
Swinney says sorry to Gypsy Travellers for ‘trauma' of the ‘tinker experiment'
His comments came as a new report, published by the Scottish Government, stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'.
Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in.
When families became too big to be housed in the huts, children would sometimes be taken away.
The Scottish Government has been carrying out research into the impact of what happened – with report, by the Third Generation Project at St Andrews University, revealing 'discriminatory' policies had been carried out in 27 of Scotland's current 32 local authorities.
The Church of Scotland also issued 'a heartfelt and genuine apology for these historic wrongs'.
Mr Swinney, in a statement to Holyrood, said he hoped his apology could be the 'beginning of a new conversation' with efforts to improve the lives of Gypsy Traveller community in Scotland.
The First Minister told MSPs 'without ambiguity' that 'what happened to Gypsy Traveller communities in Scotland was unacceptable'.
He added: 'It is clear to the Government that stark prejudice and lack of cultural awareness led to a series of unfair and unjust policies.
'These policies resulted in children being removed from families, and families were forced to live in substandard accommodation and degrading conditions.
'The trauma that this has caused to individuals, families and groups, including those who regard themselves as 'victims of tinker experiments', is significant and lasting'.
First Minister John Swinney made clear the policies pursued in what was known as the 'tinker experiment' were 'wrong' (PA)
With Gypsy Travellers in Holyrood's public gallery, Mr Swinney continued: 'As First Minister of Scotland, I want to say this directly to Gypsy Traveller communities: the 'tinker experiments' should not have happened.
'These policies were wrong. And we recognise how much it is still hurting so many.
'And more than anything else I want to say this – on behalf of Scotland, we are sorry.'
Mr Swinney added that although Scotland had 'come a long way since the 'Tinker experiments', there was 'still much to do' in tackling the prejudice the community continued to face.
And while Holyrood ministers published a new Gypsy Traveller action plan last year, the First Minister said the experiences shared as part of the government's work 'underline the urgent need for systemic change, greater accountability, and a shift in attitudes at every level'.
He declared: 'We must do better.'
Stressing the need for 'meaningful action' he highlighted the importance of 'challenging stereotypes, confronting everyday discrimination, and committing to long-term efforts that promote understanding, respect, and equity for Gypsy Travellers'.
He stated: 'Our hope is that we now have a foundation for continuing to build trust and fostering renewed relationships with all those who have been impacted by historical policies.'
His comments came as the report described the tinker experiments as being the 'recurring societal and institutional dehumanisation of Gypsy Travellers in Scotland'.
This was 'often carried out under the stereotype of Gypsy Travellers as a people that collectively practised a backwards or undeveloped way of life', it added.
The research highlighted the role of the UK national government 'and specifically the Scottish Office as a primary actor in the construction and enforcement of such policies'.
But it said that others – including local councils, churches and charities – were involved in 'constructing the environment' that allowed this to happen.
Gypsy Travellers in Scotland were housed in accommodation including Nissen-type huts, repurposed military buildings and disused properties, the report added – with these 'known by government agents to be substandard' with such properties 'frequently without' electricity and running water.
The report also highlighted the 'forced transfer of children', with some youngsters being removed from their families and placed in temporary care, while others were permanently taken away, being adopted either in the UK or overseas.
Afterwards, the Reverend Tommy MacNeil, convener of the Faith Action Programme Leadership Team of the Church of Scotland and Dr Mike Cantlay, convener of its Social Care Council said: 'On behalf of the Church of Scotland, we offer a heartfelt and genuine apology for these historic wrongs, highlighted in the report and carried out in the name of the Church.'
They added: 'We wish to say we stand in solidarity with those who suffered, and deeply regret the harm that came to them as a result of actions by the Church in the past.'
Their statement acknowleged that the Church of Scotland 'tolerated discrimination and the use of derogatory language by its employees and members'
The men stressed: 'We regret and are very sorry for the trauma that was inflicted on Gypsy Traveller communities, families and individuals by our Church.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
John Swinney: Rebel independence plan will not work
Under the rebel plan, first revealed by The Herald this month, a majority of list votes for pro-independence parties in 2026 would secure a mandate for independence negotiations with the UK Government. A total of 43 local branches backed the proposal. But it is at odds with Mr Swinney's plan, which contends that a mandate is only achievable if the SNP wins a majority of seats at Holyrood. READ MORE: Asked by STV in an interview on Monday night about the grassroots proposal, Mr Swinney said: "I don't agree with it and I don't think it will work." The rebel resolution was blocked by the SNP's conferences committee from the party's draft agenda for the annual conference to take place in Aberdeen in October. Members now intend to summit an amendment to Mr Swinney's resolution. The conferences committee will decide after September 5 whether to accept the amendment for debate. Asked about whether it should be heard, Mr Swinney said: "It will be up to the conferences committee to decide." He was asked if he would be prepare to debate the grassroots plan, Mr Swinney replied: "Of course I would be. I am a democrat. I lead a democratic political party and I have debated many important choices with my party over time. "But I don't think it will work because we had that in 2016 and 2021 and it didn't break the log jam and the issue is having a route which results in Scotland becoming Scotland is to become independent there has to be domestic and international legitimacy for an independent Scotland. We had that in 2014 because all the rules were agreed." The rebel resolution, which argues this threshold should be lowered and include votes cast for Alba and the Scottish Greens, was proposed by members in Oban and Lorn, Tweeddale, and Helensburgh. The group submitted the following motion for approval by the SNP's conference committee: 'Conference instructs the Party to prioritise obtaining a mandate from the sovereign Scottish people to deliver independence. This will be possible by achieving a majority of the popular vote on the sum of the Independence Supporting Parties' List Votes in the 2026 Scottish parliamentary election." After the rebel resolution failed to make it on the party's draft agenda for the party's conference, one activist, who supported the proposal, told The Herald:"I am absolutely seething. I have never known a resolution with so much backing which has been so unceremoniously put to the side."


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Ministers warned not to 'close the door' on hydrogen for heating amid heat pumps 'disastrous rush'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... UK government ministers have been urged not to 'close the door' on harnessing hydrogen to heat homes before the outcome is known of a landmark pilot of the technology in Fife. The appeal comes as SNP ministers are poised to finally table their long-delayed and watered-down heat in building proposals that could allow for hydrogen for heating to be used as an alternative to heat pumps and heat networks as part of efforts to reach net zero. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Hydrogen Power Unit John Swinney has flirted with the idea of hydrogen being used for heating in contrast to the Scottish Government's initial heat in buildings strategy, drawn up by former minister Patrick Harvie, which stated that hydrogen-ready boilers would be classed as 'direct emissions heating systems' and not consistent with net zero aims. Campaign groups and experts including the independent Climate Change Committee have warned that utilising hydrogen for heating would likely be a distraction from efforts to scale up the roll-out of heat pumps and networks as the primary method to decarbonise how buildings are heated. Green hydrogen, the blend of the fuel that does not rely on fossil fuels, requires large amounts of energy to produce. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government's heat in buildings bill, which is expected to be published once MSPs return from summer recess, would need the green light from the UK government, if hydrogen was to play a role in heating. The UK government is poised to launch a fresh consultation on whether hydrogen could be used for heating homes before making a judgment on the use of the technology. A separate UK government consultation document on opening up hydrogen regulations for industrial and power uses, states that 'the potential role of hydrogen in heating (homes) will be covered in a separate forthcoming consultation'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But a trade union leader has called for the UK government judgment to be delayed until a pilot in Fife is concluded, to give a better understanding of the potential the technology could have on heating homes. SGN is running the pilot for around 300 homes in Fife which will use green hydrogen for heat and will begin operating later this year until 2027. The H100 project in Fife will use hydrogen boilers for around 300 homes (Pic: SGN) The GMB union has warned that without allowing the pilot to conclude before deciding whether to exclude the technology for heating, UK ministers are putting an industry and jobs at risk. The union believes harnessing hydrogen for heating could potentially ease the impact of the move to replace fossil fuel boilers with heat pumps and networks on the gas industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Louise Gilmour, GMB Scotland secretary, has claimed the risk of prematurely running down gas supply networks could be catastrophic for jobs and household bills and insisted the move is avoidable. She said that a 'verdict' on the technology should not be delivered 'before hearing the case and ministers, like all of us, do not yet know the potential of hydrogen'. GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour. Picture: Andrew Cawley Ms Gilmour added: 'The trial in Fife could possibly help shape an energy strategy for generations to come but we will never know if ministers rush to reject hydrogen heating in homes. 'It makes no sense to effectively close the door on that potential before understanding its scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It would be a needless and possibly disastrous rush to judgement chilling any hope of private investment and risking jobs and a practical, effective energy transition.' In February, the First Minister branded the H100 pilot in Fife as a 'shining example' of how technology could help deliver net zero and told The Scotsman that using hydrogen for heating was 'a really exciting opportunity'. Ms Gilmour added: 'We have yet to be told just exactly how much the electrification of homes will cost householders and the National Grid and there is likely a good reason for that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The impact on the many industries and jobs underpinning our country's reliance on gas, which will continue for decades, is another great unknown. 'The impact of the UK's ill-judged rush to abandon oil and gas production is being seen every day as jobs, skills and contracts are lost to the UK while being exported around the world. 'We need a measured, effective and, above all, realistic energy strategy. 'To rush to net zero without a plan and whatever the cost is absolute folly because the cost in terms of jobs and the communities relying on them is unimaginable while the risk to our planet remains unchanged.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A spokesperson for the UK's government's Depertment of Energy Security and Net Zero said: "We have been engaging with stakeholders on this issue. We are continuing that engagement and will publish the consultation in due course."


Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
SNP leader provokes fresh rebellion over independence
Rebel SNP members have lashed out at John Swinney after their alternative plan to achieve Scottish independence was blocked from being discussed at the party conference. They had unveiled a blueprint to open independence negotiations with the UK Government if nationalist parties got a majority of the popular vote in next year's Holyrood election. The plan differed markedly from Mr Swinney's proposal that the SNP winning an outright majority of seats in the election should force Sir Keir Starmer to allow another independence referendum. But a resolution outlining the rebel plan was not selected by a powerful party committee for discussion at October's conference, despite it being backed by 43 local branches. The Herald reported that it was excluded from a draft agenda for the conference, which has been distributed to members. Unless it is amended, this means that the rebel plan will not directly rival Mr Swinney's motion on his blueprint, which will be discussed and voted on by members at the Aberdeen gathering. It has previously emerged that some of the rebel group want to oust Mr Swinney as party leader amid concerns he is not doing enough to achieve independence. One SNP activist said: 'John Swinney last year made a point several times that he was going to listen to the membership. But he hasn't done so. 'There are just under 200 branches, nearly a quarter of all branches supported the resolution, but the party leadership is refusing to listen. 'If there is a difference of opinion between the leadership and the members then it should be debated at conference and conference should decide. To not let this resolution be debated at the conference is ignoring the internal democracy of the party.' A second activist, who supported the proposal, added: 'I am absolutely seething. I have never known a resolution with so much backing which has been so unceremoniously put to the side.' Mr Swinney has argued that the SNP winning an outright majority of seats next year should be the benchmark as this was the precedent set by the 2011 Holyrood election. Alex Salmond led the SNP to a majority win that year and David Cameron, the then prime minister, authorised the referendum that was lost by the nationalists in 2014. First Minister 'living in cuckoo land' But this is an extremely high bar and Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary, previously told the Telegraph that Mr Swinney was 'living in cloud cuckoo land' given the current level of public support for the SNP. Under the rebel plan, independence negotiations would open between the Scottish and UK governments if the three nationalist parties – the SNP, the Greens and Alba – together achieve more than 50 per cent of the regional list vote. Successive UK governments have repeatedly turned down SNP calls for a second referendum, with the UK Supreme Court ruling in 2022 that only Westminster can allow another poll. Sir Keir said last month that he could not imagine another referendum being staged while he was prime minister and an SNP victory in the May 2026 election would not change his mind. Kenny MacAskill, the Alba Party leader and a former SNP justice secretary, said: 'You cannot expect the SNP members to unite behind a strategy when the views of 43 of its branches have been so casually dismissed. 'This is treating the grassroots of the party with utter contempt and is totally unacceptable in a democratic party.'