logo
Great Tits Sometimes Break Up, Bird Researchers Find

Great Tits Sometimes Break Up, Bird Researchers Find

Gizmodo12 hours ago
We're talking about the birds.
Great tits are small, yellowish songbirds common to the woodlands of Europe. Tit pairs are known to be monogamous during breeding season, splitting up after fully raising their offspring. But new research suggests that this 'tit divorce' may be the product of complex social relationships formed during and after the breeding season.
Published July 30 in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the paper reports that not all tit pairs separate in late summer when breeding season ends. A sizeable portion of tit couples remain together throughout the winter, hitting it off again when spring comes. Other tits start drifting apart as early as late summer and eventually part ways at different times during fall and winter. In other words, tit dating status is complicated, and for reasons that aren't yet entirely clear.
'Our results show that bird relationships are far from static,' Adelaide Daisy Abraham, study lead author and behavioral ecologist at Oxford University in the United Kingdom, said in a statement. 'Divorce appears to be a socially driven process, unfolding over time.'
For the study, Abraham and her colleagues tracked individual great tits found in the woods near Oxford. These tits had a small radio tag attached to them, alerting the team whenever the birds visited one of several feeders set up by the researchers. Over a period of three years, the researchers collected great tit social data by checking which tits were associating with each other and how often.
Surprisingly, they discovered that the combination of tit pairs wasn't as random or confined to proximity as was previously believed. While early mating might be a product of who's nearby, whether these tit couples stay together may depend more on 'social decision-making' throughout the season, the paper surmised. The researchers also found that signs of tit divorce emerged as early as late summer, becoming more prominent over winter.
'Those divorcing birds, they, from the start, are already not associating as much [at the feeders] as the faithful birds,' Abraham told NPR. 'That only increases as the winter goes on.'
The paper, however, did not offer a definitive explanation for what exactly drove the tit couples apart—although, to be fair, the birds weren't exactly forthcoming about their personal lives. But the paper does raise some questions, like, are divorced birds who find a new partner just as successful in mating? Do they exhibit different parenting patterns? Are the birds influenced by better mating choices? And do some birds get shoved out by the competition? Fortunately, the researchers seem to be asking similar questions, concluding that future studies should explore these causal relationships.
'Following these individual birds across seasons and over many years allows us to see how relationships form and break down in nature in a way that short-term studies wouldn't,' said Josh Firth, study senior author and behavioral ecologist at the University of Leeds in the U.K., in the same statement.
'There is actually a lot more going on in those flocks of birds out your window than you think there is,' Abraham added.
When we think of non-human intelligence, we're often drawn more to grander subjects, like extraterrestrial life. But as the new study shows, there's still a lot for us to learn about the creatures here on Earth that are equally important and delightful—tit fidelity being a great example.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pilot scheme reveals how much individual DNA impacts the effectiveness of medicine
Pilot scheme reveals how much individual DNA impacts the effectiveness of medicine

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pilot scheme reveals how much individual DNA impacts the effectiveness of medicine

A pilot scheme has revealed a widespread genetic sensitivity to common medicines which could increase side effects or stop them working as they should. The trial saw 2,200 adults undergo whole genome sequencing to analyse how their individual DNA responds to the likes of antibiotics and over-the-counter painkillers. A staggering 99% showed a genetic variant that affects their sensitivity to certain medicines. This could mean some drugs, including over-the-counter, everyday painkillers, antibiotics and other prescription medications, won't work for some people based on their individual DNA. DNA could stop over-the-counter medicines working for some Brits The blood test, part of Bupa's My Genomic Health scheme, also looked into their genetic risk of developing 36 preventable diseases, including cancers, heart conditions and type 2 diabetes. It found 91% of participants were found to be at risk of developing a disease with genetic and lifestyle risk factors, such as fatty liver disease, breast cancer and certain heart diseases. While 73% had multiple genetic variants that put them at raised risk of developing a condition that could be prevented or detected early, leading to better health outcomes, including the likes of high cholesterol, skin cancer and type 2 diabetes. Of the participants, 49% were found to be carriers of a genetic variant that could lead to a raised risk of a certain condition in future generations. How to get your own Medication Check Following the successful pilot, Medication Check can now be purchased through Bupa and will also be available to more than three million of its customers as part of its workplace health scheme. A saliva test will establish what medications are most likely to be effective, those with increased risk of adverse side effects, or ones that won't work for you at all. When to see your GP about cancer Dr Rebecca Rohrer, clinical innovation and genomics director for Bupa, said: 'We've long known that most medications only work for 30-50% of the population. 'However, this pilot has highlighted just how significantly individual genomes impact the effectiveness of medications in treating conditions. 'With more than half of us regularly taking a prescription medication and an increasing number affected by a chronic condition, it's crucial that people are prescribed the right medicine from the start, tailored to their unique genetic makeup. 'In the longer term, genomics is key to early detection and even preventing some illnesses altogether.' After completing the at-home medication check, patients will be offered a GP consultation with the healthcare provider to review any medication identified in their genetic tests. It comes as Bupa is about to introduce two new products to its My Genomic Health suite later this year that will help to prevent or detect illness earlier. The DNA Health Check will give people early warning of an increased genetic risk of four different conditions - breast cancer, prostate cancer, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. While the Advanced DNA Health Check will combine insights from medication, disease risk, carrier status and traits, and will look at the genetic risk of developing conditions such as heart disease, metabolic disease and 10 types of cancer. Recommended reading: Full list of the DWP benefits and pensions changes due this month Freddie Flintoff praises NHS staff who cared for him after serious car crash Insurance refuse to pay man 'paralysed for life' after horror accident abroad Carlos Jaureguizar, CEO for Bupa Global, India & UK, said: 'Whole genomic sequencing is fundamentally changing our approach to healthcare, pivoting from treatment to prevention. 'It has the power to become a health passport that people can reference throughout their lives. 'We firmly believe genomics is the path to health innovation and prevention, reducing the nation's health burden and giving people personalised knowledge of their own genomic profile to live well for longer.'

We must lead AI revolution or be damned, says Muslim leader
We must lead AI revolution or be damned, says Muslim leader

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

We must lead AI revolution or be damned, says Muslim leader

Muslims must take charge of artificial intelligence or 'be damned' as a marginalised community, the head of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has said in a leaked video. Dr Wajid Akhter, the general secretary of the MCB, said Muslims and their children risked missing the AI revolution in the same way as they had been left behind in the computer and social media revolutions. He added that while Muslims had historically been at the forefront of civilisation and were credited with some of the greatest scientific advances, they had ended up as the butt' of jokes in the modern world after failing to play a part in the latest technological revolutions. 'We already missed the industrial revolution. We missed the computer revolution. We missed the social media revolution. We will be damned and our children will damn us if we miss the AI revolution. We must take a lead,' said Dr Akther. Speaking at the MCB's AI and the Muslim Community conference on July 19, he added: 'AI needs Islam, it needs Muslims to step up.' Scientists 'made fun of' faith at computer launch Dr Akther recalled how at the launch of one of the world's earliest computers, the Mark II , US scientists brought out a prayer mat aligned towards Mecca. 'They were making fun of all religions because they felt that they had now achieved the age of reason and science and technology and we don't need that superstition any more,' he said. 'And so to show that they had achieved mastery over religion, they decided to make fun and they chose our faith. 'How did we go from a people who gave the world the most beautiful buildings, science, technology, medicine, arts to being a joke? 'I'll tell you one thing – the next time that the world is going through a revolution, the next time they go to flip that switch, they will also pull out a prayer mat and they will also line it towards the Qibla [the direction towards Mecca] and they will also pray, but this time, not to make fun of us, they will do so because they are us.' Government eases stance on MCB Dr Akther also told his audience: 'We lost each other. And ever since we lost each other, we've been falling. We've been falling ever since. We are people now who are forced, we are forced by Allah to watch the genocide of our brothers and sisters in Gaza. 'This is a punishment for us if we know it. We are people who are forced to beg the ones who are doing the killing to stop it. We are people who are two billion strong but cannot even get one bottle of water into Gaza.' Dr Akhter said Gaza had 'woken' Muslims up and showed they needed to unite. 'We will continue to fall until the day we realise that only when we are united will we be able to reverse this. Until the day we realise that we need to sacrifice for this unity,' he added. British governments have maintained a policy of 'non-engagement' with the MCB since 2009 based on claims, disputed by the council, that some of its officials have previously made extremist comments. However, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, is drawing up a new official definition of Islamophobia, and last week it emerged the consultation has been thrown open to all groups including the MCB. Earlier this year, Sir Stephen Timms, a minister in the Department for Work and Pensions, was one of four Labour MPs to attend an MCB event. The MCB has been approached for comment. Solve the daily Crossword

These 4 Habits Could Help You Avoid Cognitive Decline, New Study Says
These 4 Habits Could Help You Avoid Cognitive Decline, New Study Says

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

These 4 Habits Could Help You Avoid Cognitive Decline, New Study Says

Reviewed by Dietitian Mandy Enright, M.S., RDN, RYTKey Points A new study suggests exercise, diet and regular healthcare check-ups may lower dementia risk. That includes physical exercise—ideally six times per week—and mental exercises to keep you sharp. Following the MIND diet, a combination of the Mediterranean and DASH diets, may also support better brain disease (AD) and related dementias are significant public health challenges for many reasons. More people are being affected by dementia, and the condition can bring heavy emotional, social and financial burdens. And as much as you or a loved one may want to lower your dementia risk, it can be hard to figure out where to start. Memory decline in older adults often has multiple causes, so effective treatments ideally tackle several targets at once. While new medications that target amyloid (a group of proteins linked to Alzheimer's) show promise in slowing the disease in its early stages, they don't address other common problems like blood vessel damage in the brain, which can also contribute to memory loss. This highlights the need for better, more comprehensive treatments. Non-drug approaches, like improving lifestyle factors, offer a safe, affordable, and accessible way to reduce dementia risk. A groundbreaking study in Finland (called the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability, or FINGER) showed that combining certain healthy lifestyle changes improved memory and thinking in older adults at risk for dementia. To determine if the positive results from the FINGER study in Finland could also apply to a larger and more diverse group of people in the United States who are at risk for dementia, researchers studied this method's impact on brain health and thinking abilities, and the results were published in JAMA. This study was called the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk, or U.S. POINTER. How Was This Study Conducted? Researchers recruited subjects for this study by using electronic health records and by working with local community organizations to reach people directly. The goal was to include older adults (ages 60 to 79) who didn't have memory problems but were at higher risk of developing dementia. To qualify, participants had to meet specific criteria regarding both lifestyle factors and risk factors. Those factors included having low physical activity levels—meaning less than 60 minutes of moderate exercise per week—and not following the MIND diet, which is designed to support brain health. As for risk factors, participants needed to meet at least two of the following conditions: A close family member (like a parent or sibling) had memory problems. They had health risks like high blood pressure, high cholesterol or high blood sugar. They identified as part of a racial or ethnic group that is often underrepresented in research, such as Native American, Black, Middle Eastern, or Hispanic or Latino. They were in the older age range (70 to 79 years old) or were male, as men are often underrepresented in dementia prevention studies. Both groups focused on improving brain health through physical activity, cognitive activity, healthy eating, social engagement and heart health monitoring. The difference between the two groups was in how the program was delivered. The first group was the structured group, and participants in this group received extra support from trained professionals and worked closely with peer teams of 10-15 people for motivation and accountability. Participants attended 38 team meetings over two years, and meetings were led by trained navigators and specialists. They also participated in the following: Physical exercise: 30-35 minutes of moderate-to-intense aerobic activity four times a week, plus strength and flexibility exercises twice a week. Cognitive exercise: Computer-based brain training program three times a week for 30 minutes, plus regular engagement in other intellectually challenging and social activities. Nutrition: Adherence to the MIND diet, which emphasizes dark leafy greens, berries, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish, and limits sugar and unhealthy fats. Health monitoring: Regular check-ins (every 6 months) on blood pressure, weight and lab results. The second group was the self-guided group. This group was more independent but still had access to resources and support from peer teams and navigators from the Alzheimer's Association. Participants received publicly available resources about healthy lifestyle changes, such as tips on exercise, diet and brain health. They only attended six peer team meetings over two years, and had their health checked once a year during clinic visits, following standard health guidelines. This study measured brain health and thinking abilities using a global cognitive score, which combined results from three key areas: executive function, which includes skills like planning, problem-solving, and multitasking; episodic memory, which focuses on remembering specific events or experiences; and processing speed, which measures how quickly the brain can handle information. To calculate the global score, participants completed a series of brain tests during clinic visits at the start of the study and every six months for two years. What Did The Study Find? Both groups in the U.S. POINTER study showed improvements in overall brain function over time as measured by their global cognitive scores. After adjusting for certain factors, the structured group improved slightly faster than the self-guided group, and this difference was statistically significant. When focusing on the different cognitive areas the researchers measured, here is what they found: Executive Function: In planning, problem-solving and multitasking, the structured group improved more than the self-guided group, and the difference was statistically significant. Processing Speed: In gauging how long the brain took to process information, the structured group also showed slightly greater improvement—however, this difference was not statistically significant. Episodic Memory: As for remembering specific events, both groups improved at about the same rate, with no meaningful difference between them. The structured program seemed to have the biggest impact on participants who started the study with lower cognitive function. However, the structured program worked similarly well regardless of participants' sex, age or heart health at the start of the study. Additionally, the effects of the structured program were the same for people with or without the APOE ε4 gene, which research has linked to a higher risk of Alzheimer's disease. In summary, the structured program provided the most benefit for executive function and was especially helpful for participants who started with lower cognitive abilities. Other factors like age, sex and genetic risk didn't seem to change how effective the program was. This study has a few limitations to consider. First, the results might not apply to everyone because the study only took place at five sites, included participants specifically at higher risk for cognitive decline and required a significant two-year commitment from participants. Second, the study wasn't designed to measure whether the interventions could prevent cognitive impairment or dementia, so those outcomes remain unknown. It's also worth noting that the self-guided group wasn't a true 'no-intervention' control group, as they still received some resources and support. Plus, participants knew which group they were in, which could have influenced their behavior or results. Additionally, it's unclear how long the benefits of the structured program will last, how easily it could be scaled up for larger populations or how meaningful the improvements are in the long term. How Does This Apply to Real Life? This study highlights the power of lifestyle changes when it comes to supporting brain health and reducing the risk of memory decline. It shows that combining regular exercise, a brain-healthy diet, mental stimulation and social engagement may make a real difference, especially for people at higher risk of dementia. The structured program, which provided extra guidance and support, was particularly effective in improving skills like planning, problem-solving and multitasking. This observation suggests that having a clear plan and access to professional support may help people stick to healthy habits and see better results. But the self-guided group, which had more flexibility, showed improvements, proving that small, consistent changes in daily life can still benefit brain health. This means that adopting healthier habits like staying active, following the MIND diet, engaging in mentally challenging activities, and staying socially connected can be a practical and accessible way to protect brain health. While the study focused on older adults at risk for dementia, the findings are a reminder that it's never too early or too late to start making positive changes. Our Expert Take A study recently published in JAMA provides valuable evidence that lifestyle changes can play a significant role in supporting brain health and reducing the risk of cognitive decline. In particular, these findings highlight the potential of combining regular exercise, a brain-healthy diet, mental stimulation and social engagement to improve cognitive health, especially for those at higher risk of dementia. Both structured and self-guided programs led to improvements in overall brain function, with the structured program showing slightly greater benefits, particularly in areas like planning, problem-solving, and multitasking. Importantly, the study also demonstrated that even small, self-guided changes can make a meaningful difference, making these strategies accessible to a wide range of people. Read the original article on EATINGWELL

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store