Warren Mundine backtracks on ‘disrespectful' gender comments after losing preselection battle to woman
Mundine on Wednesday dismissed any suggestion the Liberal party have a women problem as a 'sideshow'. He told Guardian Australia he now vowed to do everything possible to get Kapterian elected to federal parliament.
Mundine initially congratulated Kapterian on being preselected for the seat of Bradfield but then told ABC news he believed she had triumphed over him because of her gender.
'She is entitled to her views, but I have text messages [from people in the Liberal party] regarding her being a woman,' Mundine said.
Kapterian had denounced Mundine's comments as 'disrespectful'.
Mundine, the once-Labor national president, told the Guardian on Wednesday that gender of candidates would not be a deciding factor for Australians in the upcoming election.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'They couldn't care if you are Arthur or Martha. They just want a candidate who is going to work for them,' Mundine said.
'My focus is we need to get more Liberals in the parliament. Doesn't matter if they're men, women, Aboriginals or whatever.'
Kapterian earlier denounced comments from Mundine that she was preselected for the Liberal-held seat of Bradfield because she is a woman as 'disrespectful'.
Mundine, who was also vying for preselection, initially congratulated Kapterian on her success but later told ABC news he believed she had triumphed over him because of her gender.
'She is entitled to her views, but I have text messages [from people in the Liberal party] regarding her being a woman,' Mundine said.
Kapterian, the Liberals' centrist candidate for Bradfield and a former staffer to Michaelia Cash and Julie Bishop, beat Mundine's preselection bid in the first round of voting earlier this month, 207 votes to his 171.
Kapterian had gained support from senior Liberals – including the deputy opposition leader, Sussan Ley, former Liberal treasurer Joe Hockey and former NSW premier Gladys Berejiklian – to represent the party in its fight against a popular teal candidate at the upcoming federal election.
'I think to suggest I was selected for any reason other than on my merit is disrespectful not only to me and my preselectors, but also for the process itself,' Kapterian told the ABC.
Mundine had been backed by fellow leading anti-voice campaigners, including the former Liberal prime minister Tony Abbott.
Mundine, who lives in the Bradfield electorate, said that Kapterian would be his number one pick at the polls. 'I'll fight for her to be elected. I'll do everything that's physically possible.'
Bradfield was the only Liberal-held electorate in the country to return a majority yes vote in the voice referendum.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
On Wednesday, Angus Taylor backed the preselection process, saying Kapterian had won through a 'democratic plebiscite process' based on merit.
'I believe firmly in merit, and what I absolutely love about the democratic process we went through for Bradfield … is that they're democratic processes where our members get to choose the person they want as their candidate and to represent them in this seat,' he said.
The Liberal party quietly adopted a 50-50 gender target in 2016. It was reinforced in 2022 after a post-election report by Jane Hume and former federal Liberal director Brian Loughnane recommended the party reach 50-50 representation in parliament by 2032.
But efforts to achieve gender parity have been thwarted after the retirements of a number of senior women, plummeting the gender split to decade lows.
Women account for less than a third of the party's federal representation with nine MPs in the lower house and 10 in the Senate.
But Hume said Kapterian's preselection for Bradfield showed the party's plans to increase gender representation were working.
'It's really important that we have women representing us in the Liberal party at parliamentary level, but also at an organisational level too, pushing them through the race, through to those senior roles,' she said on Wednesday.
Bradfield has only ever been held by the Liberals but is fighting off a plummeting primary vote against the rise of independent candidate Nicolette Boele.
At the 2022 election Fletcher held the blue-ribbon Bradfield with a 4.23% margin, suffering a 15.3% swing against him, after a strong showing from Boele, who achieved 20.89% of the primary vote.
Fletcher, who is retiring from politics, previously held Bradfield on a safe margin of 16.6%.
Guardian Australia reached out to Abbott, who declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Australia's crackdown on free speech makes Britain look moderate
It seems Australia's headlong rush into nanny-state authoritarianism continues unabated. Following on from its vaunted under-16s social media restriction legislation last year, the Labor government led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is extending the ban to YouTube under the guise of 'protecting children'. There is a significant body of research that suggests social media is driving a mental health crisis in young people. Cyberbullying is causing children tragically to take their own lives. In fact, Facebook's own internal research, leaked by a whistleblower, concluded that 'Teens blame Instagram for increases in the rate of anxiety and depression … This reaction was unprompted and consistent across all groups.' However, banning it totally for everyone under 16 amounts to a wrong-headed approach to a problem, a Trojan horse for something much more sinister. How the legislation is drafted amounts to the creation of a backdoor to controlling the internet, and gives sweeping powers to an unelected bureaucrat – the e-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant – to decide what is 'reasonable' for platforms to collect and enforce. Inman Grant is the last person to whom any extra power should be given. A US House Judiciary Committee report in June accused her of coordinating with major advertisers and national governments through the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) to 'silence American speech', particularly targeting Right-of-centre viewpoints, suggestions that Grant has denied. In a speech given to the World Economic Forum in 2022, Inman Grant asserted: 'We're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, from freedom of speech to the freedom […] to be free from online violence.' Challenged about this afterwards, American-born Inman Grant responded dismissively by stating that 'the First Amendment doesn't apply in Australia.' Last year, she tried to institute a worldwide ban of video footage of the terrible stabbing attack on Assyrian Christian Bishop Mari Emmanuel while he was giving a sermon to his congregation in a suburban Sydney church, only backing down after an international outcry. Just a couple of weeks ago, Inman Grant had a significant loss in Australia's Administrative Review Tribunal, when Canadian man Chris Elston (more commonly known as 'Billboard Chris') successfully stopped her from censoring him on X. Her attempts to impose a $782,500 fine on X for alleged 'cyber abuse' were also thrown out. In handing down its decision, the Tribunal delivered a subtle rebuke to Inman Grant, declaring: 'The role of the Tribunal is not to assess the merits of what the applicant posted, or to agree or disagree with the views he expressed.' Now, on her recommendation, the Albanese government wants to ban YouTube for kids under 16. This is despite Communications Minister Anika Wells saying back in 2022 that it was a great way to keep her kids entertained. To enforce this ban, the supposed 'voluntary' digital ID will not be so voluntary after all. Australians will be asked to upload personal documents, submit facial scans, and hand over sensitive data to unaccountable third parties to prove their age. Thanks to the UK Online Safety Act, we are getting a working demonstration of how, hidden behind the concerns for children's welfare, there is in fact what could be described as a politicised attempt to radically extend government control over platforms which shape social discourse. The Online Safety Act, designed to supposedly 'protect kids from porn by asking them to prove their age', has been used to censor political discussion by British adults. As noted by the Spectator, the Act 'is not being used to shut down Pornhub or xHamster for adolescents, but to silence discussion – or even basic news – about those topics most awkward for the British government: Pakistani rape gangs, illegal immigration, protests about asylum hotels.' Seemingly that is how politicians and bureaucrats view social media – as a place to propagate their politics and manipulate voters. They know that most people under the age of 35 get their information and views not from traditional media, but from social media. Navigating these sites is a matter of parental choice – and parents should not be outsourcing their responsibilities to the government. As it is, the word 'parent' isn't even mentioned once in the Australian social media ban legislation. If the government really was interested in doing something positive to address social media addiction, it would look at tackling the algorithms, which are often designed to get kids addicted. We have no idea how these algorithms work, what content they promote, or how they are impacting young people. This ban is less about online safety for kids and more about online safety for the political and bureaucratic class. An unacceptable dystopia awaits Australia in December.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Use of AI could worsen racism and sexism in Australia, human rights commissioner warns
AI risks entrenching racism and sexism in Australia, the human rights commissioner has warned, amid internal Labor debate about how to respond to the emerging technology. Lorraine Finlay says the pursuit of productivity gains from AI should not come at the expense of discrimination if the technology is not properly regulated. Finlay's comments follow Labor senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah breaking ranks to call for all Australian data to be 'freed' to tech companies to prevent AI perpetuating overseas biases and reflect Australian life and culture. Ananda-Rajah is opposed to a dedicated AI act but believes content creators should be paid for their work. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Productivity gains from AI will be discussed next week at the federal government's economic summit, as unions and industry bodies raise concerns about copyright and privacy protections. Media and arts groups have warned of 'rampant theft' of intellectual property if big tech companies can take their content to train AI models. Finlay said a lack of transparency in what datasets AI tools are being trained on makes it difficult to identify which biases it may contain. 'Algorithmic bias means that bias and unfairness is built into the tools that we're using, and so the decisions that result will reflect that bias,' she said. 'When you combine algorithmic bias with automation bias – which is where humans are more likely to rely on the decisions of machines and almost replace their own thinking – there's a real risk that what we're actually creating is discrimination and bias in a form where it's so entrenched, we're perhaps not even aware that it's occurring.' The Human Rights Commission has consistently advocated for an AI act, bolstering existing legislation, including the Privacy Act, and rigorous testing for bias in AI tools. Finlay said the government should urgently establish new legislative guardrails. 'Bias testing and auditing, ensuring proper human oversight review, you [do] need those variety of different measures in place,' she said. There is growing evidence that there is bias in AI tools in Australia and overseas, in areas such as medicine and job recruitment. An Australian study published in May found job candidates being interviewed by AI recruiters risked being discriminated against if they spoke with an accent or were living with a disability. Ananda-Rajah, who was a medical doctor and researcher in AI before entering parliament, said it was important for AI tools to be trained on Australian data, or risk perpetuating overseas biases. While the government has stressed the need for protecting intellectual property, she warned that not opening up domestic data would mean Australia would be 'forever renting [AI] models from tech behemoths overseas' with no oversight or insight into their models or platforms. 'AI must be trained on as much data as possible from as wide a population as possible or it will amplify biases, potentially harming the very people it is meant to serve,' Ananda-Rajah said. 'We need to free our own data in order to train the models so that they better represent us. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'I'm keen to monetise content creators while freeing the data. I think we can present an alternative to the pillage and plunder of overseas.' Ananda-Rajah raised skin cancer screening by AI as an example where the tools used for testing have been shown to have algorithmic bias. Ananda-Rajah said the way to overcome any bias or discrimination against certain patients would be to train 'these models on as much diverse data from Australia as possible', with appropriate protections for sensitive data. Finlay said any release of Australian data should be done in a fair way but she believes the focus should be on regulation. 'Having diverse and representative data is absolutely a good thing … but it's only one part of the solution,' she said. 'We need to make sure that this technology is put in place in a way that's fair to everybody and actually recognises the work and the contributions that humans are making.' An AI expert at La Trobe university and former data researcher at an AI company, Judith Bishop, said freeing up more Australian data could help train AI tools more appropriately – while warning AI tools developed overseas using international data may not reflect the needs of Australians – but that it was a small part of the solution. 'We have to be careful that a system that was initially developed in other contexts is actually applicable for the [Australian] population, that we're not relying on US models which have been trained on US data,' Bishop said. The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, is also concerned by the lack of transparency around the data AI tools use. In a statement, she said tech companies should be transparent about their training data, develop reporting tools and must use diverse, accurate and representative data in their products. 'The opacity of generative AI development and deployment is deeply problematic,' Inman Grant said. 'This raises important questions about the extent to which LLMs [large language models] could amplify, even accelerate, harmful biases – including narrow or harmful gender norms and racial prejudices. 'With the development of these systems concentrated in the hands of a few companies, there's a real risk that certain bodies of evidence, voices and perspectives could be overshadowed or sidelined in generative outputs.'
Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Senator Fatima Payman delivers brutal four-word message to Anthony Albanese after being vindicated for quitting Labor over Palestine
Fatima Payman, who sensationally quit Labor over its stance on Gaza, has demanded an apology from Anthony Albanese after he announced the Australian government would recognise Palestinian statehood. The Prime Minister revealed on Monday that Australia would recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations next month, following similar commitments made by other Western allies including the UK, France and Canada. Senator Payman, who defied Labor in June 2024 by voting with the Greens to call for the recognition of Palestinian statehood, said she was 'absolutely thrilled' by Monday's announcement, claiming it was vindication for her decision to defy Albanese. 'Having to cross the floor to vote for such an important issue and then having to endure the resulting fallout from Labor and some in the community was one of the most stressful moments of my life,' Senator Payman said in a media release. 'But it is terrific to know that Labor has finally caught up and that my move has been vindicated.' Senator Payman was forgiving of her former boss, Albanese, claiming she was now 'sanguine' over his decision to 'indefinitely suspend' her for 'disrespecting' the Labor Party caucus. But that same magnanimity was not matched in Senator Payman's social media comments section, after she shared a buoyant where she claimed that Albanese's long-awaited announcement proved she was 'on the right side of history'. Responding to a critic who asked if she would 'now apologise to Albo and beg to be allowed back in the party', Senator Payman did not mince her words. 'Why would I do that lol?', she responded, in her trademark 'youth-speak'. 'I stuck by the Labor Party Platform and did right by the members. He owes me an apology.' A spokesperson for Senator Payman told the Daily Mail she has not heard anything from the Prime Minister's office or any one within Labor's senior ranks. Treasurer Jim Chalmers was asked on Wednesday morning whether Senator Payman had now been vindicated in her decision to quit Labor but dodged the question. 'I always think that whether it's Senator Payman or others, we're better off working for change within the party, rather than sitting outside the party,' Chalmers told ABC RN. 'She doesn't have an identical view to the government on this still, and this government works through issues in a considered, consultative and methodical way, and that's why we've made this announcement that we made earlier in the week.' 'I haven't spoken to Senator Payman about it, or heard any public commentary from her. 'No doubt there's been some. But we work through these issues in our own way, on our own, in our own time, and that's what's seen the progress delivered this week.' Senator Payman, who is in the process of founding her own party, said that recognition of Palestinian statehood was only the first step. 'Now we need sanctions on Israel, an end to the arms trade, full transparency in our trade relationships, and recognition of the Palestinian right to return,' she added. 'Only then can recognition be matched with the meaningful action Palestinians deserve.' Labor's long-awaited announcement triggered a flurry of furious criticism from Israel and Jewish groups, who accused them of playing into Hamas 's hands by 'effectively 'rewarding terrorism'. However, Albanese hit back, accusing the Israeli government of presiding over a 'completely unacceptable' situation whereby Gazans are dying of starvation. Albanese said that when he spoke to Netanyahu last Thursday, the Israeli Prime Minister made the same argument that he had made a year ago. 'That if we just had more military action in Gaza, somehow that will produce a different outcome,' Albanese told the ABC. 'What it's producing is more and more innocent lives being lost. More and more violence. More and more destitution that we're seeing play out with the starvation that has occurred in Gaza.' Albanese accused Netanyahu of being 'in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people'. Labor's support for Palestinian statehood is contingent on Hamas playing no role in any future government, free elections being held and demilitarisation of the region. However, serious doubts have been raised about the faith Albanese is placing in the 89-year-old Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas, who has not faced election since 2005 in the notoriously corrupt West Bank, has also promised to end 'pay to slay' rewards for terrorists and their families. However, Jewish groups have pointed out that he has a notorious track record of breaking promises.
