logo
Doom: The Dark Ages review: thrilling prequel goes too big too fast

Doom: The Dark Ages review: thrilling prequel goes too big too fast

Digital Trends09-05-2025
Doom: The Dark Ages
MSRP
$70.00
Score Details 'Doom: The Dark Ages has plenty of thrills, but it could stand to take its foot off the gas.'
Pros Doom Slayer gets his due
Excellent combat
Intricate level design
Looks fantastic
Cons Convoluted lore story
Underwhelming mech and dragon missions
Dynamically flat action throughout
Table of Contents
Table of Contents Year One Primal violence Bigger doesn't mean better
Just a few missions into Doom: The Dark Ages, I felt like I'd reached the apex of action games. There I was behind the controls of an enormous Atlan mech, eclipsing the kind of battleground that felt enormous to me moments before. The sky above me was scorched. Buildings turned to ruins under my feet. One by one, an army of demonic kaiju ate my metallic fists. How can it get any bigger and badder than this?
Recommended Videos
It doesn't — and that's both the gift and curse of the Doom Slayer's latest saga.
In an attempt to one up the already hellacious shooter series, one that reached new adrenaline highs in 2020's Doom: Eternal, developer Id Software turns every dial up to 11 from right Chapter 1. The battles are faster and more ferocious. Hidden lore becomes glitzy cutscenes. Our hero rides a mechadragon, for God's sake. Every single piece of it is an exercise in maximalist escalation, trying to find a ceiling to a timeless shooter hyper violent glory. It reaches that height, but comes up against a hard truth: There's nothing left to climb once you've reached the top.
Doom: The Dark Ages delivers another dose of reliable thrills by building on the foundation established by its excellent predecessors. The power fantasy of it all is more potent than ever, but Id Software's experiment in excess proves that there is such a thing as 'too much' when it comes to video game spectacle.
Year One
Rather than picking up where Eternal left off, The Dark Ages is a prequel to Id Software's rebooted Doom series. It acts as a Doom Slayer origin story that draws inspiration from Batman: Year One, Frank Miller's gritty tale about The Dark Knight's first year on the job. That approach lays the groundwork for the most narrative-focused Doom game to date, complete with big cutscenes. It's analogous to the jump from Metroid Prime to Metroid Prime 3: Corruption. The latter built on Retro Studio's famously atmospheric adventure by ratcheting up the lore and introducing a large cast of characters to deliver it all in dialogue. The Dark Ages does the same for Doom with mixed results.
The idea is that it all takes place in Doom's own medieval era, where humans fight a war against demons with crossbows, flails, and — you guessed it — shotguns. It's a fun enough gimmick that allows Id Software to imagine more primitive versions of classic weapons, but the tale under that schtick is Doom's most incomprehensible chapter to date. New characters who are never properly introduced spend cinematics rattling off proper nouns that never really mean anything to me. A lot of money went into creating a story that more or less just boils down to 'There's a war happening between humans and demons.'
More successful is its characterization of the Doom Slayer. While previous installments paint him as an all-powerful killer who's always in control, he's initially a tool here. The origin story involves him being reduced to a living weapon whose personality is electrified out of his body in order to give him a one-track mind that's hyper focused on demon killing. It's a clever meta twist that turns the character's usually thin persona and turns it into a source of pain that drives him down a more layered path of revenge and destruction. A few key sequences that show his humanity cut through an otherwise convoluted word soup.
The Dark Ages goes full Hollywood …
I can understand the instinct here. Doom has always been one of those deceptively deep series. To the average player, it might seem like there's not much more to it than guns and guts. Deep fans will tell you that there's much more beneath the surface, and The Dark Ages feels like it's built to finally reward that audience. In delivering that, Id loses something special about the series. There's a certain mystique to old games that were light on in-game story. They were often sparse and atmospheric, leaving players' imaginations to fill the negative space. Only the most dedicated fans would crawl down the rabbit hole, finding secret lore hidden away in books or cassette tapes. Those scattered tidbits gave games like Doom a sense of hidden history, turning fans into archivists who could trade their findings with one another.
The bigger Doom gets, the smaller its world actually feels. Wet concrete seeps into every gap, creating a solidified record of history that's the same for every player. Even the little details are enshrined in in-game Codex entries. 2016's Doom reboot found a happy medium, retaining a sparse and sleek story while still expanding the lore. The Dark Ages goes full Hollywood and feels a little less special for it.
Primal violence
The expanded scope is detrimental to areas of The Dark Ages, but it does wonders for its core action. If Eternal was all about showcasing the Doom Slayer's agility, this installment is all about power. The basics of shooting remain the same from the 2016 reboot. I rip and tear through enemies with an arsenal of oversized weapons, no reloading required. Battles are fast-paced and heavy, requiring me to constantly stay on the move while also remaining in the heat of battle in order to refill my health through gory finishers. Anytime my finger isn't pressing down the trigger, I'm wasting my time.
The Dark Ages still does all that while layering in a wealth of new systems that make for the series' most involved combat system yet. First, there's my trusty Shield Saw. I can toss it like Captain America's shield to cut through weak enemies or hold it steady to parry incoming attacks. The latter is especially impactful as it gives me even more confidence to stand tall in the center of the action instead of running for cover. Performing a perfect parry will also trigger my selected Shield Rune, which punishes any enemy who dares to lash out at me. My rune of choice was a shoulder turret that would activate on each block, letting me spray more lead out as an act of vengeance.
It's a primal kind of violence.
Similarly, there's a greater emphasis on melee attacks this time too. By the end of the campaign, I'm able to equip one of three melee weapons: gauntlets, a flail, or a spiked mace. Each one has its own speed and power, but each easily allows me to chip armor off of enemies and get some of my own for the trouble. It's another incentive to get up close and personal, doling out three-hit combos to buff up defenses while leaving my enemies defenseless. Systems like that successfully build on Eternal's puzzle-like combat, which was built around using the right move to top off the right resource. The only difference is that I'm even more of a menace.
Those new ideas pair nicely with The Dark Ages new guns, which ratchet the chaos up even more. Some of them are your average Doom weapons, from Super Shotguns to plasma rifles. Each weapon has two modes that can be swapped between on the fly and each has its own small upgrade tree. The best guns in the batch are the Slayer's new medieval-flavored tools, which really pay off the absurdity of the setting. One primitive tool throws a skull into a grinder and shoots the shards out in a wide spread. My personal favorite is a ball and chain that can be charged up, fired, and retracted. It feels incredibly powerful and just a little slapstick as it bonks demons. That's exactly the kind of energy I look for in modern Doom games.
What's impressive is just how natural the juggling act of all these systems comes to me, another one of Eternal's strengths that's retained here. Every button has a clear use on the control scheme and I'm never left confused about what to press and when — the only exception to that is the radial weapon wheel, which remains a clumsy way to swap between guns on the fly. When I'm locked into an arena battle, combat becomes balletic. I toss my shield to one side to cut down some dregs and turn to fire a rocket. My shield returns to me just in time to parry an incoming attack, telegraphed with a green cue. I follow it up with a few flail hits and then a bloody finisher. All of this happens in one smooth motion, like I'm executing movements in a dance (a suite of great accessibility features helps make sure more players can find that same flow for themselves, too).
I don't really appreciate how second nature it all is to me until I find myself dropped into a trap. After getting a collectible, I fall into a dark, narrow hallway that's full of melee recharge items. Soon, a wave of enemies comes flooding towards me and I have to think fast to block their attacks and counter with quick shots. The action on screen almost becomes abstracted, full of flashing colors like a Norman McLaren animation. I don't miss a beat, hitting all of my moves working off green and purple streaks alone. Moments like that are where The Dark Ages clicks most, putting the Doom Slayer's instincts in my own head. You really start to understand why this guy likes killing demons so much. It's a primal kind of violence.
Bigger doesn't mean better
With action that strong, The Dark Ages should be the best entry in the trilogy. After all, it checks all of the right boxes. It's a technical powerhouse, filled with spectacular visuals that create an enormous sense of scale, all while maintaining a smooth 60 frames per second. Id's level design is at its best here, too. Chapters take me from hellish corridors to an open battlefield where I carry out a siege against waves of demons. Each space is meticulously detailed and filled with well-hidden secrets that find ways to use my shield as an environmental puzzle tool. The audio design is as loud and proud as ever, with gunshots and metal music combining into one ruthless symphony of destruction. The story is longer, has a bit of extra variety, and threads in plenty of epic set pieces.
So why wasn't I nearly as thrilled with it as I was by 2016's Doom?
Id Software has described The Dark Ages as a return to the series roots, but it couldn't feel further from them.
The Dark Ages is emblematic of a recurring issue in big-budget franchise video game design. The instinct is to always go bigger each time. How do you top Monster Hunter World? More weapons, creepier monsters, larger environments. It's all about escalation, whether through gameplay iteration or technical prowess. That's the top priority here, but it's a self-defeating approach that turns The Dark Ages into the most inelegant and meandering game of the trilogy.
The scope increase isn't without some creativity, mind you. In addition to standard first-person shooting levels, The Dark Ages also features chapters that have the Doom Slayer piloting mechs and dragons. Both are fun ideas that feel like a teenage boy's coolest dreams come to life, but neither are exactly as exciting as they sound. The first mech chapter is awe-inspiring, but the actual combat systems aren't terribly deep. I'm mostly just hitting my right trigger to slowly punch out kaiju enough to fill a special meter. It gets old fast. The thrill of dragon flying is similarly short-lived, as I'm largely taking down ship after ship by completing a dodging minigame. Both gimmicks look very different and make for welcome formula diversions, but they boil down to the same one-note duck and counter gameplay hook.
What's especially strange is where those chapters fit into the story. The Dark Ages doesn't save either of them for some big, climactic moment. Both first occur back to back early in the run of 22 missions. That decision means that the scale climbs to unimaginable heights by Chapter 6 and then has nowhere else to go. With no sense of mounting progression, The Dark Ages is dynamically flat for most of its run time. An epic siege in a critical early chapters feels no different than a random arena battle in a lower-stakes transitional level later. The excitement turns to monotony once the same explore-and-shoot formula is repeated over and over across 45-minute chapters that shuffle the same enemies into different arenas. It's no coincidence that 2016's Doom is both the best and shortest of the trilogy. The Dark Ages is twice its length without actually adding much.
But hey, that's just Doom, right? Of course every dial is going to be cranked up as far as it can go. The goal is to create a non-stop adrenaline ride that doesn't take its foot off the gas, isn't it? Excess is the appeal.
Is that actually true though? My instinct is to say that The Dark Ages is the logical progression for the series, fully realizing its maximalist potential. It sounds right in my head, but I don't think that it actually is. I wouldn't describe 1993's Doom as excessive. Perhaps it was for the time, but its timeless appeal comes from its elegant minimalism. Walk through hallways, find colored keycards, shoot demons. It's the shooter's version of Pong, boiling the complexity of the genre down to its essence. 2016's reboot worked because it carried the same energy, rejecting open-world trends of the time to create a focused, linear adventure fueled by atmospheric storytelling and heavy metal. Id Software has described The Dark Ages as a return to the series roots, but it couldn't feel further from them. If anything, it feels like more of a cousin to the bloated God of War Ragnarok.
I don't think any of this will stop players from having the time of their life blasting through demons. As critical as I am of The Dark Ages' design philosophy, I still spent hour after hour poking around its intricate levels and mastering its stellar combat. I may have tuned out the story more than I expected, but my jaw wasn't immune to dropping when I had to blast an approaching giant with an explosive turret. Even with its faults, this is still a bonafide blockbuster by a studio that knows how to dish them out better than anyone. It just feels like the pedal is as far against the metal as it can go. Doom: The Dark Ages starts cruising at 100 miles per hour and never pumps the brakes. That's perfectly fine for a joyride, but you need acceleration to really appreciate speed.
Doom: The Dark Ages was tested on PlayStation 5 Pro.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tempus AI (TEM) Raises Full-Year Revenue Guidance
Tempus AI (TEM) Raises Full-Year Revenue Guidance

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tempus AI (TEM) Raises Full-Year Revenue Guidance

Tempus AI has posted an impressive price move of 21% over the last week, likely influenced by a blend of recent developments. The company announced significant revenue growth in its second quarter results and notably reduced its net loss. This positive financial performance was reinforced by the raised full-year revenue guidance, although it accompanies challenges such as a class action lawsuit and a substantial equity offering. The broader market has also been on an upward trajectory, with the Dow reaching records, which may have contributed to buoying Tempus AI's stock amidst mixed news on legal and financial fronts. We've discovered 3 warning signs for Tempus AI that you should be aware of before investing here. We've found 19 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Tempus AI's recent developments, including significant revenue growth and reduced net loss for the second quarter, have influenced its impressive 21% share price increase over the last week. Over the longer period of the past year, the company's total return was 45.01%, showcasing substantial growth compared to both the broader market and its industry peers. Tempus AI outpaced the US Life Sciences industry, which had a return of -19.8%, and also exceeded the US market's 17% return. These positive financial results reinforce the company's revenue and earnings forecasts, supported by strong testing volumes and strategic biopharma partnerships. Analysts have projected Tempus AI's revenue to grow by 29.8% annually over the next three years, even though profitability remains elusive in the short term. The raised full-year revenue guidance could further bolster future earnings, provided reimbursement and regulatory challenges are effectively managed. Despite the current share price of $73.78, slightly above the consensus analyst price target of $70.0, the company's rapid growth trajectory potentially justifies this premium. Analysts' expectations reflect a degree of agreement regarding Tempus AI's valuation, suggesting that the stock may be fairly priced. However, sustained momentum in revenue, coupled with disciplined cost management, will be crucial for aligning with long-term growth objectives and closing any gaps between market performance and valuation targets. Our comprehensive valuation report raises the possibility that Tempus AI is priced higher than what may be justified by its financials. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include TEM. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Anxiety Builds at CBS News Over Potential Moves by Skydance
Anxiety Builds at CBS News Over Potential Moves by Skydance

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Anxiety Builds at CBS News Over Potential Moves by Skydance

The journalists at CBS News are eager to report out details of what might happen to their own workplace. Staffers at the unit, now part of Paramount Skydance, are worried about the potential for a new round of layoffs, according to three people familiar with the news division, and are also curious about a possible new chapter for 'CBS Evening News,' which has seen its ratings drop noticeably since embracing a new, atypical format. More from Variety 'CBS Evening News' Executive Producer Guy Campanile to Return to '60 Minutes' Paramount Skydance Shares End Roller-Coaster, Memestock-Fueled Week Up 30%, Boosting Market Cap by $2 Billion Investor Mario Gabelli Sues Shari Redstone's National Amusements Inc. Alleging 'Unfair and Inequitable' Terms in Paramount-Skydance Merger CBS News declined to make executives available for comment. Layoffs are indeed possible. Executives from Skydance signaled earlier this month during a meeting with reporters that they intended to follow through on previously announced plans to cut $2 billion in costs from the company, which has suffered from longer-term downturns in traditional advertising and distribution revenue as one-time TV viewers embrace streaming technology. Jeff Shell, the new president of Skydance, indicated those cuts and reductions should be disclosed by the company's next quarterly report to investors in November. As for 'CBS Evening News,' executives are poised to experiment with a tweak to the current format, which relies on two anchors delivering news side by side. A person familiar with the matter suggests viewers will in weeks to come see a more frequent reliance on one of the anchors — John Dickerson and Maurice DuBois lead the program — being out on the road at major, breaking events. Just last week, Dickerson was on the ground in Alaska as U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met to discuss Russia's ongoing battle with Ukraine. Making use of both anchors in such fashion would put an authoritative person in the field and the studio, this person suggested, while giving the newscast the ability to deliver breaking news at the top of the broadcast. That suggests a new wrinkle in the show's mission. The original concept behind this 'Evening News' iteration was to emphasize more feature and enterprise reporting. In its earliest weeks, even CBS News' Washington bureau veterans tried to examine the effects of Trump-era policies on people in places like Baltimore or Canada. And yet, critics complained that the show was at times giving short shrift to breaking headlines. The format tweak could potentially give 'Evening News' a shot of the latest headlines while still leaving some room for the distinct elements it brings to the mix. Speculation on 'Evening News' has grown since the disclosure that its current executive producer, Guy Campanile, would leave the show and return to his former home, '60 Minutes,' where he has long worked as a producer. One of the concepts behind the new 'Evening News' was to adopt some of the spirit of '60,' which generates its own headlines by pursuing stories both tied to headlines and completely disconnected from them. But evening-news audiences, accustomed to a format that has worn well for many decades, didn't bite. Approximately 3.74 million viewers watched 'CBS Evening News' for the five-day period ended August 4, according to Nielsen. ABC's 'World News Tonight,' which leads the category, captured an average of nearly 6.89 million, while NBC's 'NBC Nightly News' won an average of nearly 5.35 million. CBS News executives had hoped their new 'Evening News' might pick up viewers as Tom Llamas picked up the reins at NBC following a decision by Lester Holt to step away from the 'Nightly' role. Instead, the CBS show has lost hundreds of thousands of viewers since moving away from the format that had been anchored by Norah O'Donnell. One potential candidate to take the 'Evening News' reins behind the camera is said to be Kim Harvey, a veteran producer who has worked for CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC, along with CBS News. Harvey has logged time working on MSNBC town halls during the run up to the 2016 election, and with anchors that range from Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes to Bill O'Reilly and Greta Van Susteren. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025

You won't believe what Sydney Sweeney has for breakfast instead of coffee
You won't believe what Sydney Sweeney has for breakfast instead of coffee

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

You won't believe what Sydney Sweeney has for breakfast instead of coffee

The actor has a very unusual breakfast routine When she's not making movies or breaking the internet with a controversial jeans campaign, Sydney Sweeney is just a regular human being who wakes up in the morning like the rest of us. It's what she does next that separates her from most of the population. An estimated one billion people a year drink at least a cup of coffee a day. That number does not include Sydney Sweeney. The actor has gone on record with outlets like The Wall Street Journal to declare that not only does she not drink coffee, she's never even tried the stuff. Sweeney revealed she's never tried coffee She also says she gets by on very little rest, revealing that sometimes she sleeps as little as two hours a day. So, where does she get her energy if she avoids coffee? In an interview with Bustle, Sweeney said her morning beverage of choice is water. When the outlet asked how she maintains her energy without caffeine, she shared an unexpected answer. Sugar. She has an alternate source of energy Although it isn't unusual to start the morning with sugar (hello, maple syrup), it was the source of Sweeney's sugar fix that surprised us. The actor told the outlet, ' Instead of coffee, I'll have some Swedish Fish or anything gummy if I'm tired.' That's right. When she needs a morning boost, Sweeney turns to Swedish Fish, those fish-shaped, red-colored, lingonberry-flavored chewy candies. They're delicious, but this is the first time we've heard them suggested as a substitute for coffee. Swedish Fish isn't the only thing Sweeney eats in the morning. In past interviews, she's also discussed starting her morning with berries, croissant toast with cinnamon sugar, and honey butter. She also told Women's Health she enjoys eggs and bagels in the morning. The actor has a famous sweet tooth Sweeney's sweet tooth is legendary. This summer, she even collaborated with Baskin-Robbins to create Sydney's Signature Scoop, which is described as Rainbow Sherbert with rainbow sprinkles, topped with miniature gummi bears. The treat is served in a waffle cone dipped in chocolate. The menu also included Sydney's Signature Fizz, a frozen blend of STARRY™ lemon lime soda and Rainbow Sherbert. The drink is topped with, you guessed it, miniature gummi bears. The special menu is only available while supplies last. After that, you can still eat like Sydney Sweeney if you've got Swedish Fish on hand.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store