Demonstrators demand overpass at dangerous Carberry intersection
They carried signs that read 'safety not shortcuts,' and 'how many more accidents before they listen.' The group opposes a U-turn option, which is called an RCUT.
Jordan Dickson, 31, one of the organizers, said the RCUT model isn't safe for the farmers and truckers who live in the area.
More than 150 people gathered to protest proposed changes for the Trans-Canada Highway and Highway 5, where 17 people died in a crash in June 2023.
'There's hundreds, if not thousands of trucks … plus all the other everyday passenger traffic coming through here,' she said.
The RCUT model, or restricted crossing U-turn, doesn't exist in Manitoba but is commonly found in the United States. The Carberry RCUT would include U-turns both east and west of the current intersection.
At an open house in late March, a consultant hired by the provincial government said three design options were under consideration, but his presentation focused on the RCUT design because, he said, it is unfamiliar to Manitobans.
Dickson, who lives 30 seconds away from the intersection, said the McCain potato plant southeast of Carberry is the source of a lot of traffic throughout the year, and big vehicles would have a hard time matching the speed on the Trans-Canada before slowing down for a U-turn.
'For all those vehicles to have to merge onto the (Trans-Canada), merge over three lanes, do a U-turn, merge back over — it's a recipe for a disaster,' said Dickson, standing near crosses that have been erected to honour the 17 victims of the June 2023 crash.
They died after their minibus crossed into the eastbound lanes of Highway 1 and was hit by a semi-trailer.
Attendees at the rally said they want an overpass — a much more expensive option — to be built.
The province has said it isn't feasible, but Dickson said cost shouldn't matter.
'How many more lives have to be lost before the province finally realizes that the cost is worth it?' she said.
Kirsten Duguay said her daughter is supposed to start working at the hospital in Neepawa soon and will have to cross the intersection to get to work. She said she's worried about her safety if an RCUT is implemented.
'It makes me nervous that she has to navigate that intersection, possibly after a 12-hour shift where she's tired,' said the 55-year-old Duguay, who is a nurse in Carberry.
A truck driver who said he uses the intersection at least three times a day said he's worried about the RCUT intersection.
'I can tell you right now, your accident rate is going to skyrocket,' said 50-year-old Byron Vanrooyen. 'A truck can't pick up speed fast enough, and the guys with the cars come down here driving at 110, 120 (km/h) — you can't push a truck in there faster.'
Vanrooyen said some tractors can't go faster than 30 km/h when pulling equipment, and they'll be in the way of other traffic.
TIM SMITH / THE BRANDON SUN
Protesters carried signs that read 'safety not shortcuts,' and 'how many more accidents before they listen.' The group opposes a U-turn option, called an RCUT.
'You're going to create more problems, with people having more accidents and more deaths,' he said.
Rally-goers, equipped with a megaphone, said the province surveyed traffic volumes in July, which is among the least busy times of the year. They said the survey should have been conducted in the busy spring or fall seasons.
'The consultants aren't listening. They roll their eyes, they brush us off,' Dickson told the crowd via the megaphone.
Carberry Mayor Ray Muirhead, who wasn't at the rally, said he's 'still on the fence' about which route the province should select.
He said because the province said it won't build an overpass, he prefers the RCUT, as the design is safer than other interchanges. But he also acknowledged that farming equipment, which travels a lot slower than the 100 km/h speed limit, could pose a danger on the busy Trans-Canada.
Muirhead said the province should put the overpass option back on the table, and said the NDP government saying it's too expensive is a way of 'passing the buck off to another government.'
Weekday Mornings
A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day.
He said the rally will draw attention to the issue but he doesn't think it will affect the government's decision.
Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Lisa Naylor, in a statement Thursday, didn't provide an update on which design is favoured.
'The province has conducted extensive community consultations, and no final decision has been made,' said a spokesperson from Naylor's office. 'Work continues on the functional design process and the project remains on schedule.'
Construction is set to begin in early 2026, and should be open to traffic in the fall of 2026.
— Brandon Sun
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
12-08-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Cars and tax fairness
Opinion Let's go car shopping in Manitoba: The first car is a brand-new Ford Mustang Mach-E that costs more than $55,000 and the second is a used 2008 Toyota Corolla for $8,500. Which of these cars do you think comes with a $4,000 cheque from the Manitoba government? It's not the used Corolla. That's right, the Manitoba government has been bankrolling electric vehicle buyers since last year. When someone buys a new EV costing up to $70,000, the government sends them a $4,000 cheque. Used EV buyers can expect $2,500. The government initially was spending $25 million on the subsidy, but in Budget 2025, the government revved up the spending by $14.8 million. That's almost $40 million worth of cheques going to Manitobans who can afford EVs. Like a reverse Robin Hood, the government is taking tax dollars from people who can't afford a new EV and handing it over to wealthier people who can. All the Corolla buyer gets is a seven per cent retail sales tax bill from the provincial government. After the person saved up $8,500 to buy the used Corolla, they will have to fork over about $595 extra to the government. It doesn't matter how many times the used vehicle has been bought and sold and taxed before. Every time a vehicle changes hands in Manitoba, the government sends an RST bill, even if the tax has already been paid multiple times before. And the sale price is not the only thing the government considers when sending you your tax bill. If the government's black book value shows the car is worth more than you paid for it, it sends you an RST bill for that amount, instead of the deal you got. However, if you paid more than the black book value, the government expects an RST cheque for the higher amount. The government doesn't care if you shopped around to find a deal on your latest car, it expects to get its full cut. Manitobans who can afford to purchase a brand-new EV don't need cheques from the government. But Manitobans looking to buy used could definitely use a break on their taxes. That's because the majority of EV owners earn more than $100,000 per year, according to government briefing notes. The average Manitoban earns about $60,000. A quick look at AutoTrader shows more than 200 gas- or diesel-powered vehicles for sale in Manitoba under $10,000. There are less than five used electric vehicles available under that price. However, none of them would even qualify for the government's subsidy because they are more than four years old. And even if you could find a used electric car that's new enough and in your price range, it's unlikely to fit most Manitobans' needs. If you work a job that requires carrying stuff in your vehicle or live somewhere without EV chargers, a used Nissan Leaf compact car isn't going to cut it, regardless of the government subsidy. The federal government doesn't even charge GST on vehicles bought through private sales. Alberta doesn't charge sales tax on any vehicle, because it doesn't have a provincial sales tax. Manitobans aren't usually buying a used Corolla because it's their dream car, they are buying it because it's a necessity to get to work or take their kids to school. It's already ludicrous to get a tax bill when you purchase any necessity, but it is especially unfair when the tax has already been paid on the vehicle, potentially multiple times. And it just adds insult to injury that your wealthy neighbour is getting a $4,000 cheque from the government for their luxury EV purchase. Instead of trying to take as many tax dollars as possible by taxing the same used vehicle multiple times, the government should cancel its multimillion-dollar handout to wealthy EV buyers and axe the sales tax on used vehicles to give buyers a break on their next car purchase. Gage Haubrich is the Prairie director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
Calgary Herald
08-08-2025
- Calgary Herald
Alberta's new auto insurance system lacks clarity on whether or not there will be cost savings: experts
Article content Fred Litwiniuk, chief growth officer at Litco Legal Support Organization, said the numbers can be misleading since they mainly say the maximum amount those in vehicle accidents could receive, but might not. Article content 'They also reference the province of Manitoba in there. I would want to know how much Manitobans actually get paid, versus what the benefits are on paper,' Litwiniuk said. Article content 'People get lured in by the big numbers, because the care-first system numbers that they've outlined, some of the numbers look pretty big. The question is, where's that money going to come from if the insurers are already pleading poverty,' he said. Article content Injury lawyers bracing for impact Article content Officials at a Wednesday technical briefing said the new system reduces the need for litigation because of how high the benefits are. Article content Under the new model, Albertans injured in collisions will only be able to pursue litigation in select cases such as for pain-and-suffering damages if the driver was convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code or Traffic Safety Act, or those who have to pay out of pocket beyond the benefits provided by the policy will also be able to sue the at-fault driver for those expenses. Article content Article content According to the report, by reducing the cost of litigation, Albertans can 'expect to see a stabilization of rates and a reduction in the premiums they pay for third-party liability coverage under their auto insurance policy.' Article content Personal injury lawyer Mark McCourt, who has been advocating against the reforms, said in his 30 years practising at McCourt Law Offices, there has been one person who has received the current maximum $50,000 payment in medical expense benefits. Article content 'There's there's a reason there are lawyers in the system. Lawyers are there to keep wrongdoers honest and with the lawyers out of the picture, the wrongdoers and the representatives of those wrongdoers, in this case insurance companies, are going to be able to act with impunity,' McCourt said. Article content McCourt said once the new system is implemented on Jan. 1, 2027, it could mean the end of the line for his business. Article content Article content 'I don't think my business is going to be able to survive with a 99 per cent decrease in revenues, and that would go for every other injury law firm in the in the province,' McCourt said. Article content Alberta NDP affordability critic Sharif Haji criticized the province's lack of clarity on how the reforms will reduce premiums, despite the government's claims about affordability. Article content Article content
Edmonton Journal
08-08-2025
- Edmonton Journal
Alberta's new auto insurance system lacks clarity on whether or not there will be cost savings: experts
Fred Litwiniuk, chief growth officer at Litco Legal Support Organization, said the numbers can be misleading since they mainly say the maximum amount those in vehicle accidents could receive, but might not. 'They also reference the province of Manitoba in there. I would want to know how much Manitobans actually get paid, versus what the benefits are on paper,' Litwiniuk said. 'People get lured in by the big numbers, because the care-first system numbers that they've outlined, some of the numbers look pretty big. The question is, where's that money going to come from if the insurers are already pleading poverty,' he said. Officials at a Wednesday technical briefing said the new system reduces the need for litigation because of how high the benefits are. Under the new model, Albertans injured in collisions will only be able to pursue litigation in select cases such as for pain-and-suffering damages if the driver was convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code or Traffic Safety Act, or those who have to pay out of pocket beyond the benefits provided by the policy will also be able to sue the at-fault driver for those expenses. According to the report, by reducing the cost of litigation, Albertans can 'expect to see a stabilization of rates and a reduction in the premiums they pay for third-party liability coverage under their auto insurance policy.' Personal injury lawyer Mark McCourt, who has been advocating against the reforms, said in his 30 years practising at McCourt Law Offices, there has been one person who has received the current maximum $50,000 payment in medical expense benefits. 'There's there's a reason there are lawyers in the system. Lawyers are there to keep wrongdoers honest and with the lawyers out of the picture, the wrongdoers and the representatives of those wrongdoers, in this case insurance companies, are going to be able to act with impunity,' McCourt said. McCourt said once the new system is implemented on Jan. 1, 2027, it could mean the end of the line for his business. 'I don't think my business is going to be able to survive with a 99 per cent decrease in revenues, and that would go for every other injury law firm in the in the province,' McCourt said. Alberta NDP affordability critic Sharif Haji criticized the province's lack of clarity on how the reforms will reduce premiums, despite the government's claims about affordability. 'I think taking away the right to sue is problematic … but other than that, it doesn't provide any substantive way to see that how much premiums will go down,' Haji said. Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters . You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun
