Aussie bank chief's brutal Trump call
A big four bank chief economist has accused the White House of 'punching its own economy' in a wide-ranging speech on global growth.
In a speech at the Morningstar conference, Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis took aim at US President Donald Trump's tariff policy and its impact on the global economy.
'It will be a huge growth hit but not a full-blown recession,' she said.
'And that's working on the assumption that just, you know, Trump can stop punching the economy in the face anytime he likes,' she said.
Mr Trump announced on April 2 a global tariff policy on just about every trading partner on the basis on evening up the US trade deficit.
At a minimum, every country, including Australia, faced a 10 per cent tariff, while 'cheating' countries faced higher tariffs.
Mr Trump eventually paused the tariffs for 90 days due to the damage that was being done to his own economy and money markets.
Ms Ellis said the Australian example showed the US tariff policy would not work.
'As we know in Australia, you don't get rich behind a tariff wall,' she said.
Australia's Cash Rate 2022
'It actually is not the recipe for a competitive, innovative manufacturing sector. It's a recipe for people saying every time I find it hard to compete with imports, I'm going to go to the government and ask for more help.'
The economist also forecast that Australia would grow slowly on the back of China hitting its 5 per cent growth target, labelling Australia's economic growth as a 'bit disappointing', which is set to continue even with a rate cut.
According to Westpac, consumer growth will remain sluggish at 1.5 per cent, below the revised 1.9 per cent Reserve Bank target.
'Consumers have been really, really grumpy over the last few years because they've really been copping it in the neck,' Ms Ellis said.
'And while they are still gloomy, and they did take a little bit of a tumble in sentiment after liberation day, we can see that in the daily run of data, the survey was in the field that week, things are a little bit better than what they were two years ago.' Luci Ellis said Australian consumer growth would remain sluggish. NewsWire, Monique Harmer Credit: News Corp Australia
But in welcome news for households, Ms Ellis predicted there would be at least two more interest rate cuts that could help lift consumer spending.
'Obviously, the big news this week is the RBA doing what it needed to do and cutting rates by 25 basis points yesterday,' she said.
'That was what we predicted. That was what the market had priced in.
'We expect two more cuts this year. This has been our longstanding view, coming down to 3.35 per cent by year end, but there's is a chance they do more.'
NED-9175-Australia's GDP
Ms Ellis said Australia's big four drivers of the economy – iron ore, coal, liquefied natural gas and university education – were tapped out but believed there could be new drivers going forward.
'It may surprise you to know that Australia has a $7.5bn dollar export industry called software licensing,' she said.
'That's more than we export in copper metal, in aluminium, in barley or in rice.
'You probably didn't realise that.
'And then I'll mention Canva, Atlassian and WiseTech.
'And you add the two together, add the three together, and that's pretty much most of that 7½ billion.
'It only takes a few winners to suddenly have a whole new export industry.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
39 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Give Trump ‘a new Pine Gap', say experts claiming AUKUS go-slow
AUKUS was announced in 2021, but the government has not picked a nuclear waste site or an east coast submarine base, and there are concerns about the speed of planning for a shipyard in Henderson, Western Australia. Australia made the first of six $US500 million ($770 million) payments to boost the capacity of the US submarine industry earlier this year as part of the $368 billion deal, and has hosted visiting American vessels. The US informed Australia about a 30-day review of the pact weeks ago, which became public on Thursday. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he welcomed the review. 'It's something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do,' he said on the ABC. Senior Australian government sources, not permitted to speak publicly, said the US stood to gain from AUKUS and believed the review might be designed to gain leverage as Washington pushed Australia to spend more on defence. Former US ambassador Joe Hockey said bases should be expanded into locations at which the US could perform large volumes of submarine maintenance to help the US overturn a backlog crippling its ability to keep subs in operation. 'It would be enormously important to the Americans and allow for a significant increase in their capability and deterrence value in the region,' Hockey told this masthead. 'Australia is lagging behind.' The man central to the US' AUKUS review, defence official Elbridge Colby, has previously expressed reservations about handing over nuclear submarines in the early 2030s at the same time as a potential confrontation between China and Taiwan may demand all the US' firepower. Colby has this year made more positive remarks about AUKUS' first pillar. The review was instituted by Colby, not the White House. But Colby's focus on war-readiness in the case of a conflict with China – which is far from guaranteed, and may not draw in Australia – has spurred calls to make the AUKUS deal more useful for its short-term focus on China. Pezzullo, who helmed the 2009 defence white paper, said the Henderson base should be transformed into a joint facility. 'Better still, Australia could establish this shipyard, by treaty, as a joint Australian-US facility, in recognition of its vital role in the alliance, which could be at least as significant as the contribution of the Pine Gap satellite ground station,' he wrote in an article for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think tank last month. In 2023, the Albanese government dismissed Pezzullo for exerting undue political influence under the previous Coalition government. 'Being able to operate routinely in the Indian Ocean without having to transit the congested littoral waters of Southeast Asia and in the Western Pacific in times of tension and conflict is of immense strategic value to the US,' Pezzullo wrote. Such a move would likely be contentious and trigger concerns, particularly on the left, about Australian sovereignty and hewing more closely to the US at a time when Western allies and citizens are growing more doubtful about US President Donald Trump's reliability. Loading But Shoebridge said Australia was already deeply enmeshed in US military architecture via Pine Gap, a critical intelligence facility near Alice Springs, and the presence of US Marines in Darwin, approved by former prime minister Julia Gillard. 'I think it would be getting to a level with Pine Gap,' Shoebridge said, backing the idea of a bigger plan for Henderson and criticising Labor for the speed of decision-making and funding on AUKUS milestones. 'If we're not doing those long lead-time items, how can we still tell the Americans we are serious about AUKUS?'
The Age
39 minutes ago
- The Age
Give Trump ‘a new Pine Gap', say experts claiming AUKUS go-slow
AUKUS was announced in 2021, but the government has not picked a nuclear waste site or an east coast submarine base, and there are concerns about the speed of planning for a shipyard in Henderson, Western Australia. Australia made the first of six $US500 million ($770 million) payments to boost the capacity of the US submarine industry earlier this year as part of the $368 billion deal, and has hosted visiting American vessels. The US informed Australia about a 30-day review of the pact weeks ago, which became public on Thursday. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he welcomed the review. 'It's something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do,' he said on the ABC. Senior Australian government sources, not permitted to speak publicly, said the US stood to gain from AUKUS and believed the review might be designed to gain leverage as Washington pushed Australia to spend more on defence. Former US ambassador Joe Hockey said bases should be expanded into locations at which the US could perform large volumes of submarine maintenance to help the US overturn a backlog crippling its ability to keep subs in operation. 'It would be enormously important to the Americans and allow for a significant increase in their capability and deterrence value in the region,' Hockey told this masthead. 'Australia is lagging behind.' The man central to the US' AUKUS review, defence official Elbridge Colby, has previously expressed reservations about handing over nuclear submarines in the early 2030s at the same time as a potential confrontation between China and Taiwan may demand all the US' firepower. Colby has this year made more positive remarks about AUKUS' first pillar. The review was instituted by Colby, not the White House. But Colby's focus on war-readiness in the case of a conflict with China – which is far from guaranteed, and may not draw in Australia – has spurred calls to make the AUKUS deal more useful for its short-term focus on China. Pezzullo, who helmed the 2009 defence white paper, said the Henderson base should be transformed into a joint facility. 'Better still, Australia could establish this shipyard, by treaty, as a joint Australian-US facility, in recognition of its vital role in the alliance, which could be at least as significant as the contribution of the Pine Gap satellite ground station,' he wrote in an article for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think tank last month. In 2023, the Albanese government dismissed Pezzullo for exerting undue political influence under the previous Coalition government. 'Being able to operate routinely in the Indian Ocean without having to transit the congested littoral waters of Southeast Asia and in the Western Pacific in times of tension and conflict is of immense strategic value to the US,' Pezzullo wrote. Such a move would likely be contentious and trigger concerns, particularly on the left, about Australian sovereignty and hewing more closely to the US at a time when Western allies and citizens are growing more doubtful about US President Donald Trump's reliability. Loading But Shoebridge said Australia was already deeply enmeshed in US military architecture via Pine Gap, a critical intelligence facility near Alice Springs, and the presence of US Marines in Darwin, approved by former prime minister Julia Gillard. 'I think it would be getting to a level with Pine Gap,' Shoebridge said, backing the idea of a bigger plan for Henderson and criticising Labor for the speed of decision-making and funding on AUKUS milestones. 'If we're not doing those long lead-time items, how can we still tell the Americans we are serious about AUKUS?'
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
G7 Summit will be a test of Albanese's diplomatic skill
Donald Trump has thrown another curveball at the US-Australia alliance by launching a Pentagon review of the $368 billion AUKUS trilateral defence pact to determine whether it serves America's national economic and security interests. It's reasonable to question the motives behind the probe. Trump's 'America First Agenda' has already sparked a tariff war and destabilised the international rules-based order. Meanwhile, the president's transactional diplomacy, such as threatening to withdraw US troops from Ukraine and questioning the relevance of longstanding defence alliances, has cast a cloud over America's reliability as a credible security partner.
