logo
Philadelphia gun permit levels high but boom slows

Philadelphia gun permit levels high but boom slows

Axios02-04-2025
Philadelphians flocked to firearms in 2024 as issued gun permits continued to outpace pre-pandemic levels.
The big picture: The high interest comes as some experts report more groups with traditionally lower gun-ownership rates are embracing firearms.
State of play: Philadelphia police issued 20,591 license-to-carry permits last year, per city data.
That's a nearly 13% drop from 2023, marking a third consecutive year of permit declines.
Yes, but: Before the pandemic, gun permits in Philly averaged about 8,400 annually, according to state police statistics from 2014-20.
The latest: As of mid-March, license-to-carry permits had exceeded 4,600 this year.
The intrigue: Philadelphia saw big declines in homicides and other violent crimes last year.
So far, homicides are down 28% compared with the same time last year, per Philly police's online dashboard.
Context: Philadelphia, unlike everywhere else in the state, requires a license for carrying both concealed and open firearms.
Philly is blocked from passing its own gun control measures due to the state's preemption law, which gives that power to the state Legislature.
Flashback: Carry permits skyrocketed in Philly in 2021, reaching a decade high of more than 52,200. Gun sales also surged.
Stats for gun sales in Philly for 2024 were not yet available, per a state police spokesperson.
Zoom out: Gun sales spiked nationwide starting in 2020 amid climbing homicide rates, protests over police brutality, and a rise in anti-Asian hate crimes.
But that pandemic boom appears to be on the decline, with estimated gun sales dropping nearly 4% in 2024 compared with the previous year, per an analysis from The Trace.
Meanwhile, growing concerns about racial and political violence have fueled gun purchases among demographic groups with lower gun-ownership rates, such as Democrats and Black, Asian and Hispanic Americans, per a study conducted in 2023.
What they're saying: Chris Stone, director of state affairs for Gun Owners of America, tells Axios that groups traditionally not associated with firearms have been embracing gun ownership in recent years, including women and members of the LGBTQ community.
Self-defense is a driving force behind the rise in gun ownership, he said.
"More and more people are realizing that owning a firearm, being armed, being trained, being smart, being safe isn't a partisan issue," he said.
Adam Garber of the gun-control group CeasefirePA tells Axios that fears over safety in Philly were likely propelling people toward guns.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Serbian protesters are back on the streets as clashes with government loyalists escalate

time19 minutes ago

Serbian protesters are back on the streets as clashes with government loyalists escalate

BELGRADE, Serbia -- Thousands of anti-government protesters returned to the streets in Serbia on Thursday after two days of clashes with loyalists of autocratic President Aleksandar Vucic and riot police that left dozens injured or detained. Police fired tear gas in at least two cities and numerous other incidents were reported throughout the country. In the northern city of Novi Sad, where the anti-Vucic revolt in Serbia started more than nine months ago, groups of young protesters shouted, 'He is finished,' as they demolished the offices of the president's ruling Serbian Progressive Party. The demonstrators broke windows on the party's downtown office and carried away some documents and pieces of furniture from inside. The police or Vucic's supporters, who have guarded the office for months, where nowhere to be seen. In Belgrade, the Serbian capital, and in Novi Sad, police in the evening fired multiple rounds of tear gas to disperse the protesters who then moved to other locations in smaller groups. Protesters in a downtown Belgrade area at one point scrambled in panic, some tumbling to the ground as they tried to run away. Videos on social media showed riot police beating up some protesters and a footage showed an opposition politician, his head bandaged. Vucic told pro-government Informer television that 'the state will win' as he announced a crackdown on anti-government protesters, accusing them of inciting violence and of being 'enemies of their own country.' He reiterated earlier claims that the protests have been organized from abroad, offering no evidence. The unrest throughout Serbia this week marked a serious escalation in largely peaceful demonstrations led by Serbia's university students that have shaken Vucic's firm grip on power in the Balkan country. Rival groups on Wednesday hurled rock and bottles at each other amid clouds of smoke and chaos. An army security officer at the SNS party offices at one point fired his gun in the air, saying later he felt his life had been in danger. Interior Minister Ivica Dacic on Thursday said there were gatherings at some 90 locations in the country the previous evening. The Serbian president has faced accusations of stifling democratic freedoms and of allowing organized crime and corruption to flourish in the country that is a candidate for European Union membership. He denies those allegations. The EU's Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos said the reports of violence were 'deeply concerning.' 'Advancing on the EU path requires citizens can express their views freely and journalists can report without intimidation or attacks,' Kos added on the social media platform X. Police officers on Wednesday formed a cordon around a makeshift camp of Vucic's loyalists outside the presidency building downtown. Dacic, the interior minister, accused the protesters of attacking governing party loyalists. He said 'those who broke the law will be identified and sanctioned.' University students posted on X to accuse the authorities of trying to 'provoke a civil war with the clashes' at demonstrations. The rallies so far passed for the most part without incident even while drawing hundreds of thousands of people. Occasional violence in the past months mostly involved incidents between protesters and the police, rather than between rival groups. 'Police were guarding the regime loyalists who were throwing rocks and firing flares at the protesters," a post by the informal group, Students in Blockade, said. The account is run by students from across Serbia who have been protesting the government since late last year. Demonstrations started in November after a renovated train station canopy crashed in Novi Sad, killing 16 people and triggering accusations of corruption in state-run infrastructure projects. The protesters are demanding that Vucic call an early parliamentary election, which he has refused to do. Serbia is formally seeking EU membership, but Vucic has maintained strong ties with Russia and China.

Barack Obama Sends Message to Texas Democrats Over Redistricting Battle
Barack Obama Sends Message to Texas Democrats Over Redistricting Battle

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Barack Obama Sends Message to Texas Democrats Over Redistricting Battle

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former President Barack Obama has said he is "so proud" of Texas House Democrats who have fled the Lone Star State to break quorum, preventing the passage of a redistricting bill that would likely give the Republicans another five seats in the national House of Representatives. On Thursday, Obama spoke to rebel lawmakers by video call, a photograph of which was shared on X by the official Texas House Democrats account. This was shared in turn by Obama who added: "I am so proud of the Texas House Democrats and the work that they've done. "Their willingness to put themselves on the line to highlight the current assault on our democracy has set an example for what all of us have to do." Former U.S. President Barack Obama participating in a book talk with former German Chancellor Angela Merkel at The Anthem on December 02, 2024 in Washington, DC. Former U.S. President Barack Obama participating in a book talk with former German Chancellor Angela Merkel at The Anthem on December 02, 2024 in Washington, DC. Kevin Dietsch/GETTY This is a developing story and is being updated.

Judge strikes down Trump administration guidance against diversity programs

timean hour ago

Judge strikes down Trump administration guidance against diversity programs

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the nation's schools and universities. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judges blocked various portions of the Education Department's anti-DEI measures. The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all 'race-based decision-making' or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. It's part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students. The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were 'good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair.' Gallagher, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected the government's argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal. 'It initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished,' Gallagher wrote. Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administration's attack on DEI. 'Threatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administration's war on education, and today the people won,' said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. A statement from the Education Department on Thursday said it was disappointed in the ruling but that 'judicial action enjoining or setting aside this guidance has not stopped our ability to enforce Title VI protections for students at an unprecedented level.' The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. The memo dramatically expanded the government's interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court decision barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding 'race-based preferences' of any kind. 'Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices,' wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the department's Office for Civil Rights. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using 'illegal DEI practices.' Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the government's approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination. The memos drew a wave of backlash from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship. In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing 'unclear and highly subjective' limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to 'choose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution.' standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store