Murder dramas are everywhere, but this meticulous German one is outstanding
The Black Forest Murders ★★★★
There are no sirens. Adapted from real-life events, this German crime drama operates with a quiet urgency. The momentum is constant, as detectives in the country's rural south attempt to solve the horrifying murder of a young woman, even as circumstances escalate, but the focus is their meticulous, unrelenting investigation. There are no grand deductive leaps, no cat-and-mouse interviews with a prime suspect. This is a gripping procedural founded on detail and diligence.
'The odds are in our favour,' reasons police detective Thomas Reidle (Tilman Strauss) to his senior partner, Barbara Kruger (Nina Kunzendorf), after they have begun investigating the murder of Stefanie Burghoff (Lara Kimpel), a jogger who never returned from her weekend run through the village's rolling hills and vineyards.
But his optimism is difficult to maintain, and this show emphasises the tenaciousness – to spot gaps, make difficult requests, motivate tiring officers – that is required. The case is like the jigsaw on Kruger's dinner table: 1000 tiny unsolved pieces.
Loading
The four episodes of this limited series were adapted from Soko Erle, a 2016 non-fiction book by police officer Walter Roth, who worked as the media liaison officer on a taskforce assembled to investigate a prominent murder. The show's writers, Robert Hummel and Martina Mouchot, have changed names and circumstances from the book, to avoid directly reminding the victim's family and their community of what transpired, but they have kept the granular steps the police went through.
Early on, as the case's scope widens after there's no immediate resolution, database scans are assigned. But a junior officer points out a problem they have to get around: the various German states use different IT systems, and they're not all readily compatible. At various points the authorities have nothing new to work on, so they have to go back and redo previous steps, hoping something was overlooked. You watch as officers examine a hedge with magnifying glasses, looking for minute traces.
Given the literally microscopic detail, when progress is made it's thrilling. Murder dramas are ubiquitous on our screens, but as with Netflix's outstanding Swedish series The Breakthrough, the day-to-day persistence here is fascinating. Kruger and Reidle take shape through the prosaic reality of their work: professional, but never impersonal. Their outside lives seep in via unorthodox but plausible means. At one point Reidle, who has a growing family, casually asks Kruger if her widowed father is looking to sell his house.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
The six major swipes Meghan Markle took at the royal family up until June
Meghan Markle stepped down as a working member of the British royal family more than five years ago, but she continues to take brutal swipes at the firm. In fact, the Duchess of Sussex has publicly made no less than six jabs at her husband Prince Harry's family this year, and it's only June. Meghan's return to Instagram on New Year's Day, her first time back on social media since 2018, provided the main platform for her many prods. The Duchess's Netflix lifestyle cooking show, With Love, Meghan, and her podcast, Confessions of a Female Founder, served as her accomplices. Here's a look back at ten times Meghan made a not-so-subtle stab at her estranged in-laws this year. Passionately parched In February, Meghan unveiled the launch of her lifestyle brand, As Ever, previously American Riveria Orchard, through an Instagram video. The Duchess suggested the firm previously prevented her from sharing her passions during her time as a working royal. "Cat's out of the bag," Meghan, who cut a casual figure in jeans, said in the clip. "I'm shocked we've been able to keep this a secret for so long." Meghan said those who followed her axed lifestyle blog The Tig in 2014 would know she has "always loved cooking and crafting and gardening". "This is what I do, and I haven't been able to share it in the same way for the past few years, but now, I can," she said. Cryptic contempt All eight episodes of Meghan's awaited lifestyle series With Love, Meghan debuted on Netflix on March 4 and appeared to be riddled with swipes. The Duchess's first reference to her exit from royal life came in the first episode as she introduced her first guest, makeup artist Daniel Martin. '(Daniel) has just been in my life for the before, during and after , shall we say,' Meghan said cryptically. Free from constraint While the ex-working royal appeared to steer clear from directly slamming the royal family in her show, viewers were quick to find small clues in the episodes about the Duchess's current feelings towards her in-laws. In one episode, the Duchess appeared to hint at her frustration towards the constraints of her former life and suggested she lacked 'creativity' during her brief stint as a working royal. 'I just want to raise a glass to you guys. This feels like a new chapter that I'm so excited that I'm able to share, and I've been able to learn from all of you," she said. 'And here we go, there's a business! All of that is part of that creativity that I've missed so much.' In the trenches In April, Meghan opened up about the early days of her relationship with Harry in her first-ever podcast appearance with friend Jamie Kern Lima. The Duchess used the moment to make a jab at the media intrusion the couple endured when they publicly confirmed their relationship in 2016. She claimed she and the Duke were "in the trenches" in those early days. "You have to imagine, at the beginning, it's all butterflies – but then we immediately went into the trenches together," she told Kern Lima on the The Jamie Kern Lima Show. "Right out of the gate, like six months into dating." Sky News presenter Gabriella Power discussed the moment with To Di For Podcast host Kinsey Schofield, who called the characterisation "absurd" and "over-the-top". Working woes In an interview with the New York Times in April, Meghan appeared to make another dig at the firm as she responded to a question about work. "I need to work, and I love to work," the Duchess said of why she continues to put herself in the public eye despite facing criticism. Prince Harry's wife said she had worked from the age of thirteen, only stopping when she became engaged to Prince Harry in 2016 and quit her job as an actress. Vexed over visions In the seventh episode of her Confessions of a Female Founder podcast, Prince Harry's wife was joined by Cassandra Morales Thurswell, founder of the beauty brand Kitsch, and the pair discussed all things business. They covered "how grit, intentional design, and a scrappy mindset were essential in transforming a humble start into a thriving global business". Speaking about balancing motherhood and business, Meghan appeared to take a swipe at the monarchy and her short stint as a working royal. 'Before I was a mum, I'm going to give a speech with a baby on my hip. I had a whole vision,' she said. 'Then you fast forward, granted I had a lot of external things happening by the time I had both pregnancies and (both) babies. 'But it was not the way (that) I envisioned it."
Sky News AU
15 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'The show is not being cancelled': Seven denies Sonia Kruger in trouble after debunking reports Dancing With The Stars not renewed
Channel 7 has publicly denied reports that Dancing With The Stars Australia will not be renewed after speculation the cancellation could impact the show's hosts Sonia Kruger and Dr Chris Brown. Dancing With The Stars is set to return to Channel 7 next week with 12 popular Australian celebrities set to tackle the foxtrot. Kruger, 59, is reportedly under contract with Seven for over $1 million a year and currently hosts The Voice and Dancing With The Stars. The TV star, who began her career as a ballroom dancer and appeared in the iconic film Strictly Ballroom, has been closely associated with the dance series since it first aired on Seven in 2004. However, the TV star could soon be down to just one gig at Seven amid reports the upcoming season of the long-running dance competition series will be its last. A TV insider who spoke to claimed Seven was 'tipped to axe' Dancing With The Stars because the show is too expensive to produce. Seven's decision to 'revive' the show in 2021 was reportedly at the centre of contract negotiations to woo Kruger back from Channel 9. The contract, which made Kruger one of the highest-paid women in Aussie TV, also included gigs on the now-cancelled Holey Moley and Big Brother. If true, Kruger will be down to just her hosting duties on The Voice to justify her seven figure salary, a rarity in the industry amid a massive drop in viewers and advertising revenue in free-to-air. In a statement to the Daily Mail, Seven debunked reports that Dancing With The Stars will not return to screens in 2026 and insisted 'the show is not being cancelled'. Nine gave Kruger her first on-air presenting role on the series Wonder World! in the 1990s before she moved over to Seven to work as an entertainment reporter. In 2011, Kruger joined Nine for the second time where she hosted the morning program Mornings alongside David Campbell and its successor Today Extra, as well as Big Brother and The Voice. Kruger was rehired by Seven in 2019 by then-CEO James Warburton, who she infamously called 'God' in her Gold Logie acceptance speech. Despite decades of experience, Kruger was only nominated for the Bert Newton Award for Most Popular Presenter at the Logie Awards for the first time in 2022. She was first nominated for the Gold Logie Award for Most Popular Personality on Australian Television in 2022 and won the top gong in 2023.
Man of Many
16 hours ago
- Man of Many
Charlie Vickers on ‘The Survivors', Building Character and Coming Home
By Dean Blake - News Published: 6 June 2025 |Last Updated: 4 June 2025 Share Copy Link Readtime: 10 min Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here. Charlie Vickers is on the rise. After an impressively devilish rendition of Middle-Earth's Sauron in Rings of Power, the Aussie actor is returning home to star in Netflix's The Survivors: an adaptation of Jane Harper's novel of the same name that focuses on the small, coastal town of Evelyn Bay and a series of deaths that echo through the years. In some ways, The Survivors was a particularly personal project for Vickers, who saw his own echoes in the show—a big-town man returning to his small-town roots—and who connected with the inherent Australianness of it all. Since studying acting at the College of Speech and Drama in London, Vickers has been largely living overseas, and the opportunity to return home, especially for a script he felt excited by, was too good to pass up. We caught up with Vickers ahead of The Survivors launch on Netflix on 6 June to talk though what drew him to the project, how he got started in acting, and what it was like coming back to Australia. Charlie Vickers in 'The Survivors' | Image: Netflix To start with, I wanted to get an idea of what it was about The Survivors that got you excited. What sold you on being a part of it? I love shows that adapt novels, really. The Survivors is a novel that I hadn't read, but I'd read a few other books by Jane Harper and this just sounded like a really fun adventure to be able to go on. So when I had the opportunity to potentially do it, I thought, 'It's in Tasmania, I grew up in Melbourne, but I'd somehow never been to Tasmania,' and being able to work with a whole bunch of new, amazing people and having Tony in charge of the whole project got me really excited. Also, just being able to be part of an Australian story. It's quintessentially Australian. I live in the UK now so I want to do as many Australian projects as possible, and this was such an enticing opportunity, really. The character of the town, although it's fictional, its kind of its own character in this story, and being able to film so much of it on location got me really excited. I also thought the story was interesting, and the way the script adapted the novel made me quite interested. It's quite cool seeing small-town Australia highlighted—I wanted to ask about that. Was that part of the charm for you? Is that something that reminds you of your childhood in Australia? In a way, it is . There are a huge amount of similarities between Tasmania and Victoria, and I grew up in a small coastal town exactly like . It's funny, the character of Kieran is still quite far away from who I am but he's also returning from a big city, in his case Sydney, to his childhood town, and there was a bit of familiarity there for me. I live overseas in a big city and often find myself coming back to my small, coastal town, and I think my son was about 6 months old when I was filming this, and he has a 4 month old, so there was a lot of 'world's colliding'. Having the opportunity to tell a story set in a coastal town, and you have all the dynamics . I was watching the show with my brother the other day, and he said 'god, some of these characters feel like they could be from our home town', it's crazy. Charlie Vickers in 'The Survivors' | Image: Netflix I wanted to get an idea of what you look for in a role? There's no shared characteristics of any roles , I often look for something that when I read it I get inspired, or I get excited by the idea of doing it. These roles can be completely different, but the thing they share is that I think I can bring something to the project: it has to ignite my imagination, reading it. Those kinds of jobs are few and far between, that make you excited, and this was one of those jobs. I've played quite a lot of villains in my career so far, but that's just coincidental and because of the material I've been given. How do you find your characters? When you're given a script or a treatment, how do you go about turning those words into action? For me, I try to keep it as simple as possible. I don't properly believe in the idea of 'character'. It's useful to use it in terms of referring to the character of Kieran, for example, but his 'character' is just the sum of a whole bunch of little moments. So I try not to look at things through a wide-angle lens, you know? And sometimes I watch the final product of things and find that 'oh wow, he's an entirely different person to how I had imagined him', because I tend to approach it from a moment to moment basis, and react to the circumstances he's in, and try to play to each moment truthfully, and then that paints a bigger picture of this character's life during the time period on screen. The only thing you have to be mindful of, I guess, is to think of the journey of the character throughout the show, but the specificity of each moment we see creates the 'character', I think. Charlie Vickers in 'The Survivors' | Image: Netflix Beyond being able to come back to Australia, what was the highlight of the filming process for The Survivors? There were so many. I loved being able to be in a really special place, Tasmania, that I'd never been to, with a whole bunch of amazing actors and creatives. To be able to work with these people made it an amazing experience: Actors that I've watched since I was a kid on screen. People like Damien or Robyn or Catherine and then there's this whole other amazing generation of actors like Yerin , Jess , Thom and George , and I think that's what I really love about projects. I've been really fortunate in my career in that you can just kind of go somewhere for six months and work on something and be fully immersed in the world of whatever you're doing, and then you get to move on and some of the relationships endure. That's the lasting memory of working in Tasmania : the combination of the location and the people. It was probably really good to have that filming location be somewhere you'd never been but also being very familiar in a way. Exactly, I don't know why I'd never been to Tasmania, but it really does feel different. There's an atmospheric quality to that place that is inherent, just when you're walking around. The energy there can be heavy, and I'm sure that's what Jane was trying to tap into when she wrote the novel. You mentioned earlier that you've enjoyed doing adaptations of novels, and you've done quite a few of them at this point: is there any book adaptations that you'd love to work on? I love Tim Winton's novels, and I read The Shepherds Hut recently, and also The Riders, and Eyrie, which is about a retired climate worker that lives in Freemantle, and I just think his stories are so evocatively written and I'd love to be a part of an adaptation of one of those novels on screen. I think they're pretty rarely adapted, though, and the adaptation process to take a novel to screen is often a really complex one. Those novels, when I read them, I really connected to a few of the characters and thought it'd be really cool to be a part of. I love imagining the world, that's part of the amazing thing about reading books. Charlie Vickers in 'The Survivors' | Image: Netflix You've worked in a few genres so far – is there anything you'd want to do that you haven't been given the chance to yet? It's quite a boring answer, but I'm lucky that I've been given the chance to work on bigger productions and smaller productions and things that are in pretty wildly contrasting genres that I don't really have that itch to do anything in particular. I just kind of want to work on stories that are exciting, the genre could be anything, really. If it's something that creatively inspires me, I'd be keen to do it, but there's no particular world I want to jump into anymore: which is nice, it's a nice place to be. How did you get started in acting? I did a lot of plays at school. I remember being in year 12, and I was playing Richard the 3rd in our school production of it, and it was the same year it was being done by the Melbourne Theatre Company, and Ewen Leslie was playing Richard the 3rd, and I remember going to see it and just thinking 'wow, that's so much better than what I'm doing', and thinking 'I'd love to be able to do that one day'. I remember that moment of 'wouldn't it be cool to be an actor', but then I never found it to be an accessible path. I think I was afraid. I knew you could go and audition for drama school, it just didn't seem to be a thing that was in my world, it didn't feel possible to me: getting in to a drama school and then going on to be an actor, so I didn't do it for a few years after school finished. In those intervening years I was studying a music/business degree, and while I loved uni and being around my mates and that whole period of my life, but I was really just treading water. I had no idea what I was doing, and throughout Uni I was doing amateur theatre productions. Melbourne Uni has this amazing theatre called the Union Theatre, so I did a lot of work there. Eventually, I drummed up the courage to do it, and that changed my life. I thought, maybe I should just have a go at trying for a drama school because I really didn't know what I was doing. The school I went to, the Central School of Speech and Drama in London, they come and do audition weekends in Sydney, and I decided I was going to go to it. I flew up and didn't tell anyone because I was afraid of telling people I auditioned and I didn't get in, so I did the audition over a weekend and then found out six weeks later that I'd got in, and then had to decide whether I wanted to uproot my life or did I want to wait until the end of the year and maybe try some of the Australian schools. But when you get into a drama school, it's so unlikely in the first place that I just thought I have to take this opportunity – it might not happen again. So yeah, I moved to London, and that was really the moment the direction of my life changed. The Survivors launches exclusively on Netflix on 6 June.
