Backlash after interview with AI avatar of US school shooting victim
Former CNN White House chief correspondent Acosta interacted with a virtual likeness of Joaquin Oliver, one of the 17 people killed in the Parkland, Florida school shooting in 2018.
Acosta, a long-standing hate figure for some supporters of President Donald Trump who often derided the veteran Washington correspondent, has long been an advocate for increased gun control.
The clip posted on Acosta's YouTube channel on August 4 to coincide with what would have been Oliver's 25th birthday has gathered more than 22,000 views.
On the Guy Benson Show on Fox News, conservative columnist Joe Concha said of the segment "It's just sick."
Acosta said that Oliver's parents Manuel and Patricia "have created an AI version of their son to deliver a powerful message on gun violence" after falling victim to one of the deadliest US mass shootings.
In the interview Acosta asks Oliver, who was killed aged 17, what happened to him.
Despite having the blessing of Oliver's parents, critics said the approach was tasteless and did not advance the campaign against gun violence.
"It was more of a bizarre AI demonstration than an interview," wrote columnist Kirsten Fleming in the New York Post tabloid.
"It's also false. And grotesque. Like a dystopian plot come to life."
In the clip, Oliver's likeness gives opinions on how to counter gun violence.
"I was taken from this world too early while at school due to gun violence," says a metallic, sped-up voice synthesized to sound like Oliver's.
"It's important to talk about these issues so we can create a safer future for everyone."
In an opinion piece published Wednesday, journalism institute Poynter suggested that Acosta's move from major media outlet CNN to an independent operation where he operates without an editorial support mechanism was behind his judgment.
"I hope Jim Acosta decides to phone a friend next time. We've all got a lot of figuring out to do," it said.
It is not the first time artificial intelligence has been used to highlight the impact of the Parkland shooting.
Last year US lawmakers heard recreations of Oliver's voice and those of other victims in AI phone call recordings demanding to know why action had not been taken on gun control.
On February 14, 2018, then 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz walked into Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, a town north of Miami, carrying a high-powered AR-15 rifle.
He had been expelled from the school a year earlier for disciplinary reasons.
In a matter of nine minutes, he killed 14 students and three school employees, then fled by mixing in with people frantically escaping the gruesome scene.
Police arrested Cruz shortly thereafter as he walked along the street. He pleaded guilty to the massacre to the massacre in 2021 and was sentenced to life without parole a year later.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Dharmasthala case: SC to hear plea against Karnataka HC order lifting media gag
New Delhi, The Supreme Court would hear on Friday a plea challenging a recent order of the Karnataka High Court quashing a media gag on reportage surrounding the controversial Dharmasthala mass burial case. Dharmasthala case: SC to hear plea against Karnataka HC order lifting media gag The high court on August 1 set aside an earlier gag order issued by a Bengaluru civil court restraining reportage on the burial case. 'Around 8,000 YouTube channels are running defamatory material against the Dharmasthala temple,' an advocate submitted before a bench headed by Chief Justice B R Gavai and sought urgent listing of an appeal against the high court order. Harshendra Kumar D, Secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple body, moved the apex court seeking removal of what he alleges is defamatory content targeting the family that manages the temple. 'I think it's already listed for tomorrow,' the CJI said. On July 23, the CJI-led bench declined to hear another petition filed by YouTube channel Third Eye challenging a sweeping gag order that restrained media houses from reporting on matters related to the brother of Dharamadhikari D Veerendra Heggade of Dharamsthala in Karnataka. The gag order was over reports on the alleged murders of women in Dharmasthala in the state's Dakshina Kannada district. The plea, filed against an ex parte interim order of a local court, questioned the legality of the directive which directed as many as 390 media houses to remove nearly 9,000 links and stories related to the Dharamsthala burial case. The CJI had questioned the petitioner for not moving the high court. 'You go the high court first,' the CJI said. The gag order was passed in Kumar's defamation suit alleging spread of false and defamatory online content, despite the absence of specific allegations against him or the temple authorities in any FIR. Recently, Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara said a thorough investigation must precede any conclusions regarding the alleged murders of women in Dharmasthala. The state government has constituted a special investigation team to probe the allegations. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Former Superman actor Dean Cain is joining ICE after Trump's anti-immigrant drive: ‘We have a broken immigration system'
Dean Cain, who is known for playing Superman in Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman, has shared that he is set to join the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after sharing a recruitment video for the agency. The actor made an appearance on Fox News' Jesse Watters Primetime show, where he talked about his motivations for joining the ranks in order to support U.S. President Donald Trump's anti-immigration drive. (Also read: James Gunn made a 'mistake' calling Superman an immigrant, says Dean Cain: 'How woke is Hollywood is going to make him?') Dean Cain played Superman on Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman from 1993 to 1997. What Dean Cain said During his appearance, Dean said, "I put out a recruitment video yesterday, I'm actually a sworn deputy sheriff and a reserve police office, I wasn't part of ICE, but once I put that out there and you put a little blurb on your show, it went crazy. So now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent, ASAP.' 'This is what people voted for' Dean Cain continued about his motivation to join the organisation and added, 'This country was built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not, and doing the right thing. I truly believe this is the right thing. We have a broken immigration system. Congress needs to fix it, but in the interim, President Trump ran on this. He is delivering on this. This is what people voted for. It's what I voted for and he's going to see it through, and I'll do my part and help make sure it happens. Hopefully, a whole bunch of other former officers, former Ice agents, will step up and we'll meet those recruitment goals immediately, and we'll help protect this country.' Trump's anti-immigrant crackdown Donald Trump took office in January after he pledged to deport millions of illegal immigrants in the US during his election campaign. The intention behind this was to curb serious crimes, he said. The administration has defended the move as a way of quickly removing migrants who should not be in the US, including those with criminal records and convictions.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
ED recovered ₹23K cr laundered money, distributed it to victims: SG to SC
The Enforcement Directorate has recovered around ₹23,000 crore laundered money and distributed it to the victims of financial crimes, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court on Thursday. The statement was made by the top law officer before a special bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma during the open court hearing on a batch of pleas seeking review of the controversial May 2 judgement of the apex court. The apex court had on May 2 ordered liquidation of Bhushan Power & Steel Limited (BPSL) while setting aside a resolution plan of JSW Steel Limited for the ailing firm. The CJI-led bench on July 31 recalled the verdict and decided to hear afresh the review pleas in the high stake matter. During the hearing on the review pleas, a lawyer referred to the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) probe in the BPSL case as well. Here also ED is there, the CJI quipped. In response, the solicitor general said, Let me tell a fact, which was never said in any court, and that is ED has recovered Rs 23,000 crore (laundered money) and given it to the victims". The law officer said recovered money does not remain with the state exchequer and goes to the victims of financial crimes. What is the conviction rate, the CJI asked. Mehta said conviction rates in penal offences are also very low, and referred to the ills plaguing the criminal justice system in the country as the key reason for it. To which, the CJI said, Even if they are not convicted you have been successful in sentencing them almost without a trial for years together". The law officer said, In some of the cases where the politicians were raided, where the cash was found, our (cash counting) machines stopped functioning because of the huge cashwe had to bring new machines". He added that some narratives are being built on YouTube programmes when some big politicians are caught. The CJI said, We do not decide matters on narratives I don't see news channels. I see headlines in newspapers only in the morning for 10-15 minutes". The law officer said he knew the cases are not decided by the judges on the narratives being built on social media and outside courtrooms. Several benches of the top court have been critical of alleged high handedness of the ED especially in cases involving opposition leaders in money laundering cases. The CJI-led bench on July 21, in a different case, had observed that the Enforcement Directorate was "crossing all limits". The suo motu matter pertained to summoning of two senior advocates by the ED for offering legal advice or representing clients during investigations.
