5 apps you should use instead of Obsidian
Obsidian is far more than just a simple note-taking app. If you're willing to put in some effort, you can transform it into a highly versatile personal knowledge management (PKM) system, capable of everything from a detailed to-do list and a budget tracker to various sophisticated databases.
However, despite its power, Obsidian isn't suitable for everyone. Some users might be deterred by its steep learning curve or its particular aesthetic. If you're ready to explore other options for whatever reason, here are five alternatives you should consider, along with their key strengths and why they might be a good fit for you.
Which of the following is the best Obsidian alternative in your opinion.
0 votes
Notion
NaN %
Google Keep
NaN %
Evernote
NaN %
Anytype
NaN %
Capacities
NaN %
Other (tell us in the comments)
NaN %
Notion
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
This is the Obsidian alternative I personally use, and the two are quite similar in many ways. Both Notion and Obsidian offer an incredible degree of flexibility, allowing you to create a customized knowledge base or streamline your workflow. The possibilities for organization and content creation are truly vast on both services.
One of the major distinctions between them, however, is their foundational approach: Obsidian is primarily local-first, meaning your data is stored on your device, while Notion is cloud-based. I personally prefer cloud-based software for its ease of access across multiple devices. That said, for those who prioritize maximum privacy and local data control, Obsidian remains the stronger choice.
It's important to note that Notion also comes with a significant learning curve, comparable to Obsidian's. So, if you're looking for something simpler, you might want to consider the next two entries on this list. But if the learning curve isn't an issue, Notion has a wealth of features to offer, including a vast library of free templates for nearly any purpose, an excellent design, extensive customization options, and a genuine sense of accomplishment once you've successfully set up your personalized workflow.
Google Keep
Joe Maring / Android Authority
It truly doesn't get any simpler than Google Keep. I've used this app for years and am very familiar with its capabilities. While it suited my workflow perfectly for a long time, I eventually transitioned to Notion when my needs demanded more advanced features.
Google Keep is a straightforward note-taking app.
However, everyone has unique requirements. If all you're looking for is a straightforward note-taking app that's incredibly easy to learn and use, Google Keep is a fantastic option. It's entirely cloud-based, ensuring all your notes seamlessly sync across all your devices. Plus, it's completely free, without any ads or premium subscription plans to worry about.
The main limitations are its basic text formatting and note organization features, which might be a drawback for some users. If you're seeking something less feature-packed than Obsidian but offering more robust capabilities than Keep, the next service on this list might be ideal.
Evernote
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Evernote is the app I initially switched to from Google Keep before eventually moving on to Notion. It's very simple to use, so there's no steep learning curve like with Obsidian. It's almost as user-friendly as Keep but provides more features, such as better note management, improved text formatting, and a lot more.
It worked much better for my workflow at the time, and it's also cloud-based, syncing across all connected devices (within the plan's limits). I particularly liked its web clipper, which is a browser extension that allows you to quickly save articles directly into a notebook of choice.
However, there are some notable downsides. You'll frequently encounter nudges to sign up for a premium plan. The free plan also has limitations on the number of notes you can create and the devices you can connect to your account. Evernote has significantly restricted its free offering over the years, which is a shame, but it can still be a worthwhile service for certain users.
Anytype
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
Unlike Google Keep and Evernote, Anytype is more of a direct competitor to Obsidian. This means it offers a similar suite of powerful tools and features, and it can be just as challenging to learn at first. It also embraces an 'offline-first' approach, which is excellent for those who are highly privacy-focused.
Anytype combines the best elements of Notion and Obsidian.
My colleague Dhruv is a big fan of Anytype, saying that he believes the software takes the best elements of Notion and Obsidian and then adds its own unique flavor to it. Setting it up is similar to how you would configure Notion, although Anytype provides even more ways to organize your data. And, like Obsidian, it offers a top-down, interconnected view of all your objects and how they link to each other.
If you appreciate both Obsidian and Notion but find that neither fully meets your needs, you should definitely give Anytype a try, as it truly offers a compelling blend of both.
Capacities
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
Just like Anytype, Capacities is another tool that shares many similarities with both Notion and Obsidian. It can take a while to get the hang of, but once everything is set up, it can significantly boost your productivity. My colleague Dhruv is currently using it, though he found it's not necessarily 'better' than Obsidian.
What he does believe, however, is that it can effectively complement tools like Obsidian and Notion, as its structure is just different enough to suit his specific workflow. You can read more about his experience with it here, but it's important to remember that not everyone will find themselves in the same camp as him.
Some users may still prefer to use Capacities as their sole productivity tool, as it's powerful enough to stand on its own. Whether you want to use it as a simple note-taking app or to set up a complex workflow with intricate databases, Capacities has you covered.
These are five excellent Obsidian alternatives to explore, though there are certainly plenty of other great options out there. Head to the comments section and let me know which ones you recommend and why.
Follow
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
24 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Tired of scrolling through your messy notes? Google Keep is fixing that
Google Keep is one of those apps that doesn't change too often, but when it does, the updates are usually worth the wait. Now, Google appears to be rolling out a long-anticipated sorting feature to its Android app, giving some users a much easier way to organize their notes. A user on X ( @BlindMan199 ) first tipped us off that the new sort option had appeared, and we were able to verify that it's available on at least one of our devices, though not all of them. That suggests it's a limited rollout for now, but could expand more widely over the coming days or weeks. If you have the feature, you'll see a new sort icon inside the search bar at the top of the main screen, as shown in the screenshots above. Tapping this opens a pop-up menu at the bottom that gives you three different ways to sort your notes: Custom: Lets you manually drag notes into any order; Lets you manually drag notes into any order; Date created: Showing notes in the order you originally made them; Showing notes in the order you originally made them; Date modified: Keeps the most recently edited ones at the top. Keep has always allowed manual rearrangement and pinned notes, but outside of that, your list was stuck in reverse chronological order. For anyone juggling a large number of notes, these new options could make a big difference. The feature was spotted in development some time ago, but this is the first time it's been available in the wild. It's appearing in version 5.25.302.02.90 of the app.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Google Lens just made this easily overlooked option impossible to ignore
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Google Lens makes it easy to run searches based on pics you snap with your phone's camera. Lens has supported voice searches by tapping and holding on the shutter button. Now you can do the same thing with a new 'Ask' button dedicated to voice input. Google Lens may not be as flashy as anything like Circle to Search, but the easy-to-overlook image analysis tool has been a reliable workhorse that continues to get better and better. Like everything else in Google's stable, recently that's meant pumping it full of all things AI, like the conversational Search Live tool that's starting to roll out widely. Today we just spotted yet another addition to Lens, with Google adding a conspicuous new way to access a feature you may not have even known about. Normally when you're using Lens, you snap an image, Google does its initial analysis, and presents you with its interpretation along with some visual matches. If you have more specific questions you'd like Google to address, you're free to follow up with those. But it doesn't have to work like that. Instead of tapping and waiting, Lens has also supported voice search, right from the beginning of your query. To pull this off, you'd press and hold on the shutter button in Lens, then ask your question aloud. While this defaults to using the entire image as input, rather than first isolating a specific item in it, it does let you move things along a little more quickly when you know exactly what you're looking for. The biggest problem, though, is that this hasn't been super intuitive — and unless anyone ever spelled that out to you, there's a fair chance you'd never even realize that holding the button was an option that would modulate the tool's behavior. That's finally changing now, as Google adds a new 'Ask' button off to the right side of the shutter in Lens, accompanied by a microphone icon that clearly communicates it's here for voice input. In our tests, pressing and holding the shutter button functions exactly the same as hitting Ask, and while a ton of redundancy isn't necessarily a great thing, at least now it's impossible to miss that voice search is even an option for Lens. We're seeing the button arrive across multiple devices running different versions of the Google Android app, so it looks like this change is already headed out widely. Follow
Android Authority
4 hours ago
- Android Authority
Free, offline ChatGPT on your phone? Technically possible, basically useless
Robert Triggs / Android Authority Another day, another large language model, but news that OpenAI has released its first open-weight models (gpt-oss) with Apache 2.0 licensing is a bigger deal than most. Finally, you can run a version of ChatGPT offline and for free, giving developers and us casual AI enthusiasts another powerful tool to try out. As usual, OpenAI makes some pretty big claims about gpt-oss's capabilities. The model can apparently outperform o4-mini and scores quite close to its o3 model — OpenAI's cost-efficient and most powerful reasoning models, respectively. However, that gpt-oss model comes in at a colossal 120 billion parameters, requiring some serious computing kit to run. For you and me, though, there's still a highly performant 20 billion parameter model available. Can you now run ChatGPT offline and for free? Well, it depends. In theory, the 20 billion parameter model will run on a modern laptop or PC, provided you have bountiful RAM and a powerful CPU or GPU to crunch the numbers. Qualcomm even claims it's excited about bringing gpt-oss to its compute platforms — think PC rather than mobile. Still, this does beg the question: Is it possible to now run ChatGPT entirely offline and on-device, for free, on a laptop or even your smartphone? Well, it's doable, but I wouldn't recommend it. What do you need to run gpt-oss? Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority Despite shrinking gpt-oss from 120 billion to 20 billion parameters for more general use, the official quantized model still weighs in at a hefty 12.2GB. OpenAI specifies VRAM requirements of 16GB for the 20B model and 80GB for the 120B model. You need a machine capable of holding the entire thing in memory at once to achieve reasonable performance, which puts you firmly into NVIDIA RTX 4080 territory for sufficient dedicated GPU memory — hardly something we all have access to. For PCs with a smaller GPU VRAM, you'll want 16GB of system RAM if you can split some of the model into GPU memory, and preferably a GPU capable of crunching FP4 precision data. For everything else, such as typical laptops and smartphones, 16GB is really cutting it fine as you need room for the OS and apps too. Based on my experience, 24GB RAM is required; my 7th Gen Surface Laptop, complete with a Snapdragon X processor and 16GB RAM, worked at an admittedly pretty decent 10 tokens per second, but barely held on even with every other application closed. Despite it's smaller size, gpt-oss 20b still needs plenty of RAM and a powerful GPU to run smoothly. Of course, with 24 GB RAM being ideal, the vast majority of smartphones cannot run it. Even AI leaders like the Pixel 9 Pro XL and Galaxy S25 Ultra top out at 16GB RAM, and not all of that's accessible. Thankfully, my ROG Phone 9 Pro has a colossal 24GB of RAM — enough to get me started. How to run gpt-oss on a phone Robert Triggs / Android Authority For my first attempt to run gpt-oss on my Android smartphone, I turned to the growing selection of LLM apps that let you run offline models, including PocketPal AI, LLaMA Chat, and LM Playground. However, these apps either didn't have the model available or couldn't successfully load the version downloaded manually, possibly because they're based on an older version of Instead, I booted up a Debian partition on the ROG and installed Ollama to handle loading and interacting with gpt-oss. If you want to follow the steps, I did the same with DeepSeek earlier in the year. The drawback is that performance isn't quite native, and there's no hardware acceleration, meaning you're reliant on the phone's CPU to do the heavy lifting. So, how well does gpt-oss run on a top-tier Android smartphone? Barely is the generous word I'd use. The ROG's Snapdragon 8 Elite might be powerful, but it's nowhere near my laptop's Snapdragon X, let alone a dedicated GPU for data crunching. gpt-oss can just about run on a phone, but it's barely usable. The token rate (the rate at which text is generated on screen) is barely passable and certainly slower than I can read. I'd estimate it's in the region of 2-3 tokens (about a word or so) per second. It's not entirely terrible for short requests, but it's agonising if you want to do anything more complex than say hello. Unfortunately, the token rate only gets worse as the size of your conversation increases, eventually taking several minutes to produce even a couple of paragraphs. Robert Triggs / Android Authority Obviously, mobile CPUs really aren't built for this type of work, and certainly not models approaching this size. The ROG is a nippy performer for my daily workloads, but it was maxed out here, causing seven of the eight CPU cores to run at 100% almost constantly, resulting in a rather uncomfortably hot handset after just a few minutes of chat. Clock speeds quickly throttled, causing token speeds to fall further. It's not great. With the model loaded, the phone's 24GB was stretched as well, with the OS, background apps, and additional memory required for the prompt and responses all vying for space. When I needed to flick in and out of apps, I could, but this brought already sluggish token generation to a virtual standstill. Another impressive model, but not for phones Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority Running gpt-oss on your smartphone is pretty much out of the question, even if you have a huge pool of RAM to load it up. External models aimed primarily at the developer community don't support mobile NPUs and GPUs. The only way around that obstacle is for developers to leverage proprietary SDKs like Qualcomm's AI SDK or Apple's Core ML, which won't happen for this sort of use case. Still, I was determined not to give up and tried gpt-oss on my aging PC, equipped with a GTX1070 and 24GB RAM. The results were definitely better, at around four to five tokens per second, but still slower than my Snapdragon X laptop running just on the CPU — yikes. In both cases, the 20b parameter version of gpt-oss certainly seems impressive (after waiting a while), thanks to its configurable chain of reasoning that lets the model 'think' for longer to help solve more complex problems. Compared to free options like Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash, gpt-oss is the more capable problem solver thanks to its use of chain-of-thought, much like DeepSeek R1, which is all the more impressive given it's free. However, it's still not as powerful as the mightier and more expensive cloud-based models — and certainly doesn't run anywhere near as fast on any consumer gadgets I own. Still, advanced reasoning in the palm of your hand, without the cost, security concerns, or network compromises of today's subscription models, is the AI future I think laptops and smartphones should truly aim for. There's clearly a long way to go, especially when it comes to mainstream hardware acceleration, but as models become both smarter and smaller, that future feels increasingly tangible. A few of my flagship smartphones have proven reasonably adept at running smaller 8 billion parameter models like Qwen 2.5 and Llama 3, with surprisingly quick and powerful results. If we ever see a similarly speedy version of gpt-oss, I'd be much more excited. Follow
