logo
Nelli lives with chronic pain. It took her 20 years to find the right help

Nelli lives with chronic pain. It took her 20 years to find the right help

SBS Australia7 days ago
Nelli Stevenson has been living with chronic pain since she was a teenager — but it has taken her many years, and a serious medical emergency, to find the help she needed. Stevenson, 37, started experiencing chronic pelvic pain, along with a nerve pain called sciatica, when she was around 14 years old. These conditions later worsened after the birth of her child, and became chronic around three years ago. "I live with chronic persistent pain. I've had several medical professionals tell me I'll likely be in pain for the rest of my life," she told SBS News.
"There is only so much they can do for me surgically. So, I manage my pain on a day-to-day basis through a number of physical interventions, as well as medical interventions as well."
Stevenson works for a community legal service with flexible arrangements, and says she is fortunate to have access to a specialist GP and team who support her physical therapy and pain management. "However, it took me about 20 years of pushing through the medical system, constantly advocating for myself and fighting to be taken seriously, to be able to find that group of people," she said. This started in her late teens. "I was told, like most people with pelvic pain, that it's just part of being a woman, it's part of your period. I was gaslit for several years," she said. This had serious consequences. At one point, Stevenson says she had normalised the chronic abdominal pain she was experiencing that she didn't notice her appendix had ruptured. "I didn't present to hospital until 12 days after it had happened," she said. Stevenson ended up in ICU and needed two major surgeries to save her life. She says these caused significant scar tissue, which added to her chronic pain.
She said she has heard many stories of late diagnosis, misdiagnosis and gaslighting from the chronic pain community.
"They [medical professionals] aren't taking seriously these people who are saying, 'I cannot live like this anymore. I need more help.'" Chronic pain is taking longer to diagnose in 2025, according to a new report from peak consumer body Chronic Pain Australia .
The 11th edition of its National Pain Survey, released on Monday to kick off a week-long awareness campaign, has revealed what it calls a "devastating national crisis" marked by diagnosis delays and a severe mental health toll.
Waiting for a diagnosis Chronic pain is a common and complex condition characterised by persistent pain experienced on most days of the week, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Approximately one in five Australians, or 3.6 million, live with chronic pain. However, Chronic Pain Australia believes the figure is higher. "That figure came from a study that was done about 15 years ago," Chronic Pain Australia chair Nicolette Ellis said.
"What we're predicting chronic pain is sitting at in [terms of] prevalence is about four million Australians in this day and age, and [this is] projected to go up to five million in 2050."
Of the almost 5,000 survey respondents, many had multiple conditions, including pain, joint pain and nerve pain, often experienced at the same time.
Over half (54 per cent) of respondents reported waiting more than two years for a diagnosis, and 44 per cent waited over three years. This has increased from 42 per cent waiting over three years in 2024, and 41 per cent in 2023.
Mental health impacts — and a 'pervasive' stigma Ellis said delayed diagnoses can contribute to the "vicious cycle" of chronic pain, including mental ill health. "For a lot of people, it takes away their identity, increases their mental health issues … and that's because of [what] pain can take away," she said. "If you're waiting for a diagnosis, typically you lose function. That might be reduced hours at work, or it might be leaving the workforce altogether."
The report revealed 74 per cent of respondents had experienced mental health impacts, with 87 per cent experiencing sleep disturbances.
Among other impacts was 63 and 59 per cent of respondents who experienced strain on family relationships and friendships. Stigma around chronic pain is "pervasive", according to the report, which found 74 per cent reported feeling ignored or dismissed. Ellis said this can come from health professionals along with friends, family, and community members. However, reported stigma from health professionals was higher than overall levels.
"Many people feel gaslit or stigmatised by health professionals — that this is all in their head and it's not a true condition," she said.
Calls for more complex care Despite the complex nature of chronic pain, the report found access to appropriate multidisciplinary and specialist care is falling short. Only 18 per cent of respondents received a referral to multidisciplinary pain management, and 30 per cent of those referred never secured an appointment. Ellis said access to multidisciplinary care is limited and dependent on location. "If you're in a metropolitan area, usually you can get into a tertiary or hospital-based pain clinic. But they have massive wait lists," she said.
"Access to that kind of care is very limited."
Chronic Pain Australia has been advocating for integrating multidisciplinary care programs into primary care settings. Ultimately, it wants to see chronic pain recognised as a condition in its own right — and made a national health priority. "Currently, we don't recognise pain as a condition in its own right; we recognise it as a symptom. What that means is that not only is chronic pain invisible to society, it's invisible in our health system data and in our policies," Ellis said. Ellis said recognising chronic pain in its own right would increase awareness of the condition, to guide adequate funding and resources. SBS News has contacted the federal health department for comment. It's understood the latest report will be presented to parliament later this week. For Stevenson, having access to early diagnosis and complex care can make an "extraordinary difference". "It means that someone who may otherwise be bedridden for weeks and weeks on end can actually participate in society, can maintain a healthy work-life balance, and can go about their days as a person living as pain free as possible, which surely we all deserve."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inquest begins into Baby R's death at Bendigo Health after planned home birth
Inquest begins into Baby R's death at Bendigo Health after planned home birth

ABC News

time18 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Inquest begins into Baby R's death at Bendigo Health after planned home birth

A coroner's court has heard a mother whose baby died after a home birth in central Victoria, did not want to deliver at a local hospital after facing a traumatic first birth in 2019. Baby R, as the infant is being referred to during the coronial inquest, died from perinatal hypoxia in August 2022 after an emergency caesarean at Bendigo Health. The parents of Baby R, who cannot be identified, read statements to the court in Melbourne today on day one of the inquest. The court heard the baby boy's parents initially assumed they would be unable to have a home birth as their first child was born by emergency caesarean in 2019. However two different doctors referred Baby R's mother to private midwives as part of her options for her second birth. Baby R's mother described a "what if" moment during the home birth, when she noticed meconium liquor as she moved from her bedroom to the lounge room. Meconium liquor is waste usually passed by a baby after birth. In her statement to the court, the mother recalled saying "oh f***", and assumed she would be on her way to hospital. "I remember [the midwife] Mary Louise just saying, 'We'll monitor you more closely'," the mother said in her statement. The baby's mother was herself a registered midwife and had worked as both a nurse and midwife before leaving healthcare following a difficult first birth. The statement from Baby R's father painted the home birth as "calm", before he and the baby's mother made the decision to quickly go to Bendigo Health after complications arose. A midwife called ahead to the hospital to prepare. "When they came to me they said she was having a caesar. I thought 'Oh, here we go again," Baby R's father said. He said after the birth, the baby "wasn't breathing, wasn't squawking". "They took him straight to [paediatrics]," he said. The court also heard Baby R's mother declined an appointment with an obstetrician prior to the birth. She said it felt like an administrative call and questioned why it would be necessary, as no health care providers had flagged the need for an obstetrician consult pre-birth. "It felt like a box ticking exercise," her statement said. Counsel assisting told the court a consultant obstetrician at Bendigo Health assessed Baby R's mother as "high risk" after reviewing her file following the birth. GP Dr Veronica Moule had a 12-week prenatal consultation with Baby R's mother in 2022 and gave evidence on Monday. The court heard Dr Moule was not made aware the mother had a postpartum haemorrhage following her first birth. "I did not receive a discharge summary from Bendigo Health after that; that's where the information would've been written," Dr Moule said. Dr Moule said had she known, she may not have said Baby R's mother was a suitable candidate for a vaginal home birth. "The outcome was tragic," she said. When questioned if it was possible to make an informed decision without a consultation with an obstetrician pre-birth, Dr Moule said "possibly not." Coroner Dimitra Dubrow indicated on Monday morning both midwives involved in Baby R's birth would object to giving evidence in the coronial inquest. The court heard the midwives, Marie-Louise Lapeyre and Elizabeth Murphy, were concerned the evidence may expose them to civil liability. Following investigations by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency and the Nursing and Midwifery Board, both Ms Murphy and Ms Lapeyre have been told they cannot practise as private midwives, along with other conditions. The inquest will continue tomorrow.

Legacy of ACT's first organ donor remembered 50 years on amid calls for more donors
Legacy of ACT's first organ donor remembered 50 years on amid calls for more donors

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Legacy of ACT's first organ donor remembered 50 years on amid calls for more donors

Annette Taylor was just 11 when she suffered an unexpected cerebral brain haemorrhage.. However the darkness of her tragic death 50 years ago would become a life-saving moment as she became Canberra's first organ donor. "She came home from school and said she had a headache, later that night she was in hospital, unconscious, and passed away four days later," her brother Michael Taylor said. However the young girl had previously had several conversations with her mother Marjorie Taylor about wanting to donate her organs. Those conversations proved lifesaving. Mr Taylor's wife, Debbie, said her mother-in-law fought hard to honour her daughter's wish. "Canberra Hospital said 'no, can't happen' but Marj didn't take no for an answer." Eventually a specialist team from Sydney performed the procedure and Annette's two kidneys were given to a 40-year-old man and a 15-year-old boy, changing their lives. Annette became the ACT's first organ donor. Mr Taylor said the trauma of Annette's death had turned into a legacy honouring the caring girl who always went out of her way to help others. "It seems a bit like a bad dream which I had 50 years ago, but that dream has become an amazing legacy," Mr Taylor said. Annette's legacy will continue to live on with the ACT government announcing a street in the west Belconnen suburb of Macnamara will be named 'Annette Street'. Joshua Lindenthaler was diagnosed with a heart condition in 2008, which progressed to him needing a defibrillator, and then a transplant. The Canberra physiotherapist was fortunate, and just three months after being added to the transplant waitlist, he received a new heart in October 2021. "I had a big cardiac episode in the family home requiring CPR from a family member, so surviving that was a pretty big miracle — out of hospital CPR survival rate is five to 10 per cent," he said. Mr Lindenthaler was taken from Canberra Hospital to St Vincent's Hospital in Sydney, and about a week later a viable heart became available. "It's been amazing," he said. An avid cyclist, Mr Lindenthaler said he was living his life to the full and making the most of the gift he'd been given. "I've still got a lot of things I want to do and I want to achieve," he said. "And to try and help other people [by getting] people to register as donors so other people like myself can have a second chance." Only two per cent of people who die in Australian hospitals meet the criteria for donating their organs. One of the requirements is that they have to die in an intensive care unit or emergency department, as organs need to be functioning well to be considered for transplantation. According to data from DonateLife, there are around 1,800 Australians on the waitlist for an organ transplant and 14,000 more on dialysis — many of whom could benefit from a kidney transplant. About 50 Australians on the transplant list die each year because they are still waiting. Most Australians support organ and tissue donation, but only 36 per cent are registered donors. Only 28 per cent of Canberrans are registered. DonateLife ACT agency manager Nadia Burkolterm said the biggest barrier to organ donation was would-be donors not communicating with their loved ones. "More families will say no to donation than yes at that particular crisis moment if they haven't had a conversation that guides them at that time. "Visit the DonateLife website and it honestly takes less than one minute."

Victorian Aboriginal woman Heather Calgaret's death in custody was preventable, coroner finds
Victorian Aboriginal woman Heather Calgaret's death in custody was preventable, coroner finds

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Victorian Aboriginal woman Heather Calgaret's death in custody was preventable, coroner finds

From behind bars, Heather Calgaret wrote to loved ones that she wanted to leave prison behind and become a "better person", to make her children proud. NOTE: This story uses images of Heather Calgaret with the permission of her family. "I look back with sadness rather than hate. I look forward with hope rather than despair," she wrote. But the 30-year-old never got the chance to fulfil her dream of rebuilding a life in the community before her death in November 2021. On Monday, coroner Sarah Gebert found that death was preventable and came after a litany of missed opportunities to support the Aboriginal woman's health in Melbourne's Dame Phyllis Frost prison. "Not only was Heather's passing preventable, she should never have passed in the manner she did," Ms Gebert said. The coronial inquest heard Heather was less than 10 weeks from completing a sentence for armed robbery when her sister Suzanne Calgaret, who was living in the same prison unit, was unable to rouse her ahead of the daily check-in. Ms Gebert said after the alert was raised in the prison, Heather was rushed to Sunshine Hospital, but she had already suffered an irreversible brain injury. The coroner found the passing of the Noongar, Yamatji, Wongi and Pitjantjatjara woman after respiratory failure was the preventable result of inappropriately prescribed medication the day before. She found the doctor who prescribed the injection of the opioid substitution drug buprenorphine did not follow guidelines in place to ensure Heather would be able to tolerate the drug. Heather had sought access to opioid substitution therapies because she wanted to ensure she would stay off drugs after her release from prison just weeks later, the inquest heard. Ms Gebert said usually, a patient would receive another drug — suboxone — for five days before beginning treatment with buprenorphine, as a stabilising step. In Heather's case, this did not happen because the doctor believed she had already been using suboxone in prison, relying on self-reported use by Heather. But the coroner found the doctor could not have been "reasonably satisfied" by this assumption. Ms Gebert said the prescription of the injection of buprenorphine was therefore "inappropriate". The court heard the departure from prescribing protocol was not communicated by the doctor to nurses, who may have otherwise been more vigilant in monitoring after treatment. "I consider that but for the administration of [buprenorphine], Heather would not have passed," Ms Gebert said. During the delivery of her findings, the at-times emotional coroner acknowledged the three other Aboriginal women who had been in the same prison unit with Heather, including her sister Suzanne. "I acknowledge those women who supported each other and were each other's family during their incarcerations," she said. "They unfortunately witnessed the unspeakable which occurred in their unit: the passing of a loved one and another death in custody. 'It is my hope that the manner in which Heather passed does not overshadow her spirit or her tremendous life of value." In findings running to almost 300 pages, the coroner also identified "numerous issues" of concern relating to the way Heather's parole assessment was managed. She recommended the agencies involved in Heather's journey through the justice system reflect on why the standards of care and fairness laid down in policies and called for by past commissions and the Yoorrook truth-telling inquiry had, at times, not been met. Speaking before the findings were handed down, Heather's family told the ABC they were still struggling to process the loss of their "rock", who had filled their lives with love and laughter. "She was the best older sister," her youngest brother Rory Smith said. He said Heather had been going through a "rough time" when she went into prison — in part because child protection authorities had taken custody of her children — but that did not define her. "Her kids were literally her world," he said. "If she would have gotten parole she would still be here today." In her findings, Ms Gebert noted an "insightful" letter written by Heather in which she put forward her case for parole. In it, the mother of four noted that she had been told that in order to complete parole she needed to finish a rehabilitation program, but the prison was not running any sessions in the near future. "I guess what I'm trying to say, is if Dame Phyllis is not running the See Change program, is there any possibility of completing this on the outside, in the community," Heather wrote. The coroner said the inquest had heard there was a "cruel Kafkian circularity" in the requirement to complete a particular program to be eligible for parole, when no such program was available. Ms Gebert said while parole was never guaranteed for prisoners, it was reasonable to expect that the justice system should be able to facilitate the sentences handed down by judges after close scrutiny of each individual case. She also noted that Heather's suggestion that she could live with her mother was judged "unsuitable" during her parole assessment, but there was no evidence that authorities had previously raised concerns about the address. While in prison, Heather gave birth to her fourth child and applied to have her baby live with her in the prison's mother-and-baby unit. That application was rejected, in a decision that was not within the scope of the coronial inquest — although one expert told the court that allowing Heather and her child to remain together may offered an opportunity to break a cycle. Heather's mother, Aunty Jenny Calgaret, said the decision by authorities to take Heather's newborn child from her would have "crushed" her. "She was so excited when she was pregnant … she couldn't wait to have the baby and she was confident that she was going to keep the baby in the prison with her," Aunty Jenny said. The coronial inquest heard that in the aftermath of the removal, Heather began self-medicating with food, gaining a significant amount of weight as her mental health declined. Ms Gebert said the inquest had heard her condition required "urgent mental health treatment" that she was unlikely to get in prison. "There were many missed opportunities throughout that time to intervene [on] Heather's health decline," she said. During her time in prison, Heather turned to visual art to express herself, producing a series of paintings which she shared with family and sold through the not-for-profit Torch art program. "She used to ring all the time and tell us, 'I sold another painting today'," Aunty Jenny said. "I was really happy and proud for her." Aunty Jenny said the vibrant compositions were now a reminder of her beautiful, funny daughter, who had been filled with laughter and love for her family. "I see Heather. I see her, straight away. It's her all over," Aunty Jenny said. After Monday's hearing, Heather's sister Suzanne said the family hoped lessons would be learnt to prevent similar deaths in future. "[For prison health workers] to be aware of just how strong the opioids can be, especially for those who are on it and who do need it, it can happen to any which one of them," she said. "Life is precious, that's what we all need to realise. Once you're gone, you're gone." The Victorian Minister for Corrections has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store