Former Taiwan president Tsai to make sensitive visit to Britain this week
Britain, like most countries, has no official diplomatic ties with Taiwan, but the economic and political exchanges between the two sides have increased as Beijing ratchets up military threats to force Taipei to accept its sovereignty claim over the democratic island.
Tsai, who stepped down in May last year, has become a symbol of Taiwan's defiance against China's military threats. She is currently in Lithuania and will travel to Denmark and then Britain later this week, her office said.
Tsai was invited by "friends in Britain's parliament" in a trip that is designed to deepen friendship between Taiwan and Britain, the office said in a statement, adding Tsai, who has a doctorate from the London School of Economics, will meet with unspecified British politicians.
Britain's Foreign Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent outside of office hours in London.
China's foreign ministry also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Tsai had been due to visit London in October of last year, but that coincided with a trip to Beijing by British Foreign Secretary David Lammy at a time London was trying to re-set strained ties with China and Tsai did not end up going.
Tsai last year visited the Czech Republic, France, Belgium and Canada, drawing condemnation from Beijing which has repeatedly denounced Tsai as a "separatist".
Despite a lack of formal ties, Taiwan sees Britain as an important democratic partner.
In 2023, Taiwan and Britain signed an Enhanced Trade Partnership Arrangement and Britain is also one of the countries which has helped Taiwan with its indigenous submarine programme, a vital part of Tsai's push to boost Taiwan's defence against China's threat.
China says Taiwan is one of its provinces with no right to the trappings of a state, a position Taipei's government strongly rejects.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Jimmy Kimmel obtained Italian citizenship in response to Trump's ‘unbelievable' re-election
Jimmy Kimmel has revealed he acquired Italian citizenship due to Donald Trump's presidency, the latest in a wave of celebrities to make contingency plans after his re-election in 2024. Speaking on The Sarah Silverman Podcast, the US late night host confirmed the news. Italian news agency Ansa confirmed that Kimmel had obtained Italian citizenship earlier this year after proving his ancestral lineage. 'A lot of people I know are thinking about, where are they going to get citizenship?' Silverman said, of the wider exodus in response to Trump's re-election. 'I did get Italian citizenship,' Kimmel said. 'What's going on is as bad as you thought it was gonna be. It's so much worse – it's just unbelievable. I feel like it's probably even worse than he would like it to be.' In June, Kimmel spoke of his heritage at an Italian Republic Day event in Los Angeles, telling the audience that his grandfather's parents moved to New York from Ischia, an island off the coast of Naples, after an earthquake in 1883 killed most of their family. 'I have just obtained citizenship, thanks to my beloved grandmother Edith, whose family came from Candida, in the province of Avellino. She used to repeat to me, 'You have the brain of a hamster!'' he reportedly told the audience. Rosie O'Donnell moved to Ireland in January, while Ellen DeGeneres recently confirmed she and her wife, the actor Portia de Rossi, decided to relocate to the UK after Trump's election last year. 'It's clean,' DeGeneres said, of the UK. 'Everything here is just better – the way animals are treated, people are polite. I just love it here.' She also expressed concern for the future of LGBTQ+ rights in the US, hinting that she and De Rossi may get married again in the UK due to the possibility that same-sex marriage could be overturned in the US. Kimmel is among a cohort of late night hosts, including John Oliver, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, who regularly use their shows as a platform to criticise the Trump administration. In May, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert was controversially axed by CBS, not long after he criticised the network's decision to settle a $16m lawsuit with Trump on-air. CBS has denied it was a politically motivated decision, but Trump did not disguise his pleasure at the news, writing on social media: 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert!' A few days later, he wrote: 'The word is, and it's a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, [Jimmy] Fallon will be gone.' Speaking on Silverman's show, Kimmel said former Trump supporters who found themselves in opposition to his agenda in office should be supported. 'Now you see these clips of Joe Rogan saying, 'Why is he doing this? Why are you deporting people?' And people go, 'Fuck you! You supported him.' I don't buy into that,' Kimmel said. 'The door has to stay open. If you want to change your mind, that's so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that is so hard and so rare to do. You are welcome.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NGOs urge Nandy to halt sale of Telegraph over China links
A group of nine human rights and freedom of expression organisations have called on the culture secretary to halt RedBird Capital's proposed £500m takeover of the Telegraph and investigate the US private equity company's ties to China. The international non-governmental organisations, which include Index on Censorship, Reporters Without Borders and Article 19, have written to Lisa Nandy arguing that RedBird Capital's links with China 'threaten media pluralism, transparency and information integrity in the UK'. A consortium led by RedBird Capital agreed a deal in May to buy the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph, ending two years of uncertainty over the future of the titles. The organisations said that RedBird Capital's chair, John Thornton, sits on the advisory council of the China Investment Corporation, the country's largest sovereign wealth fund. Thornton, a former chair of Goldman Sachs Asia, has also previously chaired the Silk Road Finance Corporation. 'Both [are] vehicles through which China has pursued financial influence,' the letter said. The signatories, who also include Hong Kong Watch, Human Rights in China and the Hong Kong Democracy Council, said Nandy should follow her predecessor, Lucy Frazer, who issued a public interest intervention notice (PIIN) in January last year. RedBird Capital, which contributed 25% of the funding to the RedBird IMI joint venture that controls the Telegraph, is in the process of buying out its partner, IMI. IMI, which may retain a stake of up to 15% in the Telegraph under RedBird Capital's plan, is controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, vice-president of the United Arab Emirates. The letter to Nandy states: 'We believe that there is reasonable grounds to suspect the Telegraph acquisition by RedBird Capital raises both public interest and potential foreign media influence concerns. We call on you to issue relevant notices to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Ofcom.' The signatories also said the culture department should ensure that the investigations carried out by the CMA and Ofcom, the communications regulator, involve independent consultation with 'experts in Chinese foreign information manipulation and influence operations, as well as experts in media pluralism, transparency, and freedom of expression'. Separately, the former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith and the independent peer David Alton have written to Nandy asking her to investigate reports of a £5.3m editorial budget cut. The politicians claim that the cuts, revealed by the former Telegraph journalist Fraser Nelson, represent a change to the paper's structure that is not allowed during a takeover process. They argued that the government's 2024 public interest merger reference pending approval of a takeover prohibits changes to the editorial structure and staff of the Telegraph. A spokesperson for the newspaper group, said: 'Ongoing management and oversight of Telegraph Media Group and its operations require the board and chief executive to liaise with all relevant stakeholders, including RedBird Capital, in line with agreed governance protocols. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'The board and chief executive will continue to fulfil their fiduciary duties and facilitate an anticipated transaction, consistent with the requirements of relevant government legislation.' In June, a cross-party group of MPs and peers, including Duncan Smith and Lord Alton, called on ministers to investigate how RedBird Capital is funding its £500m takeover. A spokesperson for RedBird said: 'There is no Chinese involvement or influence in RedBird Capital's proposed acquisition of the Telegraph.' They added that the company had 'been clear on its position regarding press independence, which is a fundamental tenet of its investment thesis in owning and growing news businesses – whether it's CBS News in the US or the Telegraph in the UK'. The spokesperson said that, after more than two years in 'regulatory limbo', it was now time for the takeover to be completed and to 'finally position the Telegraph for growth'. 'The partnership with RedBird will enable the Telegraph's world-class group of editors and reporters to thrive in this transformative moment for news organisations globally.' Last month, the sale of the Telegraph came a step closer after government legislation to allow foreign states to own up to 15% in British newspapers survived a potentially fatal vote in the House of Lords. RedBird Capital – which is also potentially aiming to bring in investors including the parent company of the Daily Mail and Len Blavatnik, the owner of Warner Music – has also said it can fully fund a deal in its own right. The government declined to comment.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Swiss lived in splendid isolation for years. Trump's tariffs have shattered that complacency
Growing up in Zurich often felt like being removed from the world. It shouldn't be that way: after all, Switzerland is at the heart of Europe. Riding on the cosy Zurich trams, one hears all the world's languages; and the airport offers more direct intercontinental flights than Berlin. And yet, coming of age in Switzerland is like sitting in an aquarium looking at the world through a thick bulletproof window. That glass was shattered last week when Donald Trump announced 39% tariffs on Swiss exports. The US is the most important destination for Swiss products: 18.6% of all its exports go there. If Trump maintains the tariffs, sales to the US 'will be effectively annihilated', said Switzerland's industry lobbying group. The rightwing Swiss business minister, Guy Parmelin, announced a furlough programme to shield the economy from 'mass layoffs'. The tabloid newspaper Blick captured the mood with a stark black front page, pronouncing it a 'black day' for Switzerland. Trump's tariff shock has provoked a major identity crisis in a country that has grown rich on exports, and done so in splendid isolation from world politics. To understand Switzerland, imagine it as a giant country club. First, you don't get in there easily: immigration laws are tight, although being rich helps. Second, it's a tidy place: every inch of land is curated, and every lawn mowed. Third, there are ample leisure activities on offer: after work, the Swiss go biking, or show off their toned bodies on the shores of immaculate lakes. Most importantly, the Swiss club has traditionally offered its members tranquillity. History doesn't happen here. The last war Switzerland was involved in was the Sonderbund war of 1847 (it lasted 26 days, and about 100 people died). The country has been run by a majority rightwing government since 1848. The Swiss economy has contracted in only six of the last 60 years. As a teenager in the 2000s, looking out through the bulletproof window at the rest of Europe, I saw Islamist terrorism and mass youth unemployment. We had none of it. Crime is low and social conflict barely exists, though Islamophobia did raise its ugly head in the 2009 vote to ban minarets. The Swiss have Europe's lowest proportion of working days lost to strikes. Disputes are resolved through compromise, and frustrations vented through direct democracy, or drowned in a sea of passive-aggression. And yes, 93.2% of trains do run on time. This all-pervasive sense of calm and predictability is perhaps the main reason why so many wealthy people move here. On a chaotic and anxious planet, Switzerland offers the luxury of living in a parallel reality – a chance to take a break from the world. That is the Swiss dream. That is the story of the children's book Heidi, in which a wealthy German girl suffering big city life in Frankfurt escapes to the Alps. That is the story of Thomas Mann's The Magic Mountain, in which Europe's neurotic elite retreats to the Swiss Alps to pontificate on the state of the world from a safe, numbing distance. Switzerland's long history of neutrality and deliberate remoteness also nurtured a feeling of Swiss exceptionalism. Surviving two world wars untouched convinced many that staying alone means staying safe – indeed, that it can even be profitable, especially if you are happy to trade with Nazi Germany and apartheid South Africa. Isolationism carries benefits even today. Not being part of either Nato or the EU allows Switzerland to be the only European country, apart from Iceland, to have a free trade agreement with China. It also allows Berne to spend just 0.7% of GDP on defence – far below Nato's 3.5% target. Swiss aid to Ukraine stands at just 0.13% of GDP, eight times lower than that of the Netherlands. Switzerland has thrived on being part of the free world without shouldering any of the burdens that come with it. But in the new era of cutthroat geoeconomics, this 'have your cake and eat it' policy doesn't work any more. Moreover, Trump's move completely blindsided Berne. In Switzerland, many people assumed that the president Karin Keller-Sutter's majority rightwing government would get along well with the Rolex-wearing Trump. After all, he dislikes the EU, taxes and wokeness, and so do the Swiss. When the US vice-president, JD Vance, argued at the Munich Security Conference in February that social media 'censorship' was a bigger danger to Europe than Russia, Keller-Sutter praised the speech as 'very Swiss'. Trump's shocking tariff announcement has left the Swiss establishment clueless as to how to respond. Last week, Keller-Sutter tried to convince Trump to let go of the US's $38bn trade deficit with Switzerland. Trump later said of the call, 'The woman was nice, but she didn't want to listen.' Switzerland has little leverage at its disposal. The country has already committed to buying F-35 fighter jets. Keller-Sutter can't even promise to cut tariffs on US products. In 2024, Bern unilaterally eliminated tariffs on industrial products. If Trump adds pharmaceuticals to the 39% tariffs, the economic pain will be real: up to 0.7% of GDP a year or 700 Swiss francs a head, according to the Swiss Economic Institute. But the greater shock is psychological. A nation that has become accustomed to always getting its own way is now floundering, with a worse tariff rate than Algeria (30%). In a multicultural, federal country with four official languages, the grand unifying narrative of Swiss exceptionalism is in tatters. Perhaps worst of all, Brussels is getting a better trade deal than Berne. That is provoking a lot of head scratching in a country where support for EU membership stood at 17% in a 2024 poll. Keeping the EU at a distance may no longer be the best option. The first test will come soon: the Swiss will vote on new economic treaties with the EU – something that the Swiss far right is fighting tooth and nail. Trump's golf-cart style of governing ought to see him fit right in to the Swiss country club. Who would have guessed that he would be the one to finally shatter its splendid isolation? Joseph de Weck is a fellow with the Foreign Policy Research Institute
