Police's disposal of miners' strike documents ‘deeply worrying'
Information related to the so-called Battle of Orgreave is said to be among the two boxes which were disposed of by the force in April 2024.
Lucy Powell said anyone involved in the strikes 'must retain the records' and come forward with information when asked to, after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns in the Commons.
In its manifesto, the Labour Party pledged to ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, 'that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'.
The violent confrontation in June 1984 outside a coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, led to many miners being injured and arrested, although their trials later collapsed.
Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question Labour MP Ian Lavery
Speaking during business questions, Mr Lavery said it was 'extremely disturbing news that Northumbria Police has destroyed all documents relating to the miners' strike, including Orgreave'.
The MP for Blyth and Ashington said: 'It is absolutely alarming.
'The Labour Government have pledged an inquiry through investigation into these events, yet the wanton destruction of this vital and critical evidence has been allowed to happen.
'Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question.
'Who gave the permission to destroy these documents and what's behind it?
'Can we have an urgent debate into how the Government can instruct all police forces, all authorities, everyone that holds any detail on the miners' strike and on Orgreave (to) make sure that they retain and maintain that evidence, for when the Labour Government maintains its pledge for an inquiry into the events that happened in 1984.
'Because justice cannot be served if the evidence is systematically and deliberately destroyed.'
Police escorting picketers away from their position near the Orgreave Coking Plant near Rotherham in 1984 (PA)
Ms Powell replied: 'This sounds like a deeply, deeply worrying development in this case, and I am sure the whole House will be shocked to hear it.
'He has campaigned for justice and for answers in relation to what happened at Orgreave, 41 years ago, raised it with me last week. I will continue to raise that with ministers on his behalf.
'And I would join him in saying to people, anyone involved, that they must retain the records and they must come forward, as they would be expected to do when those questions are asked, with every bit of information they've got on what happened.'
News of the destroyed boxes came to light following a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the Guardian reports.
A Northumbria Police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
PM in talks with Labour rebels over DWP benefit cuts
Keir Starmer confirmed today the Government is locked in talks with rebellious backbenchers over welfare reforms. Here The Mirror looks at the PM's immediate options Keir Starmer confirmed today the Government is locked in talks with rebellious backbenchers over welfare reforms. In a Commons update on Thursday, the PM also addressed the growing rebellion and hinted at possible concessions in the coming days. He said he and his team "want to get this right". The PM said benefits claimants "are failed every single day" by a "broken system". Mr Starmer told MPs: "On social security, I recognise there is a consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform of our welfare system, because the British people deserve protection and dignity when they are unable to work and supported to work when they can. "At the moment, they are failed every single day by the broken system created by the Conservatives, which achieves neither.I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I. We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday." But with 126 Labour MPs signing an amendment that could torpedo the plan, the Government could face an embarrassing defeat if it goes ahead. Here The Mirror looks at the PM's immediate options. Press ahead with vote Keir Starmer could decide to press ahead with the vote even if concessions aren't reached. This would be perhaps the nuclear option. With over 120 Labour MPs now opposed to the plans, rebels have the numbers to wipe-out the government's majority and deliver a humiliating defeat. And it is likely there are many more backbenchers - possibly frontbenchers - who are opposed to the plans but have not said so publicly yet. A defeat on this scale - overturning the government's huge majority - would leave the government's welfare plans in tatters. It would also leave the Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a £5billion black hole in her plans. Concessions to rebels The most likely scenario is that Keir Starmer will thrash out concessions with rebels over the coming hours and days in an attempt to salvage the reforms. Under existing plans the eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will be restricted. This is where most of the £5billion savings are being made. The benefit is paid to people both in and out of work and helps with daily tasks due to a long-term physical or mental health condition. Eligibility is calculated using a points-based system, based on how difficult someone finds it to perform tasks like washing themselves and getting dressed. But from the end of 2026 people would need to score a minimum of four points in at least one daily activity to qualify under the plans. Needing help to get in or out of the shower, or supervision to use the toilet are measures that don't meet this threshold. There have been suggestions this could be tweaked so people would need to score three points instead to make the new system slightly more generous. The Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests this could increase eligibility by 190,000 - at a cost of £0.8 billion. But even in this scenario it is extremely unlikely to satisfy all the rebels. There is a bloc of rebels opposed to the principle of taking away disability and sickness benefits full stop and will still vote against the proposals. Delay the vote - or pull the reforms If no concessions are reached, Mr Starmer may feel he has no other option but to delay the vote on Tuesday. This would allow time to speak to rebels and reach a compromise over the summer months, before a vote after the summer recess. It would be a screeching U-turn and politically messy. Over the last 24 hours both Mr Starmer and the Deputy PM Angela Rayner have insisted the vote will go ahead - a line repeated by No10 and a series of ministers. But it would mean avoiding a Commons defeat on one of the government's flagship policies almost a year to the date Labour won a historic victory at the general election. And if the rebels are not won over, pulling the reforms completely could also be on the cards.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Minister admits ‘work needed' to improve neurodivergent support
During a ministerial statement in the chamber on Thursday, Mr Arthur said: 'I recognise significant work is needed in this area. "I do not underestimate how much work is needed to ensure that neurodivergent young people are able to access the support they need when they need it. 'This work will not happen overnight. It will require collaboration and a range of partners working together.' 'I recognise that a formal diagnosis can be important to an individual's identity and understanding of themselves or their child, however, support should be provided on a basis of need not diagnosis.' Mr Arthur also said the government would provide £500,000 of additional funding this year to deliver improvements to the support and services available to children and families. Earlier this week, the report, Experiences of Autism Assessment and Diagnosis in Scotland, surveyed 624 people and it paints a stark picture of delays, refusals, and a lack of support in the current system. Scotland's autism organisations have since warned of a 'highly inconsistent' and 'failing' system with the report pointing to individuals waiting as long as seven years to receive an autism diagnosis. Some 65% of the 624 respondents to the survey were autistic adults with 35% comprising of family members and carers of autistic people. Of those surveyed, nearly two-thirds (62%) reported a lack of information about the process, including a lack of guidance and support. Scottish Labour MSP also hit out at the government for what they named as its "Orwellian" response to the report. READ MORE: Individuals in Scotland waiting seven years for autism diagnosis Labour MSP slams Scottish Government over autism support Autism crisis in Scotland: Can Scot Gov learn from a golden retriever? In his response, newly-appointed Wellbeing Minister Tom Arthur said accusations that the Scottish Government has 'removed' children from CAMHS waiting lists are false. However, Mr Johnson hit back, saying people have been removed from waiting lists for referral. "They have been removed," he told The Herald, "CAMHS may not be the right service, but they haven't specified what is the right service. "Right now it is impossible, either as a matter of policy or a matter of fact, to get an assessment for autism or ADHD as a child or adult. "Health boards have either stopped taking referrals or have such long waits they might as well have. 'It is Orwellian [from the Government]. To say it is false, just on a strict measurement, it is a fact." Today, Mr Arthur re-iterated his comments that they were "incorrect assertions" that young people are being moved off waiting lists to meet CAMHS waiting times targets. However, Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney said he was "dismayed" at this statement from the minister as he said "it's a matter of fact not assertion". "Children get removed off the CAMHS list to different pathways with often indefinite waiting times. "It's struck me as a bit of Orwellian Double Think." 'Some children are still waiting too long to receive the support they need.' Data on neurodevelopmental diagnostic waiting times is currently not publicly available. In the chamber, the minister admitted 'further work is needed' to improve the quality of data in this area. Conservative MSP Brian Whittle accused the Scottish Government of 'cherry-picking and manipulating' data to 'fit their narrative'. Later, the party's public health spokesperson added: 'This SNP government are not being honest with the public and families over why there has been such a massive increase in demand for diagnosis in such a short period of time. 'In typical SNP fashion they have failed to be transparent over the data. 'It is a disgrace that fewer than a third of children were seen for a neurodevelopmental assessment within the recommended timescales in March 2024. 'The SNP government must do more to support children with neurodevelopmental disorders by providing more resources to support activities in communities up and down the country.' The new taskforce on improving neurodivergent support for young people will be chaired jointly by Fiona Davis, chief executive of NHS Highland and Dr. Lynne Binnie, Edinburgh Council's head of Education for Inclusion.
Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Ex-Tory minister urges Labour to drop repealing of Northern Ireland Legacy Act
He said: 'Many of those surviving veterans are now in their 70s or even their 80s, and I suspect that many Labour MPs opposite would find it extremely difficult to explain to those veterans and their loved ones why they are taking this action, just because their Government is literally obsessed with the Human Rights Act 1998.'
