donald Trump is reshaping democracy for authoritarians
Donald Trump is reshaping democracy for authoritarians

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Donald Trump is reshaping democracy for authoritarians

It depicts US president Donald Trump as a firefighter arriving at an emergency scene somewhere – most likely Los Angeles – declaring: 'I'm here to put out the fire.' Facing off against him is a lone US citizen who duly points out to the firefighter that what, in fact, he's carrying is not a water hose but a flamethrower. To say that it encapsulates what is happening in Los Angeles right now would be an understatement, for the United States is changing in ways rarely seen before. READ MORE: SNP minister responds to 'secret meeting to discuss John Swinney leadership' reports Some, rightly, will argue it was ever going to be thus after the last US presidential election, and Trump was unleashed by the American people on themselves. In retrospect, doubtless some Americans regret electing Trump now that they see him set about the nation, brandishing every available tool or weapon capable of causing division or harm. 'Chainsaw' or 'flamethrower,' these have become Trump's weapons of choice in reshaping his country's democracy in tandem with imposing a blueprint of authoritarian rule. Yes, Trump has insisted that sending in federal troops is aimed at restoring calm or 'putting out the fire' of radical 'left-wing' agitators. He's even suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to quell the protesters in Los Angeles. But the real insurrection here – as back in January 2021 – is one ignited by Trump himself. There is a familiar even deeper historical pattern emerging here too, one that I was reminded of while watching a repeat on BBC4 recently of the landmark series, Rise Of The Nazis. As one newspaper review of the original series aired back in 1999 rightly noted, it served as a lesson in 'how easily – and petrifyingly quickly – a democratic country can move to a totalitarian dictatorship'. (Image: Evelyn Hockstein, REUTERS) Those who say such an observation is nothing but hyperbole in relation to America right now, need to think again. For watching the Rise Of The Nazis is to recall the ease with which propaganda, economic exploitation, and political manipulation came together and were harnessed for authoritarian rule. Trump like Hitler – and all those with authoritarian tendencies – know the political value in triggering those same tendencies among supporters by presenting them with a perceived threat to their shared way of life. Just as the Nazis manufactured crises to work to their advantage, so too does the Trump administration. Right now, the federal intervention in the US – again like 1930s Germany – is aimed at creating a showdown by painting a picture of a threat of disorder to the country at large. In Los Angeles, the template being deployed was outlined succinctly this week in The Economist magazine and goes as follows. First, 'announce an immigration crackdown on a city whose leadership does not want it, wait for protests, then call in the troops to put down the protesters. Cracking heads serves as a warning to other cities that might resist. It is also a signal to MAGA loyalists that Trump is doing what they elected him for'. (Image: MARK FELIX, AFP /AFP via Getty Images) Trump then is increasingly keen on using the military to quell protests against his policies. Sound familiar? 'We're gonna have troops everywhere,' he said, when asked about the situation in Los Angeles. And that's just the start, for Americans will see lots more US military personnel and weaponry on the streets of Washington this weekend as parades marking the US Army's 250th anniversary get underway. That there are echoes here of the Nuremberg rallies of 30s Nazi Germany has not been lost on many. The deployment of federal troops and US Marines in Los Angeles aside, we've also seen paratroopers drop from the sky with Trump giving a partisan encore speech to troops at Fort Bragg. This weekend it will culminate in a 'big beautiful' parade to coincide with the 'great leader's' birthday that will make last month's Victory Day parade in Moscow look quaint by comparison. Only the most blinkered could fail to see what Trump is doing here. This, after all, is a president with whom the US military has by and large had little truck until now. Trump's timely diagnosis of bone spurs in his heels that led to his medical exemption from the military during Vietnam never did him any favours in the eyes of many veterans. His unwillingness to recognise their sacrifice in fighting fascism in the Second World War led also to that infamous remark that Europe's military cemeteries 'were filled with losers'. But now, for Trump, it's time to think again, for that's what despots and dictators do when they need the military onside. All this wooing of America's armed forces with false praise allows Trump to make a point of showing executive force he always coveted but could only dream of during his first term. Admittedly, not everyone is convinced by Trump's newfound 'celebration' of America's military might, with reports that US veterans are split over their president's true motives. While some see it as a thing to be proud of, others remain wary of Trump's manipulation of it for his own political ends. Which takes me back to events unfolding in Los Angeles, for here the devil lies in the detail. That detail is how Trump's administration has cited a provision in the armed forces code allowing the president to put National Guard members under federal control when there is a 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion' against the authority of the US government. It's almost as if Trump and his cabal know what's coming with regard to America's future as they cynically seek to expand the powers of his presidency by riding roughshod over America's political system of checks and balances between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Some might say so what? Trump, they argue, was elected democratically by a sweeping majority. But so too have other leaders who went on to consolidate authoritarian regimes. Back in 1930, while appearing before a constitutional court, Adolf Hitler brazenly informed the court that once he had achieved power through legal means, he intended to shape the government as he saw fit. 'So, only through constitutional means?' a judge asked, to which Hitler's now infamous sharp reply was, 'Jawohl'. Yes indeed. Just as Germany transformed politically in the 1930s before the world's eyes, likewise the momentum in America's shift toward authoritarian rule is accelerating by the day. It's high time we sat up and took notice of just what that could mean for us all.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store