logo
No disciplinary sanction for doctor's ‘grave' failures in care of Martha Mills

No disciplinary sanction for doctor's ‘grave' failures in care of Martha Mills

Yahooa day ago

A senior doctor will face no disciplinary penalty for failings in his care of a teenager who died days later from sepsis.
Professor Richard Thompson did not refer Martha Mills, 13, to intensive care despite her displaying several high-risk indicators of sepsis.
The on-call consultant also chose not to return to London's King's College Hospital to assess her in person as her condition deteriorated.
A Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) panel sitting in Manchester had ruled those omissions were misconduct, which they described as 'particularly grave', and found his fitness to practise was impaired.
However, on Wednesday the tribunal decided there were 'exceptional circumstances' which justified taking no further action against the world-renowned paediatric liver specialist.
Martha had been an inpatient on the hospital's Rays of Sunshine Ward after she suffered a serious injury to her pancreas when she slipped while riding a bike on a family holiday in Wales in July 2021.
Weeks later she experienced a fever and increased heart rate, followed by more spikes in her temperature before the consultant hepatologist saw Martha on his morning ward round on Sunday August 29.
Prof Thompson left the hospital at 3pm, but was phoned at home two hours later by a trainee doctor, who gave an update on Martha's condition.
Medical records showed she had deteriorated over the course of the afternoon, and into the early evening, with a drop in her blood pressure, the appearance of a new rash and increases in heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature.
Tribunal chairman Robin Ince noted that by 5pm there were 'several high-risk indicators' as set out in the Nice guidelines relating to sepsis.
The duty registrar called Prof Thompson again at 8.30pm because of ongoing concerns over Martha's fever, but she was kept on the ward despite the continued presence of moderate to high-risk indicators and the absence of meaningful clinical improvement.
Martha collapsed on August 30 and was moved to intensive care before she was transferred to London's Great Ormond Street Hospital, where she died in the early hours of August 31.
Announcing its conclusions on Wednesday, Mr Ince said: 'Professor Thompson has done everything possible to address his failings.
'The tribunal considered that the best way to repair any harm caused by his failings would be for him to continue to provide his specialist expertise at home and abroad.
'To now – some four years after the index event – remove Professor Thompson from practice, even for a short period of time, for one single lapse of judgment in an otherwise exemplary career would, in the tribunal's view, be akin to punishment which is not the role of the MPTS.'
Among the 'exceptional circumstances' cited were that there was no allegation or evidence that Prof Thompson either caused or contributed to Martha's death.
There were also systemic failings regarding how the ward functioned at the time with regard to referrals to the paediatric intensive care unit, said the tribunal.
Mr Ince said: 'A sufficiently clear message has already been sent to the profession and to the public – that even such an experienced doctor as Professor Thompson could still make serious errors of clinical judgment for which he will be called to account.
'The public would be aware that this finding would remain a stain on Professor Thompson's reputation for the rest of his life.'
At a 2022 inquest into her death, a coroner ruled that Martha would most likely have survived if doctors had identified the warning signs and transferred her to intensive care earlier.
Martha's mother, Merope Mills, an editor at The Guardian, said she and her husband, Paul Laity, raised concerns about Martha's deteriorating health a number of times but these were not acted on.
The couple later successfully campaigned for Martha's Rule to give patients, families and carers the chance to easily request a second opinion from a senior doctor in the same hospital in the event of a suspected deterioration or serious concern.
Giving evidence, Prof Thompson told the MPTS hearing that he no longer provided in-patient care because he began to 'doubt my own judgment' after the tragic events.
He said he felt 'deep remorse' for Martha's death but did not believe he made any errors in her case, as he denied all the allegations brought by the General Medical Council (GMC).
The tribunal heard he had since completed a training course relating to the management of sepsis and a deteriorating child in paediatric care.
His barrister, Ben Rich, said Prof Thompson has been a dedicated doctor and specialist for nearly 40 years and had never previously been investigated by a regulator.
He said he had a reputation as a 'hard-working and outstanding clinician and researcher, who has an international reputation as one of the leading paediatric liver specialists in the world'.
Mr Rich urged the tribunal members to impose an order of conditions involving supervision on Prof Thompson's registration, but the panel disagreed and said such a measure would be 'unnecessary and artificial', as they opted to take no further action.
Christopher Rose, for the GMC, said that Prof Thompson should be suspended to send a message to the wider public and the wider profession, given the seriousness of the failings found.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Martha doctor's failings 'particularly grave'
Martha doctor's failings 'particularly grave'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Martha doctor's failings 'particularly grave'

The failings of a doctor responsible for Martha Mills' care, who died from sepsis, amounted to "gross negligence" and were "particularly grave", a medical tribunal says. Her death gave rise to Martha's Rule in hundreds of hospitals in England, giving parents the right to an urgent second opinion. The tribunal found consultant Prof Richard Thompson failed to appreciate how seriously ill 13-year-old Martha had become in the summer of 2021, following a bike accident. On the crucial afternoon, he did not examine her in person or send her to intensive care. The tribunal concluded Prof Thompson's fitness to practise was impaired, but decided to take no further action against the doctor. Martha was transferred to King's College Hospital in London in 2021, one of three specialist treatment centres in the UK, after a holiday bike accident left her with serious injuries to her pancreas. During a family holiday, she had skidded on some sand while cycling and fell heavily onto the handlebars. Her parents, Merope Mills and Paul Laity, wrote about their pain and anger over their daughter's treatment following her death. "It was a difficult, tricky injury, but it did not have to be a fatal one," Merope has said. Martha stayed in the hospital for the next month. After a few weeks, she developed an infection and then signs of sepsis - when the body's response to an infection is overwhelming and ends up injuring its own tissues and organs - but this was not managed properly. An inquest found that she could have survived her injuries if she'd been referred to the specialist children's intensive care in the hospital promptly, and received better care. Interviewed on BBC Radio 4's Today programme in 2023, Merope Mills said her family were not listened to by senior doctors on several occasions and were "not given the full picture" about Martha's deteriorating condition. Over the past few weeks, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service has heard allegations from the doctors' regulator, the General Medical Council (GMC), that Prof Thompson failed on several counts over his care of Martha. He was the consultant on call on her ward on Sunday 29 August 2021 - two days before she died. The tribunal said it was "evident" that by around 17:00 that day Martha had "several high risk indicators" including her heart rate, breathing and a rising temperature, which "indicated a sudden and significant deterioration". It said Martha's condition, which included a new rash, justified her being moved to intensive care but "this opportunity was not taken". Later that evening, Prof Thompson was called at home by a colleague about Martha's continued fever. He had already seen her on his morning ward round, but did not return to the hospital to examine her in person. Giving evidence, Prof Thompson he said that he felt "deep remorse" for Martha's death, but did not believe he had made errors in the case. He said one of the reasons he wanted to keep Martha on his ward was not to distress her parents, but the tribunal said this did not justify withholding or delaying her move to intensive care. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service concluded that his fitness to practise had been impaired. It said this would reassure the public and send a message to doctors about the importance of following the fundamental principles of good care. The GMC had argued that Prof Thompson should be suspended from clinical practice but the tribunal said he would face no disciplinary penalty. Tribunal chairman Robin Ince said Prof Thompson had done "everything possible to address his failings" and a "stain on his reputation" would remain for the rest of his life. "The tribunal considered that the best way to repair any harm caused by his failings would be for him to continue to provide his specialist expertise at home and abroad," he added. Martha's parents raised concerns about their daughter's care to the regulator, the GMC, in 2022. Responding to the tribunal's findings Martha's parents said: "It is important to us that allegations denied have been found proved and the gravity of mistakes that led to our daughter's preventable death has been recognised. "We will always have in our minds the failures of culture, training and policy on Rays of Sunshine Ward at King's College Hospital, as well as the responsibility of individuals. "We'd like to thank all the thoughtful doctors who have helped us to understand what happened to Martha." The hospital that looked after Martha has admitted mistakes were made, and the trust said previously in a statement that it "remains deeply sorry that we failed Martha when she needed us most". Martha's rule: Mum encouraged as hospitals sign up Hospitals to introduce Martha's rule from April

No disciplinary sanction for doctor's ‘grave' failures in care of Martha Mills
No disciplinary sanction for doctor's ‘grave' failures in care of Martha Mills

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

No disciplinary sanction for doctor's ‘grave' failures in care of Martha Mills

A senior doctor will face no disciplinary penalty for failings in his care of a teenager who died days later from sepsis. Professor Richard Thompson did not refer Martha Mills, 13, to intensive care despite her displaying several high-risk indicators of sepsis. The on-call consultant also chose not to return to London's King's College Hospital to assess her in person as her condition deteriorated. A Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) panel sitting in Manchester had ruled those omissions were misconduct, which they described as 'particularly grave', and found his fitness to practise was impaired. However, on Wednesday the tribunal decided there were 'exceptional circumstances' which justified taking no further action against the world-renowned paediatric liver specialist. Martha had been an inpatient on the hospital's Rays of Sunshine Ward after she suffered a serious injury to her pancreas when she slipped while riding a bike on a family holiday in Wales in July 2021. Weeks later she experienced a fever and increased heart rate, followed by more spikes in her temperature before the consultant hepatologist saw Martha on his morning ward round on Sunday August 29. Prof Thompson left the hospital at 3pm, but was phoned at home two hours later by a trainee doctor, who gave an update on Martha's condition. Medical records showed she had deteriorated over the course of the afternoon, and into the early evening, with a drop in her blood pressure, the appearance of a new rash and increases in heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature. Tribunal chairman Robin Ince noted that by 5pm there were 'several high-risk indicators' as set out in the Nice guidelines relating to sepsis. The duty registrar called Prof Thompson again at 8.30pm because of ongoing concerns over Martha's fever, but she was kept on the ward despite the continued presence of moderate to high-risk indicators and the absence of meaningful clinical improvement. Martha collapsed on August 30 and was moved to intensive care before she was transferred to London's Great Ormond Street Hospital, where she died in the early hours of August 31. Announcing its conclusions on Wednesday, Mr Ince said: 'Professor Thompson has done everything possible to address his failings. 'The tribunal considered that the best way to repair any harm caused by his failings would be for him to continue to provide his specialist expertise at home and abroad. 'To now – some four years after the index event – remove Professor Thompson from practice, even for a short period of time, for one single lapse of judgment in an otherwise exemplary career would, in the tribunal's view, be akin to punishment which is not the role of the MPTS.' Among the 'exceptional circumstances' cited were that there was no allegation or evidence that Prof Thompson either caused or contributed to Martha's death. There were also systemic failings regarding how the ward functioned at the time with regard to referrals to the paediatric intensive care unit, said the tribunal. Mr Ince said: 'A sufficiently clear message has already been sent to the profession and to the public – that even such an experienced doctor as Professor Thompson could still make serious errors of clinical judgment for which he will be called to account. 'The public would be aware that this finding would remain a stain on Professor Thompson's reputation for the rest of his life.' At a 2022 inquest into her death, a coroner ruled that Martha would most likely have survived if doctors had identified the warning signs and transferred her to intensive care earlier. Martha's mother, Merope Mills, an editor at The Guardian, said she and her husband, Paul Laity, raised concerns about Martha's deteriorating health a number of times but these were not acted on. The couple later successfully campaigned for Martha's Rule to give patients, families and carers the chance to easily request a second opinion from a senior doctor in the same hospital in the event of a suspected deterioration or serious concern. Giving evidence, Prof Thompson told the MPTS hearing that he no longer provided in-patient care because he began to 'doubt my own judgment' after the tragic events. He said he felt 'deep remorse' for Martha's death but did not believe he made any errors in her case, as he denied all the allegations brought by the General Medical Council (GMC). The tribunal heard he had since completed a training course relating to the management of sepsis and a deteriorating child in paediatric care. His barrister, Ben Rich, said Prof Thompson has been a dedicated doctor and specialist for nearly 40 years and had never previously been investigated by a regulator. He said he had a reputation as a 'hard-working and outstanding clinician and researcher, who has an international reputation as one of the leading paediatric liver specialists in the world'. Mr Rich urged the tribunal members to impose an order of conditions involving supervision on Prof Thompson's registration, but the panel disagreed and said such a measure would be 'unnecessary and artificial', as they opted to take no further action. Christopher Rose, for the GMC, said that Prof Thompson should be suspended to send a message to the wider public and the wider profession, given the seriousness of the failings found.

NICE Recommends Earlier Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure
NICE Recommends Earlier Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure

Medscape

timea day ago

  • Medscape

NICE Recommends Earlier Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure

Thousands of patients in England with early-stage chronic heart failure could benefit from earlier access to effective drug therapies under new draft guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The guidance, which updates NICE's 2018 clinical recommendations, advises earlier treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ( HFrEF). NICE said that clinical practice is changing and that medicines should be offered up to a year earlier in the treatment pathway. The changes could prevent 3000 deaths and 5500 hospital admissions annually in England, the regulator estimated. Earlier Use of Combination Therapies The four pillars of treatment for HFrEF include: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) Beta-blockers (BBs) Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors NICE said these drugs should be prescribed earlier, without the need to optimise the dose of any one medicine before introducing another. SGLT2 inhibitors such as empagliflozin and dapagliflozin should now be offered at the start of the treatment pathway, rather than after other medications have been fully titrated – a process that could take over a year. NICE also advised that angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) should be offered if a person cannot tolerate an ACEI, rather than only to patients stabilised on ACEIs or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Both SGLT2 inhibitors and ARNIs could now be initiated by GPs with advice from heart failure specialists, potentially speeding up patient access. Responding to Evolving Evidence 'We've been able to review the emerging evidence quickly to keep pace with changes in the treatment landscape and make recommendations that will widen access to effective treatments,' said Eric Power, deputy director in NICE's centre for guidelines. He added that the new approach could help reduce emergency hospital admissions and improve quality of life for people living with heart failure. Updated Diagnostic and Monitoring Advice NICE also updated guidance on diagnosis and monitoring, particularly for iron deficiency and anaemia in patients with HFrEF. Clinicians should: Assess iron status and check for anaemia using transferrin saturation (TSAT), serum ferritin, and haemoglobin Consider intravenous iron for patients with haemoglobin under 150 g/L and TSAT under 20% or ferritin under 100 ng/mL If iron deficiency anaemia is found, alternative causes beyond heart failure should be investigated. Revised Biomarker Recommendations In addition, NICE advised clinicians to be aware that: An NT-proBNP level of less than 400 nanogram per litre (47 pmol per litre) in an untreated person makes a diagnosis of heart failure less likely. The level of serum natriuretic peptide does not differentiate between heart failure with preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction. Obesity, African or African-Caribbean ethnic background, or treatment with a diuretic, an ACEI, an ARNI, an ARB, a beta-blocker, or a MRA could reduce serum natriuretic peptide levels. High levels of natriuretic peptides may also be caused by non-cardiac conditions such as COPD, diabetes, sepsis, and liver or kidney disease. Heart Failure Prevalence Almost one million people in the UK are currently living with heart failure, with 200,000 new diagnoses each year. The average age at diagnosis is 76. Rising life expectancy and obesity are driving the increased incidence and prevalence of the disease.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store