‘Rural America costs a lot of money': Trump cuts are decimating a radio station at the edge of the world
On 1 August, for example, KSDP hosted an interview with local fish biologist Matthew Keyes. Asking the questions was Austin Roof, general manager of the station. Over fuzzy microphones, the two volleyed stats back and forth about the escapement rates of 'pinks' and 'kings' (colloquialisms for two of the most fished species of salmon). Roof served as a stand-in for the laborers listening at home or aboard their ships, asking about the noticeably low catches early that summer; Keyes told listeners that while June was among the lowest harvests on record, July had been much better. He then announced the fishing schedule for early August: there would be no fishing allowed for 60 hours straight as officials monitored fish populations, after that, anglers could tune to the radio daily for specific opening and closing times. In a region where livelihoods are tied to this turbulent and highly regulated industry, this information gave residents a chance to plan their summer of labor.
How do you prepare for the end of the world? The loss of federal funding is truly that seismic for us
Austin Roof, general manager of KDSP
In just the past few summer months KSDP has brought listeners not only crucial information about local fisheries, but also delivered updates and orders to get to high ground in the wake of two tsunamis. All the while, legislators 4,000 miles away in Washington DC were solidifying a decision that will fundamentally alter the media available to millions of Americans, especially in rural areas: on 17 July, Congress voted to rescind all funding for public broadcasting.
Within hours of Roof's fishery interview, the hammer dropped: the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), through which federal funding is disbursed to public radio and television stations, announced it will close down at the end of September.
The average public radio station in the US gets less than 13% of its budget from the federal government. For many coastal and big-city stations, it is an even smaller portion. But at smalltown and rural stations, where donor bases are less robust, that number can climb above 50%. KSDP, which operates a far-reaching AM signal, a web stream, and four small FM repeater signals placed in villages across a several hundred mile stretch of islands, gets 70% of its operating budget from CPB – among the highest shares of federal support for any station in the country.
'The rural communities are definitely gonna be hit the hardest,' Roof says. 'How do you prepare for the end of the world? The loss of federal funding is truly that seismic for us.'
Chairs in KSDP's broadcasting studio and office are stacked high with jackets. Shoes overflow from a cardboard box in the small meeting room, and haphazardly folded garments fill any unused tables or shelf space. Crammed in Sand Point's city hall, the station doubles as a donation center and hosts clothing swaps a few times a year. If you attend a community barbecue in town, a public back-to-school party, or holiday celebration, there's a good chance the radio station put it on. Power tools are a permanent fixture in the studio, and there is always a neighbor ready to do the simple fixes for free or cheap. Roof has personally ascended the station's 200ft AM tower in climbing gear many times to save money on repairs.
Until a few years ago, KSDP and the Sand Point area did not have a reporter dedicated to their stretch of the Aleutian Islands: a remote archipelago extending south and west from mainland Alaska, and home to roughly a dozen communities ranging in size from about 20 to a few thousand residents. For years, KSDP relied on coverage from the radio station KUCB in the larger Aleutian town of Unalaska, nearly 400 miles (644km) south-west, as well as statewide and national programs.
Now the station finally has its own reporter: Theo Greenly, who splits his time between KSDP and two other radio stations, KUCB and KUHB, each hundreds of miles apart across the Pribilof and Aleutian Islands.
Together with his colleagues Sofia Stuart-Rasi and Maggie Nelson at KUCB in the larger 4,400-person town of Unalaska, Greenly is one of just three journalists covering the 1,000-mile archipelago, and the only one assigned to cover Sand Point.
Greenly's reporting regularly brings him to isolated communities for weeks at a time, as ferries between towns in his coverage area sometimes run only monthly, and flights are often delayed or cancelled. 'There are many, many places to get news from Washington or New York,' says Greenly. 'But there are zero alternatives for news from this region.'
Greenly has covered dangerous sea algae blooms, Indigenous language revitalization efforts, and a cargo ship carrying lithium batteries that caught on fire in a local port. He was on the ground when the Aleutian town of King Cove's main employer, the Peter Pan fishing cannery, closed down, leaving many residents without jobs and many anglers unpaid for the hauls they had already delivered.
If you don't have reporters here, the nation is missing out on vital information
Theo Greenly, KDSP reporter
In July, a resident of the 400-person town St Paul, located about 400 miles north-west of Sand Point, informed Greenly that the town was running out of food; the sole grocery store, owned by the local tribal government, had been waiting over a month to receive a large shipment of stock that it had paid for, but was stuck at the Anchorage airport. Ace Air Cargo had not flown to St Paul in all that time, citing weather issues. Not long after Greenly reported the story, the company got its cargo planes in the air, delivering more than 10,000lbs of food and two tons of mail to St Paul.
It costs money to report these stories but there is not a lot of money to be made in sharing them – especially in the far-flung, sparsely populated Aleutian Islands. Commercial radio stations are exceedingly rare here; there's simply not enough of listeners. Public media, by design, fills the market gap. 'Rural America costs a lot of money,' says Roof.
Alaska is one of the most heavily federally subsidized states in the US in terms of public services such as education, internet connection and media. Nevertheless, Nick Begich, Alaska's sole congressperson, voted with all but two of his fellow Republicans to take back federal funds that had been allocated for broadcasting.
Greenly followed debate on the cuts closely. 'I mean, there is nobody covering this stuff,' he says, noting that he and his two colleagues in the Aleutians essentially double as the region's only newspaper reporters, as the paper serving the archipelago runs print versions of the public radio pieces alongside stories reported out of Anchorage or by national newsrooms. And he says it is not just locals who will suffer if public journalism in Alaska takes a hit, mentioning that his colleagues were key in covering the 2023 story of the possible Chinese surveillance balloons over Alaska.
'When Shell was doing exploratory drilling in the Arctic, this was their home port. When Chinese and Russian military ships cross into the Exclusive Economic Zone, we are the closest reporters,' he says. 'If you don't have reporters here, the nation is missing out on vital information.'
General Manager Roof says KSDP has enough to 'keep the lights on for a while'. And while he doesn't have imminent plans to close, he knows that losing more than two-thirds of the station's operating budget will fundamentally change what they can do. He says they will have to rely increasingly on volunteers rather than paid staff if they want to survive. And he can't imagine how he will be able to continue hosting things like big public events. 'Those are the kinds of things that really make our community a fun place to live,' Roof says. 'And so I just don't see that coming back.'
Roof is already planning one major change due to the cuts: he expects to have to shut down KSDP's far-reaching but costly AM signal by the end of the year. While AM listenership may be declining nationwide, it still plays an essential role here: AM signals reach much farther than FM, penetrate terrain, and carry extraordinarily far – sometimes hundreds of miles – over water, making it easy to be heard on distant islands or on ships. Roof is planning to shutter the AM signal rather than sell it, as he does not expect anyone to have any interested buyers. The tower, he assumes, will be torn down and sold for scrap.
For now, Roof plans to keep operating KSDP on a handful of very small, localized FM signals located in four villages across the Aleutians, and online via web stream, since many people in this region have internet connection for the first time thanks to new fiber optic lines and satellite systems such as Starlink. But not everyone lives in the villages with FM coverage, and the web is not always reliable, says Greenly. A ship's anchor once ripped apart the fiber cable bringing internet to the Aleutian Islands.
Related: These rural radio stations are a lifeline for their communities. Trump's cuts threaten their future
Ultimately, says Greenly, cuts to public radio will have an impact on residents regardless of how they tune in. 'The word 'radio' is kind of a misnomer in a way,' he says. He tells me that people always ask him if people can't just get this information online. 'Yes,' he tells them, 'because we, the radio station, did the work, investigated it, and put it on the internet.' Without the newsrooms and stations supported by CPB, he says, 'they can't get that information.'
Greenly says he doesn't know what will happen to his position. His role as the shared reporter for KSDP and two other local stations is funded by a grant from CPB. But his livelihood, he says, is the least of his concerns. 'I'm more saddened for the nation than for myself. I'm worried about the community. I'm worried about Sand Point,' he says.
As for him, the intrepid local reporter braving the elements to cover stories from fishing to fracking? He says: 'I mean, I go back to bartending.'
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Fewer people are reading for fun, study finds
There is evidence that reading for pleasure has been declining since the 1940s, the researchers said, but they called the size of the latest decrease 'surprising,' given that the study defined reading broadly, encompassing books, magazines and newspapers in print, electronic or audio form. Advertisement Many previous studies' results could be questioned because they didn't explicitly account for e-books and audiobooks, said Daisy Fancourt, a co-author of the study and a professor of psychobiology and epidemiology at University College London. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The study did not answer the question of why Americans were reading less. But the authors suggested some possible explanations, including increased use of social media and other technology, or more time spent at work because of economic pressure. Further research would be needed to confirm those theories. The decline in reading could have implications for Americans' learning, relationships and overall well-being, the researchers said. 'Even though reading is often thought of as more of an individual activity, when we read stories, we actually form connections with characters,' Fancourt said. 'The empathy that we feel for them is actually real, and these connections with characters can be ways that we can feel less alone, that we can feel socially and emotionally validated.' Advertisement The new study, published in the journal iScience, relied on data from the American Time Use Survey, which asks thousands of Americans per year to describe in detail how they spent a day. Over the 20 years the researchers analyzed, more than 236,000 Americans completed the survey. The findings showed significant demographic disparities among those who read for pleasure. For example, in 2023, the most highly educated people were more than twice as likely to read as the least educated, and high-income people were about 1.5 times as likely to read as low-income people. Those disparities widened over time. The researchers also found that, while more than 20% of people surveyed had a child under 9 years old, only 2% of those surveyed read with a child -- a finding that stayed largely flat throughout the study period but that could contribute to further declines in adult reading going forward, the researchers said. Research indicates that reading can have a wide range of benefits for educational attainment, reasoning and comprehension skills, imagination, empathy, mental health, cognitive health and more. Jill Sonke -- a co-author of the new paper and a director of the EpiArts Lab at the University of Florida, which studies how engagement in the arts and culture affects health -- said she would like to see more awareness that reading is a resource 'for our health and well-being.' 'As we're living in this really complex and really challenging time, we really need to be intentional about the ways in which we support our health,' Sonke said. Advertisement Fancourt expressed particular concern about the increase in demographic disparities among those who read for fun. Not only were people reading less, she said, but 'potentially the people who could benefit the most for their health -- so people from disadvantaged groups -- are actually benefiting the least.' People may draw particular benefits from thinking deeply about what they read and talking about it with others. It is not the case that 'I can sit you down and give you a Jane Austen novel, you read it, and you come out with better mental health,' said James Carney, an associate professor at the London Interdisciplinary School and the lead author of a 2022 study on reading and mental health. But discussing and reflecting on fiction -- as opposed to just reading it -- was linked to better mental health and social capabilities, including the ability to perceive nuances in interpersonal relationships, said Carney, who was not involved in the new study. Engaging with many forms of nonfiction would probably have similar benefits, he said. This article originally appeared in


The Hill
14 hours ago
- The Hill
Half of Americans say journalists ‘losing influence' on society: study
Half of Americans don't find journalists to be influential over society and public discourse, a new study from the Pew Research Center found. About half of U.S. adults, 49 percent, said journalists are losing influence in society, compared with 15 percent who said they are gaining influence, the study published on Wednesday found. Fewer than half, 45 percent, said they have a great deal or a fair amount of confidence in journalists to act in the best interests of the public, according to the study. Majorities of respondents described most journalists as 'intelligent,' 63 percent, and 'well-intentioned,' 58 percent. More than half, 58 percent, also said most journalists are biased. The study comes as more Americans turn away from mainstream and traditional news outlets in favor of social media platforms, content producers and internet influencers for updates on current events. A dwindling supply of advertising revenue is leading to a diminished local media presence in many major markets, while large news providers are retooling their business away from print and linear broadcast channels and toward streaming and digital.


Newsweek
14 hours ago
- Newsweek
National Park Peak Set to Be Renamed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Teton County Board of County Commissioners is proposing to change the name of Mount Woodring in Wyoming's Grand Teton National Park to Raven Peak, due to concerns about the mountain's namesake being charged with sexual assault in the 1930s. Newsweek reached out to the press office of the National Park Service and the U.S. Geological Survey via email for comment. Why It Matters Mount Woodring was named after the park's first superintendent, Samuel T. Woodring. Woodring was charged with assaulting and attempting to commit rape against an 11-year-old girl in 1934, according to court documents. The charges were dismissed a year later because the parents of the girl did not want to put their daughter through the trauma of testifying, the name change proposal form states. The name change was proposed by the Teton County Board of County Commissioners, which said that "the name Mount Woodring is offensive." The board said that there was a "need to adopt a new name at the earliest possible opportunity." Mount Woodring was included in the U.S. Geological Survey's list of "upcoming proposals of interest" last year. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. htrnr/Getty Images What To Know The Teton County Board of County Commissioners has suggested the name Raven Peak, as "ravens are commonly found in the Tetons, they are considered intelligent birds, and the raven is considered significant in most Native American cultures." The board said it felt that it was important to name the peak after an animal and not a person, because "the reputation of a person can change with the passage of time, whereas the status of a raven is not likely to change as years pass." "The hope is that Raven Peak will have staying power that helps to make it a fitting name," the proposal said. In its original letter to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, there was also another possible name mentioned: Equality Peak. However, after listening to public feedback, the board found that there was "overwhelming support for the name Raven Peak," while the name Equality Peak was deemed "controversial" and met with "considerable opposition" by some members of the public. President Donald Trump has been an active proponent of historical monuments and military bases keeping their original names, signing an executive order in March titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The administration wrote in the order: "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." It added: "This revisionist movement seeks to undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." Earlier this year, he signed an executive order changing the name of Alaska's highest peak, Denali, back to its original name, Mount McKinley and renamed the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." What People Are Saying The Teton County Board of County Commissioners, in its letter: "Ravens live in our community and in Grand Teton National Park year-round and exhibit incredible intelligence, play an important role in our ecosystem, are adaptable – thriving at high and low elevations, often performing impressive acrobatic maneuvers – and are known to be highly social and playful. It is our community's sentiment that Raven Peak is an appropriate name for the mountain where these remarkable birds live and play." What Happens Next The final decision for the name change lies with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, although Trump is able to override the board's authority should he decide to.