International con man who used ‘sleight-of-hand' to swipe $260K in diamond rings from Tiffany, Cartier pleads guilty
Yaorong Wan, who appeared in Manhattan Supreme Court on Monday, admitted to lifting high-value items from the luxury retailers' swanky Fifth Avenue boutiques in March of last year.
At Tiffany's flagship store, Wan used distraction techniques and a fake ring to swap out a $225,000 diamond ring.
5 Yaorong Wan, a 50-year-old reputed international jewelry thief, pleaded guilt in Manhattan Supreme Court this week to grand larceny.
Steven Hirsch
Prosecutors said Wan visited the Tiffany store last year and inquired about multiple pieces of jewelry. He allegedly swapped the genuine platinum-mounted ring with a cubic zirconia fake and walked out without making a purchase, according to the DA.
Just over a week later, he struck again at Cartier, pocketing a $24,000 ring while diverting employees' attention.
At the Cartier store in Hudson Yards, Wan examined two engagement rings and two watches, but managed to pocket one of the rings while the salesperson was distracted.
Authorities said Wan's tactics — quick, skillful hand movements, misdirection and the strategic use of replica jewelry — are hallmarks of the high-end thefts that earned him international notoriety.
5 At Tiffany's flagship store, Wan used distraction techniques and a fake ring to swap out a $225,000 diamond piece.
Steven Hirsch
Wan's criminal history stretches across continents.
He was previously wanted by Interpol in connection with a $330,000 diamond theft in South Korea and has been linked to similar cases in New Jersey, California, Florida and South Korea.
5 Wan had outstanding warrants for his arrest in several jurisdictions.
Law enforcement officials said he targeted both global luxury brands and smaller independent jewelers, executing thefts with magician-like precision.
In April of last year, Wan allegedly entered London Jewelers in the Manhasset section of Nassau County and used a sleight-of-hand trick to take a Chopard Watch valued at over $17,000.
5 Wan also stole an expensive watch from the London Jewelers store in Manhasset, Long Island last year.
Matthew McDermott
Wan is also alleged to have stolen $332,000 worth of jewelry in the South Korean capital of Seoul in 2018.
Wan was arrested in May of last year at his home in Flushing, Queens, following a coordinated investigation by the NYPD, Nassau County Police, and US Marshals. During the arrest, officers recovered multiple stolen items, including the $17,000 Chopard watch reported missing from the Long Island jewelry store.
5 Last year, Wan stole a $24,000 ring while diverting employees' attention at a Cartier store in Manhattan.
REUTERS
Held without bail due to outstanding warrants in multiple jurisdictions, Wan pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree. He is scheduled to be sentenced on July 14, 2025, and faces between three and nine years in New York state prison.
'This defendant used deceptive sleight-of-hand techniques to steal hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of high-end jewelry,' Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said in a statement announcing the plea.
'Thanks to the collaboration between law enforcement agencies, we've put an end to his global theft operation.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Convicted rapist who assaulted Tinder date after SoHo House date skates with just probation thanks to lenient NYC judge
A convicted rapist — who assaulted a Tinder date at his West Village apartment — got off with a slap on the wrist Tuesday when a Manhattan judge sentenced him to just probation and therapy. Prosecutors had pushed for the maximum sentence of four years behind bars for William Hathaway, but Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Josh Hanshaft said he ultimately found the 'better alternative' to prison was sending the sicko back on the streets. 'I'm not sure if this sentence is what's the right answer or should you be sitting in a jail cell for a while to get a sense of what incarceration is about,' the judge told Hathaway, 33, at his sentencing hearing. 'But I do find the probationary sentence will at least get you the help so you do not hurt another individual again.' 3 Convicted rapist William Hathaway, 33, was sentenced to 10 years of probation, sex therpay and ordered to register as a sex offender despite prosecutors seeking a four-year prison term. Steven Hirsch The judge sentenced Hathaway, now a Miami, Fla., resident, to 10 years of probation and ordered that he partake in a sex offender treatment program and register as a sex offender. Hathaway, who grew from West Hartford, Ct., went to trial and was convicted by a jury on April 24 of rape in the third degree. He met the victim, a 23-year-old woman he had connected with on the dating app, at SoHo House on February 15, 2020 and then took her to his apartment, where he raped her, prosecutors said. 'That night he took my control. He took away my voice, he took away my dignity,' the victim, who has since moved out of state, told the court on Tuesday. The woman, who is not being identified because she is a victim of sexual assault, said she's battled with alcohol abuse and suicidal thoughts since the rape. She said her life changed forever when she met Hathaway and 'he decided to do whatever he wanted' with her. 3 Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Josh Hanshaft said he felt that there were better alternatives than prison for Hathaway, who was convicted of rape in the third degree in April. Steven Hirsch 'He took away a part of me that I can never have back,' she said. 'For what? To please himself. All he was thinking about was himself.' Prosecutors have said Hathaway and the victim exchanged messages for a few days on Tinder before agreeing to meet for a date at the posh members-only club in the Meatpacking District. Hathaway, who was 27 at the time, then brought the woman back to his West Village apartment where they began to have consensual sex. The victim then told him to 'stop' — at least five times — while pushing on his chest, but he ignored her, prosecutors said. 'She clearly expressed that she did not consent, repeating 'stop' at least five times, and pushing on his chest, while he raped her without a condom,' the Manhattan District Attorney's Office has said. 3 William Hathaway was convicted of rape in the third degree by a jury in April. Steven Hirsch ADA Ashley Durkin told the judge that Hathaway felt like he was 'entitled to sex' with the victim because he met her on Tinder, which has a reputation for being a 'hook up' app. 'There is a reason the term 'date rape' exists in our lexicon,' Durkin said. 'To not sentence this defendant to a period of incarceration for his conduct would be adhering the outdated concept that there needs to be some form of violence or force to constitute rape.' Hathaway claimed that he was simply trying to have a 'fun date,' while he apologized to the victim in court. The convicted rapist then bizarrely mentioned that he's now dating with more serious intentions. 'Since my arrest, I've tried to respond to this experience in ways that reflect loyalty and responsibility. I now date with the intention of long term relationships,' he said. 'I want to be a good boyfriend, a good husband, a good father one day.' Hathaway was charged with a similar sex attack in the summer of 2020, but was acquitted during an October 2023 trial, sources told The Post. Neither the judge, nor jurors, would have been able to take the previous case into account as part of the sentencing or verdict, as it is now sealed. Hathaway's defense attorney, Aida Leisenring, claimed in court that the victim had withdrawn her consent 'approximately one minute' before the rape ended, and asked the judge to not sentence his client to prison. Hanshaft explained that the sentence was intended to 'mostly make sure this never happens again' — while hitting back at the prosecutor's suggestion that not locking up Hathaway would mean taking the case lightly. 'I don't treat this as an outdated theory, that no doesn't mean no — no means no,' the judge said. 'The crime is being considered by the legislature as rape when a person says no, it's no. I take that very serious… The law now is when someone says no and you don't stop, that's rape. And that's where we are.' Hanshaft, a former Brooklyn prosecutor in its Rackets Bureau, became a criminal court judge after he was elected to the Civil Court bench in 2017. He's also the founder of My BarTunes, an musical study app designed to help law students prepare for the bar exam. The state Office of Court Administration did not respond to a request for comment on Hanshaft's sentencing decision. Hathaway's parole will be overseen by authorities in New York, though he can request to transfer it out of state. 'You caused pain. You caused deep emotional pain,' the judge told him. 'Don't ever let that happen again. Ever.'
UPI
9 hours ago
- UPI
Probe into alleged Unification Church influence peddling deepens: media reports
South Korea's former first lady, Kim Keon-hee (C), wife of impeached former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, arrives at a court to attend a hearing to review her arrest warrant requested by special prosecutors at the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on Aug. 12 Photo by Jung Yeon-je/Pool/EPA SEOUL, Aug. 19 (UPI) -- South Korean prosecutors are deepening their probe into the Unification Church's leadership on suspicion of violations of the Political Funds Act and the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act, according to recent Korean media reports. The magazine Sisa Journal reported Monday that Jung Wonju, chief of staff to Hak Ja Han, the church's matriarch, and a vice president of Cheonmuwon -- the church's supreme decision-making body -- told prosecutors that political gifts and contributions had been made under Han's direction. Prosecutors are treating that testimony as a crucial link between illicit payments and the church's highest authority. On Tuesday, JoongAng Ilbo reported that investigators are probing whether church members were mobilized to support Kim Gi-hyeon in his successful 2023 bid for the leadership of the conservative People Power Party. The allegations involve direct violations of election and anti-graft laws. If substantiated, Han and her closest aides, Jung, and former senior church executive, Yoon Young-ho, could face criminal liability. Yoon is alleged to have delivered luxury gifts -- including a Chanel handbag and a Graff diamond necklace -- to Kim Keon-hee, the former first lady of South Korea. The trio face possible indictment under several statutes. The Political Funds Act criminalizes illegal donations with penalties of up to five years in prison. The Public Official Election Act bars third-party donations to campaigns with prison terms of up to seven years. South Korea's anti-graft law prohibits offering valuables to public officials or their spouses and carries a maximum penalty of three years in prison and fines up to 30 million won, or about $21,500. Further charges could be brought under the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes. If prosecutors prove that church assets worth more than 50 billion won were diverted for illegal political use, additional penalties can be applied from a minimum of five years up to life imprisonment. The People Power Party has resisted prosecutors' attempts to seize internal records. In late July, investigators tried to search its headquarters, but were denied access, according to the Hankyoreh and NoCut News. Party leaders have denied that the church played any role in its elections. The Sisa Journal said investigators are now seeking to determine whether the scandal was a matter of individual misconduct, as church spokespersons claim, or "a top-down directive." If prosecutors establish that Han and her aides ordered and financed illegal political activity, the case could result in prison sentences and confiscation of assets.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
13 Times Rich Celebs Insulted Or Complained About People Who Make Wayyy Less Money Than Them
Plenty of famous people worked "normal" jobs before making it big. However, once they reach a certain level of wealth — or if they were born into it — they sometimes seemingly forget that people working non-Hollywood jobs deserve just as much respect. Here are 13 times rich celebs were disrespectful towards people working "normal" jobs and got called out: 2019, Lizzo wrongly accused a Postmates delivery driver of taking her food. In a since-deleted (but very public tweet), she said, "Hey @Postmates this girl Tiffany W. stole my food. she lucky I don't fight no more." Postmates Support replied, "Hi! We're sorry to hear you've had a less than satisfactory experience on our app. Would you mind DM'ing the email address linked to your account, so we can look further into this for you?" A spokesperson told Page Six that the driver actually did show up and waited for five minutes. However, after being unable to get ahold of Lizzo, she had to move on. In her replies, people took the driver's side, advising Lizzo that publicly putting her on blast probably wasn't the best idea: Twitter: @animeicon420 Lizzo ended up apologizing, tweeting, "I apologize for putting that girl on blast. I understand I have a large following and that there were so many variables that could've put her in danger. Imma really be more responsible with my use of social media and check my petty and my pride at the door." Tiffany ended up suing Lizzo for emotional distress, libel, and false light invasion of privacy. In her lawsuit, she said that she "feared for her physical safety" and got "direct threats of violence." She also said that she was "scared to leave her house and as a result was forced to stop delivering as a courier altogether." The suit said, "[Lizzo] knew or should have known that her false and defamatory statements would be republished over and over by lacked reasonable grounds for any belief in the truth of her statements and acted negligently in failing to determine the true facts...[She] acted with actual malice and reckless disregard for the truth when she tweeted the false statements of or concerning [Tiffany]." Julia Stiles was a student at Columbia in 2001, she went on Late Night with Conan O'Brien and called the campus cafeteria workers "mole people." Related: The entire campus was upset with her remark. In the Columbia Spectator, the student newspaper, an editorial writer called her a "sloe-eyed Hollywood wench" in retaliation. In a Columbia Spectator op-ed of her own, Julia said, "I have received a lot of criticism, both to my face and in print, about flippant comments I made while appearing on talk shows to promote Save the Last Dance. I was denigrated in one Columbia media outlet and nearly slandered in another, all because I made a joke about the dining hall on national television. Talk shows require a pre-interview, where the guest is grilled for funny the case of my appearance, I was asked about the quality of food at school and told to exaggerate for the sake of comedy. Granted, I was not forced to say anything, but under the circumstances I wanted to get through the interview alive. Having every comment examined under such heavy scrutiny has made me consider the repercussions of what I say. I have apologized in writing to the dining staff; they seem to understand that I wasn't commenting on any particular person. They understand that it is a very common, if not clichéd, joke to poke fun at cafeteria food. Adam Sandler did it, and so did a writer for an on-campus publication that took issue with my comments. I didn't realize that so many Columbia students have made it their cause to go crusading for Dining Services. I also didn't realize that the way to criticize thoughtless jokes was to may be attempting humor to get in good with your audience, but even lunch ladies and Hollywood wenches have feelings." Then, in 2019, she told Glamour UK, "I went on late night talk show; I think it was Conan O'Brien or David Letterman. I was in college at the time and I was talking about college life and they asked me if I ate in the cafeteria like a normal kid. I rambled on because I was insecure and I think I used the term, 'mole people.' But my thought was there was an Adam Sandler song at the time where there was a character on a sketch comedy show where he was playing the lunch lady and she had a hairnet and a mole. It backfired on a very immediate level. The people I was in school with were furious with me. Someone wrote in the school newspaper, 'she's an elitist! How dare she insult the cafeteria workers,' which was so not my intention and not who I am as a person. To know the people who were working hard in the school, cleaning up the garbage, feeding us meals thought I was insulting them was so devastating to me because it was absolutely not my intention. So, I wrote something in the newspaper. I issued a handwritten apology to the cafeteria workers, but I learnt a valuable lesson aside from 'think before you speak'. That kind of thing is so exaggerated now because of social media. You do have to be careful about how what you say is perceived and the impact it will have." 2018, Gwyneth Paltrow told the Wall Street Journal, "Forgive me if this comes out wrong. I went to do a yoga class in LA recently, and the 22-year-old girl behind the counter was like, 'Have you ever done yoga before?' And literally I turned to my friend, and I was like, 'You have this job because I've done yoga before.'" On social media, people criticized and made fun of her comments. Twitter: @whatbunnysaid Twitter: @Annabelera a 2012 appearance on The Jonathan Ross Show, Emily Blunt made unkind and unnecessary comments about a server's weight while sharing a story about going to Chili's. The clip recirculated on social media in 2023, leading to a lot of backlash. So, Emily made a public apology, telling People, "I just need to address this head on as my jaw was on the floor watching this clip from 12 years ago. I'm appalled that I would say something so insensitive, hurtful, and unrelated to whatever story I was trying to tell on a talk show." She continued, "I've always considered myself someone who wouldn't dream of upsetting anyone so whatever possessed me to say anything like this in that moment is unrecognizable to me or anything I stand for. And yet it happened, and I said it and I'm so sorry for any hurt caused. I was absolutely old enough to know better." Here's a clip of the original interview, with this part starting a the 1:11 mark: 2019, former The Real Housewives of Orange County cast member Alexis Bellino posted an Instagram picture of the dirty floor under her couch. In the caption, she said, "When your couch accidentally disconnects and you realize your maids aren't doing deep cleaning. Found 2 socks too... 😂🤦🏼♀️🤔" Related: Her commenters called her out for publicly shaming her staff rather than simply cleaning it up herself. In a follow-up Instagram post, Alexis claimed she'd been joking. She said, ""To All: I can and WILL post whatever I want on my [Instagram]. My maids are well paid for and I love them. It was a joke. Get over yourselves, stop trolling, find happiness and please unfollow me ASAP as I'm not looking for any of your approval on my [Instagram] and I DON'T need followers." a 2021 episode of Keeping Up With the Kardashians, Kim Kardashian and Kourtney Kardashian Barker discussed a disagreement that Kourtney had with Kim's nanny while on a trip. However, Kim was quick to call her sister out on how she handled the situation. And she called her out for how she allegedly treats nannies in general, which Kourtney said was all "lies." Watch the full clip below: Related: 2022, Kim Kardashian shared her "best advice for women in business" with Variety. Kim faced backlash across the internet as many people pointed out that her comments failed to acknowledge her privileged background, which gave her a boost. Twitter: @HottyToddyAspen Twitter: @WanderingNoma14 Kim told Good Morning America, "It wasn't a blanket statement towards was taken out of context, but I'm really sorry if it was received that way." Variety denied that the quote was "taken out of context." Here's the full video, with this part starting at the 5:12 mark: 2022, on her podcast Anything Goes, Emma Chamberlain compared being a self-employed influencer to working a more traditional 9-to-5. She said, "Because you're an employee of somebody else, mentally, it's easier for you to disconnect after work so that you can enjoy all of your free time to the fullest without having to think about your job." She continued, "Whereas, when you're never stop thinking about it. You never get to disconnect. You never get to be like, 'Oh, I'm done for now.' It is so hard." In a Reddit thread about the episode, listeners expressed their frustration with her comments. a since-deleted 2018 social media video, makeup influencer Sondos al-Qattan complained about new laws in Kuwait, where she lives, that had been recently passed to provide more protection for domestic help employees, such as housekeepers. She said, "For people who want to go get a Filipino domestic worker, what are these ridiculous work contracts you've got to sign? But how can you have a servant in your house who gets to keep their passport with them? Where are we living? If they ran away and went back to their country, who'll refund me? Even worse is that they get a day off every single week! What's left?" "Honestly, with this new contract, I just wouldn't get a Filipino maid. She'd only work six days a week and get four days off a month," she said. Several beauty brands cut ties with her. Though she deleted the video, it was reposted on Twitter and YouTube, where commenters called her out. Related: In a follow-up video, the influencer said she was glad her post went viral because "maybe that will help her as an employer get more rights." Additionally, on Instagram, she said, "Due to the spreading rumors, it was only necessary to make a responsive clarification. The passport of any expat employee should be in the poseseccesion of the employer to protect the employer's interests. Irrevelant of the employer/employee nationality...I have not [in] any circumstances in present or past... degraded or in any way mistreated an employee of mine. I consider all employees as equal human being [sic]." 2005, Russell Crowe was arrested at a SoHo hotel because, after he wasn't able to get a call to his wife in Australia to go through, he threw the telephone at the concierge, who got a cut under his eye as a result. Afterward, Russell publicly apologized on The Late Show with David Letterman, saying it was "possibly the most shameful situation that I've ever gotten myself in my life." He later went to court. After pleading guilty to third-degree assault, the actor was sentenced to a conditional discharge, which meant he must meet the condition of not getting arrested again for a year. He also settled with the concierge. 2006, Paula Abdul allegedly wanted to change her 7:40 a.m. flight and called the front desk of her Las Vegas hotel. Carol Good, one of the hotel workers, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "I stayed over and printed out the flight schedules." She also said that, just as she was about to call her, Paula called the desk again and "went off on" her and blamed her and her coworker for making her missing the flight. Carol and her coworker were reportedly suspended afterwards. Paula's lawyers didn't respond to the story. 2013, Lady Gaga went to court with her former assistant, Jennifer O'Neill, who was suing her for unpaid overtime. In her deposition, the singer reportedly called her a "fucking hood rat who is suing me for money that she didn't earn." She said, "She's just — she thinks she's just like the queen of the universe. And, you know what, she didn't want to be a slave to one, because in my work and what I do, I'm the queen of the universe every day." "I'm quite wonderful to everybody that works for me, and I am completely aghast to what a disgusting human being that you have become to sue me like this," she said. "Because she slept in Egyptian cotton sheets every night, in five-star hotels, on private planes, eating caviar, partying with [photographer] Terry Richardson all night, wearing my clothes, asking YSL to send her free shoes without my permission, using my YSL discount without my permission...[This job] was essentially a favor, and Jennifer was majorly unqualified for it...I expect there to be a certain level of, like, you know, knowledge and academia about, like, your job." Lady Gaga said, "One of the biggest problems I had with Jen is that I felt like she didn't enough lay out all my stuff for me [when traveling]. "She also said that her former assistant "was asleep until 12:00 most of the time" and "got lazy." "This job is a 9-to-5 job that is spaced out throughout the day. You don't get a schedule that is like you punch in and you can play fucking Tetris at your desk for four hours and then you punch out at the end of the day. This is — when I need you, you're available," she said. "I do six shows a week, and I make a lot of money. I work, I work 24 hours a day. I'm not standing next to Steve holding tea, waiting for him to take a sip, that is not what I do. Not that people who do that don't deserve their hourly pay, but I'm just pointing out that I deserve everything I've worked for. I deserve every dollar of it. And she deserves every dollar of her $75,000 that we agreed to. But she does not deserve a penny more." In her lawsuit, Jennifer alleged that she had to share Lady Gaga's bed while they were touring so that, if the singer wanted the DVD changed in the middle of the night, she could wake up her assistant to do it for her. She also said, "Every day is a work day for her, so every day is a work day for the rest of us. There is no, 'We're going to stay in, we're going to sleep.' There is no, 'Let's put on sweatpants and go out to the movies and be girlfriends.' It doesn't work like that." Eventually, the two settled out of court. finally, Naomi Campbell has been accused of allegedly hitting her staff members multiple times. She pleaded guilty to throwing her telephone at an assistant (in 2000), got sued for throwing the phone at another assistant while having a "tantrum" (in 2003), accused of slapping a housekeeper in the face (in 2004, when she claimed the maid started it), accused of smacking her assistant in the head with her Blackberry (in 2005), arrested for allegedly assaulting her drugs counselor (in 2006), sued by a former maid who accused her of being "a violent super-bigot" (in 2006), and sentenced to community service for assaulting her housekeeper by throwing her bedazzzled cellphone at her head so hard she needed stitches after she couldn't find a specific pair of jeans (in 2007). When she cameoed on Ugly Betty in 2008, the phone incident was treated as a joke. When Naomi answered her cell at a baseball game, everyone else ducked in fear. Likewise, in 2007, after she was arrested for allegedly hitting and head-butting an ex-assistant, Naomi was spotted wearing a "Naomi hit me, and I loved it" shirt. Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity:
