US Africa Command beefs up military support to Angola and Namibia
The United States Africa Command (Africom) is helping Angola and Namibia to counter threats from Isis and Mexican drug cartels emanating from South Africa and elsewhere, says Africom's deputy commander.
Deputy Commander Lieutenant General John W Brennan said this in an online media briefing about his recent visits to Angola and Namibia with Ambassador Robert Scott, deputy Africom commander for civil-military engagement.
They were asked what the main focus of Africom's engagement with Angola and Namibia was, since these were 'two countries where jihadist groups don't currently seem to present much of a threat'.
Brennan replied that Africom's security assistance was 'really preventative.
'There are jihadist groups that operate all along the periphery of both Angola and Namibia. Isis has franchises in Mozambique, South Africa, as well as an emerging Mexican drug cartel issue that we think is … getting worse over time, that's emanating from South Africa and from coastal West Africa.
'We want to keep Namibia and Angola free of those threats as well as to prepare them for any future threats' through training, exercises and equipment.
In Angola, the two officials observed joint exercises between US and Angolan special forces, and held discussions there and in Namibia with their counterparts, 'underscoring US Africa Command's continued commitment to strengthening partnerships in Africa to promote stability and collective defence through cost-effective, African-led solutions that minimise direct US military involvement', said Africom.
Scott said what struck him on the visit was how 'tightly interlocked … security is with prosperity, with economic development', especially with maritime and trade issues.
They heard that Namibia was planning to turn Walvis Bay into a regional hub for the transhipment of goods, and Scott noted that the US was taking the lead in helping to develop the Lobito Corridor into a transformational corridor for trade, connecting eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to the Atlantic.
He said the Lobito Corridor showed how security was leveraging economic development and vice versa. He noted that the upgrading of the railway line from eastern DRC to the Port of Lobito had cut the transport time for goods like copper and agricultural products from an average of 28 days to seven days. And so the military exercises which the US was conducting with Angola were helping to keep its coastline secure.
Africom was also providing Angola with technology to increase its maritime domain awareness, helping its navy and coastguard to know exactly what ships are off its coastline and what they're doing.
Joint military exercises
Brennan said that apart from the small special forces exercises like the recent one with Angola, Africom was trying to include Angola and Namibia in the larger joint military exercises with the US, like African Lion and Obangame Express, which involved 30-50 countries and which were typically conducted several times a year.
He said that the difference between the way the US operated in Africa and the way that Russia, China and some European countries operated was that African countries led the joint US-Africa exercises.
Scott added that this year's Obangame Express exercise had been organised to support the Yaoundé Code of Conduct, the regional construct of rules of engagement for maritime security organised by its member states themselves, from Mauritania down to Namibia.
He said Obangame also included an interesting tabletop exercise on how to combat IUUF — illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing — and stop foreign country fleets 'taking all of their fish out of the ocean'.
The training included 'knowing who's out in your oceans, being able to intercept them and then having the legal ability to actually prosecute them on land'.
Brennan said Africom wanted to increase the participation of other Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries in joint military exercises. Africom was already hosting high-level discussions with their militaries, such as the annual Chiefs of Defense Conference.
'So the more African countries participating, the better,' he said, adding that the US was also adding partners and allies from across the world — for example, the last Cutlass Express exercise was partly hosted in East Africa and included India, Sri Lanka, South Korea and Brazil. He noted that holding the exercises in Africa helped to lower costs for both the US and the African countries.
Africom had 'started the burgeoning relationship with SADC many years ago', said Brennan. Botswana was the hub of that, and Africom wanted to expand its security partners, who also provided troops to operations like those fighting violent extremist organisations in Somalia, as well as stopping illicit drug and human trafficking.
Mozambique was also a partner, and Africom had recently given it boats to interdict drug shipments off its coast. He added that drug cartels making drugs in Africa and exporting them to Europe, the US and Australia, or for local consumption, were a growing problem.
Brennan said that after the US and other Western countries had been forced (by pro-Russian juntas) to remove their militaries from some African countries, it had become more difficult for them to conduct counterterrorism operations when they were not on the ground.
'Which is why we're focusing on building our partners' capacities so that they can respond to terrorist activities … that we support from afar with our partners … with things like training and equipping.' DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Mokonyane slams West for ‘terrorist' labels on African Liberation Movements
Kamogelo Moichela | Published 3 days ago ANC first deputy secretary-general Nomvula Mokonyane delivered a blistering political broadside against Western powers, accusing them of a longstanding agenda to brand African liberation movements as terrorist organisations — an effort she said has failed dismally. Speaking on day three of the Liberation Movement Summit in Ekurhuleni, attended by legacy liberation parties including South Africa's ANC, Mozambique's FRELIMO, Namibia's SWAPO, Angola's MPLA, Zimbabwe's ZANU-PF, and Tanzania's CCM, Mokonyane praised the enduring solidarity among African liberation parties and condemned the West's efforts to delegitimise their struggles. 'They tried to brand us as terrorists, but failed,' Mokonyane declared. We were not terrorists — we were the vanguard of justice, fighting to dismantle the last bastions of colonialism on this planet, said Mokonyane. The Summit, hosted under the banner of deepening cooperation between former liberation movements, aims to adopt a joint declaration reaffirming their ideological unity and commitment to eradicating the socio-economic residue of colonialism and apartheid. Mokonyane paid tribute to the support received from the Soviet Union during the liberation era, noting the military and academic training offered to African fighters, as well as diplomatic backing in international forums. 'The Soviet Union stood with us when others branded us as criminals,' she said, adding that today, political power belongs to democratic governments that reflect the interests of the people. She warned of a 'new wave of imperialism,' citing political manipulation, media interference, and the financial bolstering of opposition parties by Western governments. Mokonyane referenced recent US trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and the rollback of trade preferences, as examples of neo-colonial economic warfare. 'These are not coincidences,' Mokonyane said, stating that they were deliberate moves to weaken progressive governments and reinstall puppet regimes. 'They use their control over the media to destabilise the situation in your countries. Today, the West, represented by the US, seeks to eliminate even weak compensation mechanisms for neo-colonial robbery,' she said. The Summit, which also includes fraternal allies and observers, is expected to conclude with a declaration committing member parties to intensified economic transformation, regional solidarity, and resistance against foreign interference. Mokonyane said Africa was no longer a playground for imperialist powers. She said unity was their shield and history was their strength. 'We defeated colonialism — now we must defeat its lingering legacy,' she said. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Africa must capitalise on transformative High Seas Treaty for global ocean conservation
Having shaped the treaty, Africa must capitalise on recent global momentum to benefit from a new era in ocean governance. In June, the third United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC3) culminated in an ambitious political declaration that marks a turning point for global ocean governance. The highlight was the progress made in adopting the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement (High Seas Treaty). This landmark agreement tackles governance and regulatory gaps in areas beyond countries' jurisdiction — 64% of the ocean's total surface. These waters are critical to planetary health and human wellbeing, but are often overexploited, polluted and abused due to the lack of an overarching regulatory framework. The treaty fills these gaps by focusing on four pillars: marine genetic resources and benefit sharing; area-based management tools, including marine protected areas; environmental impact assessments; and capacity building and technology transfer. UNOC3 generated significant momentum for the agreement. In the days leading up to the conference, 28 ratifications were lodged and 22 new ratifications took place at UNOC3, bringing the total to 51 out of the 60 required for it to come into force. Overall, 139 countries have signed on to the treaty. Africa's engagement with the process has been both strategic and lacklustre. On the one hand, the African Group of Negotiators shaped the treaty, championing the common heritage of humanity principle in negotiations, and before that, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. On the other hand, only seven out of 55 African countries have officially completed their ratification processes. Kenya and Sierra Leone have ratified, but must still deposit their instruments at the UN. Thirty-four African countries have signed. Still, the threshold of 60 ratifications will probably be reached during September's UN General Assembly meeting. The agreement then enters into force 120 days later on 1 January 2026, allowing time for its translation and publication, and for states to prepare for implementation. Once in force, the first Conference of the Parties is convened. The Conference of the Parties is the decision-making body that oversees the treaty's implementation and development. Obligations under the treaty extend only to countries that have ratified it. Those that haven't — including most African states — risk exclusion from its many benefits. These include decision-making power at the Conference of the Parties, without which countries can't shape key implementation and resource allocation decisions, or designate high seas protected areas. Ratification also gives countries access to benefit-sharing arrangements linked to the exploitation of marine genetic resources. Before the Conference of the Parties, a Preparatory Commission will make recommendations on key procedural and institutional matters. It meets again from 18-29 August in New York. These meetings are open to all UN member states, and African states must attend if they want to shape the processes and institutions created for treaty implementation. Ensuring fair representation and benefit-sharing for African states — particularly regarding marine genetic resources — is essential for the legitimacy and effectiveness of the new high seas governance regime established under the treaty. Countries that have ratified the treaty will receive full access to financial mechanisms established under the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Agreement. To spearhead these efforts, the High Ambition Coalition on the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Agreement, co-chaired by the European Union (EU), Palau and Seychelles, unites over 40 countries to promote the treaty's rapid ratification and implementation. The coalition shares expertise and fosters global ocean governance cooperation. The International Union for Conservation of Nature is the coalition's secretariat, providing scientific and legal support to help members fulfil the treaty's objectives. It facilitates the €40-million EU-funded Global Ocean Programme to support states' involvement in high seas biodiversity-related processes. Marine Protected Areas Once in force, the Conference of the Parties will operationalise the treaty, establish its institutions and begin designating marine protected areas in the high seas. Several ecologically significant areas adjacent to Africa are likely candidates, including the Walvis Ridge in the Southeast Atlantic and the Saya de Malha Bank midway between the Seychelles and Mauritius. These zones are critical for migratory species, fisheries productivity and ecosystem connectivity. Establishing marine protected areas could benefit biodiversity protection, fisheries sustainability and ecosystem resilience, while supporting coastal communities' livelihoods. African countries can prepare for the post-ratification phase in two ways. First, blue economy and fisheries, environment, science, international relations and maritime security ministries must coordinate, and designated focal points must be empowered. Ocean policies and strategies should be reviewed to align with the treaty's objectives. Some commentators describe the agreement as the first global framework for high seas governance. But several regimes already exist, including regional fisheries management organisations like the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, and organisations like the International Maritime Organisation and International Seabed Authority. However, each has its own sectoral or regional mandates, which leads to governance gaps and overlaps. The Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction treaty provides a holistic, legally binding framework that coordinates and strengthens existing regimes. This approach is crucial for designating and managing marine protected areas in international waters. The Conference of the Parties can establish these areas and other tools, but must consult regional fisheries organisations when mandates overlap. States party to the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Agreement and these regional bodies must promote the aims of both instruments. Cost of monitoring, surveillance and enforcement The second way African countries can prepare for the treaty's implementation relates to the probable high cost of managing marine protected areas. Strictly protected areas are typically less expensive to administer than multiple-use zones. This is because complexity raises the cost of monitoring, surveillance and enforcement — activities that African countries have traditionally struggled to deliver. One innovative solution is uncrewed surface and underwater vessels, which offer cost-effective, continuous surveillance over vast areas. Still, once a threat is detected, enforcement must follow, and additional responsibilities may be costly. Regional and international cooperation, joint patrols and information sharing will be needed, including activities under the African Union and regional navies' frameworks. That means Africa must develop robust maritime security strategies and enhanced regional cooperation. UN Secretary-General António Guterres told UNOC3 delegates that Africa was at the heart of ocean action. Momentum around the treaty offers African states the chance to influence how the high seas are managed and protected, building on its strong legacy in ocean governance.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Dedication leads to hefty sentence for murderer
DE DEUR – Detective Sergeant Ntshidiseng Mosala has been hailed for her tireless efforts in ensuring that justice is served. This follows a hefty 36-year direct imprisonment sentence that was handed over to the accused, Samson Nguluwe, at the Vereeniging Magistrate's Court on July 23. The sentence comprises 20 years for murder, 15 years for robbery with aggravating circumstances, and a year for being an illegal foreign national in the Republic of South Africa. Speaking to Ster North, police spokesperson Constable Mampho Mahlomola said that the case dates back to July 5, 2022. Mosala was assigned to investigate the gruesome discovery of an African female's body in a veld on a farm in Roshnee. Mahlomola said during her investigation, Mosala demonstrated unwavering dedication and exceptional investigative skills. 'Through meticulous investigation, it was established that the deceased was last seen with the accused on the night of June 26, 2022, at their workplace. Camera footage revealed the accused's incriminating actions, including pulling the deceased's body and disposing of evidence. DNA evidence further solidified the case, linking the accused to the crime scene.' Mahlomola highlights that the investigating officer's tireless efforts and expertise resulted in a robust case, which culminated in the conviction of Nguluwe. The sentence was welcomed by De Deur SAPS Branch Commander, Lieutenant Colonel Selete Morolong, and acting Station Commander, Lieutenant Colonel Anver Hammond, who both commended Mosala's exceptional work.
