logo
Auckland emergency expo a 'lifeline' for local suppliers following New World fire

Auckland emergency expo a 'lifeline' for local suppliers following New World fire

RNZ News8 hours ago

New World Victoria Park was significantly damaged by a fire on 17 June.
Photo:
RNZ/Marika Khabazi
Friday's Foodstuffs hosted
event connecting affected suppliers
from the fire-damaged New World Victoria Park store and new potential buyers is being hailed as a lifeline.
The gathering will bring together about 50 impacted suppliers and local Foodstuffs store owners from the wider Auckland area who may be able to range their products.
The Auckland supermarket was
significantly damaged
by a fire last week, with all products and items left unusable.
Photo:
Lucy Xia
Managing director of Supplier Collaboration Project (SCP), Jayden Kilpatrick, who represented six small suppliers at the New World Victoria Park supermarket, said today's event will go a long way towards improving their financial outlook.
"Well, round numbers for one of our suppliers, it's about 15 percent of their annual turnover just by this one store being impacted and closed," he said. "When you're a small, scaling supplier, one store has a major impact on your total revenue and livelihood.
"The size of New World and that individual store and that impact on their livelihood is essential. To make that up elsewhere, there's a lot of time and money that needs to go in behind that to generate that size of turnover in other stores."
"So we've got to mitigate that risk with them and their team and try and make up that revenue elsewhere."
Earlier this week, Foodstuffs North Island chief executive Chris Quin said about 70 small local suppliers were stocked at the store and that typically, these suppliers sell their products in 20 or fewer stores in the Foodstuffs network.
"It had a real farmers' market feel, and the customers who shopped there were genuinely curious and open to discovering new things. For many of these suppliers, Victoria Park was a significant part of their business - in some cases, the biggest outlet they had."
Many of the Victoria Park store's small suppliers were part of Foodstuffs' Emerging Supplier Programme, which provides guidance and support to local businesses getting started in grocery.
Photo:
Lucy Xia
Kilpatrick praised Foodstuffs for hosting the event, which he likened to a "mini-expo".
"It's potentially a lifeline for probably a majority of these smaller brands that rely on Foodstuffs and what they provide through their emerging supplier programme. To enable them to be able to present to a large portion of their business at a one-stop shop, reducing costs and overheads of having to travel to individual locations is an epic opportunity.
"You're talking to the main stakeholder of these organisations or stores, so it can potentially cut out a lot of the timeline and delays when we do present at a store level, which is fantastic."
Kilpatrick said he hoped today's initiative could catch on.
"We hope it's something that actually becomes a norm. I think it's a real good opportunity, especially for New Zealand's small emerging brands to speak directly to the main stakeholders, I think it's a great initiative."
Photo:
RNZ/Marika Khabazi
The
investigation into the blaze
was ongoing.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bad rainstorm away from disaster: Why proposed forestry rule changes won't solve 'slash' problem
Bad rainstorm away from disaster: Why proposed forestry rule changes won't solve 'slash' problem

RNZ News

time44 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Bad rainstorm away from disaster: Why proposed forestry rule changes won't solve 'slash' problem

By Mark Bloomberg and Steve Urlich of During the past 15 years, there have been 15 convictions of forestry companies for slash and sediment discharges into rivers, on land and along the coastline. Photo: RNZ / Kate Newton Analysis - The biggest environmental problems for commercial plantation forestry in New Zealand's steep hill country are discharges of slash (woody debris left behind after logging) and sediment from clear-fell harvests. During the past 15 years, there have been 15 convictions of forestry companies for slash and sediment discharges into rivers, on land and along the coastline. Such discharges are meant to be controlled by the National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry, which set environmental rules for forestry activities such as logging roads and clear-fell harvesting. The standards are part of the Resource Management Act (RMA), which the government is reforming. The government revised the standards' slash-management rules in 2023 after Cyclone Gabrielle. But it is now consulting on a proposal to further amend the standards because of cost, uncertainty and compliance issues. We believe the proposed changes fail to address the core reasons for slash and sediment discharges. We recently analysed five convictions of forestry companies under the RMA for illegal discharges. Based on this analysis, which has been accepted for publication in the New Zealand Journal of Forestry, we argue that the standards should set limits to the size and location of clear-felling areas on erosion-susceptible land. In the aftermath of destructive storms in the Gisborne district during June 2018, five forestry companies were convicted for breaches of the RMA for discharges of slash and sediment from their clear-fell harvesting operations. These discharges resulted from landslides and collapsed earthworks (including roads). There has been a lot of criticism of forestry's performance during these storms and subsequent events such as Cyclone Gabrielle. However, little attention has been given to why the courts decided to convict the forestry companies for breaches of the RMA. The courts' decisions clearly explain why the sediment and slash discharges happened, why the forestry companies were at fault, and what can be done to prevent these discharges in future on erosion-prone land. New Zealand's plantation forest land is ranked for its susceptibility to erosion using a four-colour scale, from green (low) to red (very high). Because of the high erosion susceptibility, additional RMA permissions (consents) for earthworks and harvesting are required on red-ranked areas. New Zealand-wide, only 7 percent of plantation forests are on red land. A further 17 percent are on orange (high susceptibility) land. But in the Gisborne district, 55 percent of commercial forests are on red land. This is why trying to manage erosion is such a problem in Gisborne's forests. In all five cases, the convicted companies had consents from the Gisborne District Council to build logging roads. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King In all five cases, the convicted companies had consents from the Gisborne District Council to build logging roads and clear-fell large areas covering hundreds or even thousands of hectares. A significant part of the sediment and slash discharges originated from landslides that were primed to occur after the large-scale clear-fell harvests. But since the harvests were lawful, these landslides were not relevant to the decision to convict. Instead, all convictions were for compliance failures where logging roads and log storage areas collapsed or slash was not properly disposed of, even though these only partly contributed to the collective sediment and slash discharges downstream. Clear-fell harvesting on land highly susceptible to erosion required absolute compliance with resource consent conditions. Failures to correctly build roads or manage slash contributed to slash and sediment discharges downstream. Even with absolute compliance, clear-felling on such land was still risky. This was because a significant portion of the discharges were due to the lawful activity of cutting down trees and removing them, leaving the land vulnerable to landslides and other erosion. The second conclusion is critical. It means that even if forestry companies are fully compliant with the standards and consents, slash and sediment discharges can still happen after clear-felling. And if this happens, councils can require companies to clean up these discharges and prevent them from happening again. This is not a hypothetical scenario. Recently, the Gisborne District Council successfully applied to the Environment Court for enforcement orders requiring clean-up of slash deposits and remediation of harvesting sites. If the forestry companies fail to comply, they can be held in contempt of court. This illustrates a major problem with the standards that applies to erosion-susceptible forest land everywhere in New Zealand, not just in the Gisborne district. Regulations are not just "red tape". They provide certainty to businesses that as long as they are compliant, their activities should be free from legal prosecution and enforcement. The courts' decisions and council enforcement actions show that forestry companies can face considerable legal risk, even if compliant with regulatory requirements for earthworks and harvesting. Clear-felled forests on erosion-prone land are one bad rainstorm away from disaster. But with well planned, careful harvesting of small forest areas, this risk can be kept at a tolerable level. However, the standards and the proposed amendments do not require small clear-fell areas on erosion-prone land. If this shortcoming is not fixed, communities and ecosystems will continue to bear the brunt of the discharges from large-scale clear-fell harvests. To solve this problem, the standards must proactively limit the size and location of clear-felling areas on erosion-prone land. This will address the main cause of catastrophic slash and sediment discharges from forests, protecting communities and ecosystems. And it will enable forestry companies to plan their harvests with greater confidence that they will not be subject to legal action. This story was first published on The Conversation .

Consumer confidence up despite inflation worries
Consumer confidence up despite inflation worries

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Consumer confidence up despite inflation worries

Photo: RNZ Consumer confidence is improving but the economic outlook remains soft, with inflation expectations rising to the highest level in more than two years. The ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence lifted six points to 98.8 in June, following last month's drop to 92.9. ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner said a number of key indicators remained in negative territory, including the proportion of households who thought it was a good time to buy a major household appliance, at -7. In addition, annual inflation expectations rose slightly to 4.9 percent - the highest level since April 2023. "A few potential explanations seem possible," she said, including global tariff noise and concerns about energy prices. She said the increase was in line with food price inflation, which was running at 4.4 percent. "Household electricity prices are also rising as higher lines charges are passed on." However, she said a net 20 percent of consumers expected to be better off this time next year. "The economy is recovering. It's just taking a little longer than expected. "Households might be sceptical but domestic inflation is on the retreat, and that should lay the path for the RBNZ [Reserve Bank] to ultimately be able to shore up the economic recovery with a little more monetary easing." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Far North District Council ordered to pay former CEO Blair King $210,000
Far North District Council ordered to pay former CEO Blair King $210,000

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Far North District Council ordered to pay former CEO Blair King $210,000

The Far North District Council has been ordered to pay more than $210,000 to former chief executive Blair King. Photo: RNZ/Peter de Graaf The Far North District Council has been ordered to pay more than $210,000 to former chief executive Blair King, who resigned in 2023 less than a year into the role. The council's legal costs relating to King's departure case are even higher, adding up to just over $220,000. The figures were revealed to RNZ this week via a Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act request. They do not include other costs, such as staff time or expenses incurred recruiting King's replacement. The six-figure payout continues an unfortunate tradition at the council, where only one of the past four chief executives has left without an employment dispute and a hefty settlement. Some occurred when a new chief executive was hired, or had their contract renewed, shortly before a local election then fell foul of incoming councillors. Clive Manley, who was dismissed by then Far North Mayor Wayne Brown, received a severance payment in 2008 of $248,000. The reason for his departure was never disclosed. His successor, Dave Edmunds, who was rehired by Brown's council just four days before the 2013 council elections, went on "temporary leave" a few months after John Carter was voted in as mayor. In January 2014 it emerged Edmunds had left the council but the reason for his departure, or whether he had received a payout, were not revealed. However, the council's annual report, released in November that year, showed a severance payment of $193,846. Councillors then employed Colin Dale, the former head of Manukau City Council, as acting chief executive until a permanent replacement could be found. In 2017 the council hired ex-Air Force Group Captain Shaun Clarke. While councillors opted not to renew his contract for another two years from 2022, there was no employment dispute around Clarke's departure and no payout. King, the former head of Tararua District Council, was hired at the end of 2021 and started work in March 2022. According to an Employment Relations Authority ruling released late last year, King formally resigned in February 2023, alleging a "toxic" environment and being "ghosted" by councillors. Moko Tepania. Photo: Peter de Graaf/RNZ The authority found the relationship breakdown between King and then newly elected Mayor Moko Tepania started at a meeting in Kaikohe in November 2022, though accounts differed as to exactly what happened at that meeting. King argued he had been constructively dismissed and the council's behaviour had created a "toxic work environment", while the council filed a counter-claim alleging he had breached good faith obligations by failing to engage properly. The authority found fault on both sides, dismissing the council's counter-claim and some of King's complaints. However, the authority sided with King by finding he was subjected to "an unjustified disadvantage" during the Kaikohe meeting. The authority also found the council had failed to engage with King after a confidential follow-up meeting called to discuss his future with the organisation. The exact figure for the settlement paid to King, according to the council, is $212,750.00. The total legal costs were $220,115.21. Tepania said both parties had come to a settlement, and no further comment could be provided. The council's current chief executive Guy Holroyd, who previously headed Ngāti Hine Forestry Trust, said it was not appropriate to comment on an employment matter. King was contacted for comment but had not responded by publication time. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store