Bung Moktar, wife's final bid fails
As a result, Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette are scheduled to enter their defence on corruption charges before Sessions Court judge Rosli Ahmad on Aug 18.
A three-member panel of the Court of Appeal, led by Justice Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali, unanimously dismissed the couple's application yesterday stating that they had failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or a miscarriage of justice that would justify a review of the call for defence ruling.
Justice Che Mohd Ruzima sat with Court of Appeal judges Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid.
On Nov 18 last year, a Court of Appeal panel led by Justice Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the prosecution's appeal and overturned the High Court's decision to acquit Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette, and ordered both to enter their defence.
Justice Che Mohd Ruzima said the Court of Appeal has always exercised caution when invoking its power to review earlier decisions, as such a review, on the face of it, runs contrary to the principle of finality, Bernama reported.
The judge said that when counsel for Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette submitted that there had been an injustice in the case, the court observed that the couple had an alternative remedy.
'The point raised before us can be canvassed in an appeal from the Sessions Court, should a conviction subsequently be recorded.
'We are of the view that the threshold requirements for leave to review the prior decision of this court have not been met.
'We are also of the view that this is a point that may validly be raised at the end of the defence case.
'For these reasons, we find that the threshold requirement for leave to review this court's previous decision has not been fulfilled.
'Therefore, this application is dismissed,' he said.
In September 2022, the Sessions Court ordered the couple to enter their defence.
The couple succeeded in overturning the ruling through revision applications they then filed at the High Court.
This prompted the prosecution to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Bung Moktar, 65, who was then the non-executive chairman of Felcra Bhd, was charged on May 3, 2019, with two charges of accepting bribes of RM2.2mil and RM262,500 as an inducement to obtain Felcra's approval for a RM150mil investment in Public Mutual unit trusts.
He was alleged to have accepted the bribes from Public Mutual Bhd's investment agent Madhi Abdul Hamid through Zizie Izette, 46, at Public Bank Taman Melawati Branch, Kuala Lumpur, between 12.30pm and 5pm on June 12, 2015.
Bung Moktar was also charged with receiving RM337,500 in cash from Unit Amanah consultant, Norhaili Ahmad Mokhtar, under the name of Zizie Izette for the same reason and place on June 19, 2015, while Zizie Izette was charged with three counts of abetting her husband over the matter at the same place, date and time.
On April 9, this year, the Sessions Court allowed the couple's application to stay the defence proceedings pending the outcome of the review application.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
15 minutes ago
- The Star
Psychiatric examination for foreign student who ran amok with knife
KAJANG: The university student who was charged with eight counts of attempted murder and causing injury to seven victims has been ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation for one month. Sessions Court Judge Normastura Ayub and Magistrate Fatin Dayana Jalil made the ruling after allowing an application by Deputy Public Prosecutors Faelly Jeffrey Lanjungan and Siti Nur Alia Safri, who said the accused, Chinese national Liu Ting, 24, appeared confused and did not understand the charges read out. The court did not allow bail for the accused and ordered the woman to be sent to Hospital Bahagia Ulu Kinta, Tanjung Rambutan in Perak for a psychiatric examination, in addition to setting case mention for Sept 19. Previously, Faelly did not offer bail because the charges against the accused were serious and non-bailable and also requested that the accused be sent to Hospital Bahagia for psychiatric evaluation. In the Sessions Court, Liu pled not guilty to three charges, namely intent to murder two men, aged 19 and 21, and causing injury to a 35-year-old woman, and if the accused had caused death, she would be guilty of murder. The charge is under Section 307 of the Penal Code, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison and a fine. If the act causes injury to any person, the offender will be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years in prison if convicted. She also pleaded not guilty to other two charges of causing grievous bodily harm to a 60-year-old woman by slashing her right arm with a knife and stabbing a 27-year-old man in the stomach. Both charges were filed under Section 326 of the Penal Code, which provides for a prison sentence of up to 20 years and a fine or whipping, if convicted. Meanwhile, in the Magistrate's Court, the accused was also charged with causing injury to two men, aged 21 and 49, as well as a woman aged 53. Liu understood the three charges read out by the interpreter but remained silent. All three charges are under Section 324 of the Penal Code, which provides for a maximum imprisonment of 10 years or a fine or whipping or any two of those punishments, if convicted. The eight offences were allegedly committed at Jalan Besar, at the Semenyih Persimpangan Metropoint junction and at a premises in the Metropoint Complex here, between 11.39am and noon on Aug 13. A video of the incident went viral on social media, showing a woman exiting her vehicle holding a knife after she was involved in an accident. Several injured motorcyclists could be seen and as bystanders tried to restrain the woman. – Bernama

Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Court Orders Foreign Student To Undergo Psychiatric Examination
KAJANG, Aug 20 (Bernama) -- A university student charged with eight counts of attempted murder and causing injury to seven victims has been ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation for a month starting today. Sessions Court Judge Normastura Ayub and Magistrate Fatin Dayana Jalil ruled this after allowing the application by Deputy Public Prosecutors Faelly Jeffrey Lanjungan and Siti Nur Alia Safri, who said the accused, Chinese national Liu Ting, 24, appeared confused and did not understand the charges read out. The court did not allow the accused to be granted bail and ordered the woman to be sent to Hospital Bahagia Ulu Kinta, Tanjung Rambutan in Perak for psychiatric examination, in addition to setting the case mention for Sept 19. Previously, Faelly did not offer bail because the charges against the accused were serious and non-bailable, and also requested that the accused be sent to Hospital Bahagia for psychiatric evaluation. 'As the charges were read, the accused appeared confused and as if she did not understand the charges. Therefore, we request that the accused receive psychiatric treatment at Hospital Bahagia," she said. In the Sessions Court, Liu pled not guilty to three charges: with intent to murder two men, aged 19 and 21, and causing injury to a 35-year-old woman, and if the accused had caused death, she would be guilty of murder. The charge is under Section 307 of the Penal Code, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison and a fine. If the act causes injury to any person, the offender will be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years in prison if convicted. For the other two charges, she also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to a 60-year-old woman by slashing her right arm with a knife, a weapon that could cause death if used improperly, and stabbing a 27-year-old man in the stomach with a knife. Both charges were filed under Section 326 of the Penal Code, which provides for a prison sentence of up to 20 years and a fine or whipping, if convicted.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Former teacher pleads not guilty to false statement charge
SHAH ALAM: A former private teacher has pleaded not guilty to charges of transmitting false statements about the Prime Minister. S. Chandrasegaran, 46, entered his plea at the Sessions Court here today. The charge relates to allegedly using TikTok to knowingly transmit false statements intended to disparage an individual. The transmission occurred at 1.36 pm on December 30, 2024. It was later viewed at a Bandar Sunway restaurant at 6.30 pm that same day. He faces charges under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. If convicted, he could face a fine up to RM50,000 or one year imprisonment or both. An additional daily fine of RM1,000 may apply if the offence continues after conviction. The prosecution requested bail of RM30,000 with additional conditions. Conditions included monthly police station reporting and passport surrender. The accused was also to be prohibited from interfering with prosecution witnesses. Defense lawyer Muhammad Nor Tamrin requested reasonable bail for his client. He noted the accused currently has no regular income due to permanent disability. The accused is also suffering from throat cancer. He must support a wife and two children. The lawyer stated there was no risk of absconding. Judge Norazlin Othman allowed bail at RM7,000 with a local guarantor. She approved the additional conditions proposed by the prosecution. Case mention has been set for October 13. - Bernama